Tuesday, September 26, 2017

933 Update on Karl

*Update on Karl Marx: Jewish Bankers*

Newsletter published on 23 September 2017

*(1) Pdf of the 1856 NY Tribune issue of January 4, featuring "The
Russian Loan"*

*(2) Feedback from Stephen Goodson, who wrote a history of Central Banking*

*(3) Mazin Qumsiyeh expresses doubt*

*(4) A World without Jews? Just a translation with a melodramatic title*

*(5) Jesuits or Jews?*

*(6) Left-wing Billionaires, a consequence of the Rise of the Jewish
Financial Aristocracy *

*(7) Calling the 1% in America the Ruling Class*

*(1) Pdf of the 1856 NY Tribune issue of January 4, featuring "The
Russian Loan"
*

Here is a pdf of the 1856 NY Tribune issue of January 4, featuring "The
Russian Loan" (it's on p.4):

http://mailstar.net/NY-Daily-Tribune-18560104.pdf

*(2) Feedback from Stephen Goodson, who wrote a history of Central Banking*

From: "Stephen Goodson" <abolishusury@sonicmail.co.za>

Subject: Karl Marx: Jewish Bankers decide the destiny of Europe

Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 17:05:04 +0200

Congratulations!Excellent research.

*(3) Mazin Qumsiyeh expresses doubt*

From: Mazin Qumsiyeh <mazin@qumsiyeh.org>

Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 11:42:05 +0300

Subject: Re: Karl Marx: Jewish Bankers decide the destiny of Europe

Do yu have a PDF of the original texts where these things appear. I am
skeptical of their authenticity

Mazin,

Those who doubt that Marx really did write "The Jewish Bankers of
Europe" and "The "The Russian Loan" don't seem to offer the name of an
alternative author.

Who else had the expertise on Capitalism, a knowledge of Jewish
practice, and that style of writing?

Here is a pdf of the 1856 NY Tribune issue including "The Russian Loan":

http://mailstar.net/NY-Daily-Tribune-18560104.pdf

Peter

*(4) A World without Jews? Just a translation with a melodramatic title*

From: "Marek Glogoczowski" <mglogo@poczta.fm>

Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 18:28:00 +0200

Karl Marx wrote alsoa book "The World without Jews". I've read several
times about this "phantom book", and I remember the opinion of Polish
sociologist and psychologist Józef Kozielecki (he died on March 24,
2017) who during the scholarship somewhere in Netherlands, was given
this book (in German) to read, roughly 30 years ago, when Poland was
still socialist. And on the first page of journal "Polityka" (about 100
000 exemplaries weekly at that time) Kozielecki published a report from
his stay in Netherlands, mentionning that "I never red a more
antisemitic book, than this "Das Welt ohne Juden". I tried to find this
title via Google, but with no sucess,

Marek,

"A World without Jews" was just a translation of On The Jewish Question,
by Dagobert Runes.

Marx wrote On The Jewish Question in German, in 1843. The title: An Der
Juden Frage. At that time, he was not writing in English. Later on, he did.

Dagobert Runes' title is melodramatic. It might sound genocidal, but
Marx was saying that Jews should stop being Jewish, i.e. change their
cultural practices - which he saw as arising from their religion.

*(5) Jesuits or Jews?*

From: James Neary <maelkorka@eircom.net>

Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 10:23:26 +0100

Peter,

Do the Jews (Zionist Jews) control the Jesuits or the other way around?

I am reading F. Tupper Saussy's "Masters of Evil" and he puts forward a
compelling thesis that the Jesuits are the real masters. Picking up
where the Knights left off. Going back to the Byzantine empire.

I know that it was a jew that taught at Inglestat who became a Jesuit 
priest!

The Rothschilds were the bankers of the Vatican! So, they had to money!

"Follow the Money"

What is your thoughts?

Trying to keep an open mind till something breaks conclusively one way
or other!

Jim Neary ==

Jim,

Can you name any major US newspaper run by the Jesuits or the Vatican?
Any major TV channel?

This Vatican / Jesuit stuff is just a screen, to hide Jewish power.

Peter

*(6) Left-wing Billionaires, a consequence of the Rise of the Jewish
Financial Aristocracy
*

- by Peter Myers, September 24, 2017

As the Ruling Class (the 1%) has become increasingly Jewish, it has
adopted Jewish ideologies and tastes, and even Yiddish words.

Jews have championed 'Minority' causes - but mainly in the Diaspora,
where they are a minority, not in Israel / Palestine with regard to the
native Palestinians, Bedouin etc.

Our Ruling Class now promote Gender Feminism, Same-Sex Marriage, and
Trans-Sexualism. The old landed aristocracy would never have done so,
but the increasingly dominant Jewish Financial Aristocracy promotes such
'Left' causes.

It's widely called 'Cultural Marxism'; but Karl Marx himself would not
have recognized this as either 'Marxist' or 'Left'. It's his Trotskyist,
largely Jewish, disciples who have foisted these changes on us.

These stances are called 'Left', but this is a Fake Left. The True Left
would abolish Tax Havens, abandon Free Trade Agreements, jail the
Bankers, and tax the 1% so heavily that the National Debt would disappear.

So the Financial Aristocracy promotes the Fake Left; anything but the
real Left.

*(7) Calling the 1% in America the Ruling Class*

    Bill Madden<BMadden@tampabay.rr.com> 24 September 2017 at 00:50

Re:  Your calling the 1% in America the Ruling Class

Most of us don’t know who runs America but we all have our theories.

I had always been confused about the power structure in the USA and the
world until I read: “The Rich and the Super-Rich” by Ferdinand
Lundberg.  His claim is that our country is governed by our richest
families who own most of Corporate America and many other large
companies throughout the world.  These wealthy families hold their stock
and other wealth in *tax-free foundations and secret offshore
accounts*.  They are, for the most part, not visible on any radar.  The
notable exception would be the late David Rockefeller who helped found
the CFR, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderbergers, groups of
important/successful establishment minions used to brainwash and control
us.  These super-rich families are the establishment or the ruling class.

While I’m sure that members of *our wealthiest families* file income tax
returns, because their wealth is mostly insulated from the IRS, I’m also
sure that the *tax returns show only modest income *at best.  The *1%,
on the other hand, are known because they file income tax returns
showing enormous earnings which place them in the top 1%.*  The top 1%
of earners, in my humble opinion, pay very little in taxes relative to
their gigantic earnings but they do, nonetheless, pay quite a bit
relative to the Rockefellers, Fords, du Ponts, Mellons and other old
money families.

Unlike several members of my copy list, I am happy to admit that I could
be wrong.  I would be interested in your thoughts as to who really runs
America.

Bill,

The 1% include the Rockefellers, Fords, du Ponts and the linke. It's not
based on Tax Returns, because we know they are fraudulent.

It's based on real wealth. And very wealthy people want privacy; they
use their money to suppress media scrutiny by, for example, withdrawing
advertising from media that give them unfavorable publicity.

The media has a field day with the Catholic Church, but the holders of
wealth and power are largely exempt from such examination.

Companies keep two sets of books - one for their shareholders, and one
for tax authorities. The shareholders' one declares their true profits,
while the tax one cries poor. But the public has had enough of such
deceptions.

Peter

No comments:

Post a Comment