Wednesday, December 5, 2018

958 Strategies for Researchers

Strategies for Researchers

by Peter Myers, September 21, 2018


1. Identify who your best allies are, and support them when others attack them.

There's a lot of rubbish on the internet, not only in Establishment media but also in Alternative media. Just don't mix with those who serve up rubbish.

In connection with 9/11, look up "Cognitive Infiltration". A government agent actually admitted that government agents infiltrate dissident groups, and sow discord and division among them.

But the leaders of the 9/11 Truth movement have been strong enough to resist such infiltration.

You don't have to agree with your allies on all matters. It's fine to "agree to differ" on certain matters. Don't fall out with them over minor matters. You need to stick together.

2. Pay attention to small details.

Suppose that your write a brilliant article which exposes wrong-doing in high places.

The critics will start out by ignoring you, depriving you of publicity. But if that doesn't work, they'll look for minor errors in your work (let's assume there are no major errors).

When they find such minor errors, they will highlight them, pointing to your unreliability. It's plain character assassination, ad hominem attacks which violate the laws of logic - but they only care about the laws of rhetoric.

To head off such attacks, get your fine details right. Don't indulge in Overstatement. Document every claim you make. Pay attention to footnotes.

3. Don't give your opponents easy points.

Suppose you present a paper about 9/11 as an inside job (CIA) or Mossad job. Your destroy the establishment argument. But you come out as a Denier of the Moon Landings by the Apollo spacecraft.

This is exactly what Eric Hufschmid did. He wrote a brilliant book exposing 9/11, and produced a brilliant DVD on it, but stated on his website that the Moon Landings were a hoax. He thought that they were a Hollywood / CIA production.

That was the end of his credibilty; dissidents stopped using his material. For the record, when I lived in Canberra (Australia), I had occasional contact (through Ron Welch, an amateur astronomer) with Dick Barwick, a professional astronomer who was at Tidbinbilla Space Centre during the Apollo missions. I cited the case Eric Hufschmid presented. But Dick related his experience, of the spacecraft dissapearing behind the moon, then re-appearing.

Tidbinbilla Tracking Station, being on the other side of the earth from US stations, picked up some of the most important signals during the Apollo missions. Tidbinbilla was used for tracking the Apollo Lunar Module: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canberra_Deep_Space_Communication_Complex

There's no way anyone can persuade Eric he's wrong. Just don't make the same mistake.

A decade ago, some 9/11 Truthers were coming out as Holocaust Deniers. I argued that they were thereby ruining their own case.

They wanted to keep the focus on the crooks and deceivers who pulled off 9/11. But by taking Hitler's baggage on board, they were enabling critics to focus on their Holocaust Denial instead.

I have some webpages on the Protocols of Zion (Protocols Toolkit, and Protocols Debate). But I am careful there not to argue that it IS genuine, merely that it COULD be genuine, i.e. that the disproofs do not really prove that it was a forgery.

If I maintained that is definitely authentic, this gives critics easy points. There is a case, I admit, that it's a forgery. They would rubbish me.

One can't prove anything using the Protocols, because it's an uncertain source. One must establish positions using other sources, but then the Protocols can be considered, to see if it has any bearing.

It's just one document, but has come to symbolise much more: a Jewish Conspiracy. Such a conspiracy would not be by all Jews - some are National Jews; and the others are divided into Left (Soros) and Right (Netanyahu) factions. In refuting the Protocols, Lobbyists would like to think that they are refuting the broader Jewish Conspiracy; but of course they are not, and the more they insist, the more the Conspiracy bulks through the fog.

My website has been going for nearly 20 years. During that time, I have had a lot of feedback from opponents. I have found that the Lobby is more agitated about the Protocols than about any other topic, even Hitler. Of course, they try to equate the Protocols with Hitler, as if Solzhenitsyn = Hitler = Stalin.

Pharaoh = Hitler = Stalin = Protocols - that's the simplistic logic of the most brilliant minds.

Even Jimmy Carter's book on Israeli Apartheid, and Bob Carr's book on Jewish Donors trying to buy Australia's Foreign Policy, have been likened to the Protocols.

My strategy puts the onus of proof back on the critics: I present evidence that the standard 'proofs' do not take into account. I disprove the 'proofs'.

Critics usually start out with a statement that the Protocols has already been proven a Forgery; but they don't bother to cite names or books; they merely assert that the case is closed.

Who are these experts, I ask? Do they have names? I then proceed to show that the case is still open.

I want to write a book, one that does not deal with the Protocols. However I realised that critics, who want to discredit me and the book, will discover my website and say, "Hey, this guy says the Protocols might be genuine." By this means, without even reading my book, they will seek to rubbish me.

To deal with that, I updated my webpages on the Protocols. I incorporated the best material from the Forgery side, but went one better, to make the critics unsure of their case. To get that result, I had to make these webpages so strong, so hard to refute, that the critics will ignore them. The last thing they want is people starting to wonder if there really is a Jewish Conspiracy after all.

Gough Whitlam, the left-wing Prime Minister of Australia in the years 1972-5, wrote in his memoirs that the Lobby tried to blackmail him during the 1973 war:

"The Israeli ambassador, whom I knew well, made an urgent request to see me alone ... On this occasion Australia had to practise its professions of even-handedness. Australia's Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Sir Laurence McIntyre, was President of the Security Council when the war broke out. Despite some political pressure and even blackmail brought to bear on me the Government gave him every support." (The Whitlam Government: 1972-1975, Pengion, 1985, p. 125)

More recently, Bob Carr, Foreign Minister of Australia, disclosed that Jewish Donors to the Labor Government of Julia Gillard tried to have Australia's Mideast Foreign Policy subcontracted to them, in return for their donations. In response, Rabbi Shmuley Boteach likened his book Diary of a Foreign Minister to the Protocols.

I cover this and similar cases in my webpage Protocols Debate: http://mailstar.net/protocols-debate.html

UK union leader Mark Serwotka recently suggested that the 'antisemitism' campaign against Jeremy Corbyn (and by implication Ken Livingstone) had been orchestrated by Israel: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-45517094

'Now, I'm Not A Conspiracy Theorist,' He Says, 'But...' - says the Times of Israel  subheading in its article 'UK union boss suggests Israel is behind Labour anti-Semitism row' (14 September 2018):

I recently received an email from 'rebecca' on the Protocols:

QUOTE
rebecca <email withheld>         

I have read the Protocols of Zion three times and it has changed my life now that Im aware of who causes destruction in this world but I was wandering who you think the King of the Jews is and when he will come. I have read the rothschild Dynasty and it states by 2025 the world will be in complete darkness so now I assume the ‘ King ‘ of the jews will come then,

Hope to here back
ENDQUOTE

I judged this email to be phony, a set-up.

She (if it is really a woman; Mossad have no qualms about adopting a female persona) must belong to the younger generation, who use spell-checkers & grammar checkers, but have no idea of English spelling.

My reply was:

QUOTE
Don't read the Protocols any more. No one can be sure whether it's genuine or not.

Instead, read my Toolkit: http://mailstar.net/toolkit.html
ENDQUOTE

I have been in this game for so long, that I can smell a rat. I never heard back.

The public perception of whether there is a Jewish Conspiracy lies entirely in Jewish hands: if Jewish lobbies continue their efforts to control the Mideast Foreign Policy of Western countries, by Donations, Bullying or Blackmail, the public will eventually wake up.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.