867 DC Leaks reveals Soros' war on Putin & destruction of traditional values from above in the name of tolerance & equality

DC Leaks reveals Soros' war on Putin & destruction of traditional values
from above in the name of tolerance & equality

Newsletter published on 29 October 2016

(1) DC Leaks reveals Soros' war on Putin & destruction of traditional
values from above in the name of tolerance & equality
(2) Soros: we 'counter Russian support to movements defending
traditional values'
(3) DCLeaks publishes Soros OSI documents targeting Putin's 'defense of
traditional family values'
(4) Text of Soros OSI document targeting Putin's 'defense of traditional
family values'
(5) Hillary tie to Soros = Soros for president; 'national borders as the
obstacle'
(6) Establishment Panic: Ruling class fears the people won't accept its
political legitimacy - Pat Buchanan
(7) Sex Talk Eclipses Elites’ Push for World War III - Paul Craig Roberts

(1) DC Leaks reveals Soros' war on Putin & destruction of traditional
values from above in the name of tolerance & equality

http://russia-insider.com/en/dc-leaks-reveal-5th-column-soros-plan-counter-russian-foreign-policy-and-subvert-russian-traditional

DC Leaks Exposes Soros Plan to 'Counter Russian Foreign Policy and
Subvert Traditional Russian Values'

Remember this the next time someone tells you there is no plan to
subvert Russia

Richard Brandt

Sun, Aug 14, 2016 | 9,833

The recent George Soros hacks show plans/conspiracy to subvert Russia's
traditional values.

George Soros' Open Society's Foundation is responsible for funding many
"civil rights organization" that promote "Western values" in Russia.

Soros is one of the 30 richest people in the world, known for supporting
Cultural Marxist organizations around the world, using his billion
dollar wealth to wield enormous influence in society.

Here is a damning quote from the leaked files of Soros' Open Society
Foundation:

"Our inclination is to engage in activities that will ... counter
Russian support to movements defending traditional values"

The language in Soros' internal communication read as if his Foundation
sees itself as a full-scale warrior in a global conflict, "the stakes
are high", and "we should avoid entering directly into the geo-strategic
warfare..."

Enjoy these choice excerpts from the leaks"

Full leaks here: http://dcleaks.com/index.php/srs_reserves/

(2) Soros: we 'counter Russian support to movements defending
traditional values'

http://yournewswire.com/vladimir-putin-george-soros-is-wanted-dead-or-alive/

Vladimir Putin: George Soros Is Wanted "Dead Or Alive"

Posted on August 20, 2016 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai in News, World // 11
Comments Putin says Soros is wanted

Russia have officially declared that Billionaire George Soros is a
wanted man in their country, citing him and his organizations as a
"threat to Russian national security".

Putin banned Soros from Russia last year due to the fact that Soros
helped to nearly destroy the Russian economy in the early 1990’s.

Veteranstoday.com reports:

Matt Taibbi of the Rolling Stone said of Goldman Sachs six years ago:

"The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it’s
everywhere. The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire
squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its
blood funnel into anything that smells like money.

"In fact, the history of the recent financial crisis, which doubles as a
history of the rapid decline and fall of the suddenly swindled dry
American empire, reads like a Who’s Who of Goldman Sachs graduates."

Obviously Soros wants to be like Goldman Sachs. Phil Butler puts it well
when he says: "George Soros has a finger in every political pie there
is. If there is a crisis on our world, it’s a safe bet he’s had a hand
in it."

One can say that Soros and Goldman Sachs are ideologically part of the
same brotherhood. Their strategy is a little different, but the end
result is the destruction of lives via the economic system (be it
capitalism or socialism) and political manipulation.

That’s why Soros seems to think that he is invincible. He thinks he can
move the political and economic planet in a few blinks of an eye and no
one can tell him to stop. In fact, he writes books such as The Alchemy
of Finance. Soros thinks he can kill political stability throughout
Europe and indeed in America with no challenge.

Soros is certainly old, but he doesn’t want to be obsolete. His
organization has recently been caught conducting covert operations
designed to destabilize Russia. Here is an interesting quote from the
leaked files of Soros’ Open Society Foundation:

"Our inclination is to engage in activities and with actors that will
understand and counter Russian support to movements defending
traditional values…Naming and shaming from us is problematic: we are
also in the business of channeling money into other countries for
political purposes."

Now we’re talking! Now we’re seeing Soros’ true colors. All the talk
about helping so-called Syrian refugees, about rescuing Ukrainians,
about so-called "civil rights," about bringing "democracy" in Russia,
was a smokescreen.

According to Butler, this was all Soros’ own infection. Soros wanted to
bring down Russia’s traditional families. He wanted to turn Russia into
a zoo, but he had to use terms such as "democracy" to deceive the masses.

So, when Soros wrote last February that "Putin is a bigger threat to
Europe’s existence than Isis," he was marshalling his own diabolical
plan, which arguably is consistent or congruent with what the Khazarian
Mafia and their lackeys have been doing over the centuries. In fact, the
Neoconservatives like Noah Rothman of Commentary continue to sing the
ideological tune that "Russia is not your friend." Listen to Soros very
carefully here:

"The leaders of the US and the EU are making a grievous error in
thinking that president Vladimir Putin’s Russia is a potential ally in
the fight against Islamic State. The evidence contradicts them. Putin’s
aim is to foster the EU’s disintegration, and the best way to do so is
to flood Europe with Syrian refugees.

"Russian planes have been bombing the civilian population in southern
Syria forcing them to flee to Jordan and Lebanon. There are now 20,000
Syrian refugees camped out in the desert awaiting admission to Jordan."

What was the evidence that Russian planes were deliberately bombing the
civilian population? Well, the evidence could be found in George Soros
himself. Whatever comes out of his mouth is the truth. No further
investigation is needed. No rigorous testing is required. Soros is the
alpha and omega, the beginning and the end. And if evidence points to
the other direction, then the evidence must be rejected, not Soros’ own
words. If Russia is still obliterating ISIS in Syria, then the
information is false because Soros did not approve it.

Soros has obviously been making a fool of himself, and he seems to
realize that he is more vulnerable than ever before because he is not
acting according to the dictates of practical reason. In that sense, he
is anti-reason. He aspires to fulfill ideological dogmas and disregard
the truth at any cost.

It is probably true that Soros has been against the Israeli regime, but
what he gives on one hand he takes from the other. It says on paper that
he is against the Israeli regime, but it has been reported that Soros
supported organizations which sought to remove Assad from power. We have
to keep in mind again that the Israeli regime wanted to kick Assad out
since the beginning of the Syrian war.

So, whether Soros liked it or not, he was indirectly supporting Israel’s
crimes by supporting organizations which sought to oust Assad. If Soros
really had aspired to do some good, he would have framed his political
weltanschauung upon reason, not upon wicked ideologies which ended up
ruining one country after another.

As we have indicated elsewhere, George Soros proves himself to be an
agent of the New World Order by going after Russia, the very country
that has been obliterating ISIS in Syria. ISIS has been using chemical
weapons in the region, and no one, not even Soros, has said a word about
this.

Russia obviously had enough of this man and eventually forbade him to
enter the country. They eventually called him and his subversive
organizations a "threat to Russian national security." Hungarian Prime
Minister Viktor Orban said similar things. F. William Engdahl argued
last January that

"George Soros, the hedge fund speculator turned self-proclaimed
philanthropist, and his tax-exempt foundations, are an integral part of
that pre-emptive war machine."

He is obviously right. Thank God Russia was more than willing to kick
Soros out of the country. Thank God Putin was willing to act. Thank God
for Russia, which is still shaking the very foundation of the New World
Order and political Satanism:

(3) DCLeaks publishes Soros OSI documents targeting Putin's 'defense of
traditional family values'

http://dcleaks.com/index.php/srs_reserves/

[...] Russia is investing heavily in increasing its influence in many
aspects of Europe’s political life, very often supporting groups that
are against open society values. There is evidence of Russian support
for radical parties of the Left and Right, including Eurosceptic
nationalists like France’s Front National and Austria’s FPÖ, and extreme
xenophobic parties like Ataka in Bulgaria, Golden Dawn in Greece and
Jobbik in Hungary. There is also evidence of support for individual
political leaders, penetration in civil society, attempts to manipulate
national debates (for instance, to defend Russia’s energy interests),
propaganda to defend Russian international politics, and support for
traditionalist movements. However, the evidence is still rather sketchy
and based more on strong allegations, hence the need to first do a
proper mapping. Putin’s neo-imperial model has also incorporated an
ideological pillar: the defense of traditional family values. Putin has
deemed what he called a destruction of traditional values from above in
the name of so-called tolerance and equality inherently anti-democratic
because it runs counter to the will of the majority of people. This
ideology has been used to advance Russian influence beyond its borders
in Europe and Central Asia, and in international organizations. Our
inclination is to engage in activities and with actors that will
understand and counter Russian influence and support to movements
defending traditional values.

(4) Text of Soros OSI document targeting Putin's 'defense of traditional
family values'

http://dcleaks.com/index.php/srs_reserves/

Open Society Foundations

Documents describing financial reserves and plans of OSF.

http://dcleaks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/soros/reserves/russia-in-europe.docx

Proposal Title

Russia in Europe: the reactionary values agenda

Reserve Fund

Europe Reserve

Amount Requested

500,000 USD

Unforeseen Need (250 words)

Ever since the start of the Ukraine crisis Russia has been able to
attract a wide range of sympathizers across the political spectrum
within the EU, and proved adept at nudging them in the required
direction. The request to explore the work around Russia’s influence in
Europe has come from the OSF Chairman after our work-plans and budget
for 2015 had already been submitted.  The focus in the first year of
this work at OSIFE will be to gauge the influence of Russia in diverting
basic democratic values on EU proper. It will be about exposing Russia’s
many messages that are increasingly well addressed to particular
national discourses, especially building on the erosion of trust in
national and EU-level politics.

Background (Optional)

Russia is investing heavily in increasing its influence in many aspects
of Europe’s political life, very often supporting groups that are
against open society values. There is evidence of Russian support for
radical parties of the Left and Right, including Eurosceptic
nationalists like France’s Front National and Austria’s FPÖ, and extreme
xenophobic parties like Ataka in Bulgaria, Golden Dawn in Greece and
Jobbik in Hungary. There is also evidence of support for individual
political leaders, penetration in civil society, attempts to manipulate
national debates (for instance, to defend Russia’s energy interests),
propaganda to defend Russian international politics, and support for
traditionalist movements. However, the evidence is still rather sketchy
and based more on strong allegations, hence the need to first do a
proper mapping.  Putin’s neo-imperial model has also incorporated an
ideological pillar: the defense of traditional family values. Putin has
deemed what he called a destruction of traditional values from above in
the name of so-called tolerance and equality inherently anti-democratic
because it runs counter to the will of the majority of people. This
ideology has been used to advance Russian influence beyond its borders
in Europe and Central Asia, and in international organizations. Our
inclination is to engage in activities and with actors that will
understand and counter Russian influence and support to movements
defending traditional values.

Activities Proposed (500 words)

We will seek to understand in detail some of the activities by official
and unofficial Russian institutions to promote a traditional values
agenda as a means to extend its influence into EU member countries. Once
these activities are mapped and understood, we will support the creation
of tools for organizations that defend individual rights under attack
(LGBTIQ, gender equality, reproductive rights) to understand and develop
a strategy to counter the tactics that are being used in their countries
with Russian support. The three main objectives for this work are:

1)

To have a clearer picture with concrete examples and, where possible,
hard data on Russian attempts to promote a socially regressive agenda in
at least 5 countries of the European Union. The mapping will include
tracking at least two different issues: a) both the actors that our
outright supported and those who flirt with Russian support without
actually receiving it; b) discourses that these actors engage in.

2)

To equip organizations in these 5 countries defending liberal values
with the information and tools to detect, understand, and counter
Russian support for reactionary attacks on individual rights and freedoms.

3)

To generate awareness and understanding in the LGBTIQ, gender equality
and reproductive rights movements across Europe about this new threat to
individual rights and freedoms. The proposed activities would entail the
following: .

2 mapping consultancies (one for Western Europe, including at least
Austria, France and Italy; one in Central and Eastern Europe, including
at least all three Baltic Republics); .

6 in-depth country reports (countries will be selected after the mapping
exercise); .

1 in-depth report about key players in Russia and their strategies; .

Communications, dissemination and training consultancies to process and
disseminate the results; .

1 seminar/workshop to share the lessons of the research and generate a
tool kit for organizations; .

10 half-day presentations of conclusions, lessons and tool kit (6 in
each target country, one in Brussels, one with donors, one in Central
Europe, one in Southeast Europe) to activists, politicians and journalists.

We are building this work on existing links OSF has with groups in the
above referenced movements and their indications of the disruptive role
the Russian insistence on traditional family values is playing,
particularly in the Baltics. Elsewhere there is so far limited but
growing awareness of the funding streams reaching the actors in Western
Europe, particularly the people behind the Manif pour tous in France and
other defenders of reactionary values.

Summary for Board Reports (100 words)

Russia is investing heavily in increasing its influence in many aspects
of Europe’s political life, very often supporting groups that are
against open society values. Putin’s neo-imperial model has also
incorporated an ideological pillar: the defense of traditional family
values. Putin claims the West is hell-bent on destroying traditional
values from above in the name of so-called tolerance and equality, which
is inherently anti-democratic because it runs counter to the will of the
majority. The focus of this work in 2015 at OSIFE will be to gauge the
influence of Russia in diverting basic democratic values on EU proper.

Collaborating Programs within OSF and essential partners or grantees

None foreseen in financial terms for now but we will build on the
experience of Eurasia program, OSEPI and TTF both with Russia and with
researchers and investigative journalists in the selected countries.

Statement of who within OSF would guide the work

The Open Society Initiative for Europe (OSIFE) will create a separate
portfolio that will host this work and be led by Peter Matjas?ic?, a
Barcelona-based program officer.

Allocator (See list on Reserve Funds KARL)

Name

Jordi Vaquer

Date Approved

5th April 2015

Allocator Notes / Comments (To be completed by allocator only)

(Notes/Comments - Optional field)

The origin of this request is a direct demand by George Soros for OSIFE
to become active in this field, which came in November 2014, too late to
incorporate this in the budget. This work will continue in the next
years, but it will need to be part of OSIFE’s regular budget.

(5) Hillary tie to Soros = Soros for president; 'national borders as the
obstacle'

http://www.worldtribune.com/hillary-clintons-deep-ideological-ties-with-george-soros-called-serious-cause-for-alarm/

Hillary Clinton’s deep ideological ties with George Soros called
‘serious cause for alarm’

by WorldTribune Staff, October 21, 2016

The close relationship between Hillary Clinton and billionaire globalist
George Soros came into clear focus when WikiLeaks released emails from
Clinton campaign chair John Podesta.

Clinton rarely mentions Soros’s name publicly, but the emails released
thus far show the billionaire’s deep influence on the Democratic
nominee. His name comes up nearly 60 times in the email exchanges. On
the same page: George Soros and Hillary Clinton. /Getty Images Sugar
daddy: George Soros and Hillary Clinton. /Getty Images

Soros has donated nearly $11 million to Clinton’s Democratic
presidential campaign and three main super PACS — USA Action, American
Bridge 21st Century and Hillary for America, according to an analysis by
Rowan Scarborough for The Washington Times.

The new revelations show Clinton "has aligned herself closely with a
vision for America laid out by Soros, who talks of ‘international
governance,’ more open borders, increased Muslim immigration and
diminished U.S. global power."

Soros, in 1998, wrote that "the sovereignty of states must be
subordinated to international law and international institutions. We
need some global system of political decision-making. In short, we need
a global society to support our global economy."

Rep. Duncan Hunter, California Republican and co-chair of Donald Trump’s
congressional leadership caucus, said a vote for Clinton is a vote for
the Soros agenda.

"The fact that Hillary Clinton and her campaign are so closely aligned
with George Soros and his radical agenda is serious cause for alarm,"
Hunter told The Washington Times.

"Publicly, it’s a relationship she’s never really talked up, but
communications at least now reveal how closely aligned they are, and
Americans deserve to know that a Clinton presidency means even more
direct influence from George Soros. And as for an agenda, there probably
won’t be much daylight between the two, and Americans should be
concerned that a vote for Clinton is no different than a vote for George
Soros for president."

His foundation has given up to $6 million to the Clinton Foundation.

"A review of Mrs. Clinton’s private and public comments shows she has
very much absorbed Mr. Soros‘ grand plan for the world, a blueprint that
hangs under the title ‘open societies.’ His New York-based Open
Societies Foundation is at the center of his philanthropy and politics,"
Scarborough wrote.

"My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open
borders," Clinton told a closed-door audience at Brazilian bank Banco
Tau in May 2013.

Soros told Bloomberg News: "Our plan treats the protection of refugees
as the objective and national borders as the obstacle."

Clinton said on CBS’ "Face the Nation" that she wants to boost President
Barack Obama’s mark of 10,000 Syrian refugees resettled in the U.S. in
one year to 65,000 — a 500 percent increase.

In a rare public acknowledgment, Clinton said in 2004 that "we need
people like George Soros, who is fearless and willing to step up when it
counts."

(6) Establishment Panic: Ruling class fears the people won't accept its
political legitimacy - Pat Buchanan

http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/an-establishment-in-panic-2/
http://thedailytrump.org/an-establishment-in-panic/
http://americanfreepress.net/the-establishment-is-in-a-panic/

An establishment in panic: Ruling class fears the people won't accept
its political legitimacy

October 26, 2016

By Patrick Buchanan

Pressed by moderator Chris Wallace as to whether he would accept defeat
should Hillary Clinton win the election, Donald Trump replied, "I will
tell you at the time. I’ll keep you in suspense."

"That’s horrifying," said Clinton, setting off a chain reaction on the
post-debate panels with talking heads falling all over one another in
purple-faced anger, outrage and disbelief.

"Disqualifying!" was the cry on Clinton cable.

"Trump Won’t Say If He Will Accept Election Results," wailed The New
York Times. "Trump Won’t Vow to Honor Results," ran the banner in The
Washington Post.

But what do these chattering classes and establishment bulletin boards
think the Donald is going to do if he falls short of 270 electoral votes?

Lead a Coxey’s Army on Washington and burn it down as British General
Robert Ross did in August 1814, while "Little Jemmy" Madison fled on
horseback out the Brookville

What explains the hysteria of the establishment?

In a word, fear.

The establishment is horrified at the Donald’s defiance because, deep
within its soul, it fears that the people for whom Trump speaks no
longer accept its political legitimacy or moral authority.

It may rule and run the country, and may rig the system through mass
immigration and a mammoth welfare state so that Middle America is never
again able to elect one of its own. But that establishment, disconnected
from the people it rules, senses, rightly, that it is unloved and even
detested.

Having fixed the future, the establishment finds half of the country
looking upon it with the same sullen contempt that our Founding Fathers
came to look upon the overlords Parliament sent to rule them.

Establishment panic is traceable to another fear: Its ideology, its
political religion, is seen by growing millions as a golden calf, a
20th-century god that has failed.

Trump is "talking down our democracy," said a shocked Clinton.

After having expunged Christianity from our public life and public
square, our establishment installed "democracy" as the new deity, at
whose altars we should all worship. And so our schools began to teach.

Half a millennia ago, missionaries and explorers set sail from Spain,
England and France to bring Christianity to the New World.

Today, Clintons, Obamas and Bushes send soldiers and secularist tutors
to "establish democracy" among the "lesser breeds without the Law."

Unfortunately, the natives, once democratized, return to their roots and
vote for Hezbollah, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, using democratic
processes and procedures to re-establish their true God.

And Allah is no democrat.

By suggesting he might not accept the results of a "rigged election"
Trump is committing an unpardonable sin. But this new cult, this
devotion to a new holy trinity of diversity, democracy and equality, is
of recent vintage and has shallow roots.

For none of the three — diversity, equality, democracy — is to be found
in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Federalist Papers or the
Pledge of Allegiance. In the pledge, we are a republic.

When Ben Franklin, emerging from the Philadelphia convention, was asked
by a woman what kind of government they had created, he answered, "A
republic, if you can keep it."

Among many in the silent majority, Clintonian democracy is not an
improvement upon the old republic; it is the corruption of it.

Consider: Six months ago, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, the Clinton
bundler, announced that by executive action he would convert 200,000
convicted felons into eligible voters by November.

If that is democracy, many will say, to hell with it.

And if felons decide the electoral votes of Virginia, and Virginia
decides who is our next U.S. president, are we obligated to honor that
election?

In 1824, Gen. Andrew Jackson ran first in popular and electoral votes.
But, short of a majority, the matter went to the House.

There, Speaker Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams delivered the presidency
to Adams — and Adams made Clay secretary of state, putting him on the
path to the presidency that had been taken by Jefferson, Madison, Monroe
and Adams himself.

Were Jackson’s people wrong to regard as a "corrupt bargain" the deal
that robbed the general of the presidency?

The establishment also recoiled in horror from Milwaukee Sheriff Dave
Clarke’s declaration that it is now "torches and pitchforks time."

Yet, some of us recall another time, when Supreme Court Justice William
O. Douglas wrote in "Points of Rebellion":

"We must realize that today’s Establishment is the new George III.
Whether it will continue to adhere to his tactics, we do not know. If it
does, the redress, honored in tradition, is also revolution."

Baby-boomer radicals loved it, raising their fists in defiance of
Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew.

But now that it is the populist-nationalist right that is moving beyond
the niceties of liberal democracy to save the America that they love,
elitist enthusiasm for "revolution" seems more constrained.

What goes around comes around.

http://americanfreepress.net/sex-talk-eclipses-potential-for-world-war-iii-outbreak/
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/10/11/engage-in-sex-not-war-paul-craig-roberts/

(7) Sex Talk Eclipses Elites’ Push for World War III - Paul Craig Roberts

Sex Talk Eclipses Elites’ Push for World War III

October 12, 2016

By Paul Craig Roberts

During the sexual scandals of former President Bill Clinton—the "bimbo
eruptions" as Hillary Clinton called them—the Democrats and progressive
opinion ruled out a person’s sex life as a political factor. Now,
suddenly, nothing more than juvenile locker room banter without the
actual sex has become the determinant of political unfitness.

The following questions must asked: Where did the 11-year old recording
of locker room talk between Donald Trump and Billy Bush come from? Who
recorded it and kept it for 11 years for what purpose? Why was it
released the day prior to the second debate between Trump and Hillary?
Was the recording an illegal violation of privacy? What became of the
woman who recorded Monica Lewinsky’s confession to her of sex with Bill
Clinton? Wasn’t she prosecuted for wiretaping or some such offense? Why
was Billy Bush, the relative of two US presidents, suspended from his TV
show because of a private conversation with Trump?

You have to take men’s sexual banter with a grain of salt, just as you
do their fish stories. President or candidate Bill Clinton himself
publicly engaged in sexual banter. If memory serves, in a speech to blue
collar workers, Bill said that the bed of his pickup truck was covered
in artificial turf and "you know what that was for." In the Clinton
White House according to reports there were a number of female interns
seeking Bill’s sexual attention. The scantily clad young women came to
work sans underwear until Hillary put her foot down. One wonders if the
Secret Service was told to inspect compliance with the dress code.

The One Percent masquerading as prudes want to remove Trump as the
Republican candidate. Just how the people’s choice of presidential
candidate is removed in a democracy prior to election, the prudes do not
say. No one wanted to remove Clinton from the presidency despite the
sexual use of the Oval Office, called at the time the "Oral Orifice."
The House Republicans wanted to remove Clinton not for sex but for lying
about it, but the Senate would not go along with it. As senators all
lied about their sexual liaisons, they saw no harm in it. Emigrate While
You Still Can! Learn More . . .

What disturbs me about the importance attributed to Trump’s sexual
banter is that we have in front of us the dangerous situation of the
neoconservatives pushing for Washington to attack Syrian and Russian
forces in Syria and the chief Washington propagandist, neocon Carl
Gershman, calling publicly for the US to "summon the will" to bring
regime change to Russia. The tensions between the two nuclear powers are
currently at all time highs, and this dangerous situation is not a
factor in the US presidential election! And some people wonder why I
call Americans insouciant.

The U.S. media, 90% owned by the One Percent, have teamed up with their
owners against the American people—the 995. As Trump observed during the
second presidential "debate," ABC’s Martha Raddatz and CNN’s Anderson
Cooper teamed up with Hillary against him: "Nice, three on one," Trump said.

Do the 99% understand that the anti-Trump hysteria fanned by the
presstitutes is intended to keep the people in economic bondage and at war?

We all know that the hysteria over the Trump-Billy Bush locker room
banter is orchestrated for political purposes. But consider the
absurdity of it all. Trump’s private expression of sexual interest in an
attractive member of the opposite sex has been declared by the
presstitutes to be "extremely lewd comments about women."

Is what is going on here the criminalization of heterosexual sex?

 >Feminist say that women do not want to be regarded as sex objects, but

much of womankind disagrees, judging by the provocative way some of them
dress. Clothes designers, assuming they are good judges of the apparal
market for women, also disagree. At the latest Paris fashion show
(October 1) Vivienne Westwood displayed a dress on which the female
sexual organs are displayed on the dress.

Vivienne Westwood is a woman, a British fashion designer. She has twice
earned the award for British Designer of the Year. The Queen of England
awarded her the aristocratic title of Dame Commander of the British
Empire (DBE) "for services to fashion."

At a ceremony honoring her at Buckingham Palace, Westwood appeared
without panties and twirled her skirt in the courtyard of the palace.
Photographers caught the event, and in Vivienne’s words, "the result was
more glamourous than I expected."

As recently as 2012, Vivienne was chosen by a panel of academics,
historians, and journalists as one of The New Elizabethans who have had
a major impact on the UK and given this age its character.

In 18th century England, if historians are correct, young women would
appear at evening social functions in wet gowns that clung to their
bodies the better to indicate their charms. Some of them died of
pneumonia as a consequence. They did this on their own accord to attract
the attention of the opposite sex.

According to reports, robotic sexual partners are being created for men
and women that are superior to the real thing. Other news reports are
that young Japanese men go on vacation with their sex apps, not with
girlfriends. There are indications that as the advancement in social
approval of homosexual, lesbian, and transgendered sex progresses,
heterosexual sex is acquiring the designation of queer. If Trump had
expressed sexual interest in a male or a transgendered person, it would
be politically incorrect to mention it. Only heterosexual sexual
impulses are a political target.

We have reached that point in which women can appear in high heels with
skirts that barely cover their nether parts and their braless breasts
exposed, and men are lewd if they notice.

Do women really want it this way?

Is Hillary really going to win the election because Trump is sexually
interested in women?