Feedback on MH370:
Stop Looking in the Wrong Place
Newsletter published on February 3, 2019
(1) From: "Henry
Balfour"
(2) From: Manfred
Stricker
(3) From Ron
(4) From: Martin
Fonda
(1) From: "Henry
Balfour" <henry@404.co.nz>
Peter -
"a stolen US drone command and control system"
Please, please (please) don't include this kind of idiocy in
the MH370 files .... this one came up in
the early period, and was simply utter rubbish
- it was stupid then and it's
uber-stupid now considering what we know.
Why even think this is useful in the debate ? Why ?
This is like morons rattling on about holograms of planes .. it delivers
NOTHING and dilutes the arguments. It's
hard enough as it is to provide (gullible) people with information of Government
deceptions - this drone command bull was never, ever, a
runner.
FFS
The semiconductor patents I will retain, the missing info on
the cargo I will allow, the sacrifice the airline made on selling passenger
seats in order to stretch the cargo weight allowance I can accept ... just don't drag horrible bullshit in like
this "drone gear stolen from Afghanistan"
Really.... REALLY.
Diego Garcia is the best bet IMO. I note you never mention the Aussie Jindalee
over-the-horizon radar, or the equivalent that the Yaks have on DG .... these powerful long-range radars are a part
of an early warning layer that is NEVER TURNED OFF ... but when I ask the Aussie Defence people for
clarity they told me it was "not switched on at that time" I will let you judge the reason that I don't
believe them
The Jindalee system would have 'seen' MH370 entering its scan
zone.... focus on this kind of topic and
leave the Drone Machine as a nutters delight.
You are better than that.
Henry Balfour
Comment (Peter M.):
Harry,
I appreciate your comments, have added the bit about Jindalee
to the MH370 webpage, and have removed the sentence about the drone.
Now that you mention that story about a drone having been
stolen from Afghanistan, taken to Malaysia, then put on board MH370, I recall it
from about 2014, and that it went nowhere.
It's not up to us to identify exactly what the hi-tech cargo
was. Anyway, why take the long way, when you could go direct from Afghanistan to
China by the overland route?
But the point I was making remains; so I have reworded the
text as follows:
"The T34 tank was smuggled from the United States to the
Soviet Union, dissembled into numerous parts, labelled as a tractor. Might this
sort of thing have happened in the cargo of MH370? If MH370 was carrying cargo
with military use or dual-purpose use (civilian & military), even if
labelled differently, was it then a modern-day Lusitania?
"In this scenario, Malaysian authorities would be partly
liable, for lax supervision, and would not be rushing to release the Cargo
Manifest; if they had nothing to fear, they would do so. Chinese authorities
would be culpable, if they had stolen the technology, repackaged it and labelled
it incorrectly.
"Culpability would extend to the US Government (Deep State),
which hijacked the plane; then to other Governments eg the Australian
Government, for their complicity in the cover-up. This would help to explain why
Governments are hindering the investigation, keeping it looking in the wrong
place, i.e. anywhere but the Maldives and Diego Garcia.
"One of the greatest crimes of the century is left to amateur
investigators, and to scientists who are not part of the official investigation,
to solve. Despite the best efforts of some journalists and editors in the media,
the intelligence agencies are likely to have a spook in every newsroom, to stop
them from disclosing the government role in the hijacking."
Check it at http://mailstar.net/MH370.html
Peter
(2) From: Manfred
Stricker <orwell@wanadoo.fr>
You have said nothing
of a Rothschild having been a partner in this affair. A party great
specialists in stealing US knowledge alone can
read with books of Victor Ostrovsky. But perhaps the « system » has in fact been
sold to the Chinese, and the CIA has left the impression
that it has prevented
it.
With my congratulation for your good investigation.
ms
Comment (Peter M):
Manfred,
You could be right.
Blaine Gibson told me today that there are people who don't
want any more debris discovered, and in particular, they don't want personal
effects discovered. Such discoveries could lead to calls for a new underwater
search in the Acoustic Source zone between Diego Garcia and Madagascar, which
matches the area where debris has been found.
He says he knows who these people are, but would not tell me
over the internet. However, he said, "its not the americans who are after
me".
Who, then, it could be, I don't know. I would have thought
'CIA', and still do; but perhaps you are right.
Peter
(3) From Ron
Could the answers of why “the powers that be” can’t have the
bulk of the wreckage discovered obvious ? Maybe we wouldn’t find any bodies
on board , Which would be quite curious and dispell any legitimate crash
scenarios.
This would beg the
question where are the remains .,? Was MH 370 landed on Diego Garcia and
parked in a fairway cage? Passengers removed ala 9/11 and Wright- Patterson
airbase . The plane remained was intact
. Did they disassemble the actual plane and produce “proof” . Deception is a
CIA / Mossad trademark . Look to the WSJ article published with key information
a couple days after the incident . If you take the mileage and time and speed
and of the confirmed flights path you end up in Diego Garcia . Simply google it
and you can determine where and when it would arrive . The truth is in plain
sight . 2 more keys . First Lady Michelle Obama traveled to China privately
a week after the incident and personally delivered a letter to their leader
. Confirmed multiple news reports . During the first major news conference , the
first question asked was about Diego Garcia . There was a pre- scripted categorical denial of any
involvement by Diego Garcia .
Asked and answered nothing to see here . , the topic was never even brought up by
any news outlets ever again , to this day.
We haven’t even
gotten to China , Freescale semiconductor , cloaking devices ,electronic warfare
, micro processors , central banks Singapore , Malaysia and the Rothschild
Connections , patents , stock manipulation, , Mossad , CIA , MI6..
Any thoughts ?
Regards, Ron
Comment (Peter M):
Ron sent me some press clippings about Michelle Obama's trip
to Chengu about 2 weeks after MH370 was hijacked. But that trip was probably
planned well in advance. The letter could have dealt with any topic. So I don't
see any new info emerging here re MH370.
(4) From: Martin
Fonda
From: Martin Fonda <mfonda78@gmail.com>
Hello Peter: There is a mass of information here: http://avherald.com/h?article=4710c69b/0283&opt=0
The comments on this site have been reduced since the
incidemt.. There were comments in the early early days by 777 pilots that Boeing
had introduced an Uninterruptible AutoPilot on some of its 777
aircraft. Contacting the owner of this site may get you some more information,
not posted.
Best wishes, Martin
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.