Trump grovels to AIPAC, abandons Neutrality on Israel
Newsletter published on 23 March 2016
(1) Hillary
criticizes Trump's neutral stance on Israel
(2) Trump grovels to AIPAC,
abandons Neutrality on Israel
(3) Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Vow to
Protect Israel but Differ on
Means
(4) Trump reads from prepared speech
at AIPAC; Sanders did not attend
(5) Trump no longer 'neutral' on
Israel
(1) Hillary criticizes Trump's neutral stance on Israel
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-idUSKCN0WN1NS
Mon Mar 21, 2016 1:55pm EDT
Clinton criticizes Trump's neutral stance on
Israel peace efforts
WASHINGTON | By Steve Holland and Emily
Flitter
Democratic U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton addresses
the
American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Conference's morning
general session at the Verizon Center in Washington March 21, 2016.
Reuters/Joshua Roberts
Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary
Clinton attacked Republican
Donald Trump on Monday for taking a neutral
stance toward
Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts, in a preview of a possible
general
election battle between them.
On a day Trump was visiting
Washington, Clinton told the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee
(AIPAC) conference that Trump would undermine
Israel's security by taking an
evenhanded approach to negotiations
between the Israelis and
Palestinians.
"America can't ever be neutral when it comes to Israel's
security and
survival," Clinton told the pro-Israel lobbying group, without
mentioning Trump by name. "Anyone who doesn’t understand that has no
business being our president."
Trump, the Republican front-runner,
was to address the AIPAC conference
later in the day, along with his
Republican rivals, U.S. Senator Ted
Cruz of Texas and Ohio Governor John
Kasich. Clinton's Democratic
challenger, U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders of
Vermont, was not appearing at
the event.
The former reality TV star,
who has struggled to win Republican
establishment support, held private
talks with a group of Republican
lawmakers. In a separate session with the
Washington Post editorial
board, Trump named some members of his foreign
policy team.
The team included Walid Phares, who Trump called a
counterterrorism
expert, George Papadopoulos, an oil and energy consultant,
and Joe
Schmitz, a former inspector general at the Department of
Defense.
Trump has drawn fire for his position on Middle East peace
negotiations.
The New York billionaire has described himself as extremely
pro-Israel
but has said he would take a "neutral" stance in trying to
negotiate an
elusive peace settlement between Israel and the
Palestinians.
Trump's critics have said he could harm long-standing U.S.
support for
Israel. Clinton said she would make it a priority if elected to
preserve
the U.S.-Israeli relationship, ensuring Israel has a qualitative
military edge.
"We need steady hands, not a president who says he’s
neutral on Monday,
pro-Israel on Tuesday, and who-knows-what on Wednesday
because
everything’s negotiable," she said.
Clinton, a former
secretary of state, also took aim at Trump's vow that,
if elected, he would
deport illegal immigrants and bar Muslims
temporarily from entering the
United States.
She noted an incident during the 1930s, when the United
States initially
refused entry to a shipload of Jews trying to escape Nazi
tyranny.
"We've had dark chapters in our history before," Clinton said.
"We
remember the nearly 1,000 Jews aboard the St. Louis who were refused
entry in 1939 and sent back to Europe. But America should be better than
this. And I believe it is our responsibility to say so.
"If you see
bigotry, oppose it, if you see violence, condemn it, if you
see a bully,
stand up to him," she said.
Rick Jacobs, president of the Union for
Reform Judaism, the New
York-based organization representing roughly 1.5
million American Jews,
praised Clinton for her command of the issues. He
said he hoped Trump
had prepared a speech that revealed specific policy
goals as well as a
coherent philosophy of the U.S. role in the Middle
East.
"It's as complex as neurosurgery," he said. "I will be listening
very
carefully to what he says and what he doesn't say. Can he put forward a
very clear set of commitments that will help us understand
him?"
Trump was in Washington for closed-door talks with a variety of
Republicans organized by his top backer in the capital, U.S. Senator
Jeff Sessions of Alabama. It represented his most overt bid yet to seek
party unity at a time when many establishment Republicans bitterly
oppose him.
The meeting, at the law offices of Jones Day, included
some Republican
lawmakers who have backed him, such as U.S. Representative
Renee Ellmers
of North Carolina. None of the congressional Republican
leadership
attended. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich
attended.
"Donald Trump Is being discounted by the elites as a candidate
for
office, just like I was in 2010," Ellmers said in a
statement.
Trump also planned a news conference at the hotel he is
building at the
Old Post Office on Pennsylvania Avenue.
Trump's rise
has alarmed establishment Republicans who have tried in
vain to stop him.
Their best hope of derailing his insurgent candidacy
is to stretch the
contest out and deny him the 1,237 delegates needed to
formally win the
party's presidential nomination.
Trump has 678 delegates to 423 for Cruz
and 143 for Kasich, according to
the Associated Press.
If Trump does
not win the 1,237 delegates, the nominee for the Nov. 8
election would be
decided at the party's convention in Cleveland.
Despite the possibility of
turmoil at the July 18-21 event, Republican
Party Committee Chairman Reince
Preibus predicted a "fun" convention.
Priebus, on CNN, shrugged off
Trump's comment last week that riots would
break out if he is denied the
nomination.
"It'll be fine, and I guarantee you we'll have a good time,
and it'll be
a fun convention in Cleveland," Priebus
said.
(Additional reporting by Susan Heavey, Mohammed Zargham, Susan
Cornwell,
David Morgan and Emily Stephenson; Editing by Jonathan
Oatis)
(2) Trump grovels to AIPAC, abandons Neutrality on
Israel
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/21/trumps-five-most-important-declarations-at-aipac-speech/
Trump’s
Five Most Important Declarations At AIPAC Speech
by Aaron Klein21 Mar
2016773
TEL AVIV – Here are the five most important aspects of Donald
Trump’s
speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, on
Monday.
1 – Trump said he will "dismantle the disastrous deal with
Iran."
My number one priority is to dismantle the disastrous deal
with
Iran. I have been in business a long time. I know deal-making and let
me
tell you, this deal is catastrophic – for America, for Israel, and for
the whole Middle East.
However, he stopped short of pledging to
immediately nix the
international nuclear accord signed in Vienna last year.
He stated at
AIPAC that "at the very least, we must hold Iran accountable by
restructuring the terms of the previous deal."
Channelling the
sentiments of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump
said Iran should
suffer immediate consequences for likely violating U.N.
Security Council
resolution 2231 by conducting a series of ballistic
missile tests in recent
days. Netanyahu last week called for Western
powers to take "immediate
punitive steps" against Iran for the missile
tests.
Trump
stated:
The deal is silent on test missiles but those tests DO
violate UN
Security Council Resolutions. The problem is, no one has done
anything
about it. Which brings me to my next point – the utter weakness and
incompetence of the United Nations.
2 – Trump declared he will check
Iran’s growing regional dominance.
The GOP frontrunner affirmed that as
president he will "stand up to
Iran’s aggressive push to destabilize and
dominate the region."
He outlined Iran’s support for terrorism worldwide,
from Syria to the
Gaza Strip to Lebanon and beyond. "They’ve got terror
cells everywhere,
including in the western hemisphere very close to home,"
he said. "Iran
is the biggest sponsor of terrorism around the world and we
will work to
dismantle that reach."
This policy of countering Iran’s
regional influence stands in stark
contrast to President Obama’s own
coddling of Iran, and the president’s
orientation away from America’s
traditional Sunni Arab allies.
3 – Trump said he opposes the United
Nations unilaterally declaring a
Palestinian state.
An agreement
imposed by the UN would be a total and complete
disaster. The United States
must oppose this resolution and use the
power of our veto. Why? Because
that’s not how you make a deal.
Deals are made when parties come to
the table and negotiate. Each
side must give up something it values in
exchange for something it
requires. A deal that imposes conditions on Israel
and the Palestinian
Authority will do nothing to bring peace. It will only
further
delegitimize Israel and it would reward Palestinian terrorism,
because
every day they are stabbing Israelis – and even Americans.
He
further threatened to veto "any attempt by the UN to impose its will
on the
Jewish state."
4 – Trump vowed to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to
Jerusalem.
We will move the American embassy to the eternal capital
of the
Jewish people, Jerusalem – and we will send a clear signal that there
is
no daylight between America and our most reliable ally, the state of
Israel.
5 – Trump will treat Israel like an ally and not a "second-class
citizen."
When I become President, the days of treating Israel like
a
second-class citizen will end on Day One. I will meet with Prime
Minister Netanyahu immediately. I have known him for many years and we
will be able to work closely together to help bring stability and peace
to Israel and to the entire region.
While this declaration may sound
simplistic, it comes after seven years
of Obama espousing policies some have
argued are hostile to the Jewish
state. And it comes on the heels of a
turbulent relationship between
Obama and Netanyahu, including a notorious
May 2010 White House meeting
in which Obama reportedly snubbed Netanyahu for
dinner with Michelle and
his daughters. Also, the Obama administration
faced accusations it
encouraged the activism of nongovernmental
organizations working to
defeat Netanyahu in the 2015 elections in
Israel.
Aaron Klein is Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior
investigative reporter. He is a New York Times bestselling author and
hosts the popular weekend talk radio program, "Aaron Klein Investigative
Radio." Follow him on Twitter @AaronKleinShow. Follow him on
Facebook.
(3) Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Vow to Protect Israel but
Differ on
Means
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/22/us/politics/hillary-clinton-and-donald-trump-vow-to-protect-israel-but-differ-on-means.html
By
MARK LANDLER and MAGGIE HABERMANMARCH 21, 2016
WASHINGTON — Hillary
Clinton and Donald J. Trump on Monday presented
sharply different views on
how the United States should deal with the
Middle East and its relationship
with Israel, previewing for an
influential pro-Israel audience a debate on
foreign policy that could
play out this fall if they face each other in the
general election.
Mrs. Clinton promised she would stand unwaveringly with
Israel while
accusing her potential Republican rival, Mr. Trump, of being an
unreliable partner for one of America’s closest allies. "We need steady
hands," she said, "not a president who says he’s neutral on Monday,
pro-Israel on Tuesday, and who-knows-what on Wednesday."
Speaking to
the same audience hours later, Mr. Trump swore his fealty to
Israel and
condemned President Obama’s policies. But Mr. Trump, who
describes himself
as a "master counterpuncher," declined to answer Mrs.
Clinton’s criticisms,
offering a standard appeal to a pro-Israel
audience. "When I become
president," he said, "the days of treating
Israel like a second-class
citizen will end on Day 1."
Mr. Trump’s remarks, which came after he had
sent a series of
conflicting signals about Israel on the campaign trail in
recent weeks,
drew less sustained applause than Mrs. Clinton’s from the
crowd of
18,000 people assembled by the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee,
the nation’s most influential pro-Israel lobbying
group.
The competing speeches not only made for rich political theater,
but
they also vaulted the presidential campaign into a new phase, in which
Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton seemed to be turning from their primary
battles to the general election. And they thrust America’s complicated
relationship with Israel to the forefront of the campaign.
Mrs.
Clinton, the former secretary of state and the Democratic
front-runner,
wasted no time taking aim at Mr. Trump for declaring
recently that he would
be "neutral" when it came to negotiating a peace
accord between the Israelis
and Palestinians. While Mr. Trump’s remark
did not stray far from
traditional American policy, his blunt language
rattled some in Israel, who
worry that it might portend a less
supportive United States.
"America
can’t ever be neutral when it comes to Israel’s security and
survival," Mrs.
Clinton declared. "My friends, Israel’s security is
nonnegotiable."
Mrs. Clinton offered a thunderous affirmation of
American solidarity
with Israel, with promises to buttress Israel’s
military, combat
anti-Semitism, press Iran to abide by its nuclear agreement
with the
West, crack down on Iranian proxies like Hezbollah and thwart
efforts to
boycott Israeli products.
"We must repudiate all efforts
to malign, isolate and impugn Israel and
the Jewish people," she
said.
Mrs. Clinton also played up her credentials to be commander in
chief and
accused the Republican candidates of lacking either the experience
or
the will to extend American leadership in the Middle East. "We have to
get this right," she said.
Mr. Trump, ahead in the Republican race
but opposed by many parts of the
party, focused heavily on Iran, promising
to dismantle the nuclear deal
negotiated by Mr. Obama, thwart what he
described as Iran’s efforts to
destabilize the Middle East and punish Iran
for testing ballistic
missiles. "Nobody has done anything about it," he said
to cheers. "We
will. We will."
Mr. Trump’s aides released text of the
prepared remarks he used,
something he almost never does on the campaign
trail. They contained one
tempered reference to Mrs. Clinton, but he
ad-libbed another: "Hillary
Clinton, who is a total disaster by the way, she
and President Obama
have treated Israel very, very badly," he
said.
But he raised eyebrows in the audience at the Verizon Center when
he
referred repeatedly to Palestine. Senator Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican
who spoke after Mr. Trump, noted pointedly that "Palestine has not
existed since 1948." [...]
(4) Trump reads from prepared speech at
AIPAC; Sanders did not attend
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/21/donald-trump-israel-aipac-hillary-clinton
Trump
tries his hand at foreign policy in speech to skeptical Aipac
crowd
Republican makes pledges to Israel in first foreign policy speech
of
election but gets mixed reaction after branding Hillary Clinton a
‘disaster’ as secretary of state
Ben Jacobs and David Smith in
Washington
Tuesday 22 March 2016 11.43 AEDT Last modified on Tuesday 22
March 2016
12.03 AEDT
Donald Trump vowed to stand with Israel and
branded Hillary Clinton a
"disaster" as he delivered the first detailed
foreign policy speech of
his presidential campaign.
Sounding
noticeably stilted, he read from a teleprompter and almost
stuck to a script
for the first time in his campaign during Monday
night’s high stakes
appearance at the annual policy conference of the
American Israel Public
Affairs Committee (Aipac).
As the Republican frontrunner took the stage,
he announced: "I didn’t
come here to pander." And, of course, Trump then did
precisely that,
offering few policy specifics but instead delivering a
series of
pro-Israel bromides to a skeptical crowd, spiced with occasional
attacks
on Barack Obama. He received a mix of boos and cheers from the crowd
at
the Verizon Center as he branded Clinton a "total disaster" as secretary
of state.
Trump has previously earned criticism for suggesting he
would be "sort
of a neutral guy" on Israel and seek to negotiate peace with
the
Palestinians, describing himself as best placed to make "probably the
toughest deal in the world right now".
However, on Monday, in front
of an influential and passionately Zionist
audience, Trump tried to
demonstrate his foreign policy chops and stand
out in a field where he is
the only candidate without Washington experience.
He urged support for
moving the US embassy to Jerusalem in a policy
shift and demonstrated his
credentials as a lifelong supporter of
Israel, bragging about having once
"taken the risk" to serve as grand
marshal of New York’s Israel Day parade
in 2004.
Trump railed against the Iran deal that the Obama administration
reached. He argued that he would both "restructure" and "dismantle" it,
while also condemning the United Nations as "not a friend of
democracy".
The billionaire also claimed his deal-making ability would
somehow help
Israel and the Palestinians reach a peace accord. Trump,
though,
repeatedly referred to Palestine, which is not a country, and set
himself up for an immediate riposte from Ted Cruz who immediately noted
"Palestine has not existed since 1948" after taking the
stage.
Trump’s speech came shortly after the Republican frontrunner
questioned
the need for Nato and suggested that the US does not benefit from
its
involvement in east Asia in an interview with the Washington Post’s
editorial board.
Democratic congressman Brad Sherman, a stalwart
supporter of the
US-Israel alliance, said Trump "did sing some of the
greatest hits of
Aipac, he may have sang them a bit off key but he sang them
with
enthusiasm and he’s a great stadium performer." He noted: "This is not
a
room where you want to play acoustic. He brought his electric guitar, he
brought his amps."
In contrast, Democratic frontrunner Hillary
Clinton used her Aipac
speech earlier in the day to go went after Trump.
Without mentioning him
by name, the former secretary of state left little
doubt that she was
challenging Trump’s qualifications to be
commander-in-chief, portraying
him as dangerously malleable and lacking firm
convictions. Hillary
Clinton to Aipac: Trump is dangerous for the security
of Israel [...]
The only remaining presidential candidate not to attend,
Vermont senator
Bernie Sanders, instead expressed his support for a
two-state solution
between Israel and the Palestinians at a campaign stop in
Utah. Sanders,
who couldn’t appear remotely at Aipac, told attendees in
Utah. "We as a
nation are committed not just to guaranteeing Israel’s
survival but also
making sure it’s people have a right to live in peace and
security."
Sanders did criticize what he thought was Israel’s
"disproportional
response" to rocket launches and terrorist attacks from
Hamas-occupied Gaza.
(5) Trump no longer 'neutral' on Israel
http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/03/candidates-israel-trump-clinton-cruz-aipac-iran.html
WASHINGTON,
DC — Democratic and Republican presidential hopefuls
competed March 21 to
prove who is more pro-Israel at the annual
convention of the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in a
show of political correctness that
extended even to real estate magnate
Donald Trump.
Author Barbara
Slavin Posted March 22, 2016
Trump, the Republican front-runner who has
raised eyebrows in debates
and interviews by asserting that he would be
"neutral" in peace talks
between Israelis and Palestinians and questioning
US aid to the Jewish
state, executed a 180-degree turn as he delivered what
appeared to be
his first prepared campaign speech before an enthusiastic
crowd of
18,000 at a Washington sports arena.
After asserting, "I
didn’t come to pander," he ran through a series of
positions that closely
follow the policies of the current Israeli
government on Iran, the
Palestinians and recognition of Jerusalem as
Israel’s capital. He also vowed
to "totally disband Iran’s global
terrorist network" without defining it or
specifying how he would
accomplish that goal.
Trump asserted that he
was a "lifelong supporter and true friend of
Israel," but the evidence he
cited was thin. Trump said he lent his
private plane to New York Mayor Rudy
Giuliani to visit Israel after the
Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and was grand
marshal in the 2004 Israel Day
parade in New York City. "Many people turned
down this honor," Trump
said, adding, "I took the risk and I’m glad that I
did," although
failing to explain what was risky about walking down Fifth
Avenue in a
city with a large Jewish population.
On the Palestinian
issue, Trump said, "To make a great deal, you need
two willing
participants," noting that Palestinians had turned down
three prior Israeli
and American offers. "The days of treating Israel
like a second-class
citizen will end from day one," should he be
elected, Trump
said.
Trump, who has previously said he would keep the recently
implemented
nuclear agreement with Iran but "police that contract so tough
that [the
Iranians] don’t have a chance," hardened his position before
AIPAC. He
called the deal "catastrophic for America, Israel and the whole of
the
Middle East," and stated, "My first priority is to dismantle this
disastrous deal on Iran."
Along with fellow Republican contenders
John Kasich and Ted Cruz, Trump
vowed to move the US Embassy in Israel from
Tel Aviv to Jerusalem as a
"clear signal that there is no daylight between
America and our most
reliable ally." US candidates have frequently made this
pledge, but no
president has carried it out for fear of prejudicing peace
talks in
which the final status of Jerusalem would be a key issue. Cruz, a
senator from Texas, noted that point and said that unlike other
candidates, "I will do it," if elected president.
Cruz has repeatedly
said that he would tear up the Iran nuclear deal on
the first day of his
presidency. He warned the Islamic Republic to "shut
down your nuclear
program or we will shut it down for you." He added
that if Iran were to
conduct another ballistic missile test on his
watch, "We will shoot that
missile down."
Kasich said he would suspend the nuclear deal because of
the missile
launches, although they do not violate the nuclear
accord.
Democrat Hillary Clinton, who began back channel talks with Iran
when
she was secretary of state, defended the nuclear agreement while
blasting what she called "Iran’s aggression across the region." She
promised to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, "with force if
necessary," and to respond with more sanctions to the missile launches,
which she called a "serious danger" that "demands a serious
response."
Clinton, who spoke in the morning, hours before the
Republicans, gave a
pre-rebuttal of her GOP rivals. "Tonight you will hear a
lot of rhetoric
from other candidates about Iran, but there’s a big
difference between
talking about holding Iran accountable and actually doing
it," she said.
"Our next president has to be able to hold together our
global coalition
and impose real consequences for even the smallest
violations of this
agreement."
However, Clinton agreed with the
Republicans that the United States
should oppose any attempt by outside
parties, including the UN Security
Council, to impose a territorial
compromise on Israel. Trump said he
would veto such a resolution "100%"
while Cruz said he would "fly to New
York to personally veto it myself." All
the candidates condemned
Palestinian leaders for implicitly inciting attacks
on Israeli civilians
by glorifying dead Palestinian assailants as
martyrs.
Speaking two days before Jews celebrate Purim, a holiday that
celebrates
Jewish survival during the reign of a hostile Persian king,
Clinton
invoked both the biblical Queen Esther and modern Israel’s only
female
prime minister as apparent role models. "Some of us remember a woman,
Golda Meir, leading Israel’s government decades ago and wonder what’s
taking us so long here in America," Clinton said to laughter and
applause.
Clinton devoted much of her speech to skewering Trump without
using his
name. Over and over, she said that no responsible American
politician
could be "neutral" when it comes to Israel’s security. "We need
steady
hands, not a president who says he’s neutral on Monday, pro-Israel on
Tuesday and who knows what on Wednesday, because everything’s
negotiable," Clinton said. "Well, my friends, Israel’s security is
non-negotiable."
Clinton also inveighed against bigotry in a clear
reference to Trump’s
remarks against Muslims and Mexicans and seeming
willingness to accept
support from white supremacist groups. She reminded
the audience of
1939, when a ship carrying 1,000 Jewish refugees from Nazi
Germany was
denied entry to the United States and sent back to Europe.
"Americans
should be better than this," Clinton said. "If you see a bully,
stand up
to him."
J Street, a rival Jewish organization to AIPAC,
also criticized Trump in
a statement. "Sadly, Mr. Trump’s campaign to date,
characterized as it
has been by outrageous and alarming attacks on
immigrants, Hispanics,
women and other groups as well as his call for a
total ban on Muslims
entering the United States, runs diametrically counter
to the values J
Street espouses," the statement said.
A group of 40
rabbis boycotted Trump’s speech and decried the racial and
ethnic hatred
stirred up by the New Yorker’s campaign. The
Anti-Defamation League did so
as well and announced that it was
"redirecting" donations from Trump to
anti-bullying and
anti-discrimination efforts.
All the candidates got
rousing receptions from the AIPAC audience. While
about 200 people
demonstrated against Trump outside the conference,
there were no visible
protests inside the arena, where security was tight.
Clinton’s sole
competitor for the Democratic nomination, Vermont Senator
Bernie Sanders,
skipped the AIPAC meeting so he could campaign in
western states that hold
primaries March 22. He outlined his views on
the Middle East in a lengthy
statement.
The only Jewish candidate in the race, Sanders, who spent time
on an
Israeli kibbutz in his youth, said that "real friendship" with Israel
requires friends "to speak the truth as we see it … especially in
difficult times."
He promised to "work tirelessly to advance the
cause of peace" not only
by being a friend to Israel, "but to the
Palestinian people, where in
Gaza, they suffer from an unemployment rate of
44% — the highest in the
world — and a poverty rate nearly equal to
that."
On Iran, he expressed support for the nuclear deal but added, "If
Iran
does not live up to the agreement, we should re-impose sanctions and
all
options are back on the table."
Sanders was the only candidate to
mention Iran’s recent elections, which
he called "a small step in the right
direction," saying, "I was
heartened by the results of the recent
parliamentary elections in which
Iranian voters elected moderates in what
was, in part, a referendum on
the nuclear deal."
Sanders was also
alone among the contenders in suggesting "a more
balanced approach toward
Iran" in regional diplomacy. "We have serious
concerns about the nature of
the Iranian government," he said, "but we
have to be honest enough to say
that Saudi Arabia — a repressive regime
in its own right — is hardly an
example of Jeffersonian democracy."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.