Wednesday, December 5, 2018

961 Monitoring Left sites for coverage of the Al Jazeera documentary on Jewish Lobby in USA

Monitoring Left sites for coverage of the Al Jazeera documentary on Jewish Lobby in USA

Newsletter published on November 8, 2018 

(1) Monitoring Left sites for coverage of the Al Jazeera documentary on Jewish Lobby in USA
(2) Where to download episodes 1-4 of the Al Jazeera documentary on the Jewish Lobby in the USA

(1) Monitoring Left sites for coverage of the Al Jazeera documentary on Jewish Lobby in USA
by Peter Myers, Thur Nov 8, 2018

Friends,

I keep track of many websites, Left and Right.

Some months ago Counterpunch ran an article " Will We Ever See Al Jazeera’s Investigation Into the Israel Lobby?", by ROBERT FISK:

In the last few days I have been checking which Left sites report on the newly-released Al Jazeera documentary on the Jewish Lobby in the USA.

Yesterday, I sent an email to the Trotskyist site wsws.org, telling them where they can download the 4 episodes.

Today I sent emails to wsws.org (again), Strategic Culture, Global Research, and Counterpunch.

I generally find these sites quite good. But so far, only Global Research seems to have reported on this matter:

wsws.org, Strategic Culture, and Counterpunch do not seem to have covered it.

To check, search each site for the word "lobby", sorting by date or specifying this month (i.e. Nov 2018). You could also search for "jazeera" as well.

Does it matter?

The Al Jazeera documentary shows that Israel is worried about the BDS campaign, and is trying to smear it as Far Right, whereas in fact it is Far Left.

Exposing the Jewish Lobby is the most important strategy for solving the Mid-East crisis. Left activists can support BDS as much as they like, but only by bringing the Lobby's activities to public attention can there be any success.

The term "Jewish Lobby" touches a raw nerve for many on the Left. But if they don't deal with it, they're only Fake Left.

Therefore this is a litmus test for the Left. So far, wsws.org has failed the test.

I would appreciate it if you, Reader, could help me monitor Left sites on this matter. There are many others apart from the ones I listed; could you check some? Your feedback would be helpful.

(2) Where to download episodes 1-4 of the Al Jazeera documentary on the Jewish Lobby in the USA

Electronic Intifada  has obtained the Al Jazeera documentary on the Jewish Lobby in the USA.

The four episodes can be viewed at https://electronicintifada.net

The videos can be downloaded from dailymotion.com and youtube.com

Download episode 1 here:
The Lobby – USA, episode 1:

Download episode 2 here:
The Lobby – USA, episode 2:

Download episode 3 here:
The Lobby – USA, episode 3:

Download episode 4 here:
The Lobby – USA, episode 4:


960 Al Jazeera documentary on Jewish Lobby in the USA has now been partly released

Al Jazeera documentary on Jewish Lobby in the USA has now been partly released

Newsletter published on November 6, 2018

(1) Al Jazeera documentary on Jewish Lobby in the USA has now been partly released
(2) The Film The Israel Lobby Doesn't Want You To See - Moon of Alabama
(3) Watch the film the Israel lobby didn’t want you to see - The Electronic Intifada

(1) Al Jazeera documentary on Jewish Lobby in the USA has now been partly released

The Al Jazeera documentary on the Jewish Lobby in the USA has now been partly released. Episodes 1 & 2 (out of 4) are available.

The videos can be downloaded from dailymotion.com

I had to buy Videoduke, to download them.

But you may be able to get them for free. There are some tips at https://www.keepdownloading.com/how-to-download-dailymotion-videos-44.html

Download episode 1 here:

Download episode 2 here:

(2) The Film The Israel Lobby Doesn't Want You To See - Moon of Alabama


November 02, 2018
The Film The Israel Lobby Doesn't Want You To See
Today The Electronic Intifada published the first two parts of "The Lobby – USA", a four-part undercover investigation by Al Jazeera into Israel’s covert influence campaigns in the United States.

The planned broadcast of the film was prevented by Qatar, which owns Al Jazeera, on behalf of Israel.

From EI's description:

To get unprecedented access to the Israel lobby’s inner workings, undercover reporter “Tony” posed as a pro-Israel volunteer in Washington.

The resulting film exposes the efforts of Israel and its lobbyists to spy on, smear and intimidate US citizens who support Palestinian human rights, especially BDS – the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement.

It shows that Israel’s semi-covert black-ops government agency, the Ministry of Strategic Affairs, is operating this effort in collusion with an extensive network of US-based organizations.

These include the Israel on Campus Coalition, The Israel Project and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

It is amazing that Israel gets away with such spying and intelligence operations against U.S. citizens and within the United States.

Israel and its lobby did a lot to suppress the movie and its wider distribution. That can only mean that it is good and deserves a large viewership.

Watch it here.

Posted by b on November 2, 2018 at 03:28 PM

(3) Watch the film the Israel lobby didn’t want you to see - The Electronic Intifada


Watch the film the Israel lobby didn’t want you to see

The Electronic Intifada 2 November 2018

The Electronic Intifada has obtained a complete copy of The Lobby – USA, a four-part undercover investigation by Al Jazeera into Israel’s covert influence campaign in the United States.

It is today publishing the first two episodes. The Paris-based Orient XXI has published the same episodes with French subtitles.

The film was made by Al Jazeera during 2016 and was completed in October 2017.

But it was censored after Qatar, the gas-rich Gulf emirate that funds Al Jazeera, came under intense Israel lobby pressure not to air the film.

Although Al Jazeera’s director-general claimed last month that there were outstanding legal issues with the film, his assertions have been flatly contradicted by his own journalists.

In March, The Electronic Intifada was the first to report on any of the film’s specific content. We followed this in August by publishing the first extract of the film, and shortly after Max Blumenthal at the Grayzone Project released others.

Since then, The Electronic Intifada has released three other extracts, and several other journalists have watched the entire film and written about it – including Alain Gresh and Antony Loewenstein.

Now The Electronic Intifada can reveal for the first time that it has obtained all four parts of the film.

You can watch the first two parts in the video embeds above and below.

To get unprecedented access to the Israel lobby’s inner workings, undercover reporter “Tony” posed as a pro-Israel volunteer in Washington.

The resulting film exposes the efforts of Israel and its lobbyists to spy on, smear and intimidate US citizens who support Palestinian human rights, especially BDS – the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement.

It shows that Israel’s semi-covert black-ops government agency, the Ministry of Strategic Affairs, is operating this effort in collusion with an extensive network of US-based organizations.

These include the Israel on Campus Coalition, The Israel Project and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

Censored by Qatar
The film was suppressed after the government of Qatar came under intense pressure not to release it – ironically from the very same lobby whose influence and antics the film exposes.

Clayton Swisher, Al Jazeera’s head of investigations, revealed in an article for The Forward in March that Al Jazeera had sent more than 70 letters to individuals and organizations who appear in or are discussed in the film, providing them with an opportunity to respond.

Only three did so. Instead, pro-Israel groups have endeavored to suppress the film that exposes the lobby’s activities.

In April, Al Jazeera’s management was forced to deny a claim by the hard-right Zionist Organization of America that the film had been canceled altogether.

In June, The Electronic Intifada learned that a high level source in Doha had said the film’s indefinite delay was due to “national security” concerns of the Qatari government.

Covert action
As revealed in a clip published by The Electronic Intifada earlier this week, the film shows Julia Reifkind – then an Israeli embassy employee – describing her typical work day as “mainly gathering intel, reporting back to Israel … to report back to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Strategic Affairs.”

She discusses the Israeli government “giving our support” to front groups “in that behind-the-scenes way.”

Reifkind also admits to using fake Facebook profiles to infiltrate the circles of Palestine solidarity activists on campus.

The film also reveals that US-based groups coordinate their efforts directly with the Israeli government, particularly its Ministry of Strategic Affairs.

Run by a former military intelligence officer, the ministry is in charge of Israel’s global campaign of covert sabotage targeting the BDS movement.

The film shows footage of the very same ex-military intelligence officer, Sima Vaknin-Gil, claiming to have mapped Palestinian rights activism “globally. Not just the United States, not just campuses, but campuses and intersectionality and labor unions and churches.”

She promises to use this data for “offense activity” against Palestine activists.

Jacob Baime, executive director of the Israel on Campus Coalition, claims in the undercover footage that his organization uses “corporate level, enterprise-grade social media intelligence software” to gather lists of Palestine-related student events on campus, “generally within about 30 seconds or less” of them being posted online.

Baime also admits on hidden camera that his group “coordinates” with the Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs.

Baime states that his researchers “issue early warning alerts to our partners” – including Israeli ministries.

Baime’s colleague Ian Hersh admits in the film to adding Israel’s “Ministry of Strategic Affairs to our operations and intelligence brief.”

“Psychological warfare”
Baime describes how his group has used anonymous websites to target activists.

“With the anti-Israel people, what’s most effective, what we’ve found at least in the last year, is you do the opposition research, put up some anonymous website, and then put up targeted Facebook ads,” Baime explains in part three of the film.

“Canary Mission is a good example,” he states. “It’s psychological warfare.”

The film names, for the first time, convicted tax evader Adam Milstein as the multimillionaire funder and mastermind of Canary Mission – an anonymous smear site targeting student activists.

The Electronic Intifada revealed this in a clip in August.

Eric Gallagher, then fundraising director for The Israel Project, is seen in the undercover footage admitting that “Adam Milstein, he’s the guy who funds” Canary Mission.

Milstein also funds The Israel Project, Gallagher states.

Gallagher says that when he was working for AIPAC, Washington’s most powerful Israel lobby group, “I was literally emailing back and forth with [Adam Milstein] while he was in jail.”

Despite not replying to Al Jazeera’s request for comment, Milstein denied that he and his family foundation “are funders of Canary Mission” on the same day The Electronic Intifada published the clip.

Since then, Josh Nathan-Kazis of The Forward has identified several other groups in the US who fund Canary Mission.

Suppressed film
In March, The Electronic Intifada published the first details of what is in the film.

We reported that it showed Sima Vaknin-Gil claiming to have leading neoconservative think tank the Foundation for Defense of Democracies working for her ministry.

The undercover footage shows Vaknin-Gil claiming that “We have FDD. We have others working on” projects including “data gathering, information analysis, working on activist organizations, money trail. This is something that only a country, with its resources, can do the best.”

As noted in part one of the documentary, the existence of the film and the identity of the undercover reporter became known after footage he had shot for it was used in Al Jazeera’s The Lobby – about Israel’s covert influence campaign in the UK – aired in early 2017.

Since then, Israel lobbyists have heavily pressured Qatar to prevent the US film from airing.

“Foreign agent”
Clayton Swisher, Al Jazeera’s head of investigations, first confirmed in October 2017 that the network had run an undercover reporter in the US Israel lobby at the same time as in the UK.

Swisher promised the film would be released “very soon,” but it never came out.

Multiple Israel lobby sources told Israel’s Haaretz newspaper in February that they had received assurances from Qatari leaders late last year that the documentary would not be aired.

Qatar denied this, but the paper stood by its story.

Swisher’s op-ed in The Forward was his first public comment on the matter since he had announced the documentary.

In it, he refutes Israel lobby allegations about the film and expresses frustration that Al Jazeera had not aired it, apparently due to outside pressure.

Several pro-Israel lawmakers in Washington have piled on more pressure by pushing the Department of Justice to force Al Jazeera to register as a “foreign agent” under a counterespionage law dating from the 1930s.

The Israel lobby goes to Doha
While the film was delayed, a wave of prominent pro-Israel figures visited Qatar at the invitation of its ruler, Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani.

They have included some of the most right-wing and extreme figures among Israel’s defenders in the US, such as Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz and Morton Klein, the head of the Zionist Organization of America.

Swisher wrote in The Forward that he ran into Dershowitz at a Doha restaurant during one of these visits, and invited the professor to a private viewing of the film.

“I have no problem with any of the secret filming,” Swisher says Dershowitz told him afterwards. “And I can even see this being broadcast on PBS” – the US public broadcaster.

Yet it appears that Israel lobby efforts to quash the film were successful – until now.



959 recent articles/newsletters are online

Friends,

My recent articles/newsletters are online:

Jewish Fundamentalists announce birth of Red Heifer; time for Third Temple, Messiah - and Armageddon

Debate with Victoria on Holocaust matters

Strategies for Researchers

Peter




958 Strategies for Researchers

Strategies for Researchers

by Peter Myers, September 21, 2018


1. Identify who your best allies are, and support them when others attack them.

There's a lot of rubbish on the internet, not only in Establishment media but also in Alternative media. Just don't mix with those who serve up rubbish.

In connection with 9/11, look up "Cognitive Infiltration". A government agent actually admitted that government agents infiltrate dissident groups, and sow discord and division among them.

But the leaders of the 9/11 Truth movement have been strong enough to resist such infiltration.

You don't have to agree with your allies on all matters. It's fine to "agree to differ" on certain matters. Don't fall out with them over minor matters. You need to stick together.

2. Pay attention to small details.

Suppose that your write a brilliant article which exposes wrong-doing in high places.

The critics will start out by ignoring you, depriving you of publicity. But if that doesn't work, they'll look for minor errors in your work (let's assume there are no major errors).

When they find such minor errors, they will highlight them, pointing to your unreliability. It's plain character assassination, ad hominem attacks which violate the laws of logic - but they only care about the laws of rhetoric.

To head off such attacks, get your fine details right. Don't indulge in Overstatement. Document every claim you make. Pay attention to footnotes.

3. Don't give your opponents easy points.

Suppose you present a paper about 9/11 as an inside job (CIA) or Mossad job. Your destroy the establishment argument. But you come out as a Denier of the Moon Landings by the Apollo spacecraft.

This is exactly what Eric Hufschmid did. He wrote a brilliant book exposing 9/11, and produced a brilliant DVD on it, but stated on his website that the Moon Landings were a hoax. He thought that they were a Hollywood / CIA production.

That was the end of his credibilty; dissidents stopped using his material. For the record, when I lived in Canberra (Australia), I had occasional contact (through Ron Welch, an amateur astronomer) with Dick Barwick, a professional astronomer who was at Tidbinbilla Space Centre during the Apollo missions. I cited the case Eric Hufschmid presented. But Dick related his experience, of the spacecraft dissapearing behind the moon, then re-appearing.

Tidbinbilla Tracking Station, being on the other side of the earth from US stations, picked up some of the most important signals during the Apollo missions. Tidbinbilla was used for tracking the Apollo Lunar Module: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canberra_Deep_Space_Communication_Complex

There's no way anyone can persuade Eric he's wrong. Just don't make the same mistake.

A decade ago, some 9/11 Truthers were coming out as Holocaust Deniers. I argued that they were thereby ruining their own case.

They wanted to keep the focus on the crooks and deceivers who pulled off 9/11. But by taking Hitler's baggage on board, they were enabling critics to focus on their Holocaust Denial instead.

I have some webpages on the Protocols of Zion (Protocols Toolkit, and Protocols Debate). But I am careful there not to argue that it IS genuine, merely that it COULD be genuine, i.e. that the disproofs do not really prove that it was a forgery.

If I maintained that is definitely authentic, this gives critics easy points. There is a case, I admit, that it's a forgery. They would rubbish me.

One can't prove anything using the Protocols, because it's an uncertain source. One must establish positions using other sources, but then the Protocols can be considered, to see if it has any bearing.

It's just one document, but has come to symbolise much more: a Jewish Conspiracy. Such a conspiracy would not be by all Jews - some are National Jews; and the others are divided into Left (Soros) and Right (Netanyahu) factions. In refuting the Protocols, Lobbyists would like to think that they are refuting the broader Jewish Conspiracy; but of course they are not, and the more they insist, the more the Conspiracy bulks through the fog.

My website has been going for nearly 20 years. During that time, I have had a lot of feedback from opponents. I have found that the Lobby is more agitated about the Protocols than about any other topic, even Hitler. Of course, they try to equate the Protocols with Hitler, as if Solzhenitsyn = Hitler = Stalin.

Pharaoh = Hitler = Stalin = Protocols - that's the simplistic logic of the most brilliant minds.

Even Jimmy Carter's book on Israeli Apartheid, and Bob Carr's book on Jewish Donors trying to buy Australia's Foreign Policy, have been likened to the Protocols.

My strategy puts the onus of proof back on the critics: I present evidence that the standard 'proofs' do not take into account. I disprove the 'proofs'.

Critics usually start out with a statement that the Protocols has already been proven a Forgery; but they don't bother to cite names or books; they merely assert that the case is closed.

Who are these experts, I ask? Do they have names? I then proceed to show that the case is still open.

I want to write a book, one that does not deal with the Protocols. However I realised that critics, who want to discredit me and the book, will discover my website and say, "Hey, this guy says the Protocols might be genuine." By this means, without even reading my book, they will seek to rubbish me.

To deal with that, I updated my webpages on the Protocols. I incorporated the best material from the Forgery side, but went one better, to make the critics unsure of their case. To get that result, I had to make these webpages so strong, so hard to refute, that the critics will ignore them. The last thing they want is people starting to wonder if there really is a Jewish Conspiracy after all.

Gough Whitlam, the left-wing Prime Minister of Australia in the years 1972-5, wrote in his memoirs that the Lobby tried to blackmail him during the 1973 war:

"The Israeli ambassador, whom I knew well, made an urgent request to see me alone ... On this occasion Australia had to practise its professions of even-handedness. Australia's Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Sir Laurence McIntyre, was President of the Security Council when the war broke out. Despite some political pressure and even blackmail brought to bear on me the Government gave him every support." (The Whitlam Government: 1972-1975, Pengion, 1985, p. 125)

More recently, Bob Carr, Foreign Minister of Australia, disclosed that Jewish Donors to the Labor Government of Julia Gillard tried to have Australia's Mideast Foreign Policy subcontracted to them, in return for their donations. In response, Rabbi Shmuley Boteach likened his book Diary of a Foreign Minister to the Protocols.

I cover this and similar cases in my webpage Protocols Debate: http://mailstar.net/protocols-debate.html

UK union leader Mark Serwotka recently suggested that the 'antisemitism' campaign against Jeremy Corbyn (and by implication Ken Livingstone) had been orchestrated by Israel: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-45517094

'Now, I'm Not A Conspiracy Theorist,' He Says, 'But...' - says the Times of Israel  subheading in its article 'UK union boss suggests Israel is behind Labour anti-Semitism row' (14 September 2018):

I recently received an email from 'rebecca' on the Protocols:

QUOTE
rebecca <email withheld>         

I have read the Protocols of Zion three times and it has changed my life now that Im aware of who causes destruction in this world but I was wandering who you think the King of the Jews is and when he will come. I have read the rothschild Dynasty and it states by 2025 the world will be in complete darkness so now I assume the ‘ King ‘ of the jews will come then,

Hope to here back
ENDQUOTE

I judged this email to be phony, a set-up.

She (if it is really a woman; Mossad have no qualms about adopting a female persona) must belong to the younger generation, who use spell-checkers & grammar checkers, but have no idea of English spelling.

My reply was:

QUOTE
Don't read the Protocols any more. No one can be sure whether it's genuine or not.

Instead, read my Toolkit: http://mailstar.net/toolkit.html
ENDQUOTE

I have been in this game for so long, that I can smell a rat. I never heard back.

The public perception of whether there is a Jewish Conspiracy lies entirely in Jewish hands: if Jewish lobbies continue their efforts to control the Mideast Foreign Policy of Western countries, by Donations, Bullying or Blackmail, the public will eventually wake up.


957 Debate with Victoria on Holocaust matters

Debate with Victoria on Holocaust matters


Re: British Jews tried to stop Balfour Declaration

From Victoria <email withheld>

5 May 2017 at 07:20

Hello Mr. Myers,

I am writing to express my disagreement over what you said in your post in the comments section on the above article posted on Henry Makow's site.

{she proceeded to harangue me over some things that a "Peter" had posted on that site, assuming that i was the one} ==

Virginia,

I did correspond with Henry Makow at that time, and on these topics, but I believe that I was not the respondent in this case.

Anyway, I cannot find any record of the discussion, on my computer or on Makow's site, or anywhere else. Where did you find it? Please send the link.

Peter ==

RE: British Jews tried to stop Balfour Declaration article   Inbox 

From Victoria <email withheld>

Why are you sending me your address? Are you that Peter Myers who wrote the comment or not? ==


Victoria,

Now I know the source of the discrepancy.

At the current version of his webpage https://www.henrymakow.com/001458.html, Henry has removed the comments. That's why I could not find them.

But when I went to the Internet Archive, I was able to find them in the version saved on February 8, 2008:

You will notice that Henry mentions me by name (Peter Myers) in one place, with regard to my comment on "Blaming the British". That is correct.

The other comment you are referring to is simply by "Peter", no surname given. I do not believe that was by me.

Firstly, I keep records of all my emails (that's how I communicated with Henry, not by entering cmments at his site), and I have no record of this.

Secondly, because some of the viewpoints expressed are not those I hold or have held.

eg that Balfour "didn't like Jews" or saw the Declaration "as a possible way to get rid of Jews in Britain."

You were assuming that the comments by "Peter" were by me, even though no surname was given.

By the way, are you Jewish?

Peter ==

Re: Emailing: British Jews Tried to Stop Balfour Declaration - henrymakow.com   Inbox 

From Victoria <email withheld>

Mr. Myers,

I think it is entirely inappropriate of you to ask me about my ethnicity.  I never asked you about your ethnicity and don't consider it even relevant to this discussion. ==

Victoria,

Over the years, I have had a number of discussions with Henry Makow, by email. Despite our differences, were were always civil in our dealings with one another.

Right from the start, you launched into an attack on me, without first checking that I was the "Peter" in question.

> Are you that Peter Myers who wrote the
> comment or not?

The text does not say the comment was by "Peter Myers"; merely by "Peter". You were jumping to conclusions. And using a hostile tone, as if you wanted to lynch me.

Henry Makow's website is about covert forces promoting the Culture War. Some of those forces are Jewish. It is appropriate for participants to practice self-disclosure.

Attacking from the shadows, while preserving anonymity or concealing one's own identity or interests, is inconsistent with this endeavour.

Peter ==

From Victoria <email withheld>

Mr. Myers,

I don't believe that I am under any obligation to disclose  my ethnic identity, especially since you never disclosed yours to me.

On your website Neither Aryan Nor Jew, you never stated how  or in what way your ethnicity or ethnic interest, has  influenced you to start the website, or participate in discussions with Mr. Makow.

I only wrote to you to express my disagreement as a bystander, not because I had what you perceived as some hidden agenda or interest which that was influenced  by ethnicity. Sometimes people's reactions are influenced by things other their ethnic/racial identity or interests, but simply by what they see as unfair, unsubstantiated and  deceitful accusation against an entire ethnic group. People's motivations are not always driven by their ethnic origins or racial/group interests. If you are one of those people, you should understand.

Ethnic identity is a deeply personal matter. It is  only appropriate to reveal it to people who one has known or had been friends with for a very long time.

I don't know if I clarified it to you in the prior email, but here  is another commenter's response to an aforementioned comment, where he mentions your name.

[Commenting on Peter Myers' statement that I am "blaming it on the British" and "letting the Jewish lobby off the hook"]

It was one of the reasons why I decided that it was you who wrote that comment.

That was the main reason why I assumed it was you who wrote it. I believe I already told you that I was sorry for the inconvenience and in my initial email, I said that you could disregard it if it wasn't you who wrote the comment.

You said that my email was in a hostile tone. It was  due to the tone of the  comment itself being a  deeply hostile one.
The author did launch into an entirely unjustified, unfounded, and extremely mean-spirited attack on the Jews. It did seem like  he wanted to lynch every ordinary Jew he came into contact with,  possibly excluding H. Makow. ==

Victoria,

There was a Peter Meyer who had a site called serendipity.li. Some people confused the two of us. There was some overlap between our views, but differences too.

The only record I can find of dealing with him is a short email from him in 2008.

On my website, I cannot find any mention of his name "Peter Meyer", and serendipity is mentioned in one place - a link relating to 9/11: http://www.serendipity.li/wot/obl_int.htm

It is possible that he is the Peter whose comment on Makow's website upset you. He does seem to have supported Ernst Zundel. But he may not be the one. You could, however, try to get in touch with him (if he's still alive). I see that his articles are still online.

Peter ==

Re: Clarification   Inbox 

From Victoria <email withheld>

Mr. Myers,

I  was honestly insulted that you would think that just because I  was refuting a comment on  an article that dealt with Jews and Zionism, meant that I was pursuing some covert agenda having to do with my own ethnic identity and  interests.

Just because everything you do may be influenced by your identity and interests revolving around it, does not mean that this is how other people operate.

Since you say you are not the one who wrote that comment, then you are not responsible for its content.

But nobody who writes a comment such as this, where they launch into a hostile tirade against an entire ethnic group, should be surprised if somebody returns the volley at them in the same hostile manner. ==

RE: Clarification   Inbox 

From Victoria <email withheld>

Thank you, I will take a look at his website, but I haven't found any
mention of him on H. Makow's website.

It was more than 10 years ago, and it could be that you may have forgotten
that ever writing  that comment on Makow's website.

Because  some of the things you wrote about on your own site are actually
consistent with that comment's hostile tone.

But at least for now, I will take you at your  word that you never wrote it.

Regards,

Victoria. ==


Victoria,

> It was more than 10 years ago, and it could be that you may have forgotten
> that ever writing  that comment on Makow's website.

It's not a matter of forgetting. I'm a very methodical person - I keep a record of everything I write, and name each file so that I can find it.

As I explained to you, I only communicate via email - not by making comments on other people's webpages. And I keep a copy of everything.

> Because  some of the things you wrote about on your own site are actually
> consistent with that comment's hostile tone.

Even Makow agrees that Zionists hold a lot of power in the US.

Do you? Are you one of those Jews who deny that the Jewish Lobby has often manipulated American Politics?

That Jews on the Supreme Court brought Gay Marriage to the US?

Jewish writers admitted that the Balfour Declaration was part of a deal whereby Jews got Palestine in return for their

Even Jewish writers agree that Jews run Hollywood.

So it is not surprising that "Peter" shares some viewpoints with me. Nevertheless there are differences, which you seem to doubt/dispute

eg I never wrote that Balfour "didn't like Jews", because I have no knowledge of whether he did so or not.

Nor did I write that Balfour viewed the Declaration "as a possible way to get rid of Jews in Britain."

See if you can find such sentiments (by me) anywhere on my website.

Can I expect an apology or retraction from you? Not likely.

You're playing the aggrieved innocent. But actually you're a militant waging your own war on anti-Zionists.

Peter ==


From Victoria <email withheld>

Mr. Myers,

I don't know what exactly I have to apologize for, since you never apologized for concluding that I had some kind of covert agenda.

Now on top of that you insult me again by accusing me of being a militant fighting the anti-Zionists!

> You're playing the aggrieved innocent. But actually
> you're a militant waging your own war on anti-Zionists.

You don't have a right to just cut and label me a "militant Jew fighting anti-Zionists", or label me as "anything" just because you don't like what I wrote to you and my questions! I was sincerely expressing my protest with the way that "Peter" entity chose to go an a rampage against the ordinary Jews, who were never asked or taken into consideration, when the big fat cats who were running the world at that time were making common cause with the early Zionists and issuing all these declarations. I really don't care what you may think of me for expressing my disagreement and I also don't fear you!

> Are you one of those Jews who deny that the
> Jewish Lobby has often manipulated American Politics?

> even Makow agrees that Zionists hold a lot of power in the US.

> That Jews on the Supreme Court brought Gay Marriage to the US?

> Even Jewish writers agree that Jews run Hollywood.

 No, I am neither a Jew, nor a Zionist, nor "one of those Jews", and you are wrong again!

 I also am not a member of the Supreme court, don't work in Hollywood, am not involved in politics and don't hold any power at all. Therefore, you have no business bringing these issues up in your correspondence with me. If they bother you so much, then I suggest that you take them up with the Zionist Jews in question. Even if I were a Jew, you would still have no right to provocatively question me on the above issues, like I have any say in them.

 Nevertheless, no Jew in US or anywhere has to mindlessly agree with and nod their heads in agreement with the perception that their enemies have of them supposedly being directly responsible for all of those things.

 I don't know why you choose to veer off the main topic of my email, namely the British being the main culprits for promoting Jewish Zionism, and their guilt and responsibility in bringing Europe's Jews under Zionist control. Plus, British being one of the main forces guilty and responsible for the destruction of European Jewry.

> Jewish writers admitted that the Balfour Declaration
> was part of a deal whereby Jews got Palestine in return
> for their

  Like I said, whatever was the cause, the "Peter" who posted the comment had no right to vilify and attack the ordinary Jews for something that they had no control over. Those Jews behind Balfour Declaration were in fact Zionist Jews.

Instead of building bridged with the Jews, Britain and others European powers, supported and enabled the Zionists in putting Jews of Europe under their direct control, and thus paving the way for their annihilation. ==


Victoria,

> You don't have a right

Yes, BUT YOU HAVE a RIGHT to ACCUSE ME of things I didn't do, and to keep up those accusations despite my stating that I did not make Peter's comments, and that I disagreed with some of those comments.

All the Rights are yours. You are entirely in the Right.

> I was sincerely expressing my protest
> with the way that "Peter" entity

But when I explained that I was not that Peter, and did not make those comments, you kept accusing me of having done so.

The polite, courteous thing to do would have been to ASK me first if I had made those comments, and only launch your protest if I had.

> you have no business bringing these issues
> up in your correspondence with me

The matters I brought up are also covered in Henry Makow's website. He and I agree about most of those matters. And since the points you made derived from Makow's webpages, my points were quite appropriate.

In any case, Rights are always on your side. You never do anything wrong.

I think we had better wind up our discussion now. Anyway, I am going away for a trip.

Peter ==


From Victoria <email withheld>

> Yes, BUT YOU HAVE a RIGHT to ACCUSE ME of things I didn't do, and to keep up those accusations despite my stating that I did not make Peter's comments, and that I disagreed with some of those comments.

Mr. Myers,

I only told you reasons as to what made me decide (albeit wrongly)that it was you who wrote the comment.

One of the comenters brought up the name "Peter Myers" and that made me sure that the comment was yours.

> All the Rights are yours. You are entirely in the Right.

> > I was sincerely expressing my protest

>> with the way that "Peter" entity

> But when I explained that I was not that Peter, and did not make those comments, you kept accusing me of having done so.

> The polite, courteous thing to do would have been to ASK me first if I had made those comments, and only launch your protest if I had.

Like I said, I apologize for the inconvenience. I may have been quick jump to conclusions, but the reason I included my rebuttal of the comment, because I was sure you would never respond to me and would never ascertain whether it was you or not either way.

>> you have no business bringing these issues up in your correspondence
>> with me

>The matters I brought up are also covered in Henry Makow's website. He and I agree about most of those matters. And since the points you made derived from Makow's webpages, my points were quite appropriate.

> In any case, Rights are always on your side. You never do anything wrong.

I wanted d to stick to the topic of article  in response to which the comment was written.

But the  things on your website that were somewhat similar to the tone of the "Peter " in question, were the ones where you were positioning yourself as a Holocaust denier, and also your article or a review about the book where the author imputes Holocaust to the people's belief in the  infamous   "Protocols of Zion". Regardless of whether they were a forgery or not, one cannot deny that indeed they were one of the factors that led to the genocide of the European Jews by the Nazis. If they were not a forgery, then why indeed is it still so  difficult to ascertain who was their author. You would think that those who believed in them being authentic would put some mental and scholarly efforts in establishing the identities of their authors. ==


Victoria,

> you were positioning yourself as a Holocaust denier

I have never been a holocaust denier. But I do reject holocaust exceptionalism. What's the difference between being killed in a gas chamber, and being killed in the Red Terror? Or the Gulag? Or the Great Leap Forward? Or in Israel's attacks on Gaza? Or on the US invasion of Iraq, which would not have happened but for about 50 Neocons, of whom half were Jewish (mostly Trotskyists turned Zionist).

As the the historicity of the Nazi holocaust, I did "sit on the fence" over this issue for years. For good reason, as I explained in my webpage 'Fighting with Words: the word "Holocaust"

Finally in late 2008 I research the history intensively, and concluded that it had occurred.

In early 2009, I ran a debate on it for 3 weeks, in which I came out strongly against the deniers:

You must have seen that on my website, yet you chose to ignore it, and depict me as a holocaust denier.

Well, there are other kinds of denier too.

Such as those who deny the power the Jewish Lobby has wielded for years.

You're not Jewish, ok I accept that. Are you a Trotskyist or an Anarchist?

Peter ==


RE:   Inbox 

From Victoria <email withheld>

Hello Mr. Myers,

I appreciate you clarifying your position on the Holocaust.

But I don't appreciate that you are once again jumping to baseless
assumptions about me.

I am not an ideologically driven person, and I don't think I have to say
more. My emails to you were never driven by ideology.

I think what makes the Holocaust stand out, is that an entire people was
subject to a campaign of methodic genocide that was premeditated.

Even if the  genocide was not planned originally, but was mean to be a
wholesale ethnic cleansing campaign which the Nazis did make clear from the
get go, does amount to a genocide. To ethnically cleanse an entire group of
people and expel them from their homelands is genocide too.

I wrote to you with the sole purpose of rebutting what I thought was your
email on H. Makow's site.

If I will have any further questions on something that was on your website,
I will contact you then.

Finally, an apology from you for calling me a "militant Jewish anti-Zionist"
would be appreciated. ==


Victoria,

>  calling me a "militant Jewish anti-Zionist"

That purports to be an exact quote, but actually it's not.

I did not call you Jewish, but asked
"Are you one of those Jews who deny that the Jewish Lobby ..."

I did call you a militant - I wrote,
"But actually you're a militant waging your own war on anti-Zionists".

Please don't misquote me again. Such carelessless is not scholarly.

It would not have been too much trouble for you to look up what I actually wrote, but you did not bother.

I can't see any point in further discussion. Anyway, I'm about to head off.

Peter ==


Victoria,

I should have addressed your statement that holocaust exceptionalism is justified because "an entire people was subject to a campaign of methodic genocide".

The Nazis attempted to get rid of Jews within the regions they conquered. But they made no attempt to get rid of Jews in other countries. So it did not apply to "an entire people".

In the same way, Israel is conducting a genocide of the Palestinians. But only the ones living in Palestine, not those living in the West. So not "an entire people".

Further, Israel and its Lobby have lobbied for the West to attack Arab/Islamic countries - Iraq, Libya, Syria. That cost a million lives in Iraq alone, plus ongoing disasters.

Many people regard Netanyahu as akin to Nazis. The "holocaust exceptionalism" argument breaks down.

Nazi mass killing of Jews would not have happened if Jews had not been the predominant leaders of the Bolshevik Revolution.

In Ch. 16 of The Last Days of the Romanovs, Robert Wilton named the Jews running all the revolutionary parties: http://mailstar.net/wilton.html

Admittedly Stalin turned the tables on them, and gave them a taste of their own medicine. But first they had imposed the Red Terror, and a genocide of the "Great Russian" people. The term "genocide" includes destruction of a people's culture. The "holocaust exceptionalism" argument breaks down.

Finally, Nazi mass killing of Jews would not have happened if Zionists had not swayed the outcome of World War I via the Balfour Declaration - which was regarded as a contract between Britain and World Jewry.

Theordor Herzl, the founder of Zionism, wrote:

"When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of all revolutionaly parties; and at the same time, when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse." (The Jewish State, p.91)

In his Complete Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish State stretches: "From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates": 

Leonard Stein writes in his book The Balfour Declaration (Vallentine-Mitchell, London, 1961):

"Herzl describes in his diaries an interview with Chamberlain in April 1903, when the El Arish scheme was again discussed. He told Chamberlain, he says, that 'we shall get [Palestine] not from the goodwill but from the jealousy of the Powers. And if we are in El Arish under the Union Jack, then our Palestine will likewise be in the British sphere of influence.' This suggestion, Herzl writes, was not at all ill-received.89" (p. 25) http://mailstar.net/balfour.html

If all such details are kept out of the picture, "holocaust exceptionalism" seems plausible. But when the missing details are included in the total picture, the "holocaust exceptionalism" argument breaks down. All sides have blood on their hands, and none are morally superior.

Peter



956 Jewish Fundamentalists announce birth of Red Heifer; time for Third Temple, Messiah - and Armageddon

Jewish Fundamentalists announce birth of Red Heifer; time for Third Temple, Messiah - and Armageddon

Newsletter published on September 20, 2018

(1) Jewish Fundamentalists announce birth of Red Heifer; time for Third Temple, Messiah - and Armageddon
(2) Protestant Fundamentalist dupes: Red Heifer will usher in Messianic era (wasn't Jesus Messiah?)
(3) Temple Institute announces Red Heifer, prerequisite for renewal of Divine service in Third Temple
(4) Rabbi Yehuda Glick interview: priestly robes and vessels ready for 3rd Temple (2010)
(5) Glick plan of 3rd Temple: replaces Dome of the Rock, built on exact site (2013)
(6) Glick: Al-Aqsa mosque can stay; but we intend to build 3rd Temple over Dome of the Rock (2014)
(7) 3rd Temple will lead to War with Islam: 9/11 and Israeli False Flag attacks - Christopher Bollyn

(1) Jewish Fundamentalists announce birth of Red Heifer; time for Third Temple, Messiah - and Armageddon


First ‘red heifer’ born in Israel for 2000 years triggers armageddon fears

THE birth of a rare red calf in Israel points to a Biblical prophecy that may not be good news for any of us.

The Sun; News Corp Australia Network

SEPTEMBER 11, 201811:45AM

A BIBLE prophecy predicting the End of Days is feared to come true after the first "red heifer in 2000 years" was born in Israel.

The Temple Institute in Jerusalem announced the calf’s birth on YouTube, saying it would undergo "extensive examination" to determine if it is red all over.

According to The Sun, if the female baby cow is found to be "blemish free", the Institute will declare that the calf "brings the promise of reinstating Biblical purity to the world".

In both Christianity and Judaism, the red heifer is central to the prediction about the "end of times".

After sacrificing the red cow, construction can begin on the Third Temple in Jerusalem.

The Temple Institute and other groups worldwide were set up with the goal of building the Third Temple on Mount Moriah, or on the Temple Mount.

The red heifer (also known as the red cow) was a cow brought to priests for sacrifice in the Hebrew Bible. Jewish and Christian fundamentalists believe that once a red heifer is born they will be able to rebuild the Third Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. But in order to do this, they would have to demolish what stands on the hill today — the Dome of the Rock, an Islamic holy temple.

In mainstream Orthodox Judaism, once the Temple is rebuilt the world will welcome the coming of the Jewish Messiah. Humanity will then face the Last Judgment. Everyone who was moral and believed in God will have the privilege of having their name written in the Book of Life. Everyone whose name isn’t in there will be "cast into the lake of fire" (Revelation 21:8) ...

Rabbi Chain Richman, director of the Institute, believes the time is ripe to build the Third Temple, following the birth of the red heifer.

(2) Protestant Fundamentalist dupes: Red Heifer will usher in Messianic era (wasn't Jesus Messiah?)


Harbinger to Messiah: Red Heifer Is Born

By Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz

September 5, 2018 , 12:17 pm

Many will be purified and purged and refined; the wicked will act wickedly and none of the wicked will understand; but the knowledgeable will understand. Daniel 12:10 (The Israel Bible™)

Last Tuesday, the Temple Institute’s Red Heifer program was blessed with results; an entirely red female calf was born, paving the way for re-establishing the Temple service and marking the final stage of redemption.

Almost three years ago the Temple Institute inaugurated its Raise a Red Heifer in Israel program. Due to laws restricting the importation of live cattle into Israel, the Temple Institute imported frozen embryos of red angus, implanting them in Israeli domestic cows. The pregnant cows were raised on cattle ranches in different locations throughout the country. The cows are giving birth this summer with several calves already having been born.

One week after it’s birth, the newborn red heifer was certified by a board of rabbis as fulfilling all the Biblical requirements. The rabbis emphasized that the heifer could, at any time, acquire a blemish rendering it unsuitable. They will be inspecting the calf periodically to verify its condition.

The red heifer was the main component in the Biblically mandated process of ritual purification for impurity that results from proximity or contact with a dead body.  Because the elements needed for this ceremony have been lacking since the destruction of the Second Temple, all Jews today are considered ritually impure, thereby preventing the return of the Temple service.

The red heifer is described in the Book of Numbers.

"This is the ritual law that Hashem has commanded: Instruct B’nei Yisrael to bring you a red cow without blemish, in which there is no defect and on which no yoke has been laid. Numbers 19:2

Several heifers have been found in recent years that seemed to qualify but ultimately were unsuited for the ritual. Earlier this month, two calves born in Israel to the Institute’s red heifer program were deemed to be unsuitable for the performance of the mitzvah. One calf was a bull while the second, a heifer, had a small patch of white hair which disqualified her.

The heifer, born from a natural birth, must be entirely red, with no more than two non-red hairs on its body. It must also never have been used for any labor or have been impregnated. The existence of such a heifer is considered a biological anomaly and very rare. Fortunately, the ritual requires an infinitesimally small quantity of ashes. From the time of Moses, who personally prepared the first heifer, until the destruction of the Temple, only nine red heifers were prepared. Nonetheless, this was sufficient to maintain the ritual purity of the entire nation for almost 2,000 years.

According to Jewish tradition, there will only be ten red heifers in human history with the tenth heifer ushering in the Messianic era. Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon (Maimonides), the most renowned medieval Jewish scholar known by the acronym Rambam, wrote in his explanation of the mitzvah that "the tenth red heifer will be accomplished by the king, the Messiah; may he be revealed speedily, Amen, May it be God’s will." ...

The laws pertaining to the mitzvah are myriad and considered by the sages to be the archetypal chok, an inexplicable Torah commandment accepted solely on faith. Before entering the land of Israel after the Exodus, the heifer was burned outside of the camp. In the days of the Temple, the heifer was taken to the Mount of Olives across a causeway built specifically for this purpose to ensure that there was no inadvertent contact with areas along the way that may have been contaminated by dead bodies.

Cedarwood, hyssop, and wool or yarn dyed scarlet are added to the fire, and the remaining ashes are placed in a vessel containing spring water to purify a person who has become ritually contaminated by contact with a corpse. Water from the vessel is sprinkled on the subject, using a bunch of hyssop, on the third and seventh day of the purification process. The priest who performs the ritual then becomes ritually unclean, and must then wash himself and his clothes in running waters. He is deemed impure until evening.

No less stringent than the laws pertaining to the heifer are the laws pertaining to the site where the heifer is burned. Almost 30 years ago, Rabbi Yonatan Adler, who is also an archaeologist, performed an in-depth study into the textual references to the site where the red heifer was burned, publishing his results in  in the Torah journal Techumin. His calculations, based on the Holy of Holies being located where the Dome of the Rock stands today, led him to a spot where Dominus Flevit, a Catholic Church built in 1955, now stands. Archaeological surveys discovered unique characteristics of the site that corresponded to descriptions in the Talmud.

(3) Temple Institute announces Red Heifer, prerequisite for renewal of Divine service in Third Temple


The Temple Institute

4 September at 23:02 ·

Red Heifer Candidate Born In Israel

On the 17th day of Elul, 5778, (August 28, 2018), a red heifer was born in the land of Israel. The red heifer candidate is being raised and specially cared for under the auspices of the Temple Institute's 'Raise a Red Heifer' program.

One week after its birth the heifer underwent an extensive examination by rabbinical experts, who determined that the heifer is currently a viable candidate for the Biblical red heifer (para aduma) described in Numbers, chapter 19, and will be examined again in three months time to determine whether it continues to possess the necessary qualifications for the red heifer, a necessary prerequisite for the renewal of the Divine service in the Holy Temple.

The rabbinical experts who conducted the examination stress that the heifer, while currently bearing the required qualifications could, at any time in the future, become disqualified through natural causes, and therefore the heifer will be periodically reexamined.

(4) Rabbi Yehuda Glick interview: priestly robes and vessels ready for 3rd Temple (2010)


Orthodox Jews plan rebuilding of sacred temple

The World Today with Eleanor Hall

Anne Barker reported this story on Friday, January 29, 2010 12:34:00

ELEANOR HALL: Nearly 2,000 years ago the Romans under Emperor Vespasian destroyed the city of Jerusalem and according to Judaism demolished the second temple sacred to Jews.

Orthodox Jews have prayed ever since for the temple to be rebuilt and an 18th century rabbi even predicted that construction would begin in March 2010.

But one modern-day institution in Jerusalem has taken on the task of preparing for the temple's reconstruction now.

Middle East correspondent Anne Barker has our report. ...

YEHUDA GLICK: I believe that we're like 2,000 years late, but I'd say that in our modern era, in 1967 when the state of Israel united Jerusalem we should have immediately begun. And I think every single day is a day late.

ANNE BARKER: Rabbi Yehuda Glick is a director at the Temple Institute whose sole purpose is to plan the construction of the third temple which many believe must be done in time for the coming of the Jewish Messiah.

YEHUDA GLICK: One of the 613 obligations in the Jewish Torah is an obligation to build the temple and it exists every single day, whether the Messiah has arrived yet or not.

ANNE BARKER: Already the Temple Institute has spent around $30 million preparing for the temple's reconstruction.

Architectural plans have been drawn up and vast funds have been spent employing the best craftsmen to make the priestly robes and vessels to be used once it's built.

YEHUDA GLICK: We have the altar which is made of stone as you can see.

ANNE BARKER: Rabbi Glick shows me glass cabinets filled with dozens of objects fashioned on those in the Bible - among them a pure gold menorah, silver trumpets (sound of trumpet), an incense altar, even a new Ark of the Covenant to hold the tablets of law given to Moses on Mount Sinai.

YEHUDA GLICK: Actually it's very interesting because they were brought from the exact location of the altar built originally by Joshua.

ANNE BARKER: There are even plans to produce a sacrificial red heifer which the Bible says must be slaughtered before the temple can be built.

For all the biblical specifications though Rabbi Glick believes the third temple will be a thoroughly modern building.

YEHUDA GLICK: The third temple doesn't have to be as was the second temple or the first temple in terms of, I mean there can be air conditioning, parking lots, computers. I mean just the fact that people used it at the time used oil doesn't mean that today we can't use electricity.

ANNE BARKER: There is of course one not-so-small problem. The temple site has for around 1,300 years housed the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

Many Muslims in fact say no Jewish temple ever existed here and that Jews are yet to produce a single shred of archaeological evidence.

Not surprisingly some, like one Palestinian leader Mahdi Abdul Hadi, warn of warfare if Jews try to build another temple over the Dome of the Rock.

MAHDI ABDUL HADI: We will defend it, we will fight for it, whether we are religious, non religious. It's our place. It's our holy place. And this is bringing us back to the Middle Ages and the empowerment of self with the idea of killing each other.

ANNE BARKER: For now though the mosques are safe. But if the 18th century Rabbi Vilna Gaon was correct in his prophesies the temple's construction would begin in about six weeks.

This is Anne Barker in Jerusalem for The World Today.

(5) Glick plan of 3rd Temple: replaces Dome of the Rock, built on exact site (2013)


The Pulse of the Middle East

Israeli border police run in front of Dome of the Rock during a protest after Friday prayers at a compound known to Muslims as al-Haram al-Sharif and to Jews as Temple Mount, in Jerusalem's Old City, Feb. 22, 2013. (photo by REUTERS/Muammar Awad)

Rebuilding Israel's Temple Mount

I went to visit the Jewish Quarter in the Old City of Jerusalem to see how the preparations for the establishment of the new temple were getting on. For hundreds of Israelis, the task of renewing the temple has become the job of their lives. It is about time, so they believe, to establish the Third Temple in its proper place — right on the site where the First Temple and the Second Temple were once standing before being destroyed.

For hundreds of Israelis, the task of renewing the Temple at "its original place," has become a life mission.

by Daniel Ben Simon

June 7, 2013

Yehuda Glick is one of the “elite soldiers of the temple” who dedicate their lives to the mission. Since moving to Israel, he has been preparing for the great day, waiting to see the construction of the edifice that is to become the holiest place on earth for the Jewish people. A black skullcap adorning his head, his Hebrew flavored by an Anglo-Saxon accent, Glick spends his time as a tourist guide, escorting visitors to the Temple Mount. [...]

As the gates to the Temple Mount were closed, Yehuda and I headed for the Jewish Quarter, where the Temple Institute is located. Hundreds of tourists visit the Temple Institute store daily to see at close hand the preparations for the establishment of the temple. [...]

Schwartz, Cohen and Glick are all confident that once the Third Temple is erected, the world will become a fundamentally different place. The Lord would then bestow on Earth great abundance and there would no longer be anyone in need of charity.

“Those who do not feel what is going to happen are either blind or stupid, or ungrateful,” Glick noted, clearly annoyed with me, having noticed the skeptical expression on my face. “There has never been anything like that in the history of the human race; the return of an exiled people to its homeland is unique in human annals. It is all written in the Torah. And the last, supreme stage will be the construction of the temple.”

However, there is one far from marginal factor left out. In all those plans and photographs and illustrations and puzzles and books put forward by the Jewish believers, the Third Temple is seen at the center of the Temple Mount, rising high up above it.

But there is no trace there of the Dome of the Rock, as if the earth had swallowed it up.

Daniel Ben Simon is a former Knesset member from the Labor party. Prior to his political career, he was a journalist with Israeli dailies Haaretz and Davar. Ben Simon wrote four books on Israeli society and is the recipient of the Sokolov Prize, an Israeli journalism award.

(6) Glick: Al-Aqsa mosque can stay; but we intend to build 3rd Temple over Dome of the Rock (2014)


Nov 29 2014

Temple Institute prepares for the Third Temple

Yehuda Glick is a 44-year-old American-born Jew who spends most of every day preparing for the arrival of the Messiah in Jerusalem.

Since he became the executive director of the Temple Institute, Mr Glick's main task has been to supervise the manufacture of the utensils the high priests will need when the day arrives.

Crowns and other instruments made of solid gold fill glass cases in the Temple Institute museum in Jerusalem's Old City.

Other artefacts include an array of copper urns, trumpets made of silver and garments to be worn by the High Priest, woven from golden thread.

Musical instruments, including hand-made harps and lyres, lie ready to be brought to life upon the Messiah's appearance. [...]

"That is why we have engaged two architects," Mr Glick said. "It will be a modern building, with car parks and elevators, but it will look very much like the Second Temple."

The Temple Institute museum contains a large-scale model of what the Third Temple will look like, with its main building set to reach a height of 60 metres.

Today, the Temple Mount is dominated by the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the gold-topped Dome of the Rock.

"Al-Aqsa can stay," Mr Glick said, pointing to the mosque. "It's not even on the Temple Mount proper. But we intend to just build over the Dome of the Rock. We might be able to find a way to include it in the Third Temple."

Mr Glick envisages a house of prayer open to all believers in the monotheistic faiths, Christians, Muslims or Jews.

The Temple Institute has become a fixture on American evangelical tours of Israel. Thanks largely to their donations, it has so far spent $US27 million ($29 million) on preparations.

"We started with $US100," Mr Glick said. "There are 70 million evangelical Christians around the world, and most of them have become Israel's strongest supporters."

(7) 3rd Temple will lead to War with Islam: 9/11 and Israeli False Flag attacks - Christopher Bollyn

From: bronek <bronekc@me.com>
Subject: Fwd: Christopher Bollyn's Memo to President Trump-a rundown of
 Influence in America's policies.....talk about Russia, what a  diversion

9/11 and the War on Terror: Israel's History of False Flag Operations against the U.S.A.


by Christopher Bollyn

July 07, 2018

9/11 and the War on Terror: Israel's History of False Flag Operations against the U.S.A.

"We have spent $7 trillion – trillion with a T – $7 trillion in the Middle East. You know what we have for it? Nothing. Nothing." - President Donald Trump, April 28, 2018

Solving 911

Dear Mr. President,

As you said very clearly, the United States is bogged down in a costly quagmire in the Middle East, engaged in covert military operations in countries where there is no real U.S. interest.  We have gained nothing from 17 years of war in which untold thousands have been killed or maimed and entire nations have been devastated.  Our Middle East policy is disastrous and must be changed.  If we don't change our policy we can only expect more of the same – millions more refugees, thousands more dead, trillions more wasted.

In order to correct our policy we need to understand who got us into this mess in the first place.  The 9/11 event as a false flag operation and the War on Terror campaign were both conceived by Israeli military intelligence in the 1970s under the leadership of Menachem Begin, the self-proclaimed "Father of Terrorism" and founder of the Likud party who became prime minister in 1977.  War on Terror doctrine was rolled out in July 1979 at a Netanyahu Institute conference in Jerusalem.  The Israeli trick was to get the U.S. military to neutralize and fragment its enemies, most notably Iraq and Syria, under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Since 1979, this devious plan has been openly promoted by Benjamin Netanyahu.  On 9/11, War on Terror proponent Netanyahu told the New York Times that the terror atrocity was "very good" for U.S.-Israeli relations.

The Israelis have a long history of using false-flag terrorism against the United States:

1954 JUL – The Lavon Affair:  Israeli agents place bombs in U.S. and British libraries and institutions in Egypt in a false-flag operation meant to be blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood.

1967 JUN – Israeli aircraft and ships attack the defenseless USS Liberty, killing 34 and wounding 171, with the intention of sinking the ship – with no survivors – so that the blame could be assigned to Egypt.

1983 OCT – A truck bomb kills 241 Marines in their barracks in Beirut. Former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky says Mossad knew the details of the truck, the time, and location of the bombing, but only gave a general warning to the Americans.  A nebulous "Islamic Jihad" group is blamed; Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger says U.S. has no knowledge who really did the bombing. This occurred one month after a single Marine stopped an Israeli tank column – some former Marines believe Israel organized the attack.

1986 FEB – Mossad plants a radio relay device in an apartment in Tripoli, Libya, to send fake messages that appear to be from the Libyan government; U.S. intelligence is successfully tricked and President Reagan orders bombing of Libya.

1978 – Israeli agent Arnon Milchan's first film features a Boeing 747 crashing into the PanAm building. Months before 9/11 produces a film episode in which remote controlled airplanes hit buildings.

1979 JUL – Netanyahu Institute hosts conference on terrorism calling for U.S. military intervention in Middle East.

1979 – Isser Harel, founding chief of Israeli intelligence, predicts 9/11 attacks in New York City.

1982 FEB– Israeli Likud strategist Oded Yinon plan calls for the "dissolution of Syria and Iraq" and Balkanization of all Arab states.

1983 – Israel creates foe for War on Terror:  Under Ehud Barak, Israeli military intelligence (AMAN) begins arming and training anti-Western Hezb-i-Islami terrorists in Pakistan, including Osama bin Laden.

1987 – Two of Isser Harel’s senior Mossad agents, Avraham Shalom Bendor and Zvi Malkin, get the security contract for World Trade Center; Port Authority cancels the contract when their criminal history is discovered.

1990 – Rejected by Port Authority due to criminal conviction in Israel, Shalom Bendor goes to work for Jules Kroll.

1993 FEB – Zionists manage prosecution of WTC bombing: Israeli-American Michael Chertoff, U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, plays key role in prosecution. Zionist Judge Michael Mukasey presides over case against "Blind Sheikh." FBI informant Emad Salem is paid one million dollars for his testimony. Media leads public to believe that Muslims want to destroy the Twin Towers.

1993 – After first WTC bombing Kroll Associates gets security contract for the Port Authority and the WTC.

1994 – After losing Saudi and Pakistani support, the Israeli-trained "remainder of Hezb-i-Islami merges into al-Qaeda and the Taliban."

1998 DEC – Philip Zelikow’s Catastrophic Terrorism Study Group publishes report "Imagining Transforming Event" in Foreign Affairs (CFR). Co-authors Ashton Carter and John Deutch work for Global Technology Partners, an exclusive affiliate of Rothschild N.A.

1999 – Hugo Neu creates a global trading division headed by two veteran ferrous metal traders from Marc Rich and Glencore AG in Switzerland. A lot of expense and effort is spent to prepare a network to export scrap iron to Asia while its price is at the lowest level in 50 years. Hugo Neu and the state share the costs of dredging the Claremont channel to allow large ocean-going ships to Asia.

2000 SEP – A Neo-Con group, Project for the New American Century (PNAC) suggests that "a catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor" may be necessary to facilitate "the process of transformation" they call for in U.S. military policy. Ten signers of the PNAC document, including Dick Cheney, were in senior positions of the Bush administration in 2001.

2001 – Israeli Mossad company ICTS controls security screening at U.S. Airports on 9/11. Directors include Yair Shamir, son of notorious Israeli terrorist Yitzhak Shamir.

2001 – Israeli intelligence creates false histories for alleged hijackers. Israeli spies posing as "art students" live near hijacker patsies. Duplicate documents are used to create false histories, standard procedure for Mossad false-flag operations.

2001 – Ronald Lauder manages Governor George Pataki’s privatization scheme which includes WTC property. Lauder funds Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy at Mossad center (IDC) where Israeli Major General Daniel Rothschild heads Institute for Policy and Strategy.

2001 JUL 24 – Larry Silverstein gets lease for World Trade Center. Silverstein obtains lease thru fellow Zionist agent Lew Eisenberg, chairman of the Port Authority. Silverstein and Eisenberg are both members of UJA board, major Zionist fundraising organization.  Since 1996, Silverstein has close contact with Netanyahu; every Sunday afternoon Netanyahu calls Silverstein. Silverstein immediately raises rents by 40% for the few tenants he has.

2001 SEP 11 – Ehud Olmert, Israel’s deputy prime minister, is on an unreported visit in New York City. Why is it secret? While all civilian planes are grounded, at 4:11 p.m. an El Al Boeing 747 takes off from JFK bound for Tel Aviv.  The flight is authorized by the direct intervention of the U.S. Department of Defense.

9/11 – Alex Brown, a firm with ties to Israeli military intelligence and Yair Shamir’s company Scitex has many of the suspicious "put" options.  "Buzzy" Krongard, executive director of the CIA, headed AB until 1998. His wife works for Rothschild Asset Management.

9/11 – Israeli government receives the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to be in the area of the WTC or Pentagon on 9/11. Odigo, an Israeli messaging company, is used to send warning several hours before attacks.  Four Israelis die at WTC.

9/11 – Five Israelis working for Urban Moving Systems are arrested on 9/11 after being seen photographing and celebrating the attack on the WTC. The fake moving company is later found to be a front for the Mossad. Two of the Israelis are known Mossad.

9/11 – Israeli military chief Ehud Barak interprets 9/11 on BBC and Sky News in London, blaming Osama bin Laden and calling for U.S. to "launch an operational, concrete, war against terror."  Barak is Netanyahu's commander in the Sayeret Matkal, a covert commando force of Israeli military intelligence.  Other Israeli commandos (e.g. Daniel Lewin) are involved in 9/11.  Bin Laden denies responsibility for 9/11.

9/11 – Netanyahu praises 9/11 atrocity to NYT:  "It's very good… it will generate immediate sympathy." In 2008, he says in Israel: "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq."

9/11 – An Israeli controls 9-11 investigation. John Ashcroft puts Israeli dual-national Michael Chertoff in charge of 9/11 investigation.  "For day-to-day decisions, Chertoff has the last word." Destruction of crucial evidence begins immediately.

9/11 – Two Zionist-owned junkyards manage hasty destruction and exportation of evidence using large ships bound for Asia able to load at Hugo Neu because the Claremont Channel has been dredged since 1999.

Post 9/11 – Zionist with conflict of interest presides over 9/11 lawsuit:  Judge Alvin Hellerstein manages 9-11 tort litigation, while his son is lawyer in Israel with firm that represents ICTS, key defendant in 9/11 litigation. Hellerstein dismisses ICTS and every 9/11 case is settled out of court.

Post 9/11 – Zionists manage compensation funds:  Kenneth Feinberg and Sheila Birnbaum oversee compensation settlements for 9/11 families. Not a single case goes to trial. No 9/11 discovery occurs in court.

2003 MAR – Zionists control 9/11 myth:  Appointed director of 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow frames the agenda and decides what evidence the commission sees. A specialist in "public myths," Zelikow comes to commission with complete outline of report – before staff even begins working.

Until 2011 – Israelis construct 9/11 memorial and legacy:  WTC memorial is designed by Israeli Michael Arad, son of Moshe Arad, former Israeli ambassador to the United States.

Until today – Controlled media ignores crucial 9/11 questions and evidence. Media pushes false narrative about 9/11 and the War on Terror while ignoring evidence that disproves the official myth.

Very respectfully,

Christopher Bollyn