Tuesday, November 12, 2013

605 9/11 link to Police State, US invasions. Inside Job or Mossad Job? - Laurent Guyénot

9/11 link to Police State, US invasions. Inside Job or Mossad Job? -
Laurent Guyénot

Newsletter published on 23 July 2013

(1) ReThink911 to bring 9/11 ads to major cities
(2) Richard Gage 10-minute video (Dec 2012) links 9/11 to Police State,
US invasions
(3) Radio interview with Christopher Bollyn on 9/11 & Israel
(4) Patriot Dame interview with Bollyn: Odigo instant messages
(5) Haaretz repeats Odigo report "Odigo says workers were warned of
attack". But no news from FBI, and no mention in US media
(6) Newsbytes "Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC Attack" (27
September 2001)
(7) Newsbytes "Odigo Clarifies Attack Messages" (28 September 2001)
(8) Bollyn on US Media ignoring Odigo text message warning of 9/11
(9) Bollyn: structural steel evidence was destroyed, lest it expose the
real perpetrators
(10) September 11: Inside Job or Mossad Job? by Laurent Guyénot

(1) ReThink911 to bring 9/11 ads to major cities

http://ReThink911.org/

ReThink911 is the first ever global 9/11 anniversary campaign. Sponsored
by a coalition of more than 40 organizations, ReThink911 will be seen in
11 major cities around the world this September 2013.

The campaign will include outdoor and transit advertising on subways,
taxi tops and billboards worldwide, coupled with grassroots actions
involving thousands of concerned citizens and guerilla advertising in
the form of bumper stickers, lawn signs, t-shirts and more. ReThink911
will launch on September 1st and continue for the entire month of September.

Join us in this historic effort.

Solving the Mystery of WTC Building 7 {visit the link above}

(2) Richard Gage 10-minute video (Dec 2012) links 9/11 to Police State,
US invasions


From: Keith Lampe <us.exile.govt@gmail.com> Date: 31 December 2012 03:57

On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Daren <ulm2012@googlemail.com> wrote:

This is the best 10-min video on 911 I've ever seen......SUCCINCT and
TO-THE-POINT with FACTS.

I feel this is very important as it has been the premise for the following:

1. US going to war with 2 countries.

2. Many of the draconian laws that have taken away common citizens'
rights and freedoms.
Please take the time to watch the video link below......

Architect Richard Gage reminds us that 9/11 is the excuse that is used
by the government to wage aggressive wars around the world and restrict
the freedom of its citizens. [Therefore, it is of utmost importance to
recognize that the collapse of the three buildings on 9/11 was the
result of controlled demolition. Here is a short, yet compelling,
overview of the evidence.]

YouTube Posted 2012 Dec 23

Click here for the video link:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZAHp_zSGd8

== also see
9/11: Explosive Evidence–Experts Speak Out
http://911expertsspeakout.org/

(3) Radio interview with Christopher Bollyn on 9/11 & Israel

From: "Susie" <susie@memphis-group.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:50:04
+0000

Peter,
I just interviewed Christopher Bollyn about his book 'Solving 9-11' and
he talks about almost ALL of our computer systems and electronics run by
Israel.  Snowden exposed the ones monitoring Verizon for years.

http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/5/128/show_5128415.mp3

(4) Patriot Dame interview with Bollyn: Odigo instant messages
http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/5/128/show_5128415.mp3

7.00
The first story, about noon, that really struck me was Ted Koppel's. He
said that the FBI was looking for five Middle-Eastern people who had
been seen celebrating and photographing ... It turned out that this
group of five people they were looking for turned out to be these
Israeli agents. Two of them were known Mossad agents and the other three
were {unclear} ... {next day} I got on the story about these Israelis -
it was reported in New Jersey, in a little newspaper called The Berrigan
Record, by a man named Paulo Lima. It was covered there, and right away
I began to consider the possibility that it was an Israeli operation
made to look like Muslims had done it.

8.20
... that seemed to be the case, especially when another story came out
about the Odigo instant messages that were sent to these 4,000 Israelis
who should have been at work on 9/11, but didn't go to work on 9/11
because they had gotten this message on their cell phone, or their pager
or their Blackberry whathaveyou, telling them not to go to work that day.

The story about those 4,000 Israelis who didn't go to work that day,
that actually was not Arab propaganda as people tried to portray it,
that came from the Jerusalem Post, and the information came directly
from the Israeli Foreign Ministry. It was an Israeli news story that was
picked up by the Arabs because the Arabs found it very interesting. And
when you consider that these people were forewarned about an attack - it
was precise to the minute - these people got these messages as they were
getting ready for breakfast, as they were getting out of bed - a couple
of hours before - it must have been about 6 o'clock in the morning -
they were getting these messages, and their pager was beeping, "Don't go
to the World Trade Center today" - all in Hebrew, of course, "Don't go
to the World Trade Center today, there's going to be an explosion there,
stay home, give an excuse, don't go to work".

(5) Haaretz repeats Odigo report "Odigo says workers were warned of
attack". But no news from FBI, and no mention in US media


Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:30:33 EDT From: RePorterNoteBook@aol.com

Ha'aretz Daily repeats this today July 15, 2004 : Israeli workers were
warned of 9/11

RePortersNoteBook Memo:

What is going on here?

Today Ha'aretz reprints it for the third time the same exact article.
This Israeli daily reports the story with the SAME wording. There has
been nothing added or subtracted. This article is over a year old. The
Ha'aretz Daily in Israel is considered the equivalent of the New York
Times in America.

Yet no mention of this in the major media in the United States! ===========

Haaretz Daily July 15, 2004

Odigo says workers were warned of attack

{was at}
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=77744

{now at}
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/odigo-says-workers-were-warned-of-attack-1.70579

By Yuval Dror

Odigo, the instant messaging service, says that two of its workers
received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack on September
11 predicting the attack would happen, and the company has been
cooperating with Israeli and American law enforcement, including the
FBI, in trying to find the original sender of the message predicting the
attack.

Micha Macover, CEO of the company, said the two workers received the
messages and immediately after the terror attack informed the company's
management, which immediately contacted the Israeli security services,
which brought in the FBI.

"I have no idea why the message was sent to these two workers, who don't
know the sender. It may just have been someone who was joking and turned
out they accidentally got it right. And I don't know if our information
was useful in any of the arrests the FBI has made," said Macover. Odigo
is a U.S.-based company whose headquarters are in New York, with offices
in Herzliya.

As an instant messaging service, Odigo users are not limited to sending
messages only to people on their "buddy" list, as is the case with ICQ,
the other well-known Israeli instant messaging application.

Odigo usually zealously protects the privacy of its registered users,
said Macover, but in this case the company took the initiative to
provide the law enforcement services with the originating Internet
Presence address of the message, so the FBI could track down the
Internet Service Provider, and the actual sender of the original message.

(6) Newsbytes "Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC Attack" (27
September 2001)


http://911review.org/companies/Odigo/Isreal_warned_attack_9-11.html

Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC Attack

By Brian McWilliams, Newsbytes

NEW YORK, NEW YORK, U.S.A.,

27 September 2001, 11:48 AM CST

Officials at instant-messaging firm Odigo confirmed today that two
employees received text messages warning of an attack on the World Trade
Center two hours before terrorists crashed planes into the New York
landmarks.

Citing a pending investigation by law enforcement, the company declined
to reveal the exact contents of the message or to identify the sender.

But Alex Diamandis, vice president of sales and marketing, confirmed
that workers in Odigo's research and development and international sales
office in Israel received a warning from another Odigo user
approximately two hours prior to the first attack.

Diamandis said the sender of the instant message was not personally
known to the Odigo employees. Even though the company usually protects
the privacy of users, the employees recorded the Internet protocol
address of the message's sender to facilitate his or her identification.

Soon after the terrorist attacks on New York, the Odigo employees
notified their management, who contacted Israeli security services. In
turn, the FBI was informed of the instant message warning. FBI officials
were not immediately available for comment today.

The Odigo service includes a feature called People Finder that allows
users to seek out and contact others based on certain interests or
demographics. Diamandis said it was possible that the attack warning was
broadcast to other Odigo members, but the company has not received
reports of other recipients of the message.

In addition to operating its own messaging service network, Odigo has
licensed its technology to over 100 service providers, portals, wireless
carriers, and corporations, according to the company.

Odigo is online at http://www.odigo.com .

Reported by Newsbytes, http://www.newsbytes.com .

11:48 CST

Reposted 11:53 CST (20010927/WIRES TOP, ONLINE, PC, BUSINESS/WTCPOST/PHOTO)

2001 The Washington Post Company

(7) Newsbytes "Odigo Clarifies Attack Messages" (28 September 2001)

http://911review.org/companies/Odigo/Isreal_warned_attack_9-11.html

Odigo Clarifies Attack Messages

By Brian McWilliams, Newsbytes

NEW YORK, NEW YORK, U.S.A.,

28 September 2001, 4:19 PM CST

An official at Odigo today made a more substantial comment on warnings
the instant messaging firm received prior to the September 11 terrorist
attacks.

The company's vice president of sales and marketing acknowledged that
messages warning of attacks were received but would not comment on the
contents of the messages. He had replied to a question about whether he
could confirm that Odigo had received messages warning about the World
Trade Center attacks.

A sender in the alt.politics.bush newsgroup had written on Tuesday that
Odigo workers received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack
on September 11 predicting the attack would happen. The incident was
also the subject of a report in the Ha'aretz daily newspaper in Israel,
which on Wednesday quoted Odigo CEO Micha Macover as saying that "two
workers received the messages predicting the attack would happen."

Odigo Vice President of Sales and Marketing Alex Diamandis told
Newsbytes Thursday that he could not comment on the text or origin of
the message, but said that the sender of the instant message was not
personally known to the Odigo employees. Even though the company usually
protects the privacy of users, Odigo recorded the Internet protocol
address of the message's sender to facilitate his or her identification,
he said.

The Odigo workers, based in the company's research and development and
international sales office in Israel, were signed on to the same Odigo
messaging server used by worldwide users of the company's free,
Odigo-branded messaging software, Diamandis said today. Diamandis today
in a telephone interview also said the warning message did not identify
the World Trade Center as the attack target. Diamandis declined to
reveal any other information contained in the message, including whether
the warning named the targets for the attack.

"Providing more details would only lead to more conjecture," he said.

He did confirm that soon after the terrorist attacks on New York, the
Odigo employees notified their management, who contacted Israeli
security services. In turn, the FBI was informed of the instant-message
warning.

The Odigo service includes a feature called People Finder that allows
users to seek out and contact others based on certain interests or
demographics. Diamandis said Thursday that it was possible the attack
warning was broadcast to other Odigo members, but the company has not
received reports of other recipients of the message.

In addition to operating its own messaging server network, Odigo has
licensed its technology to over 100 service providers, portals, wireless
carriers and corporations, according to the company.

Odigo is at http://www.odigo.com .

Reported by Newsbytes.com, http://www.newsbytes.com .
16:19 CST

Reposted 16:37 CST
(20010928/WIRES TOP, ONLINE, LEGAL, BUSINESS/WTCINVESTIGATION/PHOTO)

2001 The Washington Post Company

(8) Bollyn on US Media ignoring Odigo text message warning of 9/11
Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World

by Christopher Bollyn

www.bollyn.com 2012

{p. 193} Israelis Forewarned

Likewise, the reports about the Odigo text message warning of the attack
at the World Trade Center were dropped into the media's memory hole. The
message of warning, sent two hours before it occurred and precise to the
minute, was sent via the Israeli-owned Odigo text messaging service and
had been received by Odigo employees in Israel. Although the story was
reported in the Israeli press and picked up by Brian McWilliams of
Newsbytes on September 27, 2001, it was never followed-up and discussed
by the major news networks.

How did the news editors at the BBC, FOX, CNN, and the leading networks
decide to censor certain aspects of 9-11? Let's look at this logically.
The 9/11 attack was probably the biggest story these news editors had
ever handled. Suffice it to say that the editorial decisions about how
to cover 9-11 were made by the boss at the top. Any decision to omit or
censor reports about explosions at the World Trade Center or indications
of Israeli prior knowledge would have been made by the senior executive
of each network. In the case of CNN it would have been Gerald M. Levin,
the CEO of Time Warner who ac

{p. 194} quired Turner Broadcasting in 1997. (Levin unexpectedly
announced his resignation in December 2001, less than three months after
9- 11.)

At FOX News the top decision maker would have been Rupert Murdoch, CEO
of News Corporation. At ABC News it would have been Michael D. Eisner,
CEO of Disney, the network's parent company. Were the media moguls
Murdoch, Levin, and Eisner involved in the 9-11 conspiracy? How did they
know that certain aspects of the event needed to be suppressed? Their
networks have continued to suppress important informatfon about 9-11
since 200 1. It can be said that they have been actively involved in a
conspiracy to cover-up the truth. Who is behind this cover-up by the
media? What hidden hand would be able to communicate with these men and
influence them to suppress important reports and evidence from 9-11?

Arnon Milchan - Mossad's Man in the Middle

If one considers the evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of 9-11 the
Odigo text messages and the five arrested Mossad agents, for example, as
indicative of Israeli involvement in the crime, the nature of the
cover-up is obvious. The "hidden hand" suppressing the information about
9-11 would have to be a high-level person in the Israeli
political-military establishment who has very close relations with media
kingpins like Murdoch, Levin, and Eisner. Arnon Milchan is such a
person. Could Milchan be the hidden hand?

"Kingpins like Warner Brothers' Gerald Levin and Disney's Michael Eisner
are quick to return his calls," the American journalist Ann Louise
Bardach wrote about Milchan in her article "The Last Tycoon" in April 2000.

{p. 195} While millions of Americans have seen his films, such as Pretty
Woman and JFK, very few know that Arnon Milchan is a "best friend" of
Shimon Peres, the Israeli president and godfather of Israel's nuclear
arsenal. Milchan's close friendship with Peres, the man who oversaw the
illegal development of Israel's nuclear weapon program, is key to
understanding Milchan's career as an undercover operative, weapons
procurer, and film producer. The fact that Milchan, the Hollywood
producer, has been Israel's "foremost weapons procurer" for decades,
brokering deals for "everything from nuclear triggers to rocket fuel to
guidance systems' " is seldom mentioned in the U.S. news media.

This is probably due to the fact that Milchan is also a "best friend"
and business partner of Rupert Murdoch. He is also a friend and business
partner with Levin (Warner Brothers) and Eisner. "I consider him one of
my best friends," Milchan said about Murdoch, "and I think vice versa.
We're having a ball. He's a very cool guy."

In 1997, after - a six-year relationship with Warner Brothers, Milchan
became a partner with Murdoch, selling him twenty percent of his film
company, New Regency Productions, for $200 million. Murdoch also
invested another $30 million in Regency Television. Today, Murdoch's
equity partnership with Milchan is close to fifty percent. "Milchan's
deal with Fox also assures him a level of financial security," Bardach
wrote. "With Murdoch's $200 million investment and a subsequent $600
million line of credit from a team of banks led by Chase Manhattan,
Milchan is well into mogul territory. "Milchan's tony offices occupy
most of Building 12, right next door to the Executive Building on the
Fox lot," Bardach wrote. "And it is from this seat of power that Milchan
is building an entertainment empire that could one day rival Murdoch's.'

(9) Bollyn: structural steel evidence was destroyed, lest it expose the
real perpetrators


Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World

by Christopher Bollyn

www.bollyn.com 2012

Making Sense of the 9-11 Cover-Up

The preceding chapter explains how the structural steel from the Twin
Towers, crucial evidence of the murderous demolitions, was destroyed by
a network of Zionist agents before it could be examined. From Michael
Chertoff, the senior official responsible for investigating and
prosecuting the crimes of 9-11, to the Mossad-controlled traders and
owners of the NewJersey junkyards that managed its destruction, the
steel passed from one Zionist agent to another until it was completely
destroyed in the furnaces of Asian steel mills. What does this
fundamental part of the 9-11 cover-up tell us about who is really behind
the crime? If Osama Bin Laden and 19 Arab hijackers truly brought down
the World Trade Center, why was a network of Israeli intelligence agents
engaged in a concerted effort to destroy the evidence?

Common sense tells us that Israeli intelligence did not mastermind the
hasty destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center because Osama
Bin Laden was responsible for the explosive demolitions of the Twin
Towers and Larry Silverstein's WTC 7. Rather, Zionist agents destroyed
the evidence to protect the lie that Arab terrorists were responsible
for the deaths of nearly 3,000 people on 9-11. The physical evidence of
the towers was hastily destroyed by a

{p. 310} network of Zionist agents because it could expose the real
perpetrators. Indeed, the fact that a Zionist network had been
established to manage the destruction of the evidence confirms the
hypothesis that 9- 11 was a false-flag terror atrocity carried out by
Israeli intelligence and their agents in the U.S. government.

The intensely hot pile of rubble at the World Trade Center was the scene
of a mass murder in which 2,752 people were killed. Dust and steel were
virtually all that remained after the explosive demolitions destroyed
the towers and the people within them. "The concrete was literally
pulverized; all you're left with is steel and dust," said Robert A.
Kelman, general manager of Hugo Neu Schnitzer East, the Jersey City
junkyard that managed the destruction of the largest part of the steel
from the World Trade Center.

The unexplained explosive demolitions of the 110-story towers directly
caused the deaths of hundreds of people, but the cause of the
unprecedented demolitions was certainly not known to the FBI
investigation team at the remains of the World Trade Center. One of the
first objects of any proper criminal investigation should have been to
determine exactly what had caused the explosive demolitions of the
towers. The federal investigation should have started with a thorough
forensic examination of the dust, the steel, and anything else that
remained of the Twin Towers. To allow the remaining structural steel to
be destroyed without being examined was clearly a grave breach of duty
by the officials at the Department of Justice and their investigative
agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The hasty destruction of the unexamined steel from the World Trade
Center could not have occurred had the FBI not allowed it to happen. The
highest officials at the Department of Justice were clearly

{p. 311} part of the conspiracy to conceal the truth about 9-11 by
allowing the crucial evidence from the World Trade Center to be
destroyed without having it examined and documented by steel experts,
scientists, and engineers.

The Zionist Cover-Up

The facts indicate that the 9-11 cover-up is a Zionist operation in
which partisans of the state of Israel have played all the key roles. If
the attacks of 9-11 were truly acts of Muslim Arab terrorists there
would be no reason for Zionists to manage the destruction of the
evidence. The terror plot to destroy the World Trade Center had been
planned for more than 20 years and was being discussed by senior Israeli
intelligence figures in 1980, as we know from published comments of
Michael D. Evans, an American Zionist who poses as a Christian
missionary. Evans was told by the former Mossad chief Isser Harel of the
plan to bomb the 'World Trade Center in 1980, when Osama Bin Laden was
about 23 years old. (See "America the Target: 9-11 and Israel's History
of False Flag Terrorism"')

This indicates that Israeli intelligence began planning and preparing
the false-flag terror attacks of 9- 11 in the late 1970s when the
notorious terrorist chief Menachem Begin and his Likud party came to
power in Israel. Begin had created the Likud party in 1973 from the
membership of the Irgun, the Zionist terror group he headed in Palestine
in the 1940s. The false-flag terror plan for 9-11 required having
high-level Zionist agents connected to the Mossad occupying positions
from which they could directly control the cover up.

Putting the agents into the key Positions was arranged by controlling
the presidential appointments of judges and officials at the

{p. 312} Department of Justice. Such political appointments are greatly
facilitated by having Mossad agents in the inner corridors of power.
Rahm Emanuel, for example, the son of an Israeli terrorist who worked
closely with Menachem Begin, was the key Mossad insider in the Clinton
White House where, for example, he single-handedly pushed the disastrous
NAFTA bill through Congress. Emanuel later became the first chief of
staff for President Obama and mayor of Chicago.

How the Cover-Up Worked

There are three fundamental fields that need to be controlled in a
cover-up like 9-11: the investigation, the interpretation, and the
prosecution and related litigation.

The investigation involves the detective work supposedly done by the FBI
and includes the collection and analysis of the evidence. Interpretation
is how the events are explained to the public by the government and
controlled media. Prosecution and litigation use the courts to assign
blame for the crime and responsibility for the losses. In the 9-11 cover
up we find high-level Zionist agents in the key positions of all three
fields.

Zionist control over the political interpretation of 9-11 can be readily
seen in how the Bush administration and the controlled media accepted
without question the unproven explanation blaming Osama Bin Laden and Al
Qaida. This explanation was exactly what the architects of terror wanted
the world to believe and was first articulated by Ehud Barak, the former
Israeli commando leader and prime minister, on BBC World television
minutes after the demolitions of the Twin Towers. Barak openly called
for the United States to begin the "War on Terror" by invading Afghanistan.

{p. 313} Through their media networks (e.g. FOX News, CNN, CBS, New York
Times, etc.) the Zionist interpretation of 9-11 was pushed relentlessly
on the gullible American public. No other possible explanation was even
discussed and people who held dissenting points of view were ignored,
slandered, and attacked, as I was by the ADL, FOX News, CNN, The Chicago
Tribune, and finally a three-man squad of undercover police in Hoffman
Estates, Illinois.

Zionist control of the media was essential in shaping public opinion
about 9-11 and directing the anger and blame at Osama Bin Laden and Al
Qaida. The controlled politicians dutifully parroted the media version,
which quickly became the "party line" of both parties. Dissent was
quashed. Politicians, academics, and journalists who expressed doubts or
raised questions about what really happened were treated like pariahs
and removed from their positions.

The Zionist control of the cover up is also seen very clearly in the
investigation and prosecution fields. Michael Chertoff, as Assistant
Attorney General in charge of the criminal division of the Department of
Justice, was directly responsible for the federal prosecution of the
terrorists behind 9-11 and for overseeing the investigation by the FBI.
Chertoff, an orthodox Jew, is an Israeli citizen by virtue of the fact
that he is the son of an Israeli, Livia Eisen, who happened to be one of
the first Mossad agents. Had the FBI collected and examined the steel
and dust from the Twin Towers, questions would have been raised by the
discovery of evidence of explosives and thermite. Rather than deal with
the evidence, Chertoff simply allowed Zionist officials working under
Mayor Rudy Giuliani to "clean up" the crime scene by destroying the
steel evidence through specially prepared junkyards in NewJersey.

{p. 314} As the federal official responsible for the criminal
prosecution, Chertoff had control over access to the evidence. Through a
newly created agency, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
and a special category of evidence known as Sensitive Security
Information (SSI), Chertoff retained his control over the 9-11 evidence
after he became the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security in
2005. The key role that Chertoff played in the 9- 11 cover-up is solely
due to the fact that he, like Rahm Emanuel, is a high-level Zionist
partisan from a family with a long and close connection to Israeli
intelligence.

Alvin K. Hellerstein is the other hand of the Zionist-controlled
cover-up in the judicial field in which access to the evidence is
crucial. Hellerstein is a US. district judge in Manhattan, appointed to
the federal bench by President Bill Clinton in 1998. Judge Hellerstein
presided over all 9- 11 tort litigation and criminal cases related to
the terror attacks and prevented a 9- 11 trial from ever taking place.
Hellerstein's judicial war of attrition against the victims' families
resulted in all of them being forced to accept out-of-court settlements.

Judge Hellerstein's son, Joseph, lives in Israel and works for an
Israeli law firm that represents the parent company of one of the
defendants, in the 9-11 tort litigation, Mossad's "security" company
International Consultants for Targeted Security (ICTS NV). ICTS owns
Huntleigh USA, the airport security company responsible for screening
the passengers that boarded the planes on 9-11. The fact that
Hellerstein is a Zionist with a close family connection to one of the
defendants should have disqualified him from managing the 9-11
litigation, but it didn't. This glaring conflict of interest was ignored
by the media.

The impropriety of Judge Hellerstein's glaring conflict of interest in
the 9-11 litigation has been completely ignored by the media. Hell-

{p. 315} erstein and Chertoff both facilitated the 9- 11 cover up and
obstructed justice for the families of the victims with their improper
conduct. Brazen and shameless, they are confident their misdeeds will be
ignored and that they will be remain protected and supported by the
larger Zionist network that controls the U.S. government.

As German intelligence experts told me in 2001, 9-11 was a sophisticated
operation that required years of planning and the fixed structure of a
state intelligence agency. It was, they said, far beyond the
capabilities of a loosely structured group like Al Qaida. Such a
false-flag terror operation consists of three levels, Andreas von Bulow
said: the architectural, managerial, and working levels. The
architectural level designs the terrorism primarily to affect public
opinion while the managerial level manages the execution of the crime
and the cover up. The working level, von Bulow said, is actually part of
the deception. While Hellerstein and Chertoff are probably not
architectural level planners of the terror attacks, they are certainly
dedicated Zionist managers of the 9-11 cover up.

The reason for Hellerstein and Chertoff to be confident in the face of
their blatant misconduct is obvious. In spite of the serious nature of
their crimes to facilitate the 9- 11 cover up, these two Zionist agents
of deception have not suffered any penalties under the law or faced a
single word of criticism from the media for the glaring improprieties
they committed as federal employees. Where is the watchful eye of the
government? Why do Hellerstein and Chertoff act as if they are above the
law? Where is the free press, the watchdog of a properly functioning
democratic state? Is this not evidence of a conspiracy?

The false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11 changed more than public opinion.
The 9-11 deception that has been foisted on the nation has

{p. 316} changed the fundamental relationship between the U.S.
government and the American people. The proper role of government is to
alleviate the suffering of the people, not increase it. The Declaration
of Independence states that governments are instituted among men in
order to secure their unalienable rights, namely life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness, and that "whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to
abolish it."

The deception of 9-11 was used to instill fear in the population in
order to usher in the fraudulent "War on Terror. ' To submit to the 9-11
deception is to subject ourselves and our nation to an open-ended agenda
of war. The Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror" began with the
false-flag terror attacks of 9-11, which led directly to illegal wars of
aggression in the Middle East and a greatly enlarged police-state
apparatus in the United States. We have certainly not seen the end of it.

The disastrous and costly wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have done immense
damage to our nation and others, wasting more than $1.6 trillion and
ruining countless lives. Believing the lies about 9-11 has made helpless
victims of millions of people, such as those who have gone to war in
Afghanistan and Iraq thinking they were defending their nation from
terrorists. The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from
continued enslavement to this criminal deception is to understand how it
was imposed on us and who is behind it.

Liberation from the deception can only happen when individuals choose to
reject fear and examine the facts with a truly open mind. The personal
choice to examine the evidence, embrace the facts, and conquer fear is
the most important decision we can make as free men.

{p. 317} As my patriotic duty to my nation and as a service to mankind,
I am sharing my insights and the fruits of my research about the 9-11
deception in the hope that by understanding how this evil deception was
planned and executed we can liberate ourselves from it and secure a more
just and peaceful world for our children.

(10) September 11: Inside Job or Mossad Job? by Laurent Guyénot

http://www.voltairenet.org/article179295.html

September 11: Inside Job or Mossad Job?

by Laurent Guyénot

Israel’s role in the events of September 11, 2001—that shape the 21st
century—is the subject of bitter controversy, or rather a real taboo
even within the 9/11 Truth Movement, causing the ostracism of the man
who dared to broach the subject, Thierry Meyssan. Most advocacy groups,
mobilized behind the slogan "9/11 was an Inside Job," remain discreet
regarding the evidence involving the secret services of the Jewish
state. Laurent Guyénot focuses on certain compelling—though grossly
under reported—facts and analyzes the mechanisms of denial.

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | 10 JULY 2013

While Israel’s role in the destabilization of the world post-September
11 is becoming increasingly clear, the idea that a faction of Likudniks,
aided by their allies embedded in the U.S. State apparatus, are
responsible for the false flag operation of September 11 is becoming
more difficult to suppress, and some individuals have the courage to
state so publicly. Francesco Cossiga, President of Italy between 1985
and 1992, declared on 30 November 2007 to the daily Corriere della Sera:
“From areas around the Palazzo Chigi, nerve centre of direction of
Italian intelligence, it is noted that the non-authenticity of the video
is supported by the fact that Osama bin Laden in it ’confessed’ that Al
Qaeda was responsible for the 9/11 attack on the Twin Towers in New
York. However, all of the democratic areas of America and of Europe,
with the Italian center-left in the forefront, now know full well that
the disastrous attack was planned and executed by the American CIA and
Mossad with the help of the Zionist world to falsely incriminate Arabic
countries and to persuade the Western Powers to intervene in Iraq and
Afghanistan [1]." Alan Sabrosky, former professor at the U.S. Army War
College and the U.S. Military Academy, did not hesitate to proclaim his
belief that September 11 is a "classical operation orchestrated by
Mossad" carried out with accomplices within the United States
government, and his voice has been forcefully echoed by some U.S. Army
veterans sites who are disgusted by the vile war that they were forced
to wage on behalf of the September 11 lie or that of the weapons of mass
destruction of Saddam Hussein [2].

The arguments in favor of the Mossad hypothesis are not only related to
the reputation of the world’s most powerful secret service, which a
report by the U.S. Army School for Advanced Military Studies (quoted by
the Washington Times on the eve of September 11th), described as
"wildcat, ruthless and cunning. Able to carry out an attack on U.S.
forces and disguise it as an act committed by Palestinians/Arabs [3]."
The Mossad involvement, together with other Israeli elite units, is made
evident by a number of little known facts.

The dancing Israelis

{inset}
The eBook by Hicham Hamza, "Israel and September 11: The Great Taboo"
(2013) brings together the case against Israel, with impeccable
precision and all easily accessible sources.
{end inset}

{Note: Hicham's ebook is in French:
http://www.amazon.fr/Israël-11-Septembre-grand-tabou-ebook/dp/B00BB1HTHY/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1374478008&sr=1-1}

How many of us know, for example, that the only people arrested on the
same day in connection with the terrorist attacks of September 11 are
Israelis [4]? This information was reported the very next day by
journalist Paulo Lima in The Record, the newspaper of Bergen County in
New Jersey, according to police sources. Immediately after the first
impact on the North Tower, three individuals were seen by several
witnesses on the roof of a van parked at Liberty State Park in Jersey
City, "celebrating” and “jumping up and down,” and photographing
themselves with the twin towers in the background. They then moved their
van to another parking spot in Jersey City, where other witnesses saw
them display the same ostentatious celebrations. The police immediately
issued a BOLO alert (be-on-the-look-out): "Vehicle possibly related to
the terrorist attack in New York. 2000 white Chevrolet van with New
Jersey plates and an ’Urban Moving Systems’ sign at the back, was seen
at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of first impact of
jetliner into the World Trade Center. Three individuals with the van
were seen celebrating after the initial impact and the explosion that
followed [5]." The van was stopped by police a few hours later, with
five young Israelis aboard: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded
Ellner and Omer Marmari. Physically forced out of the vehicle and pinned
to the ground, the driver, Sivan Kurzberg, launched this strange
sentence: "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are
our problems. The Palestinians are the problem [6].” Police sources who
informed Paulo Lima were convinced of the involvement of the Israelis in
the morning’s attacks: "There were maps of the city in the van with some
of the points highlighted. It looked like they knew [...] they knew what
would happen when they were at Liberty State Park [7]. Passports of
various nationalities, nearly 6000 dollars in cash and open airline
tickets to travel abroad were also found on them. The Kurzberg brothers
were formally identified as Mossad agents. The five Israelis worked
officially for a moving company named Urban Moving Systems, whose
employees were mostly Israelis. "I was in tears. These guys were joking
and that bothered me [8]," stated one of the few non-Israeli workers to
The Record. On September14, after receiving a visit from the police, the
business owner, Dominik Otto Suter, left the country for Tel Aviv.

The information disclosed by The Record, confirmed by the police report,
was taken on by investigative sites such as the Wayne Madsen Report
(September 14, 2005) and Counterpunch (February 7, 2007). It was also
reported in some main media as well but in a way that minimized its
scope: the New York Times (November 21, 2001) failed to mention the
nationality of the individuals, just like Fox News and the Associated
Press. The Washington Post (November 23, 2001) said they were Israelis,
but passed over in silence their apparent foreknowledge of the event.
However, The Forward (March 15, 2002), a magazine of the New York Jewish
community, revealed that, according to an anonymous U.S. intelligence
source, Urban Moving Systems was a Mossad undercover unit (which did not
prevent it from receiving a federal loan of 498,750 dollars, as shown by
the tax records)] [9].

The FBI conducted an investigation contained in a 579 page report,
partially declassified in 2005 (it will be completely declassified in
2035). Freelance journalist Hisham Hamza analyzed this in detail in his
book Israel and September 11: The Great Taboo. It shows a number of
damning elements. First, the photos taken by these young Israelis
actually show them in attitudes of celebration before the North Tower on
fire: "They smiled, they hugged and they gave each other high fives." To
explain this, stakeholders said they were simply delighted "that the
United States should now take steps to stop terrorism in the world"
(although, at this point, a majority of people thought the crashes were
an accident rather than an actd of terrorism). Moreover, at least one
witness saw them positioned at 8:00, before an aircraft struck the first
tower, while others certify that they were already taking pictures five
minutes later, which is confirmed by their photos. A former employee
confirmed to the FBI, the fanatically pro-Israeli and anti-American
atmosphere that reigned in the company, even attributing to its
director, Dominik Otto Suter, these words: "Give us twenty years and we
will seize and destroy your media and your country." The five arrested
Israelis were in contact with another moving company called Classic
International Movers, four employees of which were interviewed
separately for their links with the nineteen suspected hijackers. One of
them had called "an individual in South America with genuine links to
Islamic militants in the Middle East." Finally, "a sniffer dog gave a
positive result for the presence of traces of explosives in the vehicle
[10]."

As Hamza notes, the report’s conclusion is thought provoking: the FBI
informs the local police detaining the suspects that, "the FBI has no
further interest in investigating the prisoners and ’appropriate
immigration procedures should be initiated [11]." A letter from the
federal Immigration and Naturalization Service in fact shows that the
FBI management recommended the termination of the investigation on
September 24, 2001. However, the five Israelis spent 71 days in prison
in Brooklyn, during which they refused, then failed several lie detector
tests. They were subsequently repatriated under the simple charges of
visa violations.



Omer Marmari, Oded Ellner and Yaron Shmuel, three of the five "dancing
Israelis" are invited to report in an Israeli TV programe upon their
return in November 2001. Denying being members of Mossad, one of them
said candidly: "Our goal was to record the event."

We must finally mention an important detail of this affair, which may
provide an additional explanation for the exuberant behavior of these
young Israelis: some witnesses specify in their calls to the police,
that people rejoicing on the roof of their van seemed to be "Arabs" or
"Palestinians". In particular, shortly after the collapse of the towers,
an anonymous call to police in Jersey City, reported on the same day by
NBC News, described "a white van with two or three guys on the inside,
they look like Palestinians and they are circling around a building",
one of them "is mixing things and he has a ’sheikh’s outfit on. [...] He
is dressed like an Arab [12]." All indications are that these
individuals were precisely the five Israelis arrested later. Two
hypotheses come to mind: either our false movers are actually engaged in
a staged action to appear as Arabs/Palestinians, or the witness or
witnesses who described them as such were accomplices. As in the other
case, it is clear that their goal was to initiate media rumors that
Muslims had been spotted rejoicing not only for the attacks, but also
for having foreknowledge. The information was actually broadcast on some
radio stations at noon, and on NBC News in the afternoon. I personally
lean toward the second hypothesis (informants as accomplices rather than
true Arabs in disguise) because the police report makes no mention of
any exotic clothing found in the van, but especially because the
informant cited above, who emphasized the clothing details, seems to
have wanted to mislead the police about the exact location of the van;
the latter was intercepted only because the police, instead of being
satisfied with just this location, blocked all bridges and underground
tunnels between New Jersey and New York. But the important thing is
this: If the Israelis had not been arraigned in the late afternoon, the
story probably would have made headlines with the title: The Dancing
Arabs. Instead, it was completely suppressed and was circulated only
confidentially under the title The dancing Dancing Israelis, or The
Highfivers.




Ehud Barak, former head of Israeli military intelligence (Sayeret
Matkal), was Prime Minister from July 1999 to March 2001. Replaced by
Ariel Sharon, he moved to the United States as a consultant for
Electronic Data Systems and SCP Partners, a Mossad screen company
specializing in security issues which, with its partners Metallurg
Holdings and Advanced Metallurgical, had the ability to produce
nano-thermite. SCP Partners had an office within ten kilometers of Urban
Moving Systems. An hour after the disintegration of the towers, Ehud
Barak is on the set of BBC World to describe bin Laden as the prime
suspect (Bollyn, Solving 9-11, p. 278-280).

200 explosives expert spies

Few people, even among the 9/11 Truthers, know the story of "the dancing
Israelis" (we are still waiting, for example, for the Reopen 9/11
Association to talk about it on its Francophone site, though they are
very sharp on all other aspects of the case). Also, few people know that
at the time of the attacks, the U.S. federal police were busy
dismantling the largest Israeli spy network ever identified on US soil.
In March 2001, the National Counterintelligence Center (NACIC) posted
this message on its website: "During the past six weeks, employees of
federal offices located throughout the United States have reported
suspicious activities related to individuals posing as foreign students
selling or delivering artwork." The NACIC specifies that these
individuals, citizens of Israel, "also went to private homes of federal
officials under the guise of selling art objects [13]."

Then in the summer, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), after being
targeted by a large number of such incidents, compiled a report which
was revealed to the public by the Washington Post on November 23, 2001,
and in The World on March 14, 2002, before being made fully accessible
by the French magazine Intelligence Online. This report lists 140
Israelis arrested since March 2001. Aged between 20 and 30 years and
organized into teams of 4 to 8 members, they visited at least "36
sensitive sites in the Department of Defense." Many of them were
identified as members of the Mossad and Aman (Israeli military
intelligence), and six were in possession of phones paid for by a former
Israeli vice consul. Sixty arrests occurred after September 11, bringing
to 200 the number of Israeli spies arrested. All were eventually released.



Michael Chertoff, an Israeli citizen, the son of an Orthodox rabbi and a
pioneer of the Mossad, headed the Criminal Division of the Department of
Justice in 2001, and as such was responsible for the retention and
destruction of all evidence regarding the 11th of September – from
Pentagon cameras to World Trade Center beams. It is to him also that the
"dancing Israelis" owe their discreet repatriation. In 2003, he was
appointed to head the new Department of Homeland Security in charge of
counter-terrorism on U.S. territory, which allows him to control dissent
while continuing to restrict access to the file of Sept. 11 through the
law of Sensitive Security Information.

The DEA report concluded that "the nature of the behavior of these
individuals [...] leads us to believe that the incidents are perhaps
intelligence gathering [14]." But the nature of the information
collected remains unknown. It may be that in fact espionage was just a
secondary cover—an undergarment—of these Israeli art students,
considering the military training received by some as demolition
explosive ordnance expert, combat engineer, bomb disposal expert,
electronic signal intercept operator, according to the DEA. One of the
arrested agents, Peer Segalovitz, "acknowledged that he was capable of
making buildings, bridges and cars explode, and anything he wanted
[15]." Why would these Israeli agents have diverted attention from their
real mission in a campaign of espionage as ostentatious as unproductive
curiously focusing on the Drug Enforcement Agency? The answer to this
question is suggested by a disturbing geographical link between this
network and the attacks of September 11.

According to the DEA report, "The Hollywood community in Florida seems
to have been the focal point of these individuals [16]." In fact, more
than thirty of the fake Israeli student spies arrested shortly before
September 11 lived in or near the city of Hollywood, Florida, precisely
where 15 of the 19 alleged Islamist hijackers had regrouped (9 in
Hollywood proper and 6 others nearby). One of them, Hanan Serfaty,
through whom at least one hundred thousand dollars transited in three
months, had rented two Hollywood apartments close to the apartment and
post office box rented by Mohamed Atta, who was presented to us as the
leader of the gang of hijackers. What was the relationship between the
"Israeli spies" and the "Islamic terrorists?" According to the
embarrassed explanation by the aligned media, the former were just
monitoring the latter. Listen for example to David Pujadas introducing
the Intelligence Online article televised March 5, 2002 on France 2:
"More about Israel, but specifically concerning Afghanistan now, this
espionage affaire is troubling: an Israeli network was dismantled in the
United States, particularly in Florida: one of its missions was to track
the men of Al-Qaeda (this was before September 11). Some sources go even
further: they indicate that the Mossad may not have shared all the
information in its possession." This euphemistic explanation is an
example of damage control. Israel appears barely tainted, since we can
not reasonably blame a spy service for not shariong information. At
worst, Israel can be accused of having "let it happen", which guarantees
impunity. This explains, in my opinion, the sub-secondary cover of the
spies-as-fake-Israeli-students, actually experts at false flag attacks.
In fact, the students’ deliberately frail cover was made to draw
attention to their secondary cover, that of spies, which would serve as
an alibi for their proximity to the alleged pirates.



Why does Pujadas (propelled to France 2 television news just a week
before September 11) mention Afghanistan, which has nothing to do with
the information being introduced? The slip can only be deliberate and
illustrates "the great taboo" which Hicham Hamza alludes to: never
mention September 11 and Israel in the same sentence.

The truth is that they were probably not spying on the pirates, but that
they manipulated them, financed them, and probably likely eliminated
them shortly before September 11. An article in the New York Times of
February 18, 2009 established that Ali al-Jarrah, cousin of a suspected
Flight 93 pirate, Ziad al-Jarrah, had been a spy for the Mossad for 25
years, infiltrating the Palestinian resistance and Hezbollah in 1983. He
is currently in prison in Lebanon. Let’s also recall that the Mohamed
Atta in Florida was a fake. The real Mohamed Atta, who called his father
after the attacks (as last confirmed by the German magazine Bild am
Sonntag in late 2002), is described by his family as reserved, pious,
avoiding women and having a fear of planes. He had his passport stolen
in 1999 while studying architecture in Hamburg. The false Mohamed Atta
in Florida was living with a stripper, ate pork, loved fast cars,
casinos and cocaine. As reported by the South Florida Sun-Sentinel on
September 16, "The suspects’ actions do not add up." As also reported by
many national newspapers, this Atta got drunk, drugged and paid for the
services of several prostitutes in the weeks and days before the
September 11 attacks, and four other suicide bombers had similar
behavior incompatible with Islamists preparing for death [17].

The New York Network

According to the renegade agent, Victor Ostrovsky (By Way of Deception,
1990), the Mossad draws its effectiveness from its international network
of sayanim ("collaborators"), the Hebrew term designating Jews living
outside Israel and ready to perform illegal actions on demand, without
necessarily knowing their ultimate purpose. They number in the thousands
in the United States, particularly in New York, where the U.S. Jewish
community is concentrated. Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the
Twin Towers as of April 2001, appears as the archetype of a September 11
sayan. He is a leading member of the United Jewish Appeal/Federation of
Jewish Philanthropies of New York, the largest U.S. fund raiser for
Israel (after the U.S. government, which pays annually three billion in
aid to Israel). Silverstein was also at the time of the attacks, the
intimate friend of Ariel Sharon and Benjamin Netanyahu, with whom he was
in conversation every Sunday, according to the Israeli newspaper
Haaretz. Silverstein’s partner for the mall basement in the lease of the
WTC was Frank Lowy, another Zionist "philanthropist" close to Ehud Barak
and Ehud Olmert, former member of the Haganah. The head of the New York
Port Authority, which privatized the WTC, granting the lease to
Silverstein and Lowy was Lewis Eisenberg, also a member of the United
Jewish Appeal Federation and former vice president of AIPAC.
Silverstein, Lowy and Eisenberg were undoubtedly three key men in the
planning of the attacks against the Twin Towers.



Lucky Larry! Every morning, without exception, Larry Silverstein took
his breakfast at Windows on the World atop the north tower of the WTC.
Until the morning of September 11, when he had an appointment with a
dermatologist.

Other members of the New York-based network can be identified. According
to the NIST report, the Boeing that crashed into the North Tower "cut a
gash that was over half the width of the building and extended from the
93rd floor to the 99th floor. All but the lowest of these floors were
occupied by Marsh & McLennan, a worldwide insurance company, which also
occupied the 100th floor [18]." The CEO of Marsh & McLennan was then
Jeffrey Greenberg, a member of a wealthy Jewish family that contributed
heavily to the campaign of George W. Bush. Greenberg was also the
insurer of the twin towers and on July 24, 2001, they had taken the
precaution of reinsuring their contracts with competitors who had to
indemnify Silverstein and Lowy. And as the world of the neocons is
small, in November 2000, the Board of Directors of Marsh & McLennan
welcomed Paul Bremer, President of the National Commission on Terrorism
at the time of the attacks, and appointed as the head of the Coalition
Provisional Authority (CPA) in 2003.



Paul Bremer appeared on September 11, 2001 on the set of NBC, calm and
relaxed, while 400 employees of his company are missing (in the end, 295
employees and more than 60 of the group’s associates were to be
officially counted among the victims).

Complicity must also be sought in airports and airlines involved in the
attacks. Both airports from which flights AA11, UA175 and UA93 took off
(Logan Airport in Boston and Newark Airport near New York) subcontracted
their security to International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS),
a firm financed through Israel and headed by Menachem Atzmon, a
treasurer of the Likud. A thorough investigation would certainly lead to
other accomplices. Such an investigation should, for example, focus on
Zim Israel Navigational, a giant maritime shipping outfit 48% held by
the Jewish state (known to occasionally be used as a cover for the
Israeli secret service), the US head of which left his offices at WTC
with his 200 employees Sept. 4, 2001, one week before the attacks -
"Like an act of God [19] - commented the CEO Shaul Cohen-Mintz.

It’s the oil, stupid!

All these facts give a new meaning to the words of Bob Graham, a member
of the September 11 Commission, who, in an interview with PBS in
December 2002, cited "evidence that foreign governments contributed to
facilitating the activities of at least some of the terrorists in the
United States [20]." Graham, of course, was referring to Saudi Arabia.
Why would the Saud family have helped Osama bin Laden, after having
deprived him of his Saudi nationality and put a price on his head for
his attacks on their soil? Graham’s response, made in July 2011, is "the
threat of civil unrest led by Al-Qaeda against the monarchy [21]." The
Saudis supposedly helped Bin Laden under his threat of fomenting a
revolution. This ridiculous theory (that Graham, short on arguments,
developed into a novel) [22]. has only one goal: to divert suspicion
away from the only "foreign government" whose links with the alleged
terrorists are demonstrated, Israel, towards its enemy, Saudi Arabia. We
smile similarly when reading the summary of the book The War After
(2003) by the anti-Saudi Laurent Murawiec that "The royal power [Saudi]
has succeeded over the years to infiltrate agents of influence at the
highest levels of the U.S. administration and to organize an effective
intellectual lobby that now controls several universities among the
country’s most prestigious [23]. "

In asserting further that the Saudi track was stifled because of the
friendship between the Bush and Saudi families, Graham and his friends
use neoconservative George W. Bush as a fuse or lightning rod. The
strategy paid off since the 9/11 Truth movement as a whole barks against
him and balks at pronouncing the name of Israel. One can recognize the
art of Machiavelli: have the dirty work done by another, and then lead
the mob against him.



As I have shown elsewhere, a more appropriate term for the
"neo-conservatives" would be "machiavelo-Zionists." Michael Ledeen gives
proof of this in an article in the Jewish World Review (June 7, 1999)
where he defends the thesis that Machiavelli was "secretly Jewish" as at
the time were thousands of families nominally converted to Catholicism
under threat of expulsion (mainly Marranos from the Iberian Peninsula).
"Listen to his political philosophy and you will hear Jewish music ". By
definition, Machiavellianism advances masked by virtuous speech (ie the
human-rightist), but a growing number of Zionists overtly espouse it:
Another example is the book by Obadiah Shoher, "Samson Blinded: A
Machiavellian Perspective on the Middle East Conflict."

The day when, under pressure from public opinion, the mainstream media
will be forced to abandon the official theory, the protest movement will
have been thoroughly infiltrated and the "9/11 is an inside job" slogan
will have prepared public sentiment for an outcry against Bush, Cheney
and others, while neoconservatives remain immune from justice. And if,
by misfortune, the day of the great unravelling, media zionists fail to
keep Israel beyond the reach of justice, the Jewish state can always
play the Chomsky card: America made me do it. Noam Chomsky [24], who
camps on the far left since the Trotskyist Irving Kristol veered to the
extreme right to form the neoconservative movement, continues in effect
to relentlessly push the hackneyed argument that Israel is merely
carrying out the will of the United States, as its de facto 51st state
and the policeman in the Middle East.

According to Chomsky and hyped radical U.S. left personalities such as
Michael Moore, the destabilization of the Middle East is Washington’s
strategy prior to being that of Tel Aviv. The Iraq war? For oil of
course: "Of course it was Iraq’s energy resources. It’s not even a
question [25]." Sign of the times, here Chomsky has Alan Greenspan, head
of the Federal Reserve, joining in the chorus. In his book, The age of
turbulence (2007) Greenspan pretends to concede "what everyone knows:
one of the major factors in the war in Iraq was oil in the region."



"I personally believe that there is a deep connection between the events
of September 11 and peak oil, but it’s not something I can prove,"
states Richard Heinberg, expert on energy depletion, in the documentary
“Oil, Smoke and Mirrors”. Might as well say that the thesis arises from
irrational faith.

To this we must respond in unison with James Petras (Zionism, Militarism
and the Decline of U.S. Power), Stephen Sniegoski (The Transparent
Cabal) and Jonathan Cook (Israel and the Clash of Civilizations): "Not
only did Big Oil not encourage the invasion, it did not even manage to
control a single oil well, despite the presence of 160,000 U.S. troops,
127,000 mercenaries paid by the Pentagon and the State Department, and a
corrupt puppet government [26]." No, the oil does not explain the war in
Iraq, nor does it explain the war in Afghanistan, nor does it explain
the assault on Syria by surrogate mercenaries, no more than it explains
the planned war against Iran. And it is certainly not the oil lobby that
has the power to impose the "great taboo" over the entire media sphere
(from Marianne to Echoes, in the case of France).

The Israeli culture of false flag terror

A reminder is needed here to better situate September 11 in history.
Americans have a long history of manufacturing false pretenses for war.
We could go back to 1845 with the expansionist war against Mexico,
triggered by U.S. provocations on the disputed area on the border with
Texas (the Nueces River in Mexico, the Rio Grande for Texans) until
clashes offered President James Polk (a Texan) the opportunity to
declare that the Mexicans “spilled American blood on American soil."
After the war, a member by the name of Abraham Lincoln had Congress
admit the falsity of the casus belli. Thereafter, all the wars waged by
the United States have been under false pretenses: the explosion of the
USS Maine for the war against Spain in Cuba, the sinking of the
Lusitania for entry into the First World War World, Pearl Harbor for the
second, and the Gulf of Tonkin for the burning down of North Vietnam.
However, only the explosion of the USS Maine, which caused few deaths,
falls into the category of a false flag ploy; although it is still not
completely clear.



The transatlantic liner RMS Lusitania was torpedoed May 7, 1915 by the
Germans, while operating in a war zone. Remember the Lusitania is the
slogan that President Woodrow Wilson used in mobilizing public opinion
in favor of U.S. entry into the war. The fact that only one torpedo was
enough to sink the ship in fifteen minutes raises questions. In his
paper, Mendel Edward House, Wilson’s adviser, reports a conversation he
had shortly before with the British Foreign Minister Edward Grey (later
in 1919 ambassador to the United States). "What would the Americans do
if the Germans sank a transatlantic liner with American passengers on
board?" Grey asked. House replied: "I think a fire of indignation would
sweep the United States and that would be enough to get us into war."

However, it is a fact that Israel has a heavy past and great expertise
in false flag attacks. A world history of this strategy would probably
have to devote half of its pages to Israel, though it is the youngest of
modern nations. The mould was cast even before the creation of Israel,
with the bombing of King David Hotel, the headquarters of the British
authorities in Jerusalem. On the morning of July 22, 1946, six
terrorists of Irgun (the terrorist militia commanded by Menachem Begin,
the future Prime Minister) dressed as Arabs entered and deposited 225 kg
of TNT hidden in milk cans around the central pillar of the building,
while others planted explosives along the access roads to the hotel to
prevent the arrival of first responders. When a British officer became
suspicious, a gunfight broke out in the hotel and members of the
commando fled after detonating the devices. The explosion killed 91
people, mostly British, but also 15 Jews.

The strategem was repeated in Egypt during the summer of 1954, with
Operation Susannah, whose aim was to thwart the British withdrawal from
the Suez Canal required by Gamal Abdul Nasser with support from
President Eisenhower. This also went stale and is known as the "Lavon
Affair", named after the Israeli prime minister who was held
responsible. The most famous and most calamitous of the Israeli false
flag attacks was that on the American NSA ship USS Liberty, June 8, 1967
off the coast of Egypt, two days before the end of the Six Day War; we
see already a deep collaboration between Israel and the U.S. The Johnson
administration had covered up and perhaps even encouraged this crime
against its own engineers and soldiers. I evoked these two cases in a
previous article and will not go over them again here [27]

In 1986, the Mossad tried to make believe that a series of terrorist
orders were transmitted from Libya to various Libyan embassies around
the world. According to former agent Victor Ostrovsky (By Way of
Deception, 1990), the Mossad used a special communication system,
labeled "Trojan Horse," established by commandos inside enemy territory.
The system acts as a relay station for false transmissions sent from an
Israeli ship and immediately reissued on a frequency used by the Libyan
state. As the Mossad had hoped, the NSA caught and deciphered the
transmissions, which were interpreted as evidence that the Libyans
supported terrorism, reports that Mossad came opportunely to confirm.
Israel relied on Reagan’s promise of retaliation against any country
caught in the act of supporting terrorism. The Americans fell into the
trap and dragged with them the British and the Germans: April 14, 1986,
one hundred and sixty U.S. aircraft dropped over sixty tons of bombs on
Libya, targeting mainly airports and military bases. Among the civilian
casualties on the Libyan side was Gaddafi’s adopted daughter, aged four.
The strike torpedoed a deal for the release of US hostages held in
Lebanon, allowing Hezbollah to continue as public enemy number one in
the eyes of the West.



Isser Harel, founder of the Israeli secret service, would have predicted
to the Christian Zionist Michael Evans in 1980 that Islamic terrorism
would eventually hit the USA. "In Islamic theology, the phallic symbol
is very important. Your biggest phallic symbol is New York City and its
tallest building will be the phallic symbol they will hit. "In reporting
this exchange in a 2004 interview, Evans, author of "The American
Prophecies, Terrorism and Mid-East Conflict Reveal a Nation’s Destiny",
hopes to elevate Harel to prophet. Rational minds will see the
indication rather that September 11 matured for 30 years in the deep
state of Israel.

The manipulating capacity of the Mossad at the time can be further
illustrated by two stories analyzed by Thomas Gordon. On April 17, 1986
a young Irish woman named Ann-Marie Murphy unknowingly carried 1.5
pounds of Semtex on board a flight from London to Tel Aviv. Her fiancé,
a Pakistani named Nezar Hindawi, was arrested while trying to flee to
the Syrian Embassy. Both were actually manipulated by the Mossad, which
achieved the desired result: the Thatcher government broke off
diplomatic relations with Syria. But the manipulation was exposed in
high places (as Jacques Chirac later told the Washington Times) [28]

In January 1987, the Palestinian Ismail Sowan, a Mossad mole who
infiltrated the PLO in London, is given two suitcases packed with
weapons and explosives by an unknown person supposedly sent by his PLO
chief. Ismail reveals this to his Mossad contacts, who send him on a
trip to Tel Aviv, then denounce him to Scotland Yard as a suspect in an
Islamist attack in London. Ismail is picked up on his return to Heathrow
Airport and charged on the basis of weapons found at his home. Result:
the Mossad gains the favors of the Thatcher government [29]. After the
February 26, 1993, attack against the WTC, the FBI arrested the
Palestinian Ahmed Ajaj and identified him as a terrorist linked to
Hamas, but the Israeli newspaper Kol Ha’ir showed that qu’Ajaj had never
been involved with Hamas or the PLO. According to journalist Robert
Friedman, author of an article in The Village Voice, August 3, 1993,
Ajaj was actually a petty crook arrested in 1988 for forging dollars,
sentenced to two and a half years in prison and released after a year
following a deal with the Mossad, for whom he had infiltrated
Palestinian groups. Upon his release, Ajaj undergoes a classic
sheep-dipping by being briefly imprisoned again, this time for trying to
smuggle weapons for Fatah in the West Bank. We have therefore, with the
bombing of the WTC in 1993 a prototype for September 11, in which are
demonstrated Israel’s responsibility for terrorism and its willingness
to have Palestinians accused.



The attack against the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires in 1992, which
caused 29 dead and 242 wounded, was instantly blamed on Hezbollah
suicide bombers who used a truck bomb. But the judge in charge of the
investigation revealed pressures from the US and Israeli delegates and
manipulation of evidence and false testimony to lean the investigation
toward the theory of a truck bomb, while facts indicated that the
explosion came from inside the building. When the Argentine Supreme
Court upheld this argument, the spokesman of the Israeli embassy accused
the judges of anti-Semitism.

It is interesting to recall what was written by Philip Zelikow with John
Deutch in December 1998 in an article in Foreign Affairs entitled
"Catastrophic Terrorism," positing that the bomb used in the 1993 attack
was nuclear, and already evoking a new Pearl Harbor: "An act of
catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of
people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of
thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s
history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for
peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security within
their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test,
or perhaps even worse. […] Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our
past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond
with draconian measures scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider
surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly force
[30]."

On 12 January 12, 2000, according to the Indian newspaper The Week,
Indian intelligence officers arrested eleven Islamist preachers who were
preparing to board a flight to Bangladesh at Calcutta airport. They were
suspected of belonging to Al-Qaeda and wanting to hijack the plane. They
presented themselves as Afghans who had stayed in Iran before spending
two months in India to preach Islam. But it was found that they all had
Israeli passports. The Indian intelligence officer told The Week that
Tel Aviv "exerted considerable pressure" on Delhi to secure their release.

On 12 October 12, 2000, in the final weeks of Clinton’s term of office,
the USS Cole, en route to the Persian Gulf, was ordered by its homeport
of Norfolk to refuel in the port of Aden in Yemen, an unusual procedure
since these destroyers are generally supplied by a Navy tanker at sea.
The captain of the ship expressed his surprise and concern: the USS Cole
had recently filled up at the entrance of the Suez Canal, and Yemen is a
hostile area. The USS Cole was executing docking maneuvers when she was
approached by a dinghy apparently for the removal of garbage, which
exploded against the hull, killing 17 sailors and wounding 50. The two
"suicide bombers" driving the boat also perished in this "suicide". The
attack was immediately attributed to Al-Qaeda, although bin Laden denied
responsibility and the Taliban denied that their "host" could have been
involved. The accusation gave the United States a pretext to force the
Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh to cooperate in the fight against
anti-imperialist Islamism, closing for starters three paramilitary camps
on its territory. On top of that, a few weeks before the elections, the
attack was the October Surprise that brought Bush to power.

John O’Neill was in charge of the investigation. A twenty year veteran
of the FBI, and experienced specialist in counter-terrorism, he had
investigated the bombing at the WTC in 1993. His team came to suspect
that Israel had fired a missile from a submarine: the hole was indeed
indicative of a penetrating charge and inexplicable by the explosion of
one dinghy. The suspicions were shared by President Saleh, who spoke in
an interview with Newsweek, of the possibility that the attack was due
to Israel, "trying to spoil the US-Yemeni relationship [31]." O’Neill
and his team suffered the hostility of U.S. Ambassador Barbara Bodine.
They were kept from diving in order to inspect the damage. Finally,
taking advantage of their return to New York for Thanksgiving, Bodine
refused them re-entry to Yemen. The crew of the Cole were put under a
gag order forbidding then to talk about the attack to anyone other than
the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS). In July 2001, O’Neill
resigned from the FBI. He was soon after offered a position as head of
security at the WTC starting on September 11, 2001. His body was found
in the rubble of the WTC after he had disappeared for two days. As for
Barbara Bodine, in 2003 she joined the corrupt team of the Coalition
Provisional Authority (CPA) in Baghdad.



Where does the list of Zionist-designed fake Islamic terrorism end? The
"New York Times" and other newspapers reported that on September 19,
2005, two agents of the British Special Forces (SAS) were arrested after
forcing a road block in a car filled with weapons, ammunition,
explosives and detonators which they drove disguised as Arabs. It is
suspected that they were planning to commit violent attacks in the
center of Basra during a religious event, to stir up conflict between
Shiites and Sunnis. The same evening, a SAS unit freed the two agents by
destroying the prison with a dozen tanks assisted by helicopters.
Captain Masters, charged with the investigation of this embarrassing
affair, died in Basra on October 15.

Laurent Guyénot

Translation
Roger Lagassé

[1] Original article in Italian: "Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the
Tactics of Mistake — Alan Sabrosky."

[2] “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S.
forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act” (Rowan Scarborough,
"U.S. troops would enforce peace Under Army study," The Washington
Times, 10 September 2001.)

[3] In addition to the book by Hicham Hamza and Christopher Bollyn, more
on this issue from: Justin Raimondo, The Terror Enigma: 9/11 and the
Israeli Connection, iUniversal, 2003 as well as an article by
Christopher Ketcham, "What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11
Attacks?", CounterPunch, 2007, vol. 14, p. 1-10).

[4] "Vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack. White, 2000
Chevrolet van with New Jersey registration with ’Urban Moving Systems’
sign on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of
first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center. Three individuals with
van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion"
(Raimondo, The Terror Enigma, p. xi).

[5] "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our
problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (Hicham Hamza, Le Grand
Tabou, ch. 2).

[6] "There are maps of the city in the car with certain places
highlighted. It looked like they’re hooked in with this. It looked like
they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park"
(Raimondo, The Terror Enigma, p. xi).

[7] "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered
me"(Raimondo, The Terror Enigma, p. 19 ); Hamza, Le Grand Tabou, ch. 2.

[8] "They smiled, they hugged each other and they appeared to ‘high
five’ one another"; "the United States will take steps to stop terrorism
in the world"; "Give us twenty years and we’ll take over your media and
destroy your country"; "an individual in South America with authentic
ties to Islamic militants in the middle east"; "The vehicule was also
searched by a trained bomb-sniffing dog which yielded a positive result
for the presence of explosive traces" (Hamza, Le Grand Tabou, ch. 2).

[9] "... that the FBI no longer has any investigative interests in the
detainees and they should proceed with the appropriate immigration
proceedings" (Hamza, Le Grand Tabou, ch. 2).

[10] See Youtube “Dancing Israelis, our purpose was to document the event.”

[11] "Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like
Palestinians and going around a building. […] I see the guy by Newark
Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniforms. […] He’s
dressed like an Arab" (Bollyn, Solving 9-11, p. 278-80).

[12] "Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like
Palestinians and going around a building. […] I see the guy by Newark
Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniforms. […] He’s
dressed like an Arab" (Bollyn, Solving 9-11, p. 278-80).

[13] "In the past six weeks, employees in federal office buildings
located throughout the United States have reported suspicious activities
connected with individuals representing themselves as foreign students
selling or delivering artwork.” “These individuals have also gone to the
private residences of senior federal officials under the guise of
selling art." Drug Enforcement Administration Report.

[14] “The nature of the individuals’ conducts […] leads us to believe
the incidents may well be an organized intelligence gathering activity”
(Raimondo, The Terror Enigma, p. x).

[15] “acknowledged he could blow up buildings, bridges, cars, and
anything else that he needed to” (Bollyn, Solving 9/11, p. 159).

[16] "The Hollywood, Florida, area seems to be a central point for these
individuals” (Raimondo, The Terror Enigma, p. 3).

[17] David Ray Griffin, 9/11 Contradictions, Arris Books, 2008, p.
142-156, citing the Daily Mail, the Boston Herald, the San Francisco
Chronicle and The Wall Street Journal.

[18] "The aircraft cut a gash that was over half the width of the
building and extended from the 93rd floor to the 99th floor. All but the
lowest of these floors were occupied by Marsh & McLennan, a worldwide
insurance company, which also occupied the 100th floor." (p. 20). These
elements have been analyzed by Lalo Vespera in La parenthèse enchantée,
ch. 10

[19] "Like an act of God, we moved," (USA Today, 17 septembre 2001).

[20] “Evidence that there were foreign governments involved in
facilitating the activities of at least some of the terrorists in the
United States” (Raimondo, The Terror Enigma, p. 64).

[21] "The threat of civil unrest against the monarchy, led by al Qaeda"
("Saudi Arabia : Friend or Foe?," The Daily Beast, 11 July 2011).

[22] The Keys to the Kingdom, Vanguard Press, 2011

[23] Summary from Amazon.ca

[24] “Contrary to Chomsky’s theories, the United States has no interest
to support Israel”, by Jeffrey Blankfort, Voltaire Network, 28 September
2006.

[25] “Of course it was Iraq’s energy resources. It’s not even a
question”(Stephen Sniegoski, The Transparent Cabal : The Neoconservative
Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel,
Enigma Edition, 2008, p. 333).

[26] "‘Big Oil’ not only did not promote the invasion, but has failed to
secure a single oil field, despite the presence of 160,000 US troops,
127,000 Pentagon/State Department paid mercenaries and a corrupt puppet
régime" (James Petras, Zionism, Militarism and the Decline of US Power,
Clarity Press, 2008, p. 18).

[27] “Kennedy, the Lobby and the Bomb”, by Laurent Guyénot, Translation
Gaia Edwards, Voltaire Network, 2 May 2013.

[28] Gordon Thomas, Gideon’s Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad,
Griffin; New Ed edition (23 Feb 2007).

[29] Gordon Thomas, op.cit.

[30] “An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of
thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for
hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in
America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property
unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense
of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet
atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. […] Like Pearl Harbor, the
event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The
United States might respond with draconian measures scaling back civil
liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of
suspects and use of deadly force” (Griffin, 9/11 Contradictions, p. 295-6).

[31] "We Are Still Searching" (The Daily Beast, December 17, 2007.

Laurent Guyénot

Engineer (National School of Advanced Technology, 1982) and medievalist
(PhD in Medieval Studies at Paris IV-Sorbonne, 2009). He has authored
numerous books on the subject. He has dedicated the past three years to
studying the behind-the-scenes history of the United States, where he
lived for five years.

No comments:

Post a Comment