Julian Assange arrested "on behalf of the United States authorities"
Newsletter published on April 12, 2019
(1)
The Long Captivity of Julian Assange, by Israel Shamir
(2) John Pilger:
arrest of Assange is a Warning to all Journalists
(3) Assange arrested "on
behalf of the United States authorities"
(1) The Long Captivity of Julian
Assange, by Israel Shamir
http://www.unz.com/ishamir/the-long-captivity-of-julian-assange/
The
Long Captivity of Julian Assange
ISRAEL SHAMIR
JUNE 21,
2018
These long summer days are good for forest walks or swimming; in the
evenings, I read classics with my 10 year old son who otherwise spends
too much time at video games. This time, it happens to be the Odyssey,
the poem I translated some 25 years ago, and yesterday I came to read
Book IV on Menelaus bewailing his comrades who fell at Troy or on the
perilous way home.
And for me it was the time to beweep my dear
comrades-in-arms who have
suffered the slings and arrows of outrageous
fortune. So many of you,
who went fighting the beast, are dead, or exiled,
or imprisoned, like my
Spanish publisher Don Pedro Varela and the American
researcher Barrett
Brown. Or fired from a university like Julio Pino,
professor of Kent State.
And then Menelaus said: Much as I weep for all
my men, for none of all
these comrades do I grieve as much as for this one.
The one is Ulysses
who has been detained for years on the island of Ogygia
by Calypso the
Nymph.
It brought to my mind the fate of Julian
Assange, this modern Odysseus,
who has been held in his luxurious
Knightsbridge prison for years.
Actually, for full six years, as today, as I
write it, is the
anniversary of his incarceration in the Ecuador
Embassy.
So many epithets used by Homer for the King of Ithaca fit Julian
to a
tee! He is wise and noble, resourceful and cunning, wily and crafty,
brilliant and steadfast, but also evil-starred man of woe.
His name
still scares the enemy, and cheers a friend. Though an Antipode
by birth,
Julian became famous in the North of Europe, where this tall
slim handsome
youthful silver-haired man came to raise the banner of his
revolt. Eight
years ago, I compared him to Neo of the Matrix, the man
destined to break
the matrix of lies and set us free.
The Amazing Adventures of Captain Neo
in Blonde-Land, as no doubt the
story of Julian Assange’s escapades in
Sweden will be known once it
inevitably makes its way into the hands of one
of the goofier Hollywood
directors – say Robert Zemeckis or Mel Brooks, or
perhaps Stephen Herek
of Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure. It would do
better in the hands of
Andy Wachowski, where he might do for Julian Assange
what he once did
for Keanu Reeves.
Who could ask for a more beautiful
set-up? It’s a story fit for a
tabloid, yet it might be transformed into
something an intellectual
could read without embarrassment. This latest
adventure is the stuff of
pulp fiction, and chock full of Langley spies,
computer hackers, crazy
feminists, flatfooted cops and sleazy rags in the
female kingdom of Sweden!
Julian Assange is a character that might have
been ripped from the
celluloid frames of the Matrix: flaxen and lanky, he
moves through
cyberspace like a superman. When, on those rare occasions that
he does
emerge into the real world, it is to perform Kung Fu exercises. He
hardly ever eats or drinks. His corporeal body can normally be found
sitting in front of a MacPro or two, while his digital alter ego
commutes and computes, battling the odds and the system in fantastic
virtual combat. Like Neo, he is a natural-born hacker who hacked just
for the heck of it until he discovered the Matrix. He had hundreds of
remarkable hacking achievements to his name when in 1992 he pleaded
guilty to twenty-two of them. I like to think that someday, after he has
passed on in the fullness of time, he will become a kind of guardian
angel for hackers, or perhaps the Greek God of Cyberspace with His
Golden Board, forever surfing the web.
Recently this comparison had
been repeated by brave Jonathan Cook, the
man from Nazareth, but it is
suitable for Jonathan himself, and for many
of us, including the American
Pravda writer, Ron Unz, for we all fight
for liberation of mind and
discourse.
In the beginning of his political activity, Julian was
lionised by media
and society. His Wikileaks was considered the most
fashionable thing in
the known universe. He floated from a party to
reception, admired by the
Scandinavians from Reykjavik to
Stockholm.
But the enemy prepared its snares. A CIA-friendly feminist got
to his
bed by a dirty trick: she offered him her small flat saying she was
leaving the city for a few days, and when he accepted and moved in, she
suddenly returned and offered to share the only bed. He didn’t know she
had carried out a CIA mission in Cuba, otherwise he would have been more
cautious. Or not: a full-blooded man, he was easy to tempt. The next day
she Tweeted friends about her success, about sharing the limelight with
this celebrity. And a few days later she complained to police that he
possessed her without protection; this is an offence of second-degree
rape in feminised Sweden. Her accusation has been seconded by another
girl, who was unhappy that Julian didn’t call her the next day after
their loving tryst. A man-hating Swedish prosecutor Marianne Ny took
over the job of hunting Julian, and Swedish newspapers displayed
headlines "Rapist At Large." Immediately Julian lost all his admiring
entourage. The Empire knew the vulnerability of his crowd.
However,
in a few days his case was closed down, and Julian was free to
leave Sweden.
He went to England, and there he prepared the great
publication of
Cablegate, that is the vast collection of the State
Department and the US
Embassies’ cables from around the world. Stolen by
Manning, these cables
opened to us the full picture of the Empire
dealings with the nations. I
wrote:
One quarter of a million secret and confidential US Embassy cables
sit
like so many digital wasps waiting to be released into cyberspace. They
will strike at the tender underbelly of the empire, the flattering
self-delusions that maintain the imperial armies. It just might be
enough to turn the tide in the battle to recover our evaporating
freedoms.
These dirty little cables throw a bright light upon the murky
policies
of the American Imperium, on their methods of collecting
information, of
delivering orders, of subverting politicians and robbing
nations. Yet
before we lapse into a comfortable and reflexive
anti-Americanism, let
us never forget that this, arguably the greatest
revelation of criminal
wrongdoing in history, was only made possible because
brave and honest
Americans were willing to risk life and limb to leak the
truth.
Tensions run high when you dare oppose the awesome power of the
Matrix.
It is impossible not to admire Julian Assange. He is forever kind,
quiet, gentle, and even meek; like the Tao, he leads without leading,
directs without commanding. He never raises his voice; he hardly needs
to speak and the way becomes clear. Our Neo is guided by the ideal of
social transparency. Bright light is the best weapon against
conspiracies.
The Empire responded by having Sweden re-open the case and
issue an
arrest warrant. England picked it up, and Julian had lost his
freedom.
For a long while he stayed in East Anglia, in the house of a
friend, and
then he moved to London, with an electronic bracelet on his arm
and
under constant police supervision. When he was perilously close to
deportation to Sweden, and to a long stretch of solitary confinement in
a jail cell to be followed by extradition to the US and to its
Guantanamo tropical paradise, he jumped the boat and asked for asylum in
the Ecuador Embassy in London, after he received the then President of
Ecuador Rafael Correa’s promise. That was in June 2012, and since that
time, Assange has been immured within the walls of the
Embassy.
Meanwhile, Sweden closed his case completely, but English
authorities
still will not allow him to leave. The UN deemed him a victim of
arbitrary imprisonment, but even that didn’t help the unlucky man.
Ecuador gave him its citizenship and diplomatic passport, but England
refused to honour it. Recently the US began to court the new president
of Ecuador, Mr Lenin Moreno, and he cut off all the means of
communication between Julian and the world. He is no longer permitted to
receive guests, he can’t make calls, he is barred from the internet. If
he were deported to a far-away island of the sea he would not be more
isolated than he is now.
Looking back, Julian did a lot of great
things since the Cablegate.
* He saved Edward Snowden, by navigating him
from Hong Kong to Moscow.
He had sent the wonderful Sarah Harrison to
operate this miraculous
escape. I supported him in this and in other
enterprises, and I wrote
that Russia is the only safe place for a fugitive
and a whistle blower
of such a calibre. Snowden thought to find a safe
refuge in Cuba or
Venezuela, but none of these Latin American countries is
strong enough
to withstand American pressure. Indeed, Cuba refused to let
him in, and
Venezuela could not accept Snowden for other reasons. Even
mighty China
refused to give Snowden asylum, and intended to ship him to the
US. Iran
was not keen on accepting him. Russia, with all its faults, is
still the
only state fully independent of the Empire on earth.
It is
said that Assange was in cahoots with the Russians, that they
guided him and
provided with the stuff they hacked and even that
"Wikileaks is a Front for
Russian Intelligence". As a matter of fact,
Russians were extremely hesitant
to have anything to do with Assange.
They could not believe he was for real.
Are you so naïve, they told me,
that you do not understand he is a CIA trap?
Such people do not exist.
It is a problem of the Russian mind: as a rule,
they do not understand
and do not trust Western dissidents of Assange’s ilk.
They want their
western sympathisers to be bought and paid for. Free agents
are
suspicious in their eyes. God knows there are many people in the West
whose opinions roughly coincide with those of the Russians; but the
Russians would prefer to buy a journalist off the peg. That’s why RT has
had more than its fair share of defectors, that is of broadcasters who
denounced RT and went to the Western mass media.
A few times I have
defended Julian on Russian TV shows. Usually my
opponents would say: he is a
tool of Western intelligence services.
Wait, he will soon publish something
really nasty about Russia. With
years, this mistrust didn’t diminish. So for
good or for bad, mighty
Russia does not and did not stand by Julian, who was
and remained his
own master.
On the other hand, Julian has no special
feelings for Russia.
Geopolitically, he is very much a man of the West. Even
in his
ostensible defence of Russia, he is always doing it from the Western
point of view. He was against expulsion of Russian diplomats during the
Skripal Affair, because it would "help the Kremlin further a narrative
that it is under conspiratorial siege led by the US," in other words, it
was damaging the West and entrenching Russian suspicions of a hostile
Western agenda.
* Assange published the DNC documents, Podesta
emails, Hillary Clinton
email thus helping the US voter to make up his mind
for whom to vote in
these last fateful elections. In my view, President
Trump is heavily
indebted to Assange.
* His Wikileaks published
expose of hackers’ tools used by CIA and NSA,
their surveillance programs,
their interference in foreign elections,
i.e. in recent French
elections;
*He allowed us to have a look at the secret correspondence of
the Saudis
and Syrians, of the Russians and French, of Turks, of the IMF and
what not;
*He disclosed the conspiracy of Labour MPs against Jeremy
Corbyn.
*His own opinions expressed in his Tweets were very valuable. In
the
midst of the Skripal campaign, Assange reminded that us "while it is
reasonable for Theresa May to view the Russian state as the leading
suspect, so far the evidence is circumstantial & the OCPW has not yet
made any independent confirmation, permitting the Kremlin push the view
domestically that Russia is persecuted."
He and his organisation
provided opinions and expertise on North Korea
at the time of Kim-Trump
summit, publishing Clinton’s confidential
disclosure that the US does not
want unification of Korean peninsula,
and hundreds of confidential and
secret documents on NK nuclear tests.
I would love to see him free, as I
admire him. He is not a spent force,
and he still will be able to contribute
a lot for mankind’s wellbeing.
And good people, our comrades-in-arms,
understand that and struggle for
his freedom.
Roger Waters, of Pink
Floyd fame, life-long supporter of Palestinian
struggle, displayed a banner
in support of Julian Assange at a concert
in Berlin. Many journalists of the
Disobedient Media are organizing an
online vigil under the banner of
#ReconnectJulian. Yes, reconnect, by
all means, but let him go! This is more
important and more urgent. Six
years of imprisonment is too much for this
guiltless man.
Let Hermes, the Messenger of Zeus, in whatever guise, be
that a Trump’s
associate or Corbyn’s assistant, come to Theresa May and tell
her, as he
said to Calypso: "You keep a most unlucky man, but it is not his
fate to
die here, release him at once!"
Israel Shamir can be reached
at adam@israelshamir.net
This
article was first published at The Unz Review.
(2) John Pilger: arrest of
Assange is a Warning to all Journalists
https://twitter.com/johnpilger/status/1116286034990387200
@johnpilger
The
action of the British police in literally dragging Julian Assange
from the
Ecuadorean embassy and the smashing of international law by the
Ecuadorean
regime in permitting this barbarity are crimes against the
most basic
natural justice. This is a warning to all journalists.
3:25 AM - 11 Apr
2019
(3) Assange arrested "on behalf of the United States
authorities"
https://truthout.org/video/julian-assange-arrested-and-facing-us-charge-related-to-chelsea-manning-leaks/
Julian
Assange Arrested and Facing US Charge Related to Chelsea Manning
Leaks
BY Amy Goodman & Nermeen Shaikh, Democracy
Now
PUBLISHED April 11, 2019
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has
been arrested in London. Earlier
today, British police forcibly removed
Assange from the Ecuadorean
Embassy in London, where he has been living
since 2012. London’s
Metropolitan Police said in a statement that Assange
was arrested on
behalf of the United States authorities. The U.S. has
charged Assange
with helping Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning hack a
government
computer. The indictment was unsealed shortly after his arrest.
We speak
to Renata Ávila, a member of Assange’s legal team, as well as
British
human rights attorney Geoffrey Robertson, Pulitzer Prize-winning
journalist Glenn Greenwald and former Justice Department attorney
Jesselyn Radack.
The stories you care about, right at your fingertips
Get Truthout’s
daily edition delivered to your inbox.
Your Email name@email.com Transcript NERMEEN SHAIKH:
WikiLeaks founder
Julian Assange has been arrested in London. Just hours
ago, British
police forcibly removed Assange from the Ecuadorean Embassy in
London,
where he has been living since 2012. Video shows Assange saying the
U.K.
must resist, as he was being arrested.
JULIAN ASSANGE: The U.K.
has not surrendered. … They must resist! U.K.
will resist! Resistance
[inaudible] fight the Trump administration!
NERMEEN SHAIKH: London’s
Metropolitan Police said in a statement that
Assange was, quote, "arrested
on behalf of the United States
authorities." WikiLeaks reported via Twitter
that British police entered
the embassy at the invitation of the Ecuadorean
ambassador, and says
that Ecuador terminated his political asylum in
violation of
international law. Ecuador quickly denied the claim of an
imminent
expulsion, accusing WikiLeaks of, quote, "an attempt to stain the
dignity of the country."
Julian Assange took refuge in the Ecuadorean
Embassy in 2012, fearing
possible extradition by British authorities to the
U.S., where he could
face prosecution under the Espionage Act. One of
Assange’s attorneys,
Jennifer Robinson, tweeted this morning, quote, "Just
confirmed:
#Assange has been arrested not just for breach of bail conditions
but
also in relation to a US extradition request," she wrote. Press freedom
advocates condemned Assange’s arrest
AMY GOODMAN: Julian Assange’s
U.S. attorney, Barry Pollack, said, quote,
"It is bitterly disappointing
that a country would allow someone to whom
it has extended citizenship and
asylum to be arrested in its embassy.
First and foremost, we hope that the
UK will now give Mr. Assange access
to proper health care, which he has been
denied for seven years. Once
his health care needs have been addressed, the
UK courts will need to
resolve what appears to be an unprecedented effort by
the United States
seeking to extradite a foreign journalist to face criminal
charges for
publishing truthful information," Barry Pollack wrote. That’s
Julian
Assange’s U.S. attorney.
Christophe Deloire, the head of
Reporters Without Borders, tweeted,
"Targeting Assange because of Wikileaks’
provision of information to
journalists that was in the public interest
would be a punitive measure
and would set a dangerous precedent for
journalists or their sources
that the US may wish to pursue in future,"
unquote.
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden tweeted, "Images of Ecuador’s
ambassador inviting the UK’s secret police into the embassy to drag a
publisher of — like it or not — award-winning journalism out of the
building are going to end up in the history books. Assange’s critics may
cheer, but this is a dark moment for press freedom." That is the tweet
of Edward Snowden. [...]
AMY GOODMAN: Glenn Greenwald is joining us
on the phone. Renata Ávila is
joining us from Belgrade right now. She is one
of Julian Assange’s
lawyers. Glenn Greenwald, the Pulitzer Prize-winning
journalist, one of
the founding editors of The Intercept. Glenn, your
response to the
arrest of Julian Assange, his being dragged out of the
Ecuadorean
Embassy by British police today?
GLENN GREENWALD: I think
the most important fact is that the arrest
warrant, according to Assange’s
longtime lawyer Jennifer Robinson, is
based on allegations that Assange
conspired or collaborated with Chelsea
Manning with regard to the 2010 leaks
of Iraq and Afghanistan war logs
and diplomatic cables — a theory that the
Obama Justice Department tried
for a long time to pursue, but found no
evidence for, in order to be
able to justify prosecuting Assange and not
face the accusation that
they were endangering press freedoms by prosecuting
Assange for
something The New York Times and The Guardian and every other
media
outlet in the world routinely does, which is publish classified
information.
Even if it were true that Assange collaborated with Manning
— and,
again, the Justice Department of President Obama looked everywhere
and
found no evidence of that — it would still be a grave threat to press
freedoms, because journalists all the time work with their sources in
order to obtain classified information so that they can report on it.
It’s the criminalization of journalism by the Trump Justice Department
and the gravest threat to press freedom, by far, under the Trump
presidency, infinitely worse than having Donald Trump tweet mean things
about various reporters at CNN or NBC. And every journalist in the world
should be raising their voice as loudly as possible to protest and
denounce this.
AMY GOODMAN: And can you explain, Glenn, exactly what
you understand,
why it is that the Ecuadorean Embassy has revoked the
asylum, allowing
the British authorities to come inside, what’s going on
with President
Moreno and his charges that Julian Assange was involved in
releasing
photos, which Assange has vehemently denied?
GLENN
GREENWALD: Well, I interviewed former President Rafael Correa late
last
year. And he, of course, did something quite extraordinary, which
was for
six years stood up for Ecuadorean sovereignty and for
international law and
refused to be bullied by the U.S. and the U.K.,
which tried everything it
could to coerce him or threaten him to
withdraw the asylum protection for
Assange. He was a very unusual leader
of a small country, who famously said,
for example, "If the U.S. wants
to have military bases in Ecuador, they have
to allow us to have
military bases in Miami." He was against imperialism and
allowing
Ecuador to be a vassal state of the U.S. and the U.K.
And
his successor, President Moreno, is exactly the opposite. So, the
Trump
administration, the CIA, the U.K. and Spain — which is really
angry about
WikiLeaks’s denunciations of their abuses of protesters
during the
Catalonian debate — have spent the last year and a half doing
everything
they can, threatening Ecuador, offering rewards to Ecuador,
doing everything
they could to coerce Ecuador, under President Moreno,
to do something that
President Correa refused to do, which is violate
international law, withdraw
Julian Assange’s asylum. And, of course, he
needed to concoct an excuse to
do it, so he doesn’t look like what he
is, which is a very weak and
submissive leader, to his population, so
they made up a bunch of excuses.
But the reality is, they did it because
the U.S. and the U.K. demanded that
they do it.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: Well, let’s go to Ecuadorean President Lenín
Moreno when
he announced Assange’s arrest Thursday. And he said Britain has
guaranteed he will not be extradited, Assange will not be extradited, to
a country that has the death penalty.
PRESIDENT LENÍN MORENO:
[translated] Today, I announce that the
discourteous and aggressive behavior
of Mr. Julian Assange, the hostile
and threatening declarations of its
allied organization, against
Ecuador, and especially, the transgression of
international treaties,
have led the situation to a point where the asylum
of Mr. Assange is
unsustainable and no longer viable. … In line with our
strong commitment
to human rights and international law, I requested Great
Britain to
guarantee that Mr. Assange would not be extradited to a country
where he
could face torture or the death penalty. The British government has
confirmed it in writing, in accordance with its own rules.
NERMEEN
SHAIKH: So, that’s Ecuadorean President Lenín Moreno speaking
just a few
hours ago today. So, Renata Ávila, could you respond to what
Moreno said and
whether you think it’s likely that Assange will not be
extradited, as he
said?
RENATA ÁVILA: Well, this is the same — he’s repeating the same
things
that we have been fighting against. What is the difference between a
death penalty and life in solitary confinement in a supermax prison in
the U.S.? What we are discussing here is not the seriousness of the
penalty of a journalist being prosecuted because of the act of
publishing, but whether a journalist should be prosecuted or not because
of the act of publishing. So, that’s what the — that is really terrible.
And it is so sad to see a Latin American leader abdicating to a
superpower and throwing even constitutional principles out of the trash
can in this case.
And it will be — I mean, I cannot alert enough
journalists, not only in
the U.S., but any journalists reporting about the
U.S., of the
seriousness of this case. If we do not rally, if we do not take
this
battle as a central battle for our freedom of expression, we will be in
serious trouble. So, the hearing is taking place this afternoon, the
first hearing for Julian, and we really hope to get as much solidarity
as possible and attention and coherence with your principles and
basically empathy, because he is the first journalist facing this, but
he might not be the last. You might be the next one, anyone hearing this
show. So, it is a — the free press is key for democracy, and this is
what is at risk at the moment.
NERMEEN SHAIKH: Well, Glenn Greenwald,
I want to ask you. The American
Civil Liberties Union has just issued a
statement, Ben Wizner saying
that the prosecution of Assange is especially
troubling because
"prosecuting a foreign publisher for violating U.S.
secrecy laws would
set an especially dangerous precedent for U.S.
journalists, who
routinely violate foreign secrecy laws to deliver
information vital to
the public’s interest." Glenn Greenwald, can you
respond to that, I
mean, what U.S. journalists do and regarding this foreign
secrecy laws?
GLENN GREENWALD: Well, I think that is one of the
remarkable aspects of
this, is that Julian Assange is not an American
citizen. I think he
visited the U.S. once for about three days. WikiLeaks is
a foreign-based
media organization. So, the idea that the U.S. government
can just
extend its reach to any news outlet anywhere in the world and
criminalize publication of documents or working with sources is
extremely chilling. That would mean, for example, that China or North
Korea or Iran could do the same thing if a U.S. news outlet published
its secrets, which sometimes they do. It would mean that Iran would have
the ability, or China, to issue an international arrest warrant and
demand that the reporters who work for the U.S. news outlets be
extradited to those countries. [...]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.