Updated article Kevin Barrett's webinar on the Coronavirus - actually
gave balanced coverage
Newsletter published on June 3, 2020
(1) Updated article Kevin Barrett's webinar on the Coronavirus -
actually gave balanced coverage
(2) My last newsletter was blocked by some servers
(1) Updated article Kevin Barrett's webinar on the Coronavirus -
actually gave balanced coverage
This article is now at http://mailstar.net/Barrett-webinar-Covid.html .
Kevin Barrett's webinar on the Coronavirus - actually gave balanced coverage
by Peter Myers, June 3, 2020
I took part in Kevin Barrett's webinar on Sunday (Monday in Oz). Despite
the hype with which it was promoted, it actually gave balanced coverage
of the topic.
I helped balance the Gordon Duff line that Covid was a false flag attack
by the USA. Of course, that view was presented, but counter-evidence was
put, including by me.
The Contra-evidence I put, listed sequentially by date, is:
- Sept 18: The City of Wuhan conducted a drill, one month before the
start of Wuhan Military Games, simulating a Coronavirus infection (also
nuclear material)
- Oct 3: Chinese virologists arrested at Winnipeg biolab in Canada,
implicated in smuggling biological material to Wuhan
- Oct 21: China Congress report warned of risk of leaks from biolabs
- Jan 2: Director of Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) issued a notice
forbidding anyone to release info on the coronavirus
- Jan 28: Charles Lieber & 2 Chinese students arrested, students trying
to smuggle biological material to China
- Feb 6: article by Chinese scientists from Wuhan & Guangzhou said Covid
likely to have leaked from WIV (12km from market) or Wuhan CDC (280m
from market). Uploaded to Researchgate, later removed.
- Feb 13: Order from Beijiing said "put an end to the theft, leakage and
loss of pathogenic bacteria.
In the end, participants did not put any definitive view, but covered
the spectrum of dissident opinion (which is more informed than
mainstream opinion, because the MSM censors stories it does not like).
It was actually a valuable snapshot of current dissident opinion at present.
The webinar ran for nearly 4 hours; I have suggested that they produce a
DVD of it. It can be watched online at Barrett's No More Lies site.
The time was 4am here in Oz. I made a mistake & got up at 3am on Sunday
here, only to find that it was the next day. That gave me 24 hours to
prepare. I hooked up an extra QHD monitor for the webinar so that I had
facts on hand.
Many readers of this newsletter are inclined to the view that the
Coronavirus was made in the USA. Some think that Event 201 "went live",
as the drill on 9/11 did.
Event 201 was a Globalist exercise simulating a coronavirus pandemic,
conducted in Baltimore on October 18; Michel Chossudovsky noted that
it was held "on the same day" as the opening of the World Military Games
in Wuhan.
Further, Chossudovsky wrote on March 8, "The coronavirus was named
2019-nCoV by the WHO exactly the same name as that adopted in the
WEF-Gates-John Hopkins October 18, 2019 simulation exercise."
So, in effect, Chossudovsky was saying that Event 201 went live. The
term "went live" is current in conspiracy circles who are aware that a
drill was conducted in the US on the same day as the 911 attack, and
that the same happened in London on the day of the "7/7" bombings.
However, Chossudovsky branded Covid-19 a "fake" pandemic concocted for
the benefit of Big Pharma. Three months later, few people now call it
"fake"; but it's still considered a rigged pandemic in some circles.
Rigged, that is, to achieve a predetermined result.
WHO, Bill Gates, John Hopkins and the World Economic Forum are
Globalists. But given that Covid-19 is real not fake, to suggest that
Globalists unleashed it seems far-fetched. Why would Globalists unleash
Covid, considering that it is ruining their Globalization project?
Barrett says, to bring down China, the main beneficiary of
Globalization. But the Globalists have been suppressing evidence that
Covid leaked from a Chinese lab; they show no sign of wanting to bring
China down. Rather, they want to retain China in their NWO but without
Xi Jinping; they would like him replaced by a more amenable leader.
A couple of weeks ago, Barrett suggested that it have been released by
Neocons. They were the faction which pulled off 911 (in conjunction with
Mossad, & possibly rogue elements in the CIA). And their PNAC paper
advocated for bioweapons, although, being Israel-oriented, they probably
had Arabs in mind. Here is Barrett:
COVID a US Bioweapon? Kevin Barrett on Kalima Horra with George Galloway
By Kevin Barrett
May 21, 2020
QUOTE
Former British parliamentarian George Galloway hosts Kevin Barrett for
an uncensored discussion of the possibility that elements of the US Deep
State created and deployed COVID-19 as a biological weapon. The motives:
Stop China’s rapid economic growth even if it requires crippling the
globalized economy; accelerate the transition to authoritarianism and
hypersurveillance in the West; and target Iran’s leadership in the
bargain. Full show: https://youtu.be/2qGJNdlGadI
ENDQUOTE
Notice his term "elements of the US Deep State". The word "elements"
implies factions; and the faction that Barrett blamed then was the
Neocons. During the webinar I brought these factions up.
I noted that the Globalist faction (Soros) would not have unleashed
Covid, because it is bringing Globalization down.
Might it have been released by Neocons? Earlier Neocons had pulled off
911. Neocons are oriented to Israel, and Netanyahu in particular, yet
Israel has been cosying up to China - Israel is the western terminus of
China's new Silk Road. This cosying up to China does not fit well with
the Neocon hypothesis.
Might the CIA have unleashed it? But the Director of National
Intelligence issued a statement denying that Covid-19 had been created
in a lab. Why would they do that, if they were trying to bring China
down? Instead, the statement implies that the CIA is in the Globalist
camp, which is consistent with the Deep State's Russiagate campaign
against Trump.
Which leaves Trump's camp. Might THEY have unleashed Covid-19? But in
that case, one would think that they would have been better prepared, &
would have handled it much better, instead of vacillating for weeks and
initially denying the seriousness of the pandemic in the USA.
In short, none of the factions fit Barrett's hypothesis very well. That
may be why, during the webinar, he backtracked on the "elements" /
factions idea, and said instead that the elite / Deep State act as a
unified body.
As you know, I accept Francis Boyle's view that Covid was an experiment
in a Wuhan biolab (WIV or, more likely in my view, WHCDC) that was
accidentally leaked.
Wuhan researchers at WIV had earlier enhanced the virus during
collaborative experiments with Ralph Baric's team at the University of
North Carolina.
In a March 15, 2016 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the USA, titled "SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human
emergence", Baric et. al. thanked Shi Zhengli of WIV for supplying the
bat samples. The paper is at https://www.pnas.org/content/113/11/3048 .
It states,
"ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We thank Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of
Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike
protein."
This means that American experimenters were using bat genetic material
from WIV. Shi Zhengli had collaborated with them on many occasions.
In 2004, Chinese researchers filed a patent for the coronavirus S gene:
They filed another patent in 2005: "S protein of coronavirus SARS- CoV":
A US Patent for chimeric coronavirus spike proteins lists Ralph Baric as
Inventor:
Title: Methods and compositions for chimeric coronavirus spike proteins
United States Patent 9884895
Inventors: Baric, Ralph (Haw River, NC, US) Agnihothram, Sudhakar
(Ellicott City, MD, US) Yount, Boyd (Hillsborough, NC, US)
Publication Date: 02/06/2018
Assignee: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Chapel Hill,
NC, US)
Application US15/124,992
Filing date 2015-03-20
Whereas WIV is a BSL-4 lab, subject to stringent safety rules, although
these seem not to have been strictly observed, WHCDC is a BSL-2 lab
attracting much less attention. Yet it too was experimenting with large
numbers of bats. Might it not have got some of its samples from WIV -
given the warnings noted above about poor security there? WHCDC is only
280 metres from the wet Market.
The article by Chinese scientists, subsequently removed from
Researchgate, was titled "The possible origins of 2019-nCoV
coronavirus". It says,
"Within ~280 meters from the market, there was the Wuhan Center for
Disease Control & Prevention (WHCDC) (Figure 1, from Baidu and Google
maps). WHCDC hosted animals in laboratories for research purpose, one of
which was specialized in pathogens collection and identification 4-6. In
one of their studies, 155 bats including Rhinolophus affinis were
captured in Hubei province, and other 450 bats were captured in Zhejiang
province [...] WHCDC was also adjacent to the Union Hospital (Figure 1,
bottom) where the first group of doctors were infected during this
epidemic. It is plausible that the virus leaked around and some of them
contaminated the initial patients in this epidemic, though solid proofs
are needed in future study."
The article ends with this acknowledgment: "This work is supported by
the National Natural Science Foundation of China".
And it includes a map of Wuhan showing WIV, WHCDC, and the Huanan
Seafood Market:
The article was uploaded to Researchgate at
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339070128. It says it was
"uploaded by Botao Xiao on 06 February 2020", lead author Botao Xiao
being from the Research Laboratory of Synthetic Biology and Medicine,
School of Biology and Biological Engineering, at South China University
of Technology, Guangzhou. The other two authors were scientists from Wuhan.
Yet the article was removed from Researchgate , and is now only
available at
During the webinar, Thomas Willcuts noted that the (WIV and UNC)
experimenters engaged in Gain of Function research, enhancing the
ability of the virus to affect human cells, pretending to help nature
along just to see if it could be done, with the goal of developing
counter-measures BEFORE it naturally evolved in the same direction. In
fact, the virus now wrecking the world economy was bred by those teams
of scientists from WIV and UNC; but probably further enhanced in Wuhan.
Willcuts said that, when such Gain of Function research was banned in
the USA, Fauci invested in continuing the banned research at WIV. Wow,
that timing, if verified, would be a bombshell! But Willcuts is an
attorney; so presumably he has checked his facts.
One of the participants in the webinar said that all these Biolabs are
operating like a cartel (but that word is mine), denying lab-origin,
because if the world accepts lab-origin, there will be a campaign to
shut down all those Biolabs. Their excuse is that their work is
defensive, but actually they are creating the very problems they purport
to solve.
We are all aware that the Globalists are pushing Mass Vaccination,
surveillance and possibly chipping. I am a sort of "prepper", living on
a small farm (7/8 acre, 3500 m2) and growing fruit, nuts & vegies;
although the drought has made that difficult. Australia shut its borders
early, and the public went along with lockdowns & social distancing.
Now, many areas are opening again.
This newsletter is devoted to the Vaccination issue. If you watch
Vaxxed, you will see that some of the main contributors say they are not
against Vaccination per se, but are against the changes from the mid
1980s, when more and more vaccines, and combinations of vaccines (eg
MMR), were made mandatory, and at younger ages.
The Vaccination industry cites Measles as a deadly disease, a major
reason for vaccination.
Yet when I was growing up in the 1950s & 60s, all the kids got measles,
mumps, and chickenpox. They were no big deal. Kids only got mild
symptoms of any of them; we just took a week or two off school. Getting
measles as a child gave us lifelong immunity. Of course, the Vaxxers
will cite some rare exception as if it were the norm.
For adults who never got measles in their childhood, measles can be a
serious disease. However, if everyone gets it in childhood, there are no
adults going to suffer from it.
Similarly with Covid-19. Kids generally only get mild sytmptoms, so gain
immunity cheaply. However, in the process, adults will be exposed, and
they are much more vulnerable. Herd Immunity is not a viable option
because, as Ron Unz said during the webinar, 2 million or so Americans
would have to die, for herd immunity to be achieved.
(2) My last newsletter was blocked by some servers
The headline was 'Covid-19 and the Vaccination Agenda".
Some servers deemed it Spam, and deleted it. The recipients would have
been unaware of this.
Five servers sent a bounce message to me. The servers that did so were:
vikenfiber.no 550 5.7.1 Rejected. This message has been marked as spam.
planet.nl 550 5.0.0 Mail rejected.
fuse.net 554 5.7.1 [P4] Message blocked due to spam content in the message.
yandex.com 554 5.7.1 [1] Message rejected under suspicion of SPAM
embarqmail.com 554 5.7.1 [P4] Message blocked due to spam content in
the message.
It's possible that other servers blocked it too, without sending a
bounce message.
Where servers did not block the message, it's possible that you still
did not receive it because your webmail or email client has a filter in
place, possibly unknown to you.
The filter might say it is excluding Unsafe material, or Offensive
material, or Porn.
Check whether you have any filters in place. If you do, they may be
filtering out politically incorrect content, in the guise of excluding
porn etc.
If you can't stop your server from blocking politically incorrect
content, use another server for such emails.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.