790 Your comments on Islam woefully ignorant. Wahab was a crypto Jew. New Age Islam

Your comments on Islam woefully ignorant. Wahab was a crypto Jew. New
Age Islam

Newsletter published on 28 December 2015

(1) Your comments on Islam woefully ignorant. Wahab was a crypto Jew
(2) I live in India; I am a descendant of the Prophet
(3) We're not all Wahhabis - New Age Islam
(4) Christmas in Saudi Arabia - published in New Age Islam
(5) Ayodhya should be turned into a multi-faith centre: the Rama Temple
(Hindu), the Mosque of Babur, and a Buddhist shrine
(6) Age of Peace - Somali K Chakrabarti, New Age Islam
(7) Muslims need to refute Jihadis - Sultan Shahin, Editor, New Age Islam
(8) The Saudi Royal Family Are Crypto-Jews
(9) The Saudis: Where do they come from, who are their ancestors?
(10) "ISIS are not Sunnis. They are a British and Salafi Plot" - David
Livingstone
(11) Mr. Hempher, the British Spy to the Middle East - but was he real?

(1) Your comments on Islam woefully ignorant. Wahab was a crypto Jew
  Syed A R Zaidi<syedarzaidi@gmail.com>

28 December 2015 at 13:35 To: Peter Myers <myerspeterg@gmail.com>

Hello Peter Myers,

Shamir reposted your Trump-related posting. Just a comment. You have
confused Wahabbism with Islam. Wahab was a crypto Jew in alliance with
the Iraqi-Jew Saudi clan. They succeeded with the support of the
Jew-controlled British Empire and have undermined Islam from within by
buying up all the infrastructure of the Muslim world.

Take a look at the work of Kevin Barrett an American convert to Islam.

You seem not to know what the Jewish nation has been up to these last
two thousand years. Go through iamthewitness.com to get an education.
Then get back to Father Coughlin.

Best wishes,

Syed Zaidi (by the way, the father of a halachic Jew)

Syed,

 > Wahab was a crypto Jew

Where is the evidence for that?

 > in alliance with the Iraqi-Jew Saudi clan

Evidence, please.

Are you Sunni or Shiite? What do you make of the struggle between them?

Peter

(2) I live in India; I am a descendant of the Prophet

    Syed A R Zaidi<syedarzaidi@gmail.com> 28 December 2015 at 17:13

Are you Orthodox or Reform? Sounds idiotic, doesn't it?

Okay, I'll take the bait. I live in India, where the practice on
admission to a hospital requires an answer to the question: Religion. I
was delighted to have the opportunity to answer: Yes. I was never taught
namaz after I refused instruction at the age five. But in later years I
became interested in Buddhism for intellectual reasons connected with
Cartesian dualism, and was drawn into spiritual issues. I was sent at
the age of six to a boarding school run by American missionaries for
their children. So the example of Jesus was ready to hand.

For family reasons I looked for a Sufi master, but no one could tell me
where to find one. Along with my then wife, Jewish, I became the
disciple of a Hindu saint. In case you are still interested in the Shi'a
Sunni question, my name should tell you that I am a descendant of the
Prophet. Since Shi'a comes from Shiat-Ali, the party of Ali, I am with
my ancestor Hazrat Ali, the son-in-law of the Prophet. But my mother was
Sunni, and my father insisted on a Sunni burial for her. In any case,
both Sunni and Shi'a come under Religion, and the insistence on the
triviality of the difference is the heart of the Khomeini revolution.
What does not come under the heading of Religion is Judaism - with the
notable exception of Neturei Karta, a broken vessel full to the brim.
Let me know if you disagree. I hope that answers your question.
Best wishes,
Syed

(3) We're not all Wahhabis - New Age Islam
    Syed A R Zaidi<syedarzaidi@gmail.com> 28 December 2015 at 17:45

You need something like this website since you seem not to know what the
overwhelming majority of Muslims that are not Wahhabis spend their time
and energy thinking about. Sadly, the editor seems to think it was
Muslims, of whatever variety, that carried out 9/11. Maybe it's just
convenience, as with someone like Israel Shamir and the Holocaust. It
wastes too much energy to hew to the truth.

And by the way, do some deeper research into the destruction of the
Bamiyan Buddhas. There was a dissident member of the crypto-Jewish
Rockefeller family who wrote immediately to his friend, the head of
Indonesian security, to look into the Zionist angle.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <NewAgeIslam_Newsletter@newageislam.com>
Date: 28 Dec 2015 11:55 am
Subject: Christmas in The Ummah, NewAgeIslam.com - 28 Dec, 2015
To: <sultan.shahin@gmail.com>

Hello Friends

WELCOME TO NewAgeIslam.com Newsletter 28 Dec, 2015

http://www.NewAgeIslam.com

Regards,
Sultan Shahin,
Editor and Publisher, NewAgeIslam.com

(4) Christmas in Saudi Arabia - published in New Age Islam

http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/reverse-swing-christmas-in-the-ummah-jihadi-islam-wahhabi-barbarism-saudi-arabia/
http://www.newageislam.com/current-affairs/christmas-in-the-ummah/d/105749

Christmas in The Ummah

The hypocrisy of the Islamic world is laid bare once more

By Tunku Varadarajan

Indian Express, December 27, 2015

{caption}
There’s not a single Christian church, or Hindu temple, or Sikh
gurdwara, or Buddhist monastery, or — LOL — synagogue on the soil of
Saudi Arabia.
{end caption}

We live in a world of toxic double standards.

The Saudis export their theo-imperialist brand of Islam to murderous
effect — as Paris, London, New York, Madrid, Mumbai, Bali, Raqqa,
Beirut, Timbuktu, Tunis, Nairobi, Garissa, Bangkok and San Bernardino
can testify. And yet, they prohibit the public practice of any faith
other than Islam on their own territory.

I apologise to anyone whose city or town I’ve omitted from the preceding
catalogue of Wahhabi barbarism. I’m allowed only 600 words by my
editors. I could always put together another column comprising 600
places where mass murder could be traced financially, theologically or
demographically to Saudi Arabia — a column without verbs, prepositions
or adjectives. Just place-names drenched in blood, shed in the name of
jihadi Islam.

There are Saudi-funded mosques and madrasas and deceptively benign
evangelical institutions, as well as Saudi-moneyed apologists, all over
Europe and North America (not to mention Asia and Islamic Africa); but
there’s not a single Christian church, or Hindu temple, or Sikh
gurdwara, or Buddhist monastery, or — LOL — synagogue on the soil of
Saudi Arabia.

To gauge the ravenous exceptionalism of Saudi bigotry, be aware that
there are 257 Christian churches in Pakistan — yes, THAT Pakistan —
going by the Wikipedia entry, ‘List of Churches in Pakistan’. (Wikipedia
has flaws, and this figure is likely to be far from exact; but I’m
certain that it’s in the ballpark. The number is much higher than I’d
expected. Long live the Indian subcontinent and its tenacious — if
increasingly beleaguered — traditions of tolerance that predate 20th-
and 21st-century Islamism.)

These Pakistani churches include four in Abbottabad (a.k.a. Osamaville,
where Pakistan extended hospitality — or collusion, or colossally
improbable incompetence… take your pick — to the world’s most wanted
terrorist); 10 in Multan (which Indians regard primarily as the venue of
Virender Sehwag’s ‘jihadi’ triple century, but which is, in fact, Ground
Zero for Wahhabi wackos in the Land of the Pure); and a breathtaking 30
in Quetta, the Afghan Taliban’s home-away-from-home. (Quetta — poor,
benighted Quetta, so romantic, yet so fallen from grace. You will, one
day, if there’s a God, be the capital of an independent Baluchistan.)

But back to Islamist double standards — particularly those to do with
Christians, since this is the Christmas season. At a time when we’ve had
to put up with much breast-beating from Western liberals and
(Saudi-funded) Muslim community leaders over the “discomfort” felt by
Muslims in the West as they assert their (entirely unthreatened) right
to wear the hijab in London or New York, we’ve had news of the banning
of the celebration of Christmas in the Sultanate of Brunei.

Why the ban? Because the sultan — a man wealthier than Croesus (sorry,
Sultan, for the non-Islamic reference, but I couldn’t have said “richer
than the King of Saudi Arabia,” because you’re not) — felt that
Christmas in his Muslim “un-Freedonia” would weaken the practice of Islam.

This is a man who owns a great, gaudy raft of properties in the
Christmas-celebrating West, and whose family has a history of sexual
debauchery, some of which, undoubtedly, violates the norms of the very
religion he seeks to safeguard by his banning of Christmas.

The hypocrisy must, surely, be apparent to him, as it must be to the
Saudis whose princelings frolic, sharia-free, in London, craving
sanctuary from their own hideous land. Theirs is a holy war not just
against Christmas, but against all tolerance; and it is a war that will
determine our world’s future.

Some would call it a clash of civilisations. I’d just say, “Merry
Christmas”. ==

(5) Ayodhya should be turned into a multi-faith centre: the Rama Temple
(Hindu), the Mosque of Babur, and a Buddhist shrine

http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/out-of-my-mind-sharad-pawar-autobiography-on-my-terms-babri-majid/
http://www.newageislam.com/current-affairs/meghnad-desai/out-of-my-mind--opportunity-not-crisis/d/105750

Out of My Mind: Opportunity Not Crisis

By Meghnad Desai

Indian Express, December 27, 2015

On My Terms is a fascinating autobiography which Sharad Pawar has just
released. It reveals much about India’s political culture and ways of
making the country work. Pawar has been in and out of favour with the
Congress but managed to stay at the top thanks to his solid base in
Baramati and a capacity to deliver. The best vignette is however what he
reveals about the Babri Masjid issue. Given that once again, with the
Uttar Pradesh elections only a year or so away, stones have begun to
arrive for shilanyas at Ayodhya, it repays to read him.

The issue is of course with the Supreme Court. Pawar tells a story of
how during the brief regime of Chandra Shekhar, he was involved in a
genuine act of reconciliation. The original breach in the padlocked site
had been made in the late 1940s with the tacit support of then home
minister Sardar Patel and Uttar Pradesh chief minister Govind Ballabh
Pant. Jawaharlal Nehru was dismayed but unable to reverse what had
happened. Then, in the aftermath of the Shah Bano decision, Rajiv Gandhi
allowed installation of the Ram Lalla. The atmosphere was getting tense.

Chandra Shekhar asked Pawar and Bhairon Singh Shekhawat to intervene to
avert conflict. Shekhawat had contacts on the Muslim side in UP and
Pawar could talk to the RSS.

They found that both communities were using the site. The idols were
being worshipped in one part and Muslims were offering namaaz in another
part. A cohabitation plan could have been worked out. But then the
Chandra Shekhar government collapsed when Rajiv Gandhi withdrew support.
The rest is history.

But here we are again. Sooner or later the Supreme Court will give a
judgment. A little bit of advance thinking can do no harm. Communal
harmony is much more important than the dreams of the VHP/RSS. The germ
of the solution is in the Pawar-Shekhawat experience. It is possible to
elevate this issue, which has become bitterly partisan, into a win-win
solution for India. Here is how.

There will be a chance as and when the issue is no longer sub-judice to
plan to turn Ayodhya into a multi-faith centre of a global scale.
Jerusalem has a site where the three Abrahamic religions share the space
despite their long and often murderous quarrels over the last several
centuries. It is a global symbol of religious pluralism. There is no
reason why, if India wills, Ayodhya cannot be made into a shining
monument to the coming together of the Sanatan Dharma and Islam. There
should also be facilities for a Buddhist shrine since the Tathagata
preached in those parts.

It could be done by launching a global competition for a master plan
inviting the best architects and designers.

A Ram temple plus a mosque plus a Buddhist shrine and a conference
centre for multi-faith dialogue would declare to the world that India
has been the land where religions have been born and have flourished.
Thousands will flock to the site from around the world. They may come to
visit only one holy place but will have the chance to see three.

India has travelled miles since December 1992. Let us celebrate and tell
the world.

(6) Age of Peace - Somali K Chakrabarti, New Age Islam
http://www.newageislam.com/books-and-documents/age-of-peace/d/105736
http://www.newageislam.com/books-and-documents/somali-k-chakrabarti,-new-age-islam/age-of-peace/d/105736

Age of Peace

By Somali K Chakrabarti, New Age Islam

Some books entertain, some educate, and some leave a lasting impression
on the mind. Age of Peace, written by Maulana Wahiduddin Khan, is one
such book that falls in the latter category.

It is an enlightening and well researched book, which conveys the
message of peace in a very rational, simple and convincing manner. The
book has changed my perception that achieving social peace will always
be an ever elusive condition that finds mention, perhaps only in
mythological stories.

Age of Peace not only upholds the need for peace, it also provides the
rationale for establishing peace, and outlines the general principles
based on which it is possible to establish peace in the society.

The author, Maulana Wahiduddin Khan is a noted Islamic scholar and the
founder of Centre of Peace and Spirituality in New Delhi, who has been
internationally recognized for his contribution to world peace.

  Peace, the author says, is a pre-condition for progress and social
development. It is the ‘summum bonum’ or the greatest good that is
devoid of any negative effects. The author writes about individual peace
(peace of mind) which results from self-management, and social peace,
for which social management is needed.

Negating the general perception that peace would ensue from social
justice, the author says, that this is an obscure theory, for as long as
we think of peace as a derivative of social justice, it will remain
elusive. The key, he says, is to accept peace as the status quo.

Just like most of us recognize the contribution of our family in shaping
up our lives, similarly if we recognize the contribution of humanity at
large and its role in providing us with the comfort and luxuries that we
enjoy, then gratitude and compassion would replace negativism and serve
as an intrinsic check to violence.

Peace brings normalcy, it throws opens the door for opportunities, which
when availed increase the chances of success. With peace one can achieve
what one cannot achieve with violence.

This very thought changed my perception of peace. Accepting peace as the
status quo, the present for what it is rather than what it should be,
not living in denial and working calmly towards the goal is a very
balanced approach, which is advocated by all religions.

Backed by innumerable examples from different parts of the world, from
the past centuries to the modern age, the author advocates the use of
non – confrontational method, peaceful activism, and spreading the
message of peace through education and awareness.

The author touches upon sensitive issues such as the menace of
terrorism, political dichotomy of muslims and issues facing the muslim
community, militancy, misinterpretation of ‘jihaad’ to legitimise
militancy, and suicide bombings. Stressing upon the need for a counter
ideology, the author says that the present militancy has no sanction in
Islam.

He also talks about the futility of wars, and stresses upon the role of
third party in putting an end to wars. Fighting, he says, is an archaic
and outdated concept in the present age that provides people with
alternatives to fulfil their ambitions without resorting to violence.

Quoting some excerpts from the book

The human mind has greatest potential, but it can only work in a
peaceful atmosphere. In the absence of a peaceful environment for work,
the minds capability will remain unutilized.

The secret of success in life is not to make others suffer loses at your
hands. The secret of success in life is to plan one’s time and energy
wisely to avail of the opportunities within one’s reach.

History tells us that war is like a rootless tree. A storm can
completely uproot it. But a peaceful plan is like a tree which stands
upright on its own strong roots and remains unaffected by storms.

Violence or terrorism is a negation of God’s creation plan.

Terrorism is an unnatural act. Neither reason nor conscience can ever
sanction it. Terrorism always ends in repentance.

I had received a copy of this book from a blogger friend and after going
through it, I found that it is a very relevant book for all particularly
the youth in the turbulent times that we are living in.

The book has reinforced my belief that no religion can preach violence.
Extremism, terrorism and wars are all a fallout of greed of a few, who
misinterpret religion and use it to their convenience.

It is a book that I would like to read over and over again.

(7) Muslims need to refute Jihadis - Sultan Shahin, Editor, New Age Islam
http://www.newageislam.com/islam,terrorism-and-jihad/facing-the-jihadist-challenge--muslims-need-to-refute-jihadis’-xenophobic,-supremacist,-millenarian-thesis-and-focus-on-islamic-pluralism,-says-sultan-shahin-at-unhrc-in-geneva/d/101940

Facing The Jihadist Challenge: Muslims Need To Refute Jihadis’
Xenophobic, Supremacist, Millenarian Thesis And Focus On Islamic
Pluralism, Says Sultan Shahin At UNHRC In Geneva

By Sultan Shahin, Editor, New Age Islam

Oral Statement at United Nations Human Rights Council, Geneva, 27th
regular session 2-27 March 2015

General Debate on Agenda item 3: “Protection of the existence of and
prevention of violence against religious minorities”

On behalf of World Environment and Resource Council

13 March 2015

Mr. President,

Facing the brutalities of Islamist terror, while President Obama will
not go beyond calling it violent extremism, the head of Sunni Islam's
oldest seat of learning, Jamia al-Azhar admitted in a counter-terrorism
conference in Mecca that extremism was caused by “corrupt
interpretations of Quran and the sayings of Prophet Muhammad”, and
Islamic curriculums needed to change.

This call for reform, coming from Jamia Al-Azhar, is gratifying. But a
half-hearted approach to reform will not work. The problems Muslims face
are very basic and cannot be solved with mere tinkering with text-books.
The global Muslim community will have to introspect. One question
repeatedly asked, for instance, is about the contextual verses of the
holy Quran that are utilised by Jihadists to brainwash our youth.
Jihadists present these contextual verses as an eternal guide for Muslims.

The truth is these verses came to guide the prophet in the strife
imposed upon him in the early years of Islam. They are not supposed to
guide our conduct today. But hardly any scholar would come out and say
this in so many words. This is what gives the Jihadists their power. If
we can't even talk about constitutive and contextual verses of Quran and
the difference between their relevance for us today, then how can we
face the enormous challenge posed by Jihadists.

Similar challenge is posed by the sayings of the Prophet quoted by the
Jihadists to support their brutal, intolerant, xenophobic, supremacist,
millenarian thesis. The so-called Islamic State, in particular, does
this most adroitly. But what authenticity can one claim for a so-called
saying that was collected two centuries after the demise of the prophet.
Almost six hundred thousand of such purported sayings were discarded by
the scholars in the early centuries of Islam. How can we allow Jihadists
to disturb world peace on accounts of such fanciful legends? But we
Muslims will have to come out and question the Jihadist thesis from
every available forum. Only then we can face this challenge.

However, I am gratified that some moderate Muslims have begun to think
seriously about countering jihadist ideology. So far we were in denial,
finding it difficult to see any connection between terrorism and some
interpretations of Islam that have been propagated widely in the last
few decades. Even the international community has not clamped down on
the teaching and export of extremist text books from West-friendly Arab
countries to madrasas around the world.

It's not just the vice-chancellor of Jamia Azhar but others too that are
now calling for reformation in Islam, something that was being done so
far in a consistent and methodical manner only on Islamic website New
Age Islam. Indeed, New Age Islam remains banned for the last two years
in Pakistan for countering the Jihadist theology of violence being
propagated on over 150 Jihadi publications in that country.

Thus it is gratifying that several other Muslims from different parts of
the world are now coming out to demand introspection and change. Four
well-known Muslim intellectuals, for instance, have appealed to all
Muslim political and religious leaders to stand up and support what they
term "democratic Islam." They have called for a conference in France
early next year that would "define the contours of a progressive
interpretation of Islam firmly grounded in the 21st century."

Tariq Ramadan, Anwar Ibrahim, Ghaleb Bencheikh and Felix Marquardt have
called for a clear-eyed diagnosis of Islam's current plight and want to
develop a fundamental critique of Islamic culture and religion. [...]

(8) The Saudi Royal Family Are Crypto-Jews
Dates: 237 A.H. = 851/2 A.D.; 851 A.H. = 1465 A.D.

http://www.truedemocracy.net/hj33/08.html
http://www.fortunecity.com/boozers/bridge/632/history.html

By Abdulaziz Saud

THE SAUDI DYNASTY: FROM WHERE IS IT? AND WHO IS THE REAL ANCESTOR OF
THIS FAMILY?

RESEARCH AND PRESENTATION OF: MOHAMMAD SAKHER , who was ordered killed
by the Saudi Regime for the following findings:

1. Are the Saudi Family members belonging to the Tribe of ANZA BEN WA'EL
as they allege to be?

2. Is Islam their actual religion?

3. Are they of an ARAB ORIGIN at all?

In the year 851 A.H. a group of men from AL MASALEEKH CLAN, which was a
branch of ANZA Tribe, formed a caravan for buying cereals (wheat and
corn) and other food stuff from IRAQ, and transporting it back to NAJD.
The head of that group was a man called SAHMI BIN HATHLOOL. The caravan
reached BASRA, where the members of the group went to a cereal merchant
who was a Jew, Called MORDAKHAI BIN IBRAHIM BIN MOSHE'. During their
bargaining with that merchant, the Jew asked them : "Where are you
from?" They answered: "From ANZA TRIBE; a clan of AL MASALEEKH." Upon
hearing that name, the Jew started to hug so affectionately each one of
them saying that he, himself, was also from the clan of AL MASALEEKH,
but he had come to reside in BASRA (IRAQ) in consequence to a family
feud between his father and some members of ANZA Tribe.

After he recounted to them his fabricated narrative, he ordered his
servants to load all the camels of the clan's members with wheat, dates
and tamman; a remarkable deed so generous that astonished the MASALEEKH
men and aroused their pride to find such an affectionate (cousin) in
IRAQ- the source of their sustenance; they believed each word he said ,
and , because he was a rich merchant of the food commodities which they
were badly in need, they liked him (even though he was a Jew concealed
under the garb of an Arab from AL MASALEEKH clan).

When the caravan was ready to depart returning to NAJD, that Jewish
Merchant asked them to accept his company, because he intended to go
with them to his original homeland, NAJD. Upon hearing that from him,
they wholeheartedly welcomed him with a very cheerful attitude.

So that (concealed) Jew reached NAJD with the caravan. In NAJD, he
started to promulgate a lot of propaganda for himself through his
companions (his alleged cousins), a fact, which gathered around him a
considerable number of new supporters; but, unexpectedly, he confronted
a campaign of opposition to his views led by SHEIKH SALEH SALMAN ABDULLA
AL TAMIMI, who was a Muslem religious preacher in AL-QASEEM. The radius
of his preaching area included Najd, Yemen, and Hijaz, a fact which
compelled the Jew (the Ancestor of the present SAUDI FAMILY to depart
from AL QASEEM to AL IHSA, where he changed his name (MORDAKHAI) To
MARKHAN BIN IBRAHIM MUSA. Then he changed the location of his residence
and settled at a place called DIR'IYA near AL-QATEEF, where he started
to spread among the inhabitants a fabricated story about the shield of
our Prophet MOHAMMAD (p.b.u.h), that it was taken as a booty by an Arab
Pagan in consequence of OHOD Battle between the Arab pagans and the
Muslems. "That shield, he said, was sold by the Arab Pagan to a Jewish
Clan called BANU QUNAIQA' who preserved it as a treasure! He gradually
enhanced his position among the Bedouins through such stories which
indicated how the Jewish clans in Arabia were so influential and
deserved high esteem. He gained some personal importance among the
Bedouins, and decided to settle permanently there, at DIR'IYA town, near
AL QATEEF, which he decided to be his (Capital) on the Persian Gulf. He
aspired to make it his spring board for establishing a Jewish Kingdom in
Arabia.

In order to fulfill his ambitious scheme, he started to approach the
desert Arab Bedouins for support of his position, then gradually, he
declared himself as their king!

At that juncture, AJAMAN Tribe together with BANU KHALED Tribe became
fully aware of that Jewish cunning plan after they had verified his true
identity, and decided to put an end to him. They attacked his town and
conquered it, but before arresting him he had escaped by the skin of his
teeth.

That Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY, (MORDAKHAI), sought shelter in
a farm called at that time AL-MALIBEED-GHUSAIBA near AL-ARID, which is
called at our present time : AL-RIYADH.

He requested the owner of that farm to grant him an asylum. The farmer
was so hospitable that he immediately gave him sanctuary. But that Jew
(MORDAKHAI), no longer than a month had he stayed there, when he
assassinated the land lord and all members of his family, pretending
that all were killed by an invading band of thieves. Then he pretended
that he had bought that real estate from them before that catastrophe
happened to them! Accordingly, he had the right to reside there as a
land lord. He then gave a new name to that place: He named it AL-DIRIYA
- the same name as that he had lost.

That Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY (MORDAKHAI), was quick to
establish a "GUEST HOUSE" called "MADAFFA" on the land he usurped from
his victims, and gathered around him a group of hypocrites who started
to spread out false propaganda for him that he was a prominent Arab
Sheikh. He plotted against Sheikh SALEH SALMAN ABDULLA AL TAMIMI, his
original enemy, and caused his assassination in the mosque of the town
called (AL-ZALAFI).

After that, he felt satisfied and safe to make (AL-DIRIYA) his permanent
home. There he practiced polygamy at a wide scale, and indeed, he begot
a lot of children whom he gave pure Arab names.

Ever since his descendants grew up in number and power under the name of
SAUDI CLAN, they have followed his steps in practicing under ground
activities and conspiracies against the Arab Nation. They illegally
seized rural sectors and farm lands, and assassinated every person who
tried to oppose their evil plans. They used all kinds of deceit for
reaching their goals: they bought the conscience of their dissidents;
they offered their women and money to influential people in that area,
particularly to those who started to write the true biography of that
Jewish Family; they bribed writers of history in order to purify their
ignominious history, and make their lineage related to the most
prominent Arab Tribes such as RABI'A, ANZA, and ALMASALEEKH.

A conspicuous hypocrite in our era whose name is MOHAMMAD AMIN AL
TAMIMI- Director/Manager of the contemporary Libraries of the SAUDI
KINGDOM, made up a genealogical tree (FAMILY TREE) for this JEWISH
FAMILY (THE SAUDIS), connecting them to our Great Prophet, MOHAMMAD
(P.B.U.H). For his false work, he received a reward of 35 (THIRTY FIVE)
THOUSAND EYPTIAN POUNDS from the then SAUDI AMBASSADOR TO CAIRO, EGYPT,
in the year 1362 AH.- 1943 A.D. The name of that Ambassador is: IBRAHIM
AL-FADEL.

As aforementioned, the Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY, (MORDAKHAI),
practiced polygamy by marrying a lot of Arab women and begot many
children; his polygamous practice is, at the present time, being carried
out " to the letter" by his descendants; they cling to his marital
heritage!

One of MORDAKHAI'S sons called AL-MAQARAN, arabized from the Jewish root
(MACK-REN) begot a son called Mohammad, then another son called SAUD,
which is the name of the present day SAUDI DYNASTY.

Descendants of SAUD (the present day SAUDI FAMILY )started a campaign of
assassination of the prominent leaders of the Arab Tribes under the
pretence that those leaders were apostates; renegading from the Islamic
Religion, and deserting their Koranic doctrines; so they deserved the
SAUDI condemnation and slaughter!

In the History Book of the SAUDI FAMILY pages (98-101), their private
family historian declares that the SAUDI DYNASTY considers all the
people of NAJD blasphemous; so their blood must be shed, their
properties confiscated, and their females be taken as concubines; no
Muslim is authentic in his /her belief unless he/she belongs
(affiliates) to the sect of MOHAMMAD BIN ABDUL WAHAB, (whose origins are
also Jewish from TURKEY.) His doctrines give authority to the SAUDI
FAMILY to destroy the villages with all their inhabitants-males
including children, and to sexually assault their women; stab the
bellies of the pregnant, and cut off the hands of their children, then
burn them! They are further authorized by such a BRUTAL DOCTRINE to
plunder all the properties of whom they call renegades (not following
their Wahabi Sect).

Their hideous Jewish Family has, in fact, done all that kind of
atrocities in the name of their false religious sect (the Wahabi), which
was actually invented by a Jew so as to sow the seeds of terror in the
hearts of people in towns and villages. This Jewish Dynasty has been
committing such brutal atrocities ever since 1163 A.H. They have named
the whole Arabian Peninsula after their family name (SAUDI ARABIA) as if
the whole region is their own personal real estate, and that all other
inhabitants are their mere servants or slaves, toiling day and night for
the pleasure of their masters (THE SAUDI FAMILY).

They are completely holding the natural wealth of the country as their
own property. If any poor person from the common people raises his/her
voice complaining against any of the despotic rules of this Jewish
Dynasty, (the Dynasty) cuts off his/her head in the public square. A
princess of theirs once visited FLORIDA, USA, with her retinue; she
rented 90 (NINETY) Suite rooms in a Grand Hotel for about One Million
Dollars a night! Can anyone of their subjects comment about that
extravagant event? If he/she does, his/her fate is quite known: DEATH
WITH THE EDGE OF THE SAUDI SWORD IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE!!!!!!

Witnesses on the Jewish Ancestry of this Saudi Family:

In the 1960's the "SAWT AL ARAB" Broadcasting Station in Cairo, Egypt,
and the YEMEN Broadcasting Station in SANA'A confirmed the Jewish
Ancestry of the SAUDI Family.

King FAISAL AL-SAUD at that time could not deny his family's kindred
with the JEWS when he declared to the WASHINGTON POST on September 17,
1969 stating: "WE, THE SAUDI FAMILY, are cousins of the Jews: we
entirely disagree with any Arab or Muslem [sic] Authority which shows
any antagonism to the Jews; but we must live together with them in
peace. Our country (ARABIA) is the Fountain head from where the first
Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world." That was
the declaration of KING FAISAL AL-SAUD BIN ABDUL AZIZ!!!!!

HAFEZ WAHBI, The SAUDI Legal Adviser, mentioned in his book entitled:
"THE PENINSULA OF ARABIA" that KING ABDUL AZIZ AL-SAUD, who died in
1953, had said : "Our Message (SAUDI MESSAGE) encountered the opposition
of all Arab Tribes; my grandfather, SAUD AWAL, once imprisoned a number
of the Sheikhs of MATHEER Tribe; and when another group of the same
tribe came to intercede for the release of the prisoners, SAUD AWAL gave
orders to his men to cut off the heads of all the prisoners, then, he
wanted to humiliate and derogate the interceders by inviting them to eat
from a banquet he prepared from the cooked flesh of his victims whose
cut off heads he placed on the top of the food platters!! The
interceders became so alarmed and declined to eat the flesh of their
relatives; and, because of their refusal to eat, he ordered his men to
cut off their heads too. That hideous crime was committed by that self
imposed king to innocent people whose guilt was their opposition to his
most cruel and extremely despotic rules.

HAFEZ WAHBI, states further that King ABDUL AZIZ AL-SAUD related that
bloody true story to the Sheikhs of the MATHEER Tribe, who visited him
in order to intercede for their prominent leader at that time, FAISAL AL
DARWEESH, who was the king's prisoner. He related that story to them in
order to prevent them from interceding for the release of their Sheikh;
otherwise, they would face the same fate; He killed the Sheikh and used
his blood as an ablution liquid for him just before he stood up for his
prayer (after the false sect doctrine of the Wahabi); The guilt of
FAISAL DARWEESH at that time was that he had criticized King ABDUL AZIZ
AL-SAUD when the king signed the document which the English Authorities
prepared in 1922 as a declaration for giving PALESTINE to the Jews; his
signature was obtained in the conference held at AL AQEER in 1922.

That was and still is the system of this Regime of the JEWISH FAMILY
(SAUDI FAMILY): All its goals are: plundering the wealth of the country,
robbing, falsifying, and committing all kinds of atrocity, iniquity, and
blasphemy-all are executed in compliance with their self invented Wahabi
Sect which legalizes the chopping of the heads of their opposing subjects.

(9) The Saudis: Where do they come from, who are their ancestors?

http://english.irib.ir/analysis/articles2/item/216429-the-saudis-where-do-they-come-from,-who-are-their-ancestors
http://www.ascertainthetruth.com/att/index.php/al-islam-a-terrorism/intl-qwar-on-terrorq/707-the-saudi-dynasty-where-do-they-come-from-and-who-is-their-real-ancestor

Monday, 28 September 2015 19:40

Following the recent stampede at the holy site in Mena during climax of
this year’s Hajj rituals that led to the death of over two thousand
pilgrims, less than two weeks after the death of 109 pilgrims in the
suspicious crash of a huge crane, perilously near to the holy Ka’ba, the
symbolic House of God Almighty, questions are being asked on the
legitimacy of the Aal-e Saud regime to govern Hijaz and the two holy
cities of Mecca and Medina, let alone organize the annual Hajj.

Over the past twenty years some 10,000 Hajj pilgrims have died in the
unforeseen incidents that routinely rock the rituals at Mina, Arafaat,
Muzdalafa and Mecca, which are proof of the incompetency of the Wahhabi
regime and their scant regard to human life in the most inviolable of
all places. In addition to these supposedly accidental occurrences,
Saudi forces had in 1987 brutally murdered in cold blood over 400,
mostly Iranian pilgrims, who in accordance with the commandment of God
in the holy Qur’an, were peacefully declaring their disavowal of
disbelievers near the Sacred Mosque.

As a matter of fact, a glance at the recent history of Arabia reveals
that the Aal-e Saud have no connection to the land of Hijaz, which they
occupied through bloodshed in the late 1920s by massacring tens of
thousands of Muslims in Mecca, Medina, Ta’ef, and Jeddah. Since then
they have indulged in every crime against the sanctity of Islam
including the desecration of the sacred cemeteries of Jannat al-Baqie in
Medina and Jannat al-Mo’alla in Mecca, besides the demolition of
mausoleums of the martyrs of Ohad and the houses where the Prophet of
Islam was born and lived. Here we present you an investigative article
by Mohammad Salaam titled “The Saudi Dynasty: Where Do They Come From
and Who Are their Real Ancestors?” Please stay with us. [...]

In the History Book of the Saudi Family, on pages 98-101, their private
family historian declares that the Saudi dynasty considers all people of
Najd apostates, so their blood must be shed, their properties
confiscated, and their females taken as concubines; no Muslim is
authentic in his/her belief unless he/she belongs to the seditious cult
of Ibn Abdul Wahhab. His doctrines give authority to the Aal-e Saud to
destroy villages with all their male inhabitants, including children,
and to sexually assault their women; stab the bellies of the pregnant,
cut off the hands of their children, then burn them!

They are further authorized by such a brutal doctrine to plunder all the
properties of those not following the Wahhabi or Salafi cult – as the
Takfiri terrorists are currently doing in Syria and Iraq. Their hideous
Jewish family has, in fact, done all these atrocities in the name of
Islam so as to tarnish the image of Islam, and thus sow the seeds of
discord and terror in the hearts of Muslims. This Jewish Dynasty has
been committing such brutal atrocities ever since their attack on holy
Karbala in Iraq in 1802; followed by their pillaging of the holy cities
of Mecca and Medina in 1803 and 1804. They were punished by Mohammad Ali
Pasha of Egypt, whose son Ibrahim Pasha conquered ad-Diriya in 1818, and
sent the Wahhabi chief, Abdullah bin Saud to Istanbul, where he was
beheaded for desecrating the sanctities of Islam.

At the turn of the 20th century, the British colonialists, seeking to
destroy the Ottoman Empire, hired the desert brigand, Abdul-Aziz bin
Abdur-Rahman Aal-e Saud, and after supporting his gradual occupation of
large parts of the Arabian Peninsula, including Hijaz, the oil-rich
Shi’a populated eastern parts bordering the Persian Gulf, and Najran and
other northern parts of Yemen, declared him king of what they called
Saudi Arabia in 1932.

In the 1960's the "Sawt al Arab" Broadcasting Station in the Egyptian
capital Cairo, and the Yemen Broadcasting Station in Sana'a, confirmed
the Jewish ancestry of the Aal-e Saud Dynasty. King Faisal bin
Abdul-Aziz Aal-e Saud at that time could not deny his family's kindred
with the Jews when he declared to the Washington Post on Sept.17, 1969:
"We, the Saudi Family, are cousins of the Jews… Arabia is the fountain
head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all
over the world."

Hafez Wahbi, the Saudi legal advisor, has mentioned in his book entitled
"The Peninsula of Arabia" that King Abdul Aziz Aal-e Saud, who died in
1953, had said: "Our message (Saudi Massage) was opposed by all Arab
tribes. My grandfather, Saud the First, once imprisoned several sheikhs
of the Matheer Tribe; and when another group of the same tribe came to
intercede for the release of the prisoners, he gave orders to his men to
cut off the heads of all the prisoners.

Then, he wanted to humiliate and derogate the interceders by inviting
them to eat from a banquet he prepared from the cooked flesh of his
victims whose severed heads he place in the top of the food platters!
The interceders became alarmed and declined to eat the flesh of their
relatives, and, because of their refusal to eat, he ordered his men to
cut off their heads too.

Hafez Wahbi states further that Abdul Aziz related this bloody true
story to the Sheikhs of the Matheer Tribes, who visited him in order to
intercede for release their prominent leader at that time, Faisal
ad-Darweesh. He related this story to them in order to prevent them from
interceding for the release of their Sheikh; otherwise, they would meet
the same fate. The guilt of Faisal Darweesh was that he had criticized
Abdul Aziz for signing the document which the English Authorities
prepared as a declaration for giving Palestine to the Jews and naming it
Israel; his signature was obtained in the conference held at al-Aqeer in
1922.

AS/SS

Further readings at www.Saudhouse.com {now closed}

(10) "ISIS are not Sunnis. They are a British and Salafi Plot" - David
Livingstone

http://www.conspiracyschool.com/blog/isis-are-not-sunnis-they-are-british-and-salafi-plot-create-neo-caliphate

ISIS are not Sunnis. They are a British and Salafi Plot to Create
Neo-Caliphate

Submitted by David Livingstone on Mon, 08/18/2014 - 10:54

There is obviously an effort afoot to paint ISIS with an indelible brush
as a “Sunni” movement, in order to deliberately inculcate the fear that
they threaten to attract a far larger following, and therefore ignite a
more significant conflict in the already volatile Middle East.

But ISIS are not Sunni. Nothing could be further from the truth. ISIS
are Salafis, a leading manifestation of a modern phenomenon in Islam
which scholars have referred to as “Revivalism.” The Islamic revivalists
have two important things in common: they have all been
British-sponsored, and are marked by a rejection of Islamic legal tradition.

The communal effort to codify the intricacies of Islamic law is one of
the great intellectual achievements of human history. And by the ninth
century, there emerged the recognition that the essential details had
been examined with sufficient thoroughness, and that it was time to
proceed with implementing the justice of Islam, and not just debate
about it. It was therefore unanimously decided that 4 leading schools
would be recognized as representative of Sunni orthodoxy. The schools,
known as a Maddhabs, differed on minor points, but were considered
mutually compatible.

Therefore, Islamic law was essentially incorruptible. It had been
formulated by its greatest minds, and stringent credentials were
enforced on those who would qualify in interpreting it and enforcing it.
 From that point forward, the Doors of Ijtihad (independent reasoning)
were considered closed.

This posed an important challenge to the British, who wished to pursue
their “Divide and Conquer” strategy, by creating sects and corruptions
of the religion. They therefore sponsored a wave of these so-called
“Revivalists” who all shared in their call for a re-opening of the Doors
of Ijtihad, beginning with a Mohammed Abdul Wahhab, in the mid-1700s.

Wahhab, a crypto Jew, supported by his sponsor, another crypto-Jew, Ibn
Saud, the progenitor of the kingdom by that name, denounced every
generation before him, except for the earliest to have succeeded the
Prophet Mohammed, known as the Salaf, as having fallen into Kufr
(apostacy). In other words, he rejected the entire era that produced the
details of Islamic legal tradition and the Maddhabs. Instead, he called
for a return to the sources, the Quran and Sunnah, undefiled by “human”
opinion. He therefore also called a “Jihad” against the Muslims, first
within Arabia, and ultimately against the Ottoman Empire.

In 1932, again with British support, the Saud clan seized control of
Arabia, which they proceeded to name after themselves, and of al
Haramain, the sacred precincts of Mecca and Medina, thus donning the
very false pretense of being defenders of Sunni Islam. In 1933, they
signed away oil concessions to the Rockefellers' Standard Oil, remaining
the chief source of petroleum to that company, which has now evolved
into ExxonMobil, the world's third largest company by revenue, and the
second largest publicly traded company by market capitalization.

The extraordinary Saudi wealth was a key factor in their support for the
spread of Wahhabism, as well as the related Salafi movement, which have
since essentially become one. Salafism began in the last eighteenth
century, headed by a notorious imposter and British agent by the name of
Jamal ud Din al Afghani. Afghani was not only the Grand Master of the
Freemasons of Egypt, but also purportedly a leading figure of the
Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor, which played a pivotal role in the rise
of the European Occult Revival, leading to the Theosophical Society of
H. P. Blavatsky, considered the godmother of the New Age movement, and
of the Golden Dawn and then eventually the Ordo TEmpli Orientis (OTO) of
Aleister Crowley. Afghani was also an original source of the Masonic
teachings of the wayward Nation of Islam in the US.

Like the Wahhabis, the focus of the Salafi mission was to call for a
re-opening of the Doors of Ijtihad, and Afghani's leading disciple
Mohammed Abduh, was installed by the British as Mufti at the prestigious
university of al Azhar, where he proceeded to use that pretence re-write
the laws of Islam to suit the purposes of his sponsors. In Afghani’s own
words, as cited in Elie Kedourie, Afghani and Abduh: An Essay on
Religious Unbelief and Political Activism in Modern Islam:

We do not cut off the head of religion except with the sword of
religion. Therefore, if you were to see us now, you would see ascetics
and worshipers, kneeling and genuflecting, never disobeying God’s
commands and doing all that they are ordered to do.

Afghani’s British handler, Wilfred Scawen Blunt, was the first to
propose the establishment of a British controlled “Caliphate” (leader of
the entire Muslim community) to replace the Ottoman Empire. In 1881,
when Blunt visited Abdul Qadir al Jazairi, a Freemason and Algerian hero
residing in exile in Damascus, he decided that he was the most promising
candidate for Caliphate, an opinion shared by Afghani and Abduh.

The idea of a neo-caliphate was later actively pursued by T. E.
Lawrence, aka “Lawrence of Arabia,” who managed the Arab Revolt against
the Ottoman Empire on behalf of the British at the end of WWII. The
ostensible aim of the Arab Revolt was autonomy for the Arab peoples of
the Ottoman Empire, creating a single unified Arab state from Syria to
Yemen, under a puppet Caliphate, where Hussein would be proclaimed “King
of all the Arabs.”

The plan to create a neo-Caliphate was devised by London’s Middle East
team, which included foreign secretary Lord Curzon, Robert Cecil and his
cousin Arthur Balfour, and also Mark Sykes and David George Hogarth, the
chief of the Arab Bureau. They were joined by Winston Churchill and
Arnold Toynbee, who was head of the Round Tablers’ Royal Institute for
International Affairs (RIIA), the sister organization of the
Rockefellers’ CFR. Outlining the policy was Lawrence:

If the Sultan of Turkey were to disappear, then the Caliphate by common
consent of Islam would fall to the family of the prophet, the present
representative of which is Hussein, the Sharif of Mecca. Hussein’s
activities seem beneficial to us, because it marches with our immediate
aims, the breakup of the Islamic bloc and the disruption of the Ottoman
Empire, and because the states he would set up would be as harmless to
ourselves as Turkey was. If properly handled the Arab States would
remain in a state of political mosaic, a tissue of jealous
principalities incapable of cohesion, and yet always ready to combine
against an outside force.

The ISIS’ handlers (Mossad, CIA, MI5 or all of the above) have learned a
lot over the years. They made a mistake in choosing bin Laden who was an
engineer by education and profession, and therefore failed to convince
the Islamic world of his qualifications to set himself up as a leader or
to interpret the nuances of Jihad. Similarly, when Mullah Omar, the
leader of the Taliban, finally gained control over the country of
Afghanistan, he diffused the enthusiasm of large swaths of the Muslim
world’s would-be radicals, who had merely been watching for the outcome,
by instead only declaring himself “Amir ul Mumineen,” or “Commander of
the Faithful.”

But now the situation seems to be interpreted as being more timely by
ISI’s hidden manipulators. It’s been well advertised that not only did
ISIS’ leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who has now dared to declare himself
“Caliph” of the world’s Muslims, earn a master's degree and a PhD in
Islamic studies from the Islamic University of Baghdad, but he is also a
descendant of the Prophet Mohammed, a supposed prerequisite for that office.

The re-establishment of a Caliph over the world of Islam is the
universal aspiration of the Muslims. Every Muslim despairs at the
ravages of Western Imperialism, as well as its blind sponsorship of
rapacious Zionism. But that makes them especially manipulable by their
enemies, who dare to prop up false oppositions, or Pied Pipers like al
Baghdadi.

But they’ve made one colossal mistake: they have mistakenly claimed that
ISIS is a “Sunni organization.” Since the absence of true Sunni
authority, with the fall of the Ottoman Empire in 1924, the Saudis have
taken advantage of the vacuum to fund their aberrant interpretations,
and succeeded to a great extent in fooling the world that Wahhabism and
Salafism are merely reform trends within Sunnism. And for the most part,
many Muslims are convinced. But the problem with the Muslims today is
they are prone to extremism and lapses mistakenly identified as
“Shariah” precisely for the reason that they have been estranged from
their true Islamic legal tradition, which is found in following the
Maddhabs.

Once they recognize that truth, they will no longer be suspectible to
imposters like ISIS. But more dangerously still, they will have
rediscovered their true heritage, which made them incorruptible and an
indomnitable force in the past.

(11) Mr. Hempher, the British Spy to the Middle East - but was he real?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memoirs_of_Mr._Hempher,_The_British_Spy_to_the_Middle_East

Memoirs of Mr. Hempher, The British Spy to the Middle East

 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Confessions of a British Spy and British Enmity Against Islam
Author Ayyub Sabri Pasha(?)
Country Ottoman Empire
Language Turkish
Subject Anglophobia
Anti-Wahhabi
Genre Propaganda
Publisher Waqf Ikhlas Publications
Publication date 1868
Published in English 2001

Memoirs of Mr. Hempher, The British Spy to the Middle East or
Confessions of a British Spy is a document purporting to be the account
by an 18th-century British agent, Hempher, of his instrumental role in
founding the conservative Islamic reform movement of Wahhabism, as part
of a conspiracy to corrupt Islam. It first appeared in 1888, in Turkish,
in the five-volume Mir'at al-Haramayn of Ayyub Sabri Pasha (who is
thought to be the actual author by at least one scholar).[1] It has been
described as "apocryphal",[2] a "forgery", "utter nonsense",[3] and "an
Anglophobic variation on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”.[2] It has
been widely translated and disseminated, is available on the
internet,[3][4][5][6] and still enjoys some currency among some
individuals in the Middle East and beyond. In 2002, an Iraqi military
officer recapitulated the book in a “top secret document”.[1][7]

Content [edit]

In the book, a British spy named Hempher, working in the early 1700s,
tells of disguising himself as a Muslim and infiltrating the Ottoman
Empire with the goal of weakening it to destroy Islam once and for all.
He tells his readers: "when the unity of Muslims is broken and the
common sympathy among them is impaired, their forces will be dissolved
and thus we shall easily destroy them... We, the English people, have to
make mischief and arouse schism in all our colonies in order that we may
live in welfare and luxury."[4]

Hempher intends ultimately to weaken Muslim morals by promoting "alcohol
and fornication," but his first step is to promote innovation and
disorder in Islam by creating Wahhabism, which is to gain credibility by
being on the surface morally strict. For this purpose, he enlists "a
gullible, hotheaded young Iraqi in Basra named Muhammad ibn Abd
al-Wahhab".[3] Hempher corrupts and flatters Wahhab until the man is
willing to found his own sect. According to Hempher, he is one of 5,000
British agents with the assignment of weakening Muslims, which the
British government plans to increase to 100,000 by the end of the 18th
century. Hempher writes, "when we reach this number we shall have
brought all Muslims under our sway" and Islam will be rendered "into a
miserable state from which it will never recover again."[4]

Analysis [edit]

George Packer has characterised Hempher's Memoirs as "probably the labor
of a Sunni Muslim author whose intent is to present Muslims as both too
holy and too weak to organize anything as destructive as Wahhabism".[8]
Bernard Haykel of Harvard's Olin Institute for Strategic Studies
describes the document as an anti-Wahhabi forgery, "probably fabricated
by one Ayyub Sabri Pasha".[1] Sabri Pasha, an Ottoman writer, studied at
the naval academy and earned the rank of naval officer, serving for a
time in the Hijaz and Yemen. He wrote historical works on the Saudi
dynasty and died in 1890.[9] In The Beginning and Spread of Wahhabism,
Ayyub Sabri Pasha recounts the story of Abdul Wahhab's association with
Hempher the British spy, and their plot to create a new religion.[10]

A debunking by a Wahhabi author Abul Haarith points out that no evidence
of Hempher can be found in computer database searches of libraries and
rare books, and that facts and incidents related in the book do not
conform to facts known from contemporary sources. The "Memoirs" claim
that Hempher travelled to Basra in 1712 and there met Muhammad bin Abdul
Wahhab, a student who spoke Turkish, Persian and Arabic[citation
needed]. In fact, ibn Abdul Wahhab, born in 1115 AH[citation needed]
(1703/1704 CE), would have been 9 or 10 years old and living in his
native region of Najd at that time, since he did not leave Najd, except
for hajj, to "travel to seek knowledge until 1722"[citation needed]. The
book has Hempher boasting that the British Empire "was so vast it was
said that the sun did not set within its boundaries," when in fact this
claim was not, and could not have been, made until about a century
later[citation needed].

Other Wahhabi comments about the memoir note that British support and
help for bin Abdul Wahhab seems unlikely as "there was no British
presence in that region in the mid-18th century", and that a work
purportedly based on a diary, a genre which generally features dated
entries, explicitly mentions only two dates (1710 CE and 1730
CE).[citation needed]

Impact [edit]

An example of a contemporary reference to the book or at least to the
theory that Wahhabism is a British conspiracy, is Ayatollah Hussein-Ali
Montazeri's 1987 denunciation of Wahhabis as "a bunch of British agents
from Najd."[11] [...]

This page was last modified on 14 December 2015, at 19:12.