1044 From Weinstein to Epstein - Gilad Atzmon; we might see more 'suicides'; Media dismiss qs about Epstein death as 'conspiracy theories'

 From Weinstein to Epstein - Gilad Atzmon; we might see more 'suicides';
Media dismiss qs about Epstein death as 'conspiracy theories'

Newsletter published on August 14, 2019

(1) From Weinstein to Epstein and Beyond - Gilad Atzmon
(2) Former MCC inmate: No way Epstein killed himself: Ceiling is 8-9',
there's nothing to hang yourself with
(3) No way Mossad (or CIA) would allow Epstein to bring down the Deep
State - Capt. Dave Bertrand
(4) How The Epstein Case Might Unravel; we might see a lot more
’suicides’ - Brother Nathanael
(5) Media dismiss questions about Epstein’s death as "conspiracy
theories"; US oligarchy feels under siege - wsws
(6) Epstein's Caribbean island: Naked teenage girls and a sinister
'temple' - Daily Mail

(1) From Weinstein to Epstein and Beyond - Gilad Atzmon

https://www.unz.com/gatzmon/predators-united/

Predators United

GILAD ATZMON

AUGUST 4, 2019

In this part study I intend to delve into a deeply troublesome topic.
Due to the growing sensitivity concerning ‘anti-Semitism’ and new
legislation designed to restrict discussion of topics related to Jewish
politics, culture and history, I have limited myself to sources that are
Jewish, Israeli or mainstream news.

 From Weinstein to Epstein and Beyond

"Not Just Weinstein: The Year #MeToo Rocked and Shocked the Jewish
World" was the title of a 2018 Haaretz article that reviewed the large
number of Jews involved in sex scandals that year. "Over the past year,"
Haartez wrote, "a high number of powerful Jewish men have been accused
of sexual misconduct. While it has provided fodder for anti-Semites,
activists say addressing the problem is vital."

Haaretz listed some of the prominent Jewish men accused of predatory
sexual behaviour. "In addition to (Harvey) Weinstein and (Leon)
Wieseltier, the list of Jewish men implicated in #MeToo over the past 12
months includes former Democratic senator Al Franken; ousted CBS chief
Les Moonves; actors Dustin Hoffman, Jeffrey Tambor and Jeremy Piven;
directors Woody Allen, James Toback and Brett Ratner; playwright Israel
Horowitz; journalists Mark Halperin and Michael Oreskes; conductor James
Levine; and radio show hosts Leonard Lopate and Jonathan Schwartz."

Apparently someone decided to ‘clean the swamp’. Harvey Weinstein was
just an early bird. In 2018 we also learned about the Nxivm sex cult and
the role of Clare Bronfman at its centre. The Jewish Forward wrote that
Nxivm’s leader attracted "several prominent figures to his group,
including heiress Clare Bronfman, who pleaded guilty in April to credit
card fraud and harbouring an undocumented immigrant who provided unpaid
"labor and services." Bronfman is the daughter of the legendary ultra
Zionist billionaire Edgar Bronfman (1929 –2013) who was president of the
World Jewish Congress. In his obituary, Edgar Bronfman was described by
Haaretz as "prince of the Jews." His daughter has been ordered to pay a
penalty of $6 million out of her $200 million fortune, and she faces up
to two years in prison.

In November 2017, genius comedian Larry David admitted on Saturday Night
Live that he was uncomfortable with the fact that so many of those
accused of sexual harassment in Hollywood are Jewish. David allowed he
would much prefer Jews to be associated with the theory of relativity
and the cure for polio.

When it seemed the Jewish universe couldn’t cope with any more scandals
involving predatory sexual behaviour, the Epstein affair resurfaced. The
Jeffrey Epstein spectacle is one of the biggest of its kind in the
history of America ensnaring presidents and prime ministers. Some of the
world’s most influential men in cultural, financial and academic fields
are allegedly implicated in predatory behaviour with underage girls. And
it doesn’t take a genius to observe that the Epstein drama is,
unfortunately, a ‘Jewish drama.’

Bloomberg, not exactly an ‘anti-Semitic’ outlet, dug into The
Complicated Orbit of Jeffrey Epstein. Zionist enthusiast Leslie Wexner
was identified as Epstein’s ‘patron’. The Jewish virtual library informs
us that Wexner "often support[s] .. Jewish projects. He serves as
Honorary Vice Chairman of the Board of Congregation Aguda Achim… [And]
established the Wexner Foundation, which runs both a Graduate Fellowship
and an Israel Fellowship Program."

Bloomberg lists the following as amongst Epstein’s ‘business partners’:
Harvey Weinstein, Mort Zuckerman, Donny Deutsch, Nelson Peltz, Ehud
Barak and Ponzi aficionado Steven Hoffenberg.

Ghislaine Maxwell, the daughter of notorious Zionist pension plunderer
Robert Maxwell, is described by Bloomberg as Epstein’s ‘Inner Circle.’
And then there is Alan Dershowitz who has been labouring tirelessly to
try to convince the American media and anyone else willing to listen
that he didn’t have sex with underage girls.

Again I find myself admitting that the list of Jewish names surrounding
an unsavoury character, this time Epstein, resembles my Bar Mitzvah’s
guest list: a lot of Jewish names with just a few goyim at the margin.

This raises critical questions, the most elementary of which is, why?
Why are so many Jewish men currently in the news in connection with
sexually predatory behaviour? What is it about these rich and
influential people that pushes them over the edge?

And there are deeper questions that beg attention. Why is it that with
so many Jews in academia and media ordinarily so clever in explaining in
a ‘professorial manner’ the psychology and sociology behind every world
development and political shift, not one has volunteered to explain the
cultural, ideological and spiritual continuum between Weinstein and
Epstein and beyond? How is it that the academics and think tanks that
are so adept in analysing ‘cultural clashes’ and, as they call it,
‘Islamofascism,’ are unwilling to analyse the roots of the cultural
crisis at the core of the Epstein saga? And I must extend this inquiry
just one step further, why does the Jewish solidarity industry that
cares so much for Palestine, Immigrants, the Civil Rights Movement and
LGBT issues remain silent when it comes to the crimes committed, and on
a mass scale, against underage girls just a few blocks from JVP’s New
York headquarters?

I tend to think that it is just a question of time before we see the
formation of ‘Jews against Epstein’ or some other racially exclusive
‘Jews only’ group of that sort. Dominating the dissent is a Jewish
survival instinct. ‘As Jews’ they will protest against Epstein, Maxwell,
Barak, Weinstein and Dershowitz just to make sure that the boundaries of
criticism are kept within the safety zone. If this happens, the battle
against pedophilia will slowly evolve into an internal Jewish dispute.
Gentiles will be assured that Jews can safely take care of their problems.

Some may argue that the sickening stories to do with Weinstein, Epstein
et al have nothing to do with Jewishness, Judaism or the Jews. It is a
legitimate contention that what we are actually dealing with are the
predatory symptoms that can be associated with money and power. The
argument is that capitalism and greed corrupts the rich and the powerful
and that because Jewish men are over represented in these circles, they
only appear to be disproportionately prone to such predatory symptoms. I
could easily buy into such a theory. It certainly explains why sex
crimes are prevalent within the Jewish elite as Haaretz was brave enough
to admit. But it fails to explain the widely spread predatory behaviour
within Rabbinical communities. It is even less successful in explaining
why a bunch of Israelis were caught recently in Columbia apparently
running a human trafficking network that specialised in marketing
underage sex tourism packages for Israelis.

Not just the Rich and the Influential

In March 2017 Israeli police arrested 22 ultra-Orthodox Jews for sex
crimes against minors and women. In April 2019 Haaretz admitted that
"There’s a Hole in the System. Israel Became a Haven for Suspected
Jewish Sex Offenders." The Israeli paper reported that "65 suspected
sexual offenders [are] allegedly seeking refuge in Israel."

In July 2019 The Times of Israel reported that "Deputy Health Minister
Yaakov Litzman was alleged to have improperly intervened to aid at least
10 sex offenders from Israel’s ultra-Orthodox community." Litzman, who
is himself ultra-Orthodox and the leader of the ultra-Orthodox United
Torah Judaism Party, "had been questioned by police over suspicions that
he had attempted to prevent the extradition of accused child molester
Malka Leifer to Australia."

Malka Leifer was formerly the principal of an orthodox Jewish girls
school in Melbourne and has been charged with as many as 74 assaults
against minors. The extradition battle over Malka Leifer, who fled
Melbourne in 2008 with the help of some in the local ultra-Orthodox
community, has dragged on for several years, frustrating her accusers.

In 2015 Michael Lesher, an orthodox Jewish attorney, published a book
titled "Sexual Abuse, Shonda and Concealment in Orthodox Jewish
Communities." In the introduction Lesher writes that his book isn’t
"about sexual abuse per se but on the dismal history of how far too many
of those cases have been assiduously concealed both from the public and
from the police: how influential rabbis and community leaders have sided
with the alleged abusers against their victims; how victims and
witnesses of sexual abuse have been pressured, even threatened, not to
turn to secular law enforcement for help; how autonomous Jewish
‘patrols,’ displacing the role of official police in some large and
heavily religious Jewish neighbourhoods, have played an inglorious part
in the history of cover-ups; … how some Jewish (orthodox) communities
have even succeeded in manipulating law enforcement officials to protect
suspected abusers."

Lesher finds the Jewish media culpable. Jewish media outlets steer clear
of stories about such predatory behaviour or at most publish them only
sparingly. It would be reasonable to postulate that we are dealing with
an institutional operation to conceal sex crimes that concern the
‘Jewish orthodox ghetto.’

Far away from the Jewish orthodox ghetto, in Ayia Nap, Cyprus, next to
the sunny Mediterranean Sea, a bunch of young Israelis described by the
Israeli press as ‘the salt of the Jewish earth,’ were falsely accused
this month of a brutal gang rape of a young British citizen. The Israeli
youngsters were eventually cleared and sent home. The 19 old British
woman is now facing charges for falsifying a rape account.

Unlike Orthodox Jewry whom Lesher claims conceal sex crimes and often
take the side of the predator, as did Israeli Deputy Health Minister
Litzman, the alleged Israeli gang rape was a headline article in every
Israeli media outlet for almost two weeks. Israel didn’t attempt to
conceal the story. Israelis were discomfited by the saga and engaged in
soul searching. In fact, the Israeli press was alone amongst the media
to follow this horrible story closely.

The Daily Mail was probably the only British paper to produce a detailed
account of the alleged gang rape. The British tabloid described the
attitude of Israeli tourists to others on the Mediterranean island as
beyond unacceptable. "Other girls living at the Pambos Napa Rock hotel
have told how they were constantly pestered for sex by Israeli men
staying at the budget hotel. ‘One of my friends was asleep in her room
an Israeli came in and demanded sex. She screamed at him to get out, but
the management do not seem to care.’ Another male worker said a friend
of his was followed into the ladies toilet and proposition for sex. ‘He
just held out some Euros and said he wanted sex. It is disgusting.’ ‘The
Israeli men come up behind you and just stand there. Not many of them
speak English and it is creepy. I had no idea what it was like here. I
do not feel safe." ...

In December 2018, law enforcement authorities in Colombia suspected 12
Israelis of running a sex-trafficking network. Haaretz reported that the
"alleged sex trafficking ring provided Israeli travellers with ‘tourism
packages’ that included prostitutes, some of whom were minors, who
received between 200,000 pesos ($63) to 400,000 pesos ($126) in return
for sexual services." Ynet revealed that the Israeli "suspects
reportedly scouted local schools, recruiting underage girls as sex
workers for drug-fuelled parties, attended largely by Israeli
businessmen and discharged IDF soldiers."

These Israelis are alleged to specialise in the wide scale exploitation
of minors. The consumers of these ‘tour packages’ are ordinary Israelis
not Wall Street’s financiers or Harvard professors.

Here we may be detecting a significant and disturbing similarity among
Epstein, the Israelis at Ayia Napa and their brethren in Columbia. While
orthodox Jewish sex criminals target members of their own community,
Epstein, the boys at Ayia Napa (as described by the Daily Mail) and the
alleged criminals in Columbia prey on others. These others aren’t
necessarily Jewish or more likely, aren’t Jewish at all.

This may be the right point to introduce the problematic notion of the
Shikse.

Shikse is a derogatory term for a gentile woman or girl. The word, which
is of Yiddish origin, is widely used by Jews and others many of whom do
not speak Yiddish. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the word
came into English usage in the late 19th century. It is derived from the
Hebrew word sheqe? (??? ) meaning ‘a detested thing.’ In fact, the
Oxford Dictionary is taking a light approach to the pejorative term.
Sheqes is a Biblical Hebraic term that expresses abomination and
disgust, especially towards a small animal that is unclean.

The notion of the Shikse and the way in which it is utilised in
reference to non-Jewish woman is as revealing as it is devastating. You
might ask what crime non-Jewish women have committed to be labelled with
such a horrendous and disrespectful term.

Once again it is the genius work of Larry David who together with Jerry
Seinfeld, brought to light the embarrassing as well as irritating fact
that at least culturally, the Shikse is basically a Jewish sex object.
It is a subject of Jewish male fascination and libidinal phantasy. The
Shikse is an ideal date, a one night stand, a mistress, but not a wife.
As you will notice in this short video, this applies to thirteen years
old Bar Mitzvah boys, their fathers and even the local Rabbi. Sometime
Jewish humour tells us more than we should know.

Jews didn’t invent predatory sexual behaviour nor do they collect
royalties for pedophilia. Most Jews are likely embarrassed and disgusted
by Epstein, Maxwell, Weinstein and Malka Leifer. And despite Israel’s
notorious record of human trafficking in the 1990s, the country is now
one of the leaders in the battle against human trafficking. As I noted
in Part 1, the Israeli media published clear and reliable accounts of
the Ayia Napa saga as well as all the other embarrassing stories of
predatory sex scandals involving Israelis and Jews. On top of that, Tel
Aviv is a gay capital, famous for its liberal approach to gender and LGBTQ.

Yet, in contradiction to the openness described above, in the Jewish
State women are segregated and essentially barred from certain streets
for ‘religious reasons.’ In the Jewish State women are segregated on
public transport for the same ‘religious reasons.’ Haaretz writes "In
the ultra-Orthodox community today, not only do men and women not sit
together at celebrations, there are even separate entrances to the
places where the events are held." Haaretz explains the Jewish orthodox
community is fearful of the corrupting powers of women and continues,
"there is this fear they (male orthodox Jews) will not be able to
withstand the temptation of being near women, and therefore they must
remove even the smallest doubt – lest the evil urge cause them to commit
a sin."

Jews are amongst the leading advocates on issues to do with women’s
rights yet Harvey Weinstein is at the centre of the #MeToo scandal. Many
Jews claim to uphold the most precious universal humanist values yet
prominent Jewish characters such as Wexner, Maxwell, Barak and
Dershowitz are regularly in the news for their association with the
Epstein sex trafficking affair.

How can we encapsulate the contradictions presented by humane,
progressive and liberal attitudes towards gender, rabbinical dark
religious morbidity and the current chain of spectacular predatory
criminal affairs with so many famous Jews at their centre?

The issues to do with Jews, sexuality and abuse are confusing,
ambivalent and multi layered. Although in the Jewish orthodox home it is
the mother who has the dominant and most significant educational and
spiritual role, rabbinical Judaism treats women as walking menaces. How
are we to interpret that fact that the Judaic morning blessing includes
a praise to God "who has not made me a woman"?

Jewishness and Judaism can be realised as existing on fierce dialectical
battle grounds. Jews are people distinguished by their relentless
inclination towards self-negation. Some have observed that Jews can be
defined (politically and culturally) as people who strive to stop being
themselves while continuing to be themselves. Early Zionism promised to
fix Diaspora Jews by means of a homecoming. It promised Diaspora Jews
that it could heal their symptoms and make them ‘people like all other
people’ and still stay Jews. Bolshevism promised to fix the Jews by
proletarianization, it promised the Jews they could integrate into the
working class, be proletarians like all other proletarians and still
sustain their Jewishness. Haskala (Jewish Enlightenment) and
Assimilation gave Jews the ability to look like goyim in the street
while sustaining their Jewish identity behind doors. Judah Leib Gordon
illustrated this idea with a simple problematic mantra: "Be a Jew in
your home and a man outside it." Liberalism and progressivism offer
similar promises. Jewishness can be realised as a rebellious form of
self-rejection, whose revolutionary inclinations are set in measured
terms and restricted by overarching tribal interests and agendas.

This radical trait of self-rejection is as old as the Jews. The Biblical
prophets’ harsh critiques, guided by their thorough self-reflection,
offer us a glimpse into Judaic revolutionary dialectics. Judaism and
Jewishness can be realised as the medium of the battle between those who
adhere to the religion, the politics, the culture, the primacy of the
tribe, the spirit of Judaism and Jewish revolutionary dissenters who
oppose the above. This Biblical dialectic and rebellious spirit is
embedded in Jewishness and Judaism and has never faded.

Shabbtai Zvi was born in Izmir, Turkey in 1625 and became a Muslim in
the 1660s. In between he managed to become a Jewish messiah and
attracted the admiration of the vast majority of Jews around the globe.

The movement that developed around Shabbetai Zvi became known as
Shabbetaianism. It evolved into a secret yet influential sect of Muslim
Jewish converts called the Donme. The Shabbetains and the Donme embraced
the theory of "sacred sin." They believed that the Torah could be
fulfilled only by amoral acts representing its seeming annulment.

Zvi replaced the Ten Commandments with a new religious order based on 18
precepts that the Donme called ‘Las Incommendensas.’ Las Incommendensas
included the Ten Commandments although the formulation of the
prohibition on adultery is ambiguous, resembling a suggestion of prudence.

One of the Donme’s distinctive rituals was the Festival of the Lamb,
celebrated in the spring. At least two married couples and often many
more participated in the ceremony. For the first time that year, they
ate the meat of spring’s newly born lambs. After the meal, the lights
were extinguished and couples made love without distinguishing among
their partners. Children born from these encounters were considered
sacred. The practice had its roots in pagan beliefs and orgiastic
rituals known from other ancient cultures of the Middle East. The
analogy between this practice and messianic rebirth after the days of
the apocalypse is clear: the existing order will be abolished and
instinctive needs will be freely enjoyed.

The primary concept of Sabbatean theology was that when Zvi entered the
Jewish arena, the messianic era had begun. In this new world, everything
was turned upside down: the old law was cancelled, all the ‘do not’
commandments, including the strong prohibitions against incest, became
‘do’ mitzvahs.

Jacob Frank was born in Podolia in 1726 to a wealthy Jewish Sabbatean
family. Around the year 1755 it dawned on Frank that he was the true
successor of Shabbetai Zvi. He gathered a sect of believers who were
attracted by his charismatic personality. Frank formed a new, improved
Sabbatean theology based on radical mystical symbols that were infused
with destruction and nihilism. Frank addressed his followers: "I came
not to elevate your spirits, but to humiliate you to the bottom of the
abyss…" By ‘abyss’ he meant sexual rituals that included sacred orgies
with just a touch of incest.

Both Zvi and Frank’s theology, history and influence deserve deeper
analysis. I touch upon them briefly to illustrate the dialectic force
within Judaism. It was the rebellious Judaic spirit that opposed
rabbinical rigidity. It was the detachment from nature, the human body
and soil that brought about its counter movement and the obscene
theology promulgated by Zvi and Frank. Zvi managed to excite the
majority of his contemporaneous Jews. He offered them the opportunity to
emancipate themselves from themselves while being themselves.

The revisionist populist messianic Shabbetianism that arose in
opposition to rabbinical Judaism’s prudish obsession with sex and gender
central didn’t disappear after Jewish secularization and emancipation in
the 19th century, quite the opposite. It morphed into a set of
authoritarian pseudo scientific discourses.

The ‘Oedipal Complex,’ a notion introduced by Freud, was at least as
sick as it was revolutionary. The idea that love between mother and son
involves an ‘oedipal complex,’ an erotically driven murderous intent on
the infant’s part, is deeply troubling and has never been scientifically
verified. Freud’s theoretical attempt to reduce love, intimacy and
compassion to mere (sexual) ‘drives’ suggests that Freud and his cult of
avid disciples may have had severe deficits on the human side.

Freud didn’t resolve the complex Jewish relationship to sex and gender,
he opened a Pandora’s Box, and at least for a while, inflicted his own
morbidity on the entire West.

When Wilhelm Reich was ten years old, his parents allegedly hired tutors
to prepare him for the gymnasium entrance exams. According to Reich, his
mother had an affair with one of his tutors and the young Reich became
jealous. Reich later claimed that he briefly thought of blackmailing his
mother to have sex with him by threatening to tell his father about the
affair. Eventually, Reich confided in his father, who reacted harshly.
In 1910, after a protracted period of beatings from his father, his
mother committed suicide, a consequence for which Reich blamed himself.

That an influential man such as Wilhelm Reich, one who rightly claimed a
major role in the sexual liberation of western women and children, had
such a problematic ‘beginning’ interested me and led me to look into the
origin of his ‘Oedipal’ confession.

In Being in Time I wrote that the person who brought attention to this
disturbing incident was Wilhelm Reich’s biographer, Myron Sharaf, an
American psychotherapist and a Harvard academic. Sharaf was a student,
patient, and colleague of Reich’s from 1948 to 1954, and his book, Fury
on Earth is widely regarded as the definitive biography of Wilhelm Reich.

After reading Sharaf’s account of Reich’s ‘blackmail’ fantasy, I
realized that it raised issues far more disturbing than the alleged
incest incident (which I doubt actually occurred).

The manner by which the affair came to light is itself rather peculiar.
In late 1919 or early 1920, when Reich was about twenty-three and
already a practicing analyst within Freud’s circle, Reich wrote his
first published article , The Breakthrough of the Incest Taboo in
Puberty. In this article, Reich reported on ‘a patient’ who displayed
certain ‘Oedipal patterns.’ The ‘patient’ was attracted to his mother,
he was jealous of a visiting tutor who slept with his mother so he
informed his father about his mother’s affair, his mother was beaten and
eventually committed suicide. According to Sharaf, there is little doubt
that the ‘patient’ was Reich himself. Many years later Reich "told his
elder daughter that the article was a self-analysis." (Myron Sharaf:
Fury on Earth, pg. 40)

This is a disturbing revelation. First, young Reich published a
fabricated patient account in a scientific magazine. This alone is
enough to discredit him, and there is more. Reich was under the spell of
Sigmund Freud when he penned his ‘revelation.’ This suggests that Reich
might have fabricated a patient’s story in order to verify or validate
his master’s ‘Oedipal complex.’ Were fabricated tales of incest the path
to gaining a position within the Freud academic orbit? Scientists and
academics attempt to form theories that correspond with reality and
facts: Reich, then a member of the cult of Freud, apparently reversed
the scientific method, contriving ‘facts’ to correspond with a theory.

In the 1930s when things turned sour for German and Austrian Jews, the
Jewish ‘left’ was quick to diagnose what was wrong with ‘the Germans.’
Wilhelm Reich claimed it was their ‘repressed sexuality.’

Reich posited that sexual liberation on a mass scale would save Marxist
dogma and the working people as well. In chapter five of The Mass
Psychology of Fascism, he declared war on the traditional patriarchal
family which he saw as maintaining the core of mass conservatism: "From
the standpoint of social development," Reich wrote, "the family cannot
be considered the basis of the authoritarian state, only as one of the
most important institutions which support it." The traditional family is
a "central reactionary germ cell, the most important place of
reproduction of the reactionary and conservative individual. Being
itself caused by the authoritarian system, the family becomes the most
important institution for its conservation."

Reich, a neo-Marxist, found both romanticism and traditional family
values obstacles to socialist reform. Reich’s vehicle towards the new
world order was ‘orgasm’! In his 1927 study, The Function of the Orgasm,
he reached the conclusion that: "there is only one thing wrong with
neurotic patients: the lack of full and repeated sexual satisfaction."
In the hands of Reich, the Marx-Freud hybrid led to what some critical
cynics dubbed "genital utopia." And isn’t ‘genital utopia’ a fair
description of the universe Weinstein and Epstein built around themselves?

Reich’s ideas evolved and spread rapidly in America and the West.
Probably the most prominent proponent of such liberal ideas was the
Frankfurt School and its primary star as of 1968, Herbert Marcuse.

Marcuse focused on resolving the Freudian conflict between the Reality
Principle (work orientated and leisure-less) and the Pleasure Principle
(Eros). According to him, the conflict was between alienated labour and
Eros. Sex, he declared, was freely accessible to those in power, namely
the capitalists, but was available to workers only when it did not
disturb their performance. Marcuse contended that in a proper socialist
world we will manage without the labour of the "poor" and without the
suppression of sexual drives. He predicted that "non-alienated libidinal
work" would replace "alienated labour." Marcuse’s theories offered a
post Marxist interpretation of Reich’s genital utopia.

Of course, both Marcuse and Reich were totally delusional. As we know,
sex and sexualization didn’t liberate the working class. It did the
opposite. Pornography is a distraction that helps blind the workless
class from detecting the root cause of their plight. In reference to
Marx’s most misinterpreted adage, I allow myself to say, that at least
in the post political era in which we live, "pornography is the actual
opium of the people."

I doubt college dropout Jeffrey Epstein has read Marcuse, Reich, Zvi or
Frank but he certainly put Reich-Marcuse’s philosophy into practice. As
it now seems, Epstein wasn’t really a ‘financier.’ He hardly engaged in
labour in any form and was totally consumed by the ‘pleasure principle.’
According to recent reporting, Epstein was dedicated to Eros except when
he was amassing footage of his best friends fiddling with underage girls.

The centrality of prominent Jewish names in the current predatory
scandals can’t be denied, but I do not at all contend that predatory
behaviour or sexual morbidity is a Jewish trait or even something
predominantly Jewish. Instead these incidents are consistent with a
Jewish as well as Judaic revolutionary continuum driven by sexual
obsession. This continuum includes Zvi, Frank, Freud, Reich, the

Frankfurt School, Marcuse and many contemporary gender activists such as
Jonathan ‘Jessica’ Yaniv who made the state of his/her hairy testicles
into main stream news. This continuum may well also include Epstein,
Weinstein and the many other Jewish celebrities implicated in these far
too many nasty predatory acts.

Jewishness, as I see it, is a dynamic dialectical morphing spirit. It
contains a bold critical attitude that often evolves into a sense of
empowerment, grandeur, impunity and narcissism. This self-confidence
often produces sensational scientific and social revolutions as well as
spectacular artistic achievement. But it can equally help cause global
disasters, social-disorder, financial meltdowns, spiritual confusion and
spectacular criminal endeavours.

(2) Former MCC inmate: No way Epstein killed himself: Ceiling is 8-9',
there's nothing to hang yourself with

https://nypost.com/2019/08/10/former-mcc-inmate-theres-no-way-jeffrey-epstein-killed-himself/

Former MCC inmate: There’s ‘no way’ Jeffrey Epstein killed himself

By Brad Hamilton and Bruce Golding

August 10, 2019 | 6:17pm | Updated

The following account is from a former inmate of the Metropolitan
Correction Center in lower Manhattan, where Jeffrey Epstein was found
unresponsive Saturday, and declared dead at a hospital of an apparent
suicide. The ex-convict, who spoke to The Post’s Brad Hamilton and Bruce
Golding on the condition of anonymity, spent several months in the 9
South special housing unit for high-profile prisoners awaiting trial —
like Epstein.

There’s no way that man could have killed himself. I’ve done too much
time in those units. It’s an impossibility.

Between the floor and the ceiling is like eight or nine feet. There’s no
way for you to connect to anything.

You have sheets, but they’re paper level, not strong enough. He was 200
pounds — it would never happen.

When you’re on suicide watch, they put you in this white smock, a
straight jacket. They know a person cannot be injurious to themselves.

The clothing they give you is a jump-in uniform. Everything is a dark
brown color.

Could he have done it from the bed? No sir. There’s a steel frame, but
you can’t move it. There’s no light fixture. There’s no bars.

They don’t give you enough in there that could successfully create an
instrument of death. You want to write a letter, they give you rubber
pens and maybe once a week a piece of paper.

Nothing hard or made of metal.

There’s up to 80 people there. They could put two in cell. It’s one or
two, but I’ll never believe this guy had a cellmate. He was too blown up.

The damage that unit can do to someone.

It’s like you’re an animal and you’ve been brought into a kennel. A guy
like Jeffrey, it’s like, "Holy sh-t."

I told my parents not to come there. God wasn’t in the building.

I’ve had some heavy incidents in the building. What happened is permanent.

Some of the guards are on a major power trip. They know guys there are
suffering. They know something the rest of the world hasn’t seen, that a
place like this exists in this country, and they get off on it.

If the guards see that the guy is breaking, they’re going to help you break.

But it’s my firm belief that Jeffrey Epstein did not commit suicide. It
just didn’t happen.

(3) No way Mossad (or CIA) would allow Epstein to bring down the Deep
State - Capt. Dave Bertrand

https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/opinion-conservative/2019/3479632.html

Robert David Steele: Epstein Not Dead, on His Way to Israel? ...

Sunday, August 11, 2019 10:17

By Capt. Dave Bertrand, Ret.

Friends and Associates:

I’m being bombarded with interesting "Conspiracy Theories" about what
actually happened this morning to Jeffie boy Epstein……..hours later,
Facebook & Twitter exploded with "Conspiracy Theories," which justifies
the ‘Phoenix FBI Report’ that ONLY Right Wing Extremists are spreading
"Conspiracy Theories" and is an "act of domestic terrorism." So…..a
majority of Americans are now "domestic terrorists,"
interesting….wouldn’t ya say FBI ? How convenient was the FBI report a
week ago and today Epstein is either dead or alive ? ...

Before 9/11 when I flew for Gemini Air Cargo, as a First Officer on the
DC-10, I often witnessed extra passengers a.k.a. cargo security
personnel we carried, go back and forth to a cargo igloo and thought
nothing of it. Years later, I learned that Gemini, owned by the Carlyle
Group (GHWB Board of Directors and employer of Edward Snowden via the
sub-level affiliated company Booz Allen Hamilton)….Gemini had contracts
with the State Department (and the CIA), involved with using our flights
as rendition flights to move al Qaida terrorists from one location to
another where CIA Black Sites exist[ed] at the time…..mostly to Dubai (IMO).

Patriots are aware and awake, stating this Epstein event appears to be
another false flag. There is no way Mossad (or the CIA) would allow
Epstein to begin bringing down the world’s most important power players
in the Deep State, therefore, it is highly probable the perp is actually
dead, but not from suicide….or they are grateful for his years of
blackmailing and are giving him a new face lift and name change.

(4) How The Epstein Case Might Unravel; we might see a lot more
’suicides’ - Brother Nathanael

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1390

Brother Nathanael

August 12, 2019 @ 10:15 pm

How The Epstein Case Might Unravel

Lots of Jewish perverts out there, and you’ve seen them all on TV.

Weinstein, Weiner, Levine…but now mega Jewish pedo-pervert, Jeffrey
Epstein, is no longer on the marquee.

But take heart.

The Trump-appointed Federal Prosecutor, Geoffrey Berman—who’s not a Jew,
and who revived the case—announced that the Indictment "remains ongoing"
and that the Indictment includes a "conspiracy count."

That means those complicit with Epstein to use underage girls as sex
bait for high profile elite will be hauled into court.

Hey, remember Trump said he’d drain the swamp?

And what kind of slime might come out this time?

An apparent Mossad honey-pot sting that was in full swing.

Would political blackmail on behalf of supporting Israel be beneath even
the most ‘esteemed’ arch-Zionist, or the Israeli Intelligence Service,
the Mossad?

Even a clueless checkout clerk could answer that one.

So, here’s the lineup.

We’ve got British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, accused of being the
‘madam’ of Epstein’s teenage sex slaves—who with her ties to wealth and
power, and her reported links to the Mossad—introduced Epstein to HIGH
SOCIETY which included Prince Andrew, also known as Randy Andy…as one of
the most well-known accused A-Listers.

And Mss Maxwell just might have a lot to say about Bill Clinton too.

Here she is with her late father, Robert Maxwell, born Hymie Hoch, a
touted Mossad agent—and again, here she is at his funeral, not in
Britain, but in Israel. Whod’ve thunk it possible?

We’ve got Leslie Wexner, too, owner of Victoria’s Secret, who was
Epstein’s chief ‘client’ of his "wealth management company," and who
turned over his Manhattan mansion to Epstein absolutely free of charge.

Now, what Jew does that unless there’s a ‘conspiracy’ going on?

It’s been reported also that his "Wexner Foundation" (which listed
Epstein as head Trustee), wrote out checks to Ehud Barak, former prime
minister of Israel, whose links to the Mossad need no proof.

And then there’s Alan Dershowitz, that rabid Israel-Firster, not only
among the accused by one of Epstein’s sex slaves, but whose ties to
Mossad moles, agents, and sleepers, can easily be investigated and
uncovered.

Now, the same day Epstein was arrested at JFK Airport in July, the FBI
served a search warrant on Epstein’s Manhattan mansion.

That raid scored quite a haul which included a bonanza of lurid
photographs…and most likely the video tapes that witnesses said Epstein
stored as tools of Epstein’s dirty blackmail business.

It would seem the evidence is ripe and ready to ‘discover’ that
Dershowitz had his knickers in a knot and never took them off!

And like Dershowitz’s skivvies, it could all soon unravel and dump a
really big pile right on the courthouse floor. +++

Look, everyone, Epstein’s chief accuser, Virginia Roberts Guiffre, her
attorneys, and even the jailers who saw Epstein on the floor of his cell
- and who even might have been sent to a different part of the prison
while Epstein was choking to death - would be well-advised to take out
some good Life Insurance Policies.

Never forget, human life means NOTHING to Jewish Zionists when their
agenda and projects are threatened.

Look what those wonderful Jewish settlers on the West Bank do to
Palestinian children, women, and farmers.

They jail them, bulldoze their homes, burn down their olive groves - as
well as the IDF casually executing Palestinian Gaza medics while they
wave their hands in the air in their ‘Medic’ uniforms clearly visible
from half a mile away.

It’s against International Law, but what do Jews and the Zionist state
care about that?

The only law they care about is…"is it a good for the jews" law.

Get in the way of any Zionist Jew who always wants the upper hand…and
your life is on the line.

JFK is the ultimate model here.

He wanted to register the Jewish Lobbies as agents of a foreign nation,
do away with the Federal Reserve, call out "secret societies," and most
deadly of all, demanded that Israeli President David Ben Gurion allow
routine inspections of the obvious Jewish nuclear bomb program at
Dimona, and put himself in the crosshairs of history.

So, the Mossad along with the CIA (same thing) executed him in broad
daylight on Nov 22, 1963. I was 13, I’ll never forget the day.

Who will they murder next?

The jailers, the girls, Maxwell, the Prosecuting Attorney?

Hold on to your seats, looks like we might see a lot more ’suicides.’
++++++++++++++

(5) Media dismiss questions about Epstein’s death as "conspiracy
theories"; US oligarchy feels under siege - wsws

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/08/13/pers-a13.html

Why is the media dismissing questions about Jeffrey Epstein’s death as
"conspiracy theories"?

13 August 2019

Nearly 72 hours after billionaire money manager and accused
sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein was found unconscious on the floor of his
cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York City,
more and more evidence leads to the conclusion that his death was not
the simple suicide proclaimed in the newspaper headlines and cable
television reports.

It is now clear, as Attorney General William Barr admitted during an
appearance at a police conference in New Orleans, that there were
systematic violations of prison procedures at the MCC.

Epstein was taken off suicide watch 10 days before his death, although
he had been hospitalized July 23 in a semi-conscious state with marks on
his neck. He was then sent to share a cell with another prisoner in the
protective housing unit. This is standard procedure for a suicide risk,
since the cellmate can alert prison officials in the event of another
attempt.

But on Friday, the same day that 2,000 pages of documents were released
threatening to implicate an array of powerful and well-known figures in
the scandal, Epstein’s cellmate was moved out, leaving him alone.

In a further violation of prison rules, guards did not check in on
Epstein every half an hour during the night. At 6:30 a.m. the following
morning he was found dead.

There is no innocent explanation for this string of actions or failures
to act that culminated in the death of the most high-profile prisoner
being held in federal custody. Epstein was either murdered by an
assailant or allowed (and perhaps strongly encouraged) to commit
suicide. In either case, the death is the outcome of a criminal conspiracy.

But the response to Epstein’s death on the part of the American media,
led by the New York Times, has been to launch a coordinated campaign
denouncing as "conspiracy theories" any questioning of the official
story of unassisted suicide.

The denunciations began as soon as Epstein’s death was reported, in an
attempt to delegitimize well-grounded and entirely appropriate
suspicions of foul play, and in the complete absence of any credible
explanation—or any explanation at all—as to how Epstein could wind up
dead while in federal custody.

The campaign against "conspiracy theories" intensified on Monday. The
Times published a filthy column by Charlie Warzel claiming that the
widespread questioning of Epstein’s suicide was the product of a "deeply
poisoned information ecosystem—one that’s built for speed and designed
to reward the most incendiary impulses of its worst actors. It has
ushered in a parallel reality unrooted in fact and helped to push
conspiratorial thinking into the cultural mainstream."

Warzel blamed Twitter for magnifying what he called "a vast discrepancy
between the attention that is directed at the platform and the available
information about the developing story." But the lack of available
information is not the fault of Twitter: it is the result of the
official silence on the circumstances of Epstein’s death, as officials
seek to work out a credible explanation for an inherently damning set of
facts.

This relationship was underscored by the news account provided in
Monday’s Times, which included the following two paragraphs, presented
back-to-back:

"Senior law-enforcement officials, members of Congress and Mr. Epstein’s
accusers have all demanded answers about why Mr. Epstein was not being
more closely monitored. On Sunday, the Bureau of Prisons offered no
explanation for why Mr. Epstein was left alone and not checked on.

"Mr. Epstein’s death has also unleashed a torrent of unfounded
conspiracy theories online, with people suggesting, without evidence,
that Mr. Epstein was killed to keep him from incriminating others."

The contrast here is revealing. The prison officials have given no
explanation for what took place on their premises, under their control,
but the charge of proceeding with "no evidence" is laid at the feet of
those suggesting that Epstein was murdered!

Perhaps the most extraordinary piece in the Times’ propaganda offensive
was another article published yesterday attacking New York Mayor Bill de
Blasio for acknowledging the obvious fact that the death of Epstein is
"just too convenient."

(6) Epstein's Caribbean island: Naked teenage girls and a sinister
'temple' - Daily Mail

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7350459/Inside-exclusive-retreat-billionaire-paedophile-Jeffrey-Epsteins-pals-resist.html

Naked teenage girls and a sinister 'temple': GUY WALTERS details the
inside of the exclusive retreat that billionaire paedophile Jeffrey
Epstein's famous pals couldn't resist

Little St James in the United States Virgin Islands was Jeffrey
Epstein's lair in paradise The island boasts 70 acres of beaches, pools,
a tennis court, a mansion, outbuildings and a helipad Here the late
financier is said to have pressured young girls to have sex with him

By GUY WALTERS FOR THE DAILY MAIL

PUBLISHED: 07:47 AEST, 13 August 2019 | UPDATED: 13:32 AEST, 13 August 2019

 From the air, it looks like the perfect Caribbean island - a
billionaire’s holiday playground with its 70 acres of beaches, palm
trees, pools, a tennis court, a mansion, outbuildings and, of course, a
helipad.

Very few would turn down an invitation to spend a few days at Little St
James in the United States Virgin Islands, which is why the roster of
those who visited the late Jeffrey Epstein’s lair in paradise was truly
A-list, including Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Naomi Campbell, Peter
Mandelson and, of all people, the late Stephen Hawking.

But while the island appears to be undoubtedly a heaven on earth, for
many of its more reluctant visitors, it was hell.

For it was here that the late financier is said to have pressured
underage girls to have sex with him, to the extent that it has been
dubbed ‘paedophile island’ or ‘orgy island’ by those on neighbouring
islands.

{photo}  Prince Andrew taking a stroll through New York's Central Park
with Epstein following his prison term in 2011 {end}

These lurid, throwaway epithets do not, however, lessen the horrors that
Epstein inflicted on the girls, nor the lasting emotional damage he
caused them.

Their claims were made public last week after documents were unsealed in
a defamation suit filed by Virginia Roberts Giuffre against Ghislaine
Maxwell, Epstein’s friend and alleged procurer-in-chief.

Take the case of a 15-year-old Swedish girl who, in 2005, recalled that
while she was ‘distraught and shaking ... literally quivering’, Maxwell
and Epstein’s assistant, Sarah Kellen, had pressured her into having sex
and even confiscated her passport and phone.

FBI agents were seen raiding Jeffrey Epstein's US Virgin Island Little
St James on Monday morning and afternoon

Another who allegedly had her passport confiscated was Sarah Ransome,
who also claims to have been one of Epstein’s victims and who once tried
to swim away from Little St James. She was eventually tracked down by a
search party that reportedly included Epstein himself.

Then there is the statement made by Virginia Roberts Giuffre herself,
who claimed in her 2015 lawsuit that she was one of Epstein’s sex
slaves, and that when she was on the island, she was allegedly forced
‘into an orgy with numerous other underaged girls’.

And let us not forget Ms Giuffre’s much-publicised allegation that it
was also on the island that she ‘was forced (by Epstein) to have sexual
relations’ with Prince Andrew when she was a minor. The allegation is
strongly denied by Buckingham Palace, who claim ‘any suggestion of
impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue’.

In April 2015, a judge threw out the allegations against Prince Andrew
and ordered them to be struck from the record as being ‘immaterial and
impertinent’.

Shockingly, girls of such a young age appeared to be all-too frequent
visitors to the island, according to Cathy and Miles Alexander, the
couple who managed Little St James for Epstein for eight years until 2007.

‘I saw some girls who I thought were very young-looking — about 16 or
17, easily — and it bugged me because I have a daughter and, although
she was in her 20s, I didn’t like the idea that another woman’s child
was in that situation,’ Cathy Alexander revealed in an interview.