627 Nativity scenes and Christmas banners "unconstitutional"

Nativity scenes and Christmas banners "unconstitutional"

Newsletter published on 25 December 2013

(1) The Lobby buys support from Minorities
(2) Nativity scenes and Christmas banners "unconstitutional"
(3) Fredrick Toben corrects reports that he was imprisoned for Holocaust
denial
(4) Daily debate on Youtube between comedien Dieudonne and philosophe
Alain Soral
(5) Alain Soral: a mixture of Marxism and National Front. Anti-Feminist,
not anti-Muslim
(6) François Hollande, Zionist Always, by Thierry Meyssan
(7) France's Jewish Lobby gets Diendonne banned from public media, but
he's become a Martyr
(8) Alain Soral, Philosopher for Left economic policies & Right cultural
policies; hated and feared by the French ruling class

(1) The Lobby buys support from Minorities - Peter Myers, December 26, 2013

Yesterday's bulletin contained reports from France about Diendonne and
Soral, but I forgot to list them in the headings at the top, so I have
repeated them in this bulletin. They were sent by Chris Lancenet
<chrislancenet@gmail.com>, who has French background but lives in
Okinawa with his Japanese wife.

Soral's oscillation between the Communist Party and the National Front
attests not to a "Red-Brown alliance" so much as exploration of the No
Man's Land between the two camps. It's the territory of Otto Strasser,
leader of the anti-Hitler faction of the NSDAP, who admired Zinoviev and
at one time considered an alliance with the USSR, but who became as
resolutely anti-Stalin as he was anti-Hitler. During World War II, he
was a refugee from both.

One notes, in Australia's pending Repeal of Hate Speech laws, that
various Minorities have aligned themselves with the Lobby's position.

The point of including reports of Israel's moves to displace 30,000
Bedouin, was that these same Minorities groups are silent on such
issues. It is a silence that has been bought.

It also exposes the claims of the Lobby to Victimhood status. The
silence of Jews who espouse Minorities causes in Australia - eg Robert
Manne, David Manne and Andrew Markus - is deafening.

Search Google for "Bedouin" "Andrew Markus" and specify "within the last
12 months".
Do similar searches for Robert Manne and David Manne.

All of them will justify their silence by claiming that they are experts
on Australian Racism, not Israeli Racism.

But their anti-Racism wears a Jewish badge; it considers itself a part
of Judaism's concern for Social Justice.

(2) Nativity scenes and Christmas banners "unconstitutional"

From: Steven Salemi <ssalemi@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: Australia's Jewish Lobby fights Repeal of Hate Speech Laws
  "that protect Jews and other minority groups"
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 20:24:21 +0000

Peter,

Merry Christmas to you!  Thanks for your fine work throughout the year.

I think it is important that you point out (in an article perhaps) that
all this anti-Christian fascist behavior  (removing nativity scenes and
Christmas banners, taking down historical statues and biblical
quotations on plaques, etc.) in the military, in Federal State and Local
Government Buildings, etc., is being done with the excuse that these
displays are "unconstitutional."  However, I believe this is hornswoggle.

I recall reading some revisionist's attempts to gain constitutional
protection for his work, and some governmental apparatchik (RIGHTLY)
pointed out to him that a simple reading of the Constitution shows
exactly what is protected and guaranteed (very little) and what is not
(mostly everything).

Specifically, the Constitution says, what is it, "Congress shall enact
NO LAWS..."  -- that's where the protection is, that bit about the laws.
  If the subject under discussion isn't specifically about congress
enacting laws...then anything goes.  So removing a nativity scene
because it is "unconstitutional" is, I believe, completely and totally
untrue, an incorrect reading of the U.S. Constitution and extension of
its so-called protections into areas that it actually doesn't apply at all.

Best,

Steven Salemi
Santa Fe, NM USA

(3) Fredrick Toben corrects reports that he was imprisoned for Holocaust
denial

From: "Fredrick Toben" <toben@toben.biz>
To: <peter@mailstar.net>
Cc: "'Adelaide Institute'" <info@adelaideinstitute.org>
Subject: RE: Australia's Jewish Lobby fights Repeal of Hate Speech Laws
"that protect Jews and other minority groups"
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 19:10:23 +1030

Peter, this is a good stuff but somehow this Prof. Ignatiev's matter
seems almost impossible to believe it happened. If it did, then that's
the beginning of something that will see the USA split up -   - here's
an addition from me as regards the RDA, and best wishes for a Happy New
Year 2014.

These are my objections to the latest articles on this matter:

From: Fredrick Toben [mailto:toben@toben.biz]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 December 2013 9:45 PM
To: 'editor-in-chief@y-i.co.il'; 'ajn@jewishnews.net.au'
Cc: 'Noel Towell'; 'media.release@canberratimes.com.au';
'letters.editor@canberratimes.com.au'; 'Adelaide Institute'
Subject: Re the below articles' factual errors.

Dears

Please note that there are some factual errors within the articles
published by both The Canberra Times/SMH and Ynet on 21 December 2012. I
would be pleased if you could correct same.

1. I did not serve >>two jail sentences for Holocaust denial and
anti-Semitism<<; The German jail sentence was for „defaming the memory
of the dead‰ and the Australian jail sentence was for „contempt of
court‰, which is not a criminal matter!

2.I have never stated or written that >>the Auschwitz concentration
camps was "too small" to have been the site of mass murder.<<

3. I have never stated that >>only 2,007 Jews were killed at Auschwitz;<<

4. Contrary to what the Canberra Times‚ writer Noel Towell stated, I am
not >>a convicted Holocaust denier<<. The 1999 matter went to an appeal
and the 2008 extradition from the UK to Germany, which failed, would
have activated the appeal process. Judge Dr Meinerzhagen wrote me a
letter to state that this process has been stayed for the time being.
This means that I am still an unconvicted so called >>Holocaust
denier<<. Please contact Dr Meinerzhagen at Mannheim District Court,
Germany, for confirmation. 5. In 2009 Mr Peter Hartung became the
director of Adelaide Institute.

Kindest regards.
Fredrick Toben

{in reply to the following}

* Holocaust denialists back calls for reform of Australia's race hate laws -

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/holocaust-denialists-back-calls-for
-reform-of-australias-race-hate-laws-20131220-2zr0u.html

* Shoah deniers support Australian call to weaken anti-racism laws
Adelaide Institute, a Holocaust denial group, agree with attorney general,
human rights commissioner's proposal to weaken, limit laws defining hate
crime
Ynet, Published: 12.21.13, 13:24 / Israel News

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L4467899,00.html

(4) Daily debate on Youtube between comedien Dieudonne and philosophe
Alain Soral

From: chris lancenet <chrislancenet@gmail.com>
Wed, 25 Dec 2013 12:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 05:09:29 +0900
Subject: Re:" Is a new revolution quietly brewing in France?" a truly
open  anti juif extremely popular movement in F

Peter / taken by surprise to discover a truly open anti-juif extremely
popular movement in my country thanks to this article in english and
youTube.

You can watch the daily debate between  the comedien Dieudonne' semi
Camerounien and extremely 'populaire' even openly vulgar and the cool
Alain Soral who knows who belongs to the Lobby named CRIF in
France;Thierry Meyssan is part of the story as well in his own way; you
just have to type Dieudonne'+Soral+Meyssan on Google and see the results
in french,some YT videos show 2.3 million vieuwers.

The original  philo of Alain Soral is that french christian workers,and
Islam residents (almost 2 or 3 generations) can live together and
should;  the CRIF and the medias are not happy at all and strongly
censor the duo,according to the article the lobby aim at radicalizing
the french Islam origin youngsters to prevent Soral's E-R union  plan to
succeed.  "Quenelle" is the symbol gesture of rally of Dieudonne' which
means "F..You" to the french authorities including the"Sionistes" and to
the Medias 'Canal plus' and other TV.

"Quenelle" is also a  semi hidden nazi salute quite popular and rapidely
spreading.   on a YouTube by Dieudonne' I could see  Francois Hollande
dominated by Netanyahu on TV on which scene Alain Soral and Dieudonne
exulted by watching the french president almost screwed by the Israeli
PM when telling him "as you know, we (french people)love Israel for ever"!

Best chris

(5) Alain Soral: a mixture of Marxism and National Front. Anti-Feminist,
not anti-Muslim

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain_Soral

Besides the sociological Marxist analysis of the modern-day society,
Soral's books tend to focus on seven main themes[citation needed]:

  criticism of communitarianism

  criticism of feminism, especially neo-feminist movements

  criticism of the media and the society of spectacle in general

  criticism of capitalism and USA imperialism

  criticism of mainstream culture

  the Arab-Israeli conflict

  the dismantling of Yugoslavia, and possibly of France

Notably, Soral has written:

“In France, all forms of growing communitarianism (gay, Islamic, etc.)
form and strengthen through imitation of, hostility towards and
opposition to Judeo-Zionist communitarianism, whose privileged status
constitutes the communitarian jurisprudence by which their
revendications to the Republic are supported[4]”

Soral's analysis of society focuses on what he terms "desire
society",[5] promoted by the media and the cult of celebrity[citation
needed]. He has especially criticised monthly women's publications,
which he believes alter the conscience and relegate women to the status
of "objects".[6]

As part of the debate on 'laïcité' in French schools, Soral claimed to
prefer the Muslim veil to thong underwear.[7]

Soral defined himself as a Marxist, and was a member of the French
Communist Party in the early 90's. He left the PCF because of his
opposition to the party's renunciation of revolutionary content[citation
needed]. Soral supported left-wing dissident candidate Jean-Pierre
Chevènement during the 2002 presidential election[citation needed].

In 2005, Soral turned to the far-right, joining the National Front's
campaign committee; he was given responsibility for social issues and
for the suburbs under the authority of Marine Le Pen. Soral's personal
journey has led some to compare him with Jacques Doriot, one of the
neo-socialists in the early 1930s and Collaborationist under Pétain.[8]
He supported the Bloc identitaire's distribution of food in January 2006.[8]

Since 18 November 2007, Soral has been a member of the central committee
of the National Front which he left in early 2009 because of some ideas
he was in conflict with (especially the menace of Islam which is not an
actual threat for him).

In 2007, he founded the group "Egalité et Réconciliation",[9] a think
tank led by the ideas he developed in his books and his several
interviews (an innovative mix between social and economic ideas from
Left, and Values like Nation or morality from Right).

Controversy [edit]

Alain Soral and "gay communitarianism" [edit]

Alain Soral has denounced communitarianism as a "poison".[10] He has
been especially critical of the rise of communitarianism in the gay
community, a term that he has sharply criticised, arguing that many
homosexuals have nothing to do with Gay Pride ideology[citation needed].
For Soral, Gay Pride involves promotion of the "Gorgeous Guy" model,
youth, parties, drag queens, etc., and obscures homosexuality as
experienced by older or working-class homosexuals.

The association Act Up rounded on his publisher,[11] Éditions Blanche.
Act Up stated that through books like those of Alain Soral or Éric
Rémès, Éditions Blanche spread negative feelings and even hatred towards
homosexuals. Act Up asked the director of publication at Éditions
Blanche to stop publishing books by Soral and Rémès, and vandalised
Éditions Blanche's offices[citation needed]. The head of Éditions
Blanche claimed that members of Act Up physically assaulted his
executive assistant, and threatened to press charges. Act Up denied
those accusations.[12] No legal action has so far been pursued.

Alain Soral and feminism [edit]

In his book Vers la féminisation ? Démontage d'un complot
antidémocratique, Alain Soral argues that women have always worked (in
trade or agriculture, for example). To him, they would have invented
feminism by tiring of their role as mothers. Soral distinguishes two
types of feminism: that of the "flippées" ("freaked-out") such as Simone
de Beauvoir, and that of the "pétasses" ("bitches") like Élisabeth
Badinter. Soral claims that the most problematic inequality is not
between men and women, but between rich and poor, and that feminists,
who generally come from the upper classes of society, attempt to
distract attention from this struggle.[13]

Accusations of anti-Semitism [edit]

In a report on the television programme Complément d'enquête (in its
episode devoted to the controversial French humorist Dieudonné M'bala
M'bala), broadcast on the French television channel France 2 on 20
September 2004, Alain Soral said:

“When you're talking with a Frenchman who is a Zionist Jew, and you
start to say, well maybe there are problems coming from your side, maybe
you might have made a few mistakes, it's not always the fault of other
people if no-one can stand you wherever you go… because that's basically
their general history, you see… for 2,500 years, every time they settled
somewhere, after about fifty years or so, they get kicked. You'd think
that's strange! It's as though everyone is wrong except them. And the
guy will start shouting, yelling, going mad… you won't be able to carry
on with the conversation. Which, to sum it all up, tells you that
there's a psychopathology with Zionism Judaism, something that verges on
mental illness…[14]

This page was last modified on 18 December 2013 at 02:08.

(6) François Hollande, Zionist Always, by Thierry Meyssan

http://www.voltairenet.org/article181169.html

François Hollande, Zionist Always

by Thierry Meyssan

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | DAMASCUS | 26 NOVEMBER 2013

{photo} Valérie Trierweiler, Hollande hosted by Shimon Peres and
Benjamin Netanyahu (November 18, 2013).
{end}

François Hollande was elected president by cultivating ambiguity. Yet it
was easy enough to read his previous statements to see full support for
the State of Israel. The change he had announced to his constituents has
not occurred. On the contrary there has been continuity with his
predecessor. We cannot but note that France has gradually abandoned its
policy of independence to stand alongside the United States and the last
colonial state.

Some commentators have explained the French position in 5 +1
negotiations with Iran as dictated by Saudi Arabia, or through reference
to the Jewishness of Hollande’s Foreign Minister, Laurent Fabius. This
ignores that French policy in the Middle East has profoundly changed in
nine years.

It all started in 2004 with the break between Jacques Chirac and Bashar
al-Assad. The Syrian President had promised his French counterpart to
favour Total’s tender. But when the French proposal reached the palace,
it was so disadvantageous for the country that the president changed his
mind. Furious, Jacques Chirac broke with Syria and presented Resolution
1559 to the Security Council .

Then, the French elected Nicolas Sarkozy without knowing that he had
been partially raised by one of the principal leaders of the CIA, Frank
Wisner Jr. Not content with having been fabricated ??by the United
States, he discovered Jewish roots and cultivated his Israeli relations.
International policy was dictated by Washington but because at the time
there was no difference between Israel and the United States, he
appeared only as being at one with them.

François Hollande had, for 10 years, been designated secretary general
of his party because of his mediocrity: directing no current and not
being vassal to any leader, he could keep house while maintaining a
balance between the contenders at the Elysee. He devoted himself to
never having a personal opinion, to remaining as transparent as
possible. So much so that during his presidential election campaign each
saw him as a moderate man who could surround himself with experienced
personalities. His supporters have been the first to be hurt by this.

The reality of François Hollande emerged only once he arrived at the
Elysee. Expert in domestic policy, he does not know much about
international relations. In this area, his convictions come to him from
illustrious socialist personalities.

Thus, he had placed his nomination under the auspices of Jules Ferry,
colonization theorist. In Le Figaro, his friend, Israeli President
Shimon Peres glowingly compared him to Léon Blum and to Guy Mollet,
although the latter is no longer popular in France. In 1936, the former
had proposed to surpass the UK by creating the State of Israel in
Lebanon, which was then under French mandate. In 1956 the latter
attempted to seize the Suez Canal with the help of the Israeli army.

During his ten years at the head of the Socialist Party, François
Hollande limited his interventions on the Middle East, of which here is
a brief anthology:

• In 2000, when southern Lebanon was occupied, he along with Bertrand
Delanoe prepared plans for Prime Minister Lionel Jospin to travel to
Palestine. His speech includes a condemnation of Hezbollah which he
likens to a terrorist group.

• In 2001, he demanded the resignation of geopolitician Pascal Boniface,
guilty of having written an internal memo criticizing blind Party
support for Israel.

• In 2004, he wrote to the Superior Audiovisual Council to challenge the
authorization given to broadcast Al -Manar. He continued pressure until
the channel of resistance was censored.

• In 2005, he was hosted in camera by the Representative Council of
Jewish Institutions in France (CRIF). According to the minutes of the
meeting, he supported Ariel Sharon and strongly criticized Gaullist Arab
policy. He stated: "There is a trend that goes way back, this is called
the Arab policy of France and it is not acceptable that the government
have an ideology. There is a recruitment problem at the Quai d’Orsay and
at the ENA and this recruitment should be reorganized."

• In 2006, he took a stand against President Ahmadinejad who invited
rabbis and historians, including Holocaust deniers, to Tehran. It feins
ignorance about the direction of the conference, which was to show that
Europeans had replaced their Christian culture with the religion of the
Holocaust. And against the grain, he explained that the Iranian
president intended to deny the right of Israel to exist and was poised
to continue the Holocaust.
• He mobilized for the release of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, on the
grounds that he had French dual citizenship. No matter that the young
man was captured while serving in an army of occupation at war against
the Palestinian Authority, also an ally of France.

• In 2010, he, along with Bertrand Delanoe and Bernard-Henri Lévy,
published an open forum in Le Monde to oppose the boycott of Israeli
products. According to him, the boycott would amount to collective
punishment imposed also on Israelis working for peace with the
Palestinians. This is a line of reasoning that he had not held during
the similar campaign against apartheid in South Africa.

Finally, before the Franco-Saudi rapprochement and even before being
President, François Hollande had already expressed his support for the
Israeli colonial state. And he had already condemned the Axis of
Resistance (Iran , Syria, Hezbollah). The truth is thus the opposite:
applying the Quincy Agreement, Saudi Arabia became closer to France
because of its pro-Israel policy.

The policy of the Socialist Party in general and that of François
Hollande in particular has its roots in nineteenth century colonialism,
of which Jules Ferry was a herald and Theodor Herzl a promoter. Today ,
Zionists in the party have come together at the initiative of Dominique
Strauss-Kahn in the discrete and powerful Léon Blum Circle... whose
honorary president, Jean- Marc Ayrault has become Francois Hollande’s
Prime Minister.

Thierry Meyssan

Translation
Roger Lagassé

Source
Al-Watan (Syria)

(7) France's Jewish Lobby gets Diendonne banned from public media, but
he's become a Martyr

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=86693

Is a new revolution quietly brewing in France?

By wmw_admin on December 18, 2013

French Dissidents — via Paul Eisen Dec 16, 2013

Article taken from The Vineyard of the Saker

Today I am beginning a series of articles about what I believe is the
extremely deep crisis taking place in Europe and about the potential of
this crisis to result in some cataclysmic events. I will begin by taking
a look at what has been going on in France, probably the country in
Europe I know best, and also one which I think has be biggest potential
to generate an explosion with far reaching consequences.

One could look at France’s economic and financial situation
(catastrophic) or at the many social problems plaguing an already very
frustrated population, but I want to focus on one specific aspect of the
current French crisis: the complete alienation of the majority of the
people from the ruling elites which I will illustrate by one very
telling example: the growing hysteria of the French elites about a
brilliant philosopher – Alain Soral – and one stand-up comedian –
Dieudonne M’bala M’bala.

I have already written about these to remarkable people (here, here and
here) and I urge you to read these past articles to get a better picture
of what is taking place now. For those who are really not willing to
read a few background pages, I will begin by the following
mini-introduction.

Diendonne M’bala M’bala is a French-Cameroonian comedian which was by
far the most popular comic in France until he made one short sketch
about a religious Israeli Settler on French TV. The sketch was not
particularly funny, but it really enraged the French equivalent of the
US AIPAC – called CRIF in France – which began a systematic campaign to
smear, ban and silence "Dieudo" as he is known in France. Dieudo refused
to roll over and retaliated by making fun of those persecuting him which
made him the darling of many of those who hated the financial elites
running France since 1969. Now completely banned from any public media,
Dieudo is still the most popular comic in France. {continued in next item}

(8) Alain Soral, Philosopher for Left economic policies & Right cultural
policies; hated and feared by the French ruling class

{same URL as above} http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=86693

Is a new revolution quietly brewing in France?

By wmw_admin on December 18, 2013

French Dissidents — via Paul Eisen Dec 16, 2013

Article taken from The Vineyard of the Saker

{continued} Alain Soral is a French author and philosopher whose
political career included a membership in the French Communist Party and
the National Front. He is credited with developing the concept of
"gauche du travail – droite des valeurs" (literally "left of labor –
right of values") which can be summarized as the simultaneous advocacy
of socialist/social ideas and measures in economic and social issues
combined with conservative moral, ethical and religious values in
ideological, ethical and cultural issues. He is the founder of an
extremely interesting movement called "Egalite et Reconciliation" which
aims at reconciling native French people (called "Francais de souche" or
"root French") with those French people who recently immigrated to
France (called "Francais de branche" or "branch French") and to make
them co-exist in complete equality. Because of his numerous "politically
incorrect" ideas and very overt statements, Soral is absolutely hated
and feared by the French ruling class. Even though Soral has also been
completely banned from any public media, He remains immensely popular
with the general public and his books are all best-sellers.

Soral and Dieudo are very different people, they have very different
backgrounds and they have very different personalities. There even used
to be a time when they were sharply critical of each other. But when the
French elites decided to basically destroy them they became closer
together and now they are good friends, and they openly support each
other, as a result we have this truly bizarre phenomenon: a White
philosopher and a Black comedian have jointly become a kind of
"two-headed Emmanuel Goldstein" of modern France: the elites absolutely
hate them and the media as gone into a completely Orwellian "two minute
of hate" frenzy mode trying to convince the French people that Soral
and/or Dieudo are almost a reincarnation of Adolf Hitler. Needless to
say, this thesis is so stupid that Dieudo makes fun of it in his shows
while Soral ridicules it in his books and uses it to show that France is
run by a tiny elite of vicious and arrogant SOBs.

In truth, one has to admit that the French elites are facing two
formidable enemies. Dieudonne is truly one of the most talented French
comedian ever while Soral is without any doubt the most original and
brilliant philosopher France has seen since WWII. Furthermore, French
law makes it rather difficult to completely ban a show or a book. God
knows, the French elites have tried, and both Dieudo and Soral have been
taken to court numerous times for "racism" and "anti-Semitism", both of
them have been physically assaulted several times by the thugs of the
"LDJ" (Jewish Defense League) and both of them are constantly harassed
by the authorities (the French version of the IRS and the FBI). Yet,
this systematic campaign of persecutions has clearly backfired against
its authors and given Dieudo and Soral a (well-deserved) martyr status.
Finally, Dieudo and Soral have shown that they are extremely
sophisticated users of the Internet where their shows, special events,
interviews, books, monthly news roundups have been extremely popular and
are seen by many millions of people in France and abroad.

Gradually, Soral and Dieudo have built a real political movement which
is active both on the internal front and on international issues.

As I mentioned, "Egalite et Reconciliation" or "E&R" stands for a full
acceptance and integration of Muslim immigrants into the French society.
This is crucial because unlike the French National Front, E&R does not
advocate the expulsion of immigrants out of France. Not only that, but
E&R even denies that immigrants are the real problem. Of course, E&R
does not deny that unemployment is huge in France, nor does it deny that
a large percentage of crime and violence in France are committed by
immigrants, but they see that as an effect of previous political
mistakes and not as a cause of the problems of France.

Likewise, E&R is very openly pro-Muslim. Not in a truly religious sense,
most members of E&R are not deeply religious people, but rather in the
cultural sense. E&R primarily see Islam and French Roman-Catholicism as
two sources of ethnics, morality and civilization as for whether one is
religious or not and accepts the theology of these religions is left to
the individual member. This is quit different from the utterly sterile
"ecumenical dialog" which seeks to find common teachings to Jesus Christ
and the Prophet Mohammad while desperately trying to overlook the very
real and deep theological disagreements between these two religions.
Instead, E&R advocates a common stance on most, if not all, issues faced
by French Muslims and Christians. And that makes sense.

Think about it: both Islam and Christianity are clearly opposed to the
values of capitalism, profit maximization, speculation, usury, sexual
immorality, the destruction of the traditional family, imperialism, etc.
While the theological roots of Islam and Christianity are different,
most of their ethical philosophical teachings are very similar. Frankly,
I can think of only one big difference and that is the fundamentally
different views Muslims and Christians have on the death penalty, but
since the death penalty has been abolished in France in 1981 this hardly
matters today.

Of course, both Christianity and Islam have their crazy perverted
deviations such as the plutocratic and genocidal policies of the Papacy
in the past or the liver-eating Wahabis the world is facing today, but
E&R has no problems rejecting and condemning them. On the Christian
side, E&R advocates a type of popular Roman-Catholicism seen in the
pre-1789 France which has little to do with some of the worst excesses
of the Papacy. On the Muslim side, E&R is especially close to the
teachings Sheikh Imran Hosein and Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. They are also
close to the Iranian supported Centre Zahra in Paris.

I would say that the type of Muslims attracted to E&R are exactly the
same as the type Christians attracted to it: politically progressive,
religiously strict, observant, but tolerant. Needless to say, the
potential of this radically new movement is absolutely huge because it
unites Left and Right, Christian and Muslim, religious and secular (as
long as they are not anti-religious), native and immigrant, White and
Black, rich and poor. But what seems to really trigger the panic of the
French elites is the deep penetration of this movement into the
notorious French "banlieues", the destitute suburbs which over the past
decades were filled with immigrants from Africa and which have turned
into no-go zones of lawlessness and crime.

To understand this phenomenon it It is crucial to understand the
following: crime in France is not, repeat *not*, the product of recent
immigrants or religious Muslims. Recent immigrants and religious Muslims
have strong roots in their culture, families and lifestyles which
categorically prevent them form being criminal. And poverty has nothing
to do with this either. I personally have lived for 20 years right next
to a big mosque attended by huge crowds of dirt-poor Muslims from
sub-Saharan Africa, the Maghreb, the Balkans and the Middle-East I can
attest that never, I mean that literally, never, was any crime committed
in my neighborhood by the folks who came to this mosque. Quite to the
contrary, these mosque attending Muslims were far better behaved, and
more courteous, than the locals. In fact, it was clear that these people
were going out of their way to show the (initially rather frightened
locals) that they had no cause to fear them. The worst "crime" these
Muslims regularly committed was to park their cars on the curb and that
was because there were not enough parking places available. Finally, at
the end of each Holy Month of Ramadan, the Muslims invited the entire
neighborhood to join in the celebrations, to sample the many delicious
dishes offered, and to visit the mosque. To say that these Muslims were
perfect citizens would be an understatement.

The so-called "Muslim crime" in France is always linked second
generation youth gangs who have lost their cultural and religious roots
and who know little or nothing about them but who are also rejected by
the local, native, population. As Soral likes to say "nobody goes from
the mosque straight into a gang-raping spree". It’s really either/or –
but not both. Soral calls these thugs "Islamo-racaille" which can be
loosely translated as "Islamo-thugs" – a very nasty and dangerous type
with no sense of right and wrong and who exteriorizes his alienation by
abusing the natives whom he hates. These are exactly the types who feel
a deep attraction for the crude brutality of Wahabism and who end up
killing cops in France or joining the liver-eaters in Syria. Their
"Islam" is really only a pretext, a pious justification, for their
psychopathic thuggery. I suspect most crusaders were exactly of the same
psychological makeup.

Most young immigrants are, of course, somewhere in between the
family-educated and observant type and the out of control lawless thugs.
And for the very first time a relevant political movement offers them a
very attractive option: E&R.

In essence E&R tells them "instead of being neither, be both – be Muslim
and be French, don’t hate the natives who have the same oppressors as
you do and who are your best friends and allies, our enemies are trying
to turn us against each other to better rule over all of us, let us
therefore unite and stand together". This is an absolutely new and
original message.

In the past, only two movements openly dealt with the immigration issue.
On one hand you had the National Front who advocated policies such as
the "national preference" (better social and labor laws from the
natives), the crackdown on crime (more police, stricter laws, more and
bigger jails) and the expulsion of all immigrants (except, possibly,
those with a French passport – and even that was debated). On the other
hand, you had an organization created by the Socialist Party called "SOS
Racisme" which openly advocated the rejection of the native French
culture by the immigrants who, under the nice-sounding slogan of "right
to be different", were encouraged to hate the natives and demand a full
acceptance of their cultures of origin by the French society. Over the
past twenty years the "tag-team" of the National Front and SOS Racisme
has only served to make the issue of immigration in France infinitely
worse. The latest, and particularly ugly, development on this front has
been the new political line promoted by the French elites.

The very same elites who 20 years ago created and covertly financed SOS
Racisme and its moronic slogan "Touche pas a mon pote" (don’t touch my
buddy) have now declared that Muslims are, after all, a serious problem.
While in the past these elites were systematically ridiculing
Christianity, they are now saying that "Islam is not compatible with the
Republic". As for the youth in the "banlieues", they are now presented
as potential terrorist or al-Qaeda sleepers. As a result, when the
French elites are not legalizing homosexual marriages they are busy
banning the hijab in schools and complaining about too much halal meats
in the stores. And while only a tiny percentage of Muslim woman in
France cover their faces, the French elites have now officially banned
the burqa and the niqab in public places. Clearly, Muslim immigrants in
France have now been downgraded from "buddies" to enemies.

It is against this background that more and more young immigrants are
flocking to Soral, Dieudonne and E&R whose popularity is rapidly
growing. Recently, an absolutely incredible event took place, something
unthinkable just a few years ago.

In one of his sketches Dieudo sang a song called "Shoananas" a rather
basic play on the words ‘Shoah’ (from the Hebrew ‘HaShoah’ or ‘disaster’
– name by which the French Jews often refer to the "Holocaust") and
‘ananas’ (pineapple). Sure enough, the CRIF, SOS Racisme and other
organization sued Dieudo for "incitement to hatred". Dieudo was
sentenced to a 20’000 Euros fine and he appealed the decision. On the
day Dieudo’s appeal was heard by the court, something absolutely
extraordinary happened. I found two YouTube videos which show the event
and which I will both show because of the high probability that one, or
both, of these videos will be banned (guys – download them now while you
can!). Here they are:

For those of you who do not understand French, let me summarize what we see.

Members of the Jewish Defense League (LDJ) show up to scream insults at
Dieudo and his supporters who, in turn, shout all types of abuse at the
LDJ members and wave pineapples at them while sining "Shoananas". The
cops keep the two sides apart as best they can. Then the supporters of
Dieudo begin to chant "liberte d’expression" (freedom of speech) to
which the LDJ members reply "am Israel hai" ("Israel is alive" in
Hebrew) and begin to sing the Israeli national anthem. At this point the
supporters being to sing the French "La Marseillaise" from the top of
their lungs totally drowning out the completely overwhelmed LDJ
activists. Now take a close look at the faces singing "La Marseillaise"
– do you see that a lot of the people singing it are clearly Brown and
Black? These are precisely the type young people taken mostly, but not
only, from the notorious ‘banlieues’. These could be the same people who
in 2001 and 2002 booed the French national anthem during soccer matches
(a big scandal at the time).

The Marseillaise is first and foremost a revolutionary song, and when it
is not so much sung as it is shouted by a large crowd waving fists, this
is a very very serious development. Needless to say, none of that was
ever shown on the French media. But you can bet that the elites saw it
all and one can only imagine the fear they felt as these images.

Coincidence or not, but the fact is that when the cops heard the crowd
behind them singing the Marseillaise, they began pushing the LDJ
activist out of the court-building. This is not very surprising
considering the immense popularity Dieudo and Soral enjoy in the various
uniformed services (more about that below).

Something very important and very new is happening in France. The
traditional political paradigm of Right versus Left is falling apart if
only because the official "Right" and the official "Left" have become
indistinguishable from each other. And in the meantime, the E&R
phenomenon is becoming not only bigger, but deeper. More and more young
Frenchmen are looking back at the history of France since 1945 and they
are gradually coming to the realization that the country has been rule
by a arrogant cabal of plutocrats who overthrew de Gaulle in 1968 and
who replaced this remarkable national leader with a protégé of the
Rothschild family, Georges Pompidou, who began is career as a director
of the Banque Rothschild and who was later by the French elites to
replace de Gaulle. The French plutocracy which, together with the CIA,
had covertly orchestrated the "May 68? riots to achieve "regime change"
in France, now had free reign to radically change the "sovereignist"
political course chartered by de Gaulle. Can you guess when the policy
of mindless import of cheap foreign labor into France began? Under
Pompidou, of course! Now, thanks for E&R both native and immigrant
French people are re-discovering their common history and are beginning
to understand that they both were victims of the same politicians.

In the meantime, the regime in power commits one blunder after the
other. The latest one is both very funny and very serious. This is the
huge scandal surrounding the "quenelle".

Originally, the ""quenelle"" was a French dish which, if well prepared,
could be quite delicious. This is what a "quenelle" made with pike looks
like:

The elongated shape of the "quenelle" has also given a 2nd, slang,
meaning to this word. Let’s just say that the French expression to "put
you a "quenelle"" would have a very similar meaning to the English "up
yours!".

Dieudonne did probably not realize the far reaching consequences of his
words when he began referring to each of his jokes mocking of the regime
in power as a "quenelle". To add some emphasis, Dieudo than began to
show, with his arms, the various sizes of ""quenelle"s" which he, or his
supporters, were "putting" to the elites. The small ones were shown has
having the length of about a hand, while the big ones, the really
successful ones, where shown as having the full length of an
outstretched arm. This is a typical image of Dieudo showing a "big
"quenelle"":

This gesture rapidly went viral and became an Internet meme and more and
more people began making this gesture as sign of something like "f*ck
the system" , "screw the government" or "here is for you, Mr. President!".

To make things worse, it became something of a sport to approach
well-known personalities and to have a photo taken next to them while
flashing the "quenelle". People were making "quenelle"s everywhere,
especially when photographed next to regime officials.

Check this photo of the French Minister of the Interior, Manuel Valls, a
rabid Zionist who has openly called for the repression of Dieudonne and
Soral in a major speech in from the a congress of the Socialist Party:

Valls is the clueless grinning idiot in the middle, surrounded by a
group of young Frenchmen flashing the "quenelle". Needless to say, when
this photo was published the entire country exploded in laughter, making
the "quenelle" even more famous.

In the meantime, the League against Racism and anti-Semitism (the
equivalent of the US ADL in France) declared that the "quenelle" was an
"inverted Nazi salute and a symbol of the sodomization of the victims of
the Shoah", I kid you not! Predictably, the French Internet exploded in
laughter. The regime did not find that funny at all and it reacted with
the kind of paranoia which one would expect from dictators like Stalin
or Saddam Hussein: it literally launched a witch-hunt to try to detect
more or less overt ""quenelle"s" and when such a gesture was detected,
it attempted to punish those responsible if they were civil servants,
especially in the police and military. And, sure enough, the Internet
was flooded with all types of folks flashing the "quenelle" in defiance
of the regime’s wrath.

Dieudo, of course, invited uniformed officials to come to his theater in
Paris to perform a "quenelle" onstage, with him. He also created a
website solely dedicated to photos of uniformed people defiantly
flashing the sign: http://www.dieudosphere.com/les-"quenelle"s.html

Now the regime is completely lost and confused. On one hand, it is
simply impossible to sanction all the people who flash such signs, even
disciplining only those in uniform is impossible. Initially, the French
Chief of Staff had demanded "exemplary sanctions" against the first two
soldiers who flashed a "quenelle" (in front of a synagogue they were
ordered to guard), but now he have to punished entire crowds of defiant
soldiers, most of whom hate the regime anyway. On the other hand, how
can the regime ignore the fact that it is being openly defied, mocked
and ridiculed?

Here we are reaching a topic whose importance cannot be overstated: how
can one achieve regime change in a democracy who has been completely
bought and paid for by a plutocracy? This is question which is as
absolutely crucial for France, as it is for the USA, the UK or any other
EU country and the reply to this crucial seems to have eluded most of
the million of people in the West who are completely disgusted with the
regime in power but who see absolutely no realistic way to change it.

Violence is clearly not an option. The regime has been very clever to
label any form of "direct action" as "terrorism" while creating a
monstrous spy-state which would dwarf Ceausescu’s Securitate. If you try
as much as throwing a brick at a politician, they will call you a
terrorist and lock you up for many decades.

Playing the electoral game is futile. The plutocrats own the media
which, standing on the shoulders of folks like Edward Bernays has
learned how to brainwash a population far more effectively that Hitler
or Kim Il-Sung ever could. Basically, as shown by yesterday’s vote in
the US state of Washington, elections are bought. Period. "One man one
vote" has long been replaced by "one dollar one vote".

Trying to convince people by regular information campaigns has proven
useless too. If anything the double facts that the 9/11 Truth movement
has proven far beyond reasonable doubt that the Twin Towers and WTC7
have been brought down by controlled demolition AND the fact that his
has had exactly zero impact on the political process in the USA proves
that most people have been either zombified beyond rescue or have given
up hope in complete disgust and despair.

And yet we, the common folk, do have one formidable weapon left: we can
demonstratively show our total lack of respect for this regime and its
values. Like Dieudo, we can do that through humor and laughter. God
knows we all need a reason to laugh nowadays! And we can do it by
showing our complete contempt for all the institutions the regime tries
so hard to make us respect. First and foremost, we need to "diss" the
voice of the regime – the corporate media – and we need to "diss" the
holy liturgy of the regime – the elections. But we cannot do just that
as this is only a first step. Next, we need to follow the example of
Dieudo and Soral and use each opportunity to openly express our absolute
contempt for every shill showing respect of this regime and its values.
Not only that, but we need to denounce these propagandists as "paid
regime stooges" (which, of course, they are). Lastly, we need to force
the regime to show its true face by forcing it to take action against us.

Humor plays a crucial role here because – at least for the time being –
it has not been declared illegal. Humor is also a formidable weapon to
attack a regime’s legitimacy. Here I think of the many sketches which
the late George Carlin made about the regime in the USA, like these.

Carlin was brilliant, but he did not have the immense opportunity which
Dieudo and Soral are now using with devastating effectiveness: a large
percentage of the population which is already not only deeply alienated
by the regime in power, but which has the cultural, religious and
historical roots to dare look at another model: I am talking about the
Muslim immigrants in France.

Sure, the USA has the Nation of Islam lead by a pretty interesting
leader, Louis Farrakhan, but the problem with the NOI is that its
teachings are not truly Islamic and that cuts them off from the rest of
the much larger Islamic world. Besides, ever since the murder of Malcolm
X by two NOI activists I suspect that the NOI has been thoroughly
infiltrated by FBI plants.

In France, however, the Islamic community has a much more organic link
to the Islamic world, including to countries like Iran which fosters a
far more refined and sophisticated look at the flaws of modern society
than either the pro-regime mosques in France and abroad or the Wahabis.

It is, of course, ironical that the French who for many years have seen
the Muslim immigration to their country as a curse are now coming to
slowly realize that this might well have been a blessing. I do not mean
to paint a rosy picture of Islam in France: there are plenty of unsolved
problems to tackle both for the natives and the immigrants, and certain
forms of Islam are probably really not compatible with the original
French traditions and culture. And yes, there are many signs that the
current social brew might explode sooner or later. But the phenomenon of
Dieudo, Soral and E&R gives me the hope that this explosion does not
have to be a destructive one, that it could also be a liberating one.

What I am sure of is that some form of explosion will happen. Not only
if France ruined economically, but the regime in power is loosing its
legitimacy literally day by day. Should it come to a confrontation, and
that is a very real possibility in France, it is by no means certain
that the police and security forces will continue to remain loyal to the
plutocracy in power which, after all, has only made the life of the
regular cop much worse. I can easily imagine a "bank holiday" turning
into a violent uprising and after that, anything could happen. One of
the most knowledgeable observer of the French political scene –
economist and author Pierre Jovanovic – believes that President Francois
Hollande will not even be able to finish his current term in office.

Of course, I do not expect Dieudo or Soral to become President or Prime
Minister, neither will E&R become a big political party anytime soon
(not to mention that it’s creators did not register it as a party). That
is not the point. What I do hope for is that this movement will trigger
a re-definition of the French political scene and create a force bold
enough to take on the current power establishment head-on, something
which has not happened since May of 1968 (the National Front, whose rise
was secretly aided by the French Socialists in order to split the French
right has long been fully co-opted into the system). Considering the
many deep systemic and structural crises currently plaguing Europe,
France could lead by example, if only because France’s problems are not
much different from those facing the rest of western Europe.

The Saker
http://frenchdissidents.wordpress.com/2013/11/14/is-a-new-revolution-quietly-brewing-in-france/