*Update on Karl Marx: Jewish Bankers*
Newsletter published on 23 September 2017
*(1) Pdf of the 1856 NY Tribune
issue of January 4, featuring "The
Russian Loan"*
*(2) Feedback from
Stephen Goodson, who wrote a history of Central Banking*
*(3) Mazin
Qumsiyeh expresses doubt*
*(4) A World without Jews? Just a translation
with a melodramatic title*
*(5) Jesuits or Jews?*
*(6) Left-wing
Billionaires, a consequence of the Rise of the Jewish
Financial Aristocracy
*
*(7) Calling the 1% in America the Ruling Class*
*(1) Pdf of the
1856 NY Tribune issue of January 4, featuring "The
Russian
Loan"*
Here is a pdf of the 1856 NY Tribune issue of January 4, featuring
"The
Russian Loan" (it's on p.4):
http://mailstar.net/NY-Daily-Tribune-18560104.pdf
*(2)
Feedback from Stephen Goodson, who wrote a history of Central
Banking*
From: "Stephen Goodson" <abolishusury@sonicmail.co.za>
Subject:
Karl Marx: Jewish Bankers decide the destiny of Europe
Date: Sat, 23 Sep
2017 17:05:04 +0200
Congratulations!Excellent research.
*(3) Mazin
Qumsiyeh expresses doubt*
From: Mazin Qumsiyeh <mazin@qumsiyeh.org>
Date: Sat, 23
Sep 2017 11:42:05 +0300
Subject: Re: Karl Marx: Jewish Bankers decide the
destiny of Europe
Do yu have a PDF of the original texts where these
things appear. I am
skeptical of their
authenticity
Mazin,
Those who doubt that Marx really did write
"The Jewish Bankers of
Europe" and "The "The Russian Loan" don't seem to
offer the name of an
alternative author.
Who else had the expertise
on Capitalism, a knowledge of Jewish
practice, and that style of
writing?
Here is a pdf of the 1856 NY Tribune issue including "The
Russian Loan":
http://mailstar.net/NY-Daily-Tribune-18560104.pdf
Peter
*(4)
A World without Jews? Just a translation with a melodramatic title*
From:
"Marek Glogoczowski" <mglogo@poczta.fm>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep
2017 18:28:00 +0200
Karl Marx wrote alsoa book "The World without Jews".
I've read several
times about this "phantom book", and I remember the
opinion of Polish
sociologist and psychologist Józef Kozielecki (he died on
March 24,
2017) who during the scholarship somewhere in Netherlands, was
given
this book (in German) to read, roughly 30 years ago, when Poland was
still socialist. And on the first page of journal "Polityka" (about 100
000 exemplaries weekly at that time) Kozielecki published a report from
his stay in Netherlands, mentionning that "I never red a more
antisemitic book, than this "Das Welt ohne Juden". I tried to find this
title via Google, but with no sucess,
Marek,
"A World without
Jews" was just a translation of On The Jewish Question,
by Dagobert
Runes.
Marx wrote On The Jewish Question in German, in 1843. The title:
An Der
Juden Frage. At that time, he was not writing in English. Later on,
he did.
Dagobert Runes' title is melodramatic. It might sound genocidal,
but
Marx was saying that Jews should stop being Jewish, i.e. change their
cultural practices - which he saw as arising from their
religion.
*(5) Jesuits or Jews?*
From: James Neary <maelkorka@eircom.net>
Date:
Sat, 23 Sep 2017 10:23:26 +0100
Peter,
Do the Jews (Zionist Jews)
control the Jesuits or the other way around?
I am reading F. Tupper
Saussy's "Masters of Evil" and he puts forward a
compelling thesis that the
Jesuits are the real masters. Picking up
where the Knights left off. Going
back to the Byzantine empire.
I know that it was a jew that taught at
Inglestat who became a Jesuit
priest!
The Rothschilds were the
bankers of the Vatican! So, they had to money!
"Follow the
Money"
What is your thoughts?
Trying to keep an open mind till
something breaks conclusively one way
or other!
Jim Neary
==
Jim,
Can you name any major US newspaper run by the Jesuits or
the Vatican?
Any major TV channel?
This Vatican / Jesuit stuff is
just a screen, to hide Jewish power.
Peter
*(6) Left-wing
Billionaires, a consequence of the Rise of the Jewish
Financial Aristocracy
*
- by Peter Myers, September 24, 2017
As the Ruling Class (the
1%) has become increasingly Jewish, it has
adopted Jewish ideologies and
tastes, and even Yiddish words.
Jews have championed 'Minority' causes -
but mainly in the Diaspora,
where they are a minority, not in Israel /
Palestine with regard to the
native Palestinians, Bedouin etc.
Our
Ruling Class now promote Gender Feminism, Same-Sex Marriage, and
Trans-Sexualism. The old landed aristocracy would never have done so,
but the increasingly dominant Jewish Financial Aristocracy promotes such
'Left' causes.
It's widely called 'Cultural Marxism'; but Karl Marx
himself would not
have recognized this as either 'Marxist' or 'Left'. It's
his Trotskyist,
largely Jewish, disciples who have foisted these changes on
us.
These stances are called 'Left', but this is a Fake Left. The True
Left
would abolish Tax Havens, abandon Free Trade Agreements, jail the
Bankers, and tax the 1% so heavily that the National Debt would
disappear.
So the Financial Aristocracy promotes the Fake Left; anything
but the
real Left.
*(7) Calling the 1% in America the Ruling
Class*
Bill Madden<BMadden@tampabay.rr.com> 24
September 2017 at 00:50
Re: Your calling the 1% in America the Ruling
Class
Most of us don’t know who runs America but we all have our
theories.
I had always been confused about the power structure in the USA
and the
world until I read: “The Rich and the Super-Rich” by Ferdinand
Lundberg. His claim is that our country is governed by our richest
families who own most of Corporate America and many other large
companies throughout the world. These wealthy families hold their stock
and other wealth in *tax-free foundations and secret offshore
accounts*. They are, for the most part, not visible on any radar. The
notable exception would be the late David Rockefeller who helped found
the CFR, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderbergers, groups of
important/successful establishment minions used to brainwash and control
us. These super-rich families are the establishment or the ruling
class.
While I’m sure that members of *our wealthiest families* file
income tax
returns, because their wealth is mostly insulated from the IRS,
I’m also
sure that the *tax returns show only modest income *at best. The
*1%,
on the other hand, are known because they file income tax returns
showing enormous earnings which place them in the top 1%.* The top 1%
of earners, in my humble opinion, pay very little in taxes relative to
their gigantic earnings but they do, nonetheless, pay quite a bit
relative to the Rockefellers, Fords, du Ponts, Mellons and other old
money families.
Unlike several members of my copy list, I am happy to
admit that I could
be wrong. I would be interested in your thoughts as to
who really runs
America.
Bill,
The 1% include the
Rockefellers, Fords, du Ponts and the linke. It's not
based on Tax Returns,
because we know they are fraudulent.
It's based on real wealth. And very
wealthy people want privacy; they
use their money to suppress media scrutiny
by, for example, withdrawing
advertising from media that give them
unfavorable publicity.
The media has a field day with the Catholic
Church, but the holders of
wealth and power are largely exempt from such
examination.
Companies keep two sets of books - one for their
shareholders, and one
for tax authorities. The shareholders' one declares
their true profits,
while the tax one cries poor. But the public has had
enough of such
deceptions.
Peter
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.