707 Rauschning's Hitler Speaks authenticated by Table Talk. Hitler's intended Genocide of Ukraine & Slavs

Rauschning's Hitler Speaks authenticated by Table Talk. Hitler's
intended Genocide of Ukraine & Slavs

Newsletter published on 16 November 2014

This material is at http://mailstar.net/Rauschning-Table-Talk.doc

(1) Rauschning book Hitler Speaks authenticated by Hitler's Table Talk
(2) Authenticity of Rauschning book Hitler Speaks - from Wikipedia
(3) TABLE TALK: Hitler's intended Genocide of Ukraine & Slavs
(4) HITLER SPEAKS: Hitler's intended Genocide of Ukraine & Slavs
(5) Hitler a Zionist agent? Or British agent?

(1) Rauschning book Hitler Speaks vindicated by Table Talk
- by Peter Myers, November 16, 2014
Barack Obama is in Australia at present, attending the G20. He wowed the
young people at the University of Queensland, with a speech in which he
preached the Culture War - the very issue on which the Democrats lost
the recent Congressional election.

Obama was a hit; he even  pronounced "Brisbane" properly - it's not the
way most Americans say it. However, his audience had been hand-picked.
As he extolled America, I noticed that he did not mention certain words
- "Snowden", "inequality", "1%" and "tax avoidance".

Vladimir Putin met a hostile reception at the G20, although he has some
support among the public.

My topic today, however, is Adolf Hitler. And we all know that he gets a
bad press - a terrible press. He's not the only one, though - Stalin and
Mao do too. Gaddafi, Saddam, Assad ... most of them were enemies of Israel.

Given the bias of the "mainstream" media, we have all wondered at times
whether Hitler could really have been as bad as he's made out.

Well, he was. But, to be fair, he did some good things too (like ending
the depression); and he was a genius, even though he put that talent to
malevolent ends.

What really opened my eyes to Hitler's true nature was the books of Otto
Strasser. I asked Frederick Toben if he'd read them; he said No. When on
a later occasdon I brought up the topic again, it became clear that he
refuses to read them, even though I pointed out that they are on-line on
my website. So I came to realise that Toben is not a scholar like me,
who reads all sides of a debate, but a Nazi missionary.

The dissident movement, especially since 9/11, has been penetrated by
Nazi missionaries, just as the Green Left movement of recent decades was
penetrated by Trotskyists, Radical Feminists, and Gay activists.

Hitler was not a savior from the Netanyahus of this world; but rather
just another kind of Netanyahu.

The debate about him focuses almost exclusively on the Jews. But to make
my case today, I want to deal with his policy on the Slav peoples of
Central and Eastern Europe.

I will not deal with his Jewish policy, because that is too much a
live-wire. But by showing that his policy on the Slavs was genocidal, I
will demolish the heroic image of Hitler cultivated by the Nazi
missionaries.

This discussion was triggered by Rauschning book's Hitler Speaks, which
I put online a day or two ago. Some people claimed that it was proved a
forgery by Wolfgang Hänel, shortly after Rauschning's death.

Hugh Trevor-Roper disagreed, based on Hitler's Table Talk, a record of
conversations and monologues of Hitler from 1941 to 1944.

David Irving wrote,
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Letters/Hitler/Law200603.html

"HITLER'S Table Talk comes from the original Bormann Vermerke which the
late François Genoud purchased from Bormann's widow Gerda Bormann. They
were actually typed from notes taken by the stenographer Heinrich Heim,
whom I interviewed and who confirmed the procedure in detail. Each day's
entry was initialled by Bormann at the end. They are genuine, in the
first person, and highly reliable."

In Table Talk, Hitler enunciates a Genocidal policy towards the Slavs,
of the same kind in Rauschning book's Hitler Speaks. In 1939, no-one
believed that Hitler could be this bad.

I provide the quotes from both Hitler Speaks and Hitler's Table Talk
below; judge for yourself.

It's often said that Hitler implemented Gottfried Feder's policy of
debt-free money. In the 1920s, Hitler was impressed with Feder and
absorbed his idea about the Two Kinds of Capital. Having learned that,
he had no further need for Feder, and, after attaining power, never let
him implement his ideas. Instead, Hitler handed control of the economy
over to Schacht, who was conventional and an enemy of Feder.

Hitler did force Schacht to partly implement Feder's ideas, and sacked
him for "mutiny" when he refused to continue it. However, the MEFO bills
Schacht issued, which funded the programmes to lift Germany out of
Depression, paid interest (4.5%); they were not debt-free money like
Lincoln's Greenbacks - the sort Feder had advocated.

Hitler used the Socialist Left (Feder, Gregor Strasser and Rohm) to gain
mass support. But he could not get into power without funding from Big
Business; and the magnates insisted that he dump the Socialist Left.
That's what the Night of Long Knives was about; it ended the prospect of
a "second revolution". Feder got the message, and retired into obscurity.

(2) Authenticity of Rauschning book Hitler Speaks - from Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Rauschning#Authenticity_of_Hitler_Speaks

Authenticity of Hitler Speaks

The authenticity of the discussions Rauschning claims to have had with
Hitler between 1932 and 1934, which form the basis of his book Hitler
Speaks,[19] was challenged shortly after Rauschning's death by Swiss
researcher Wolfgang Hänel. Hänel investigated the memoir and announced
his findings at a conference of the revisionist association
Zeitgeschichtliche Forschungsstelle Ingolstadt[20] in 1983.[citation needed]

Hänel declared that Gespräche mit Hitler (the German title of Hitler
Speaks) was a fraud and that the book has no value "except as a document
of Allied war propaganda"[page needed] and concluded that:

  Rauschning's claim to have met with Hitler "more than a hundred times"
was a lie[page needed]

  that the two actually met only four times, and never alone[page needed]

  words attributed to Hitler were simply invented or plagiarized from
many different sources, including the writings of Ernst Jünger and
Friedrich Nietzsche; and an

  account of Hitler hearing voices, waking at night with convulsive
shrieks and pointing in terror at an empty corner while shouting "There,
there, in the corner!" was taken from a short story by French writer Guy
de Maupassant (Le Horla).[page needed]

Hänel based his book upon a tape-recorded interview that he had led in
1981 with Emery Reves, Jewish publisher of the original French edition
of Hitler speaks (which had been entitled Hitler m'a dit) who had
commissioned the book from Rauschning in 1939. In this interview, Reves
contended that penniless Rauschning's main reason for agreeing to write
Hitler speaks was the 125,000 francs advance, and, referring to
preliminary talks with Rauschning in 1939 where he had agreed with the
author on what themes and personality traits to apply to Hitler,
considered it as largely fabrication.

The Encyclopedia of the Third Reich also considers that "The research of
the Swiss educator Wolfgang Hänel has made it clear that the
'conversations' were mostly free inventions."[21]

The non-revisionist historian Hugh Trevor-Roper's initial view that the
conversations recorded in Hitler Speaks were authentic[22] also wavered
as a result of the Hänel research. For example, in the introductory
essay[23] he wrote for Hitler's Table Talk in 1953[24] he had said:

"Hitler's own table talk in the crucial years of the Machtergreifung
(1932–34), as briefly recorded by Hermann Rauschning, so startled the
world (which could not even in 1939 credit him with either such
ruthlessness or such ambitions) that it was for long regarded as
spurious. It is now, I think, accepted. If any still doubt its
genuineness, they will hardly do so after reading the volume now
published. For here is the official, authentic record of Hitler's
Table-Talk almost exactly ten years after the conversations recorded by
Rauschning".[25]

in the third edition, published in 2000,[26] he wrote a new preface in
which he did revise, though not reverse, his opinion of the authenticity
of Hitler Speaks:

"I would not now endorse so cheerfully the authority of Hermann
Rauschning which has been dented by Wolfgang Hanel, but I would not
reject it altogether. Rauschning may have yielded at times to
journalistic temptations, but he had opportunities to record Hitler's
conversations and the general tenor of his record too exactly foretells
Hitler's later utterances to be dismissed as fabrication."[27]

In writing his biography of Hitler, Ian Kershaw has written "I have on
no single occasion cited Hermann Rauschning's Hitler Speaks, a work now
regarded to have so little authenticity that it is best to disregard it
altogether."[28][29]

Richard Steigmann-Gall, in The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of
Christianity, is another historian contending Hitler speaks an overall
fake.[30]

The Hänel research was reviewed in the West German newspapers Der
Spiegel[31] and Die Zeit in 1985.[32]

Other historians have not been convinced by Hänel?s research. David
Redles attacked Hänel?s method which consisted of:

'pointing out similarities in phrasing of quotations from other
individuals in Rauschning's other books...and those attributed to Hitler
in Voice of Destruction [i.e. Hitler Speaks]. If the two are even
remotely similar Hänel concludes that the latter must be concoctions.
However the similarities, which are mostly slight, could be for a number
of reasons....[they] need not stem from forgery'.[33]

Eberhard Jaeckel also concluded that, whilst the work cannot be regarded
as a verbatim account, it is a good guide to Hitler's world view from
someone who conversed with him.[34]

Notes [edit]
19.^ #HitlerSpeaks1939
20.^ Ingolstadt Research Institute for Contemporary Historical Research
21.^ Bedürftig, Friedemann; Zentner, Christian (1997). The Encyclopedia
of the Third Reich. New York: Da Capo Press. p. 1162. ISBN 0-306-80793-9.
22.^ A view held by some other notable historians of the period in the
35 years following the end of World War II including Alan Bullock,
Joachim Fest, and Robert Payne
23.^ entitled: The Mind of Adolf Hitler
24.^ which was not revised when the 2nd Edition was published in 1973
25.^ #TableTalk1973 "Introduction" p.xiv
26.^ in which the introductory essay was still reproduced.
27.^ #TableTalk2000 "Preface"
28.^ He does not say why this should be so
29.^ #Kershaw page xiv
30.^ Richard Steigmann-Gall, The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of
Christianity, 1919–1945, Cambridge University Press, p. 29
31.^ Malanowski, Wolfgang (1985-09-09). "Zitat, Zitat, Zitat, und nichts
weiter (Quote, quote, quote, and nothing more)"  (Online archive of
press articles). Spiegelwissen (in German) (SPIEGEL-Verlag Rudolf
Augstein). Spiegel Online. pp. 92–99. der Spiegel 37/1985. Retrieved
June 2, 2009.
32.^ Janßen, Karl-Heinz (1985-07-19). "Kümmerliche Notizen. Rauschnings
"Gespräche mit Hitler" – wie ein Schweizer Lehrer nach 45 Jahren einen
Schwindel auffliegen ließ"  (Online article) (in German). Zeitverlag
Gerd Bucerius. Zeit Online. Retrieved Aug 29, 2011.
33.^ David Redles Hitler's millennial Reich: apocalyptic belief and the
search for salvation, page 195
34.^ Ibid., page 196

This page was last modified on 14 August 2014 at 21:14.

(3) TABLE TALK: Hitler's intended Genocide of Ukraine & Slavs
Table Talk records Hitler's dinner conversations from 5th July 1941 to
7th September 1942, from 13th June to 24th June 1943, and from  13th
March to 29th-30th November 1944.

If you just read the "excerpts" of Table Talk published on the internet
<http://davnet.org/kevin/articles/table.html>, Hitler comes across as  a
mild-mannered philosopher. That file omits his ruthless side.

But if you read the whole pdf book, or do keyword searches, that other
side of Hitler emerges.

HITLER'S TABLE TALK. 1941-1944. His Private Conversations. Translated
by. Norman Cameron and R.H. Stevens.
http://www.zogsnightmare.com/books/HitlersTableTalk.pdf

Each entry has a session# (eg at dinner) and a date. The pdf page#s are
6 higher than the printed page#s.

{pdf p.37} 31 session20 17th September 1941 means:

- this is page# 37 in the pdf file, p. 31 in the printed book - it
records session 20, which took place on 17th September 1941.

Where no date is shown for a certain pdf page#, the date above it applies.

(3) Hitler's "struggle for the hegemony of the world"

{pdf p.37} PREPARATIONS FOR WAR AGAINST RUSSIA
31 session20 17th September 1941, evening, and the night of 17th-18th

... The spirit of decision does not mean acting at all costs. The spirit
of decision consists simply in not hesitating when an inner conviction
commands you to act. Last year I needed great spiritual strength to take
the decision to attack Bolshevism.

I had to foresee that Stalin might pass over to the attack in the course
of 1941. It was therefore necessary to get started without delay, in
order not to be forestalled - and that wasn't possible before June.

{pdf p.38} The struggle for the hegemony of the world will be decided in
favour of Europe by the possession of the Russian space. Thus Europe
will be an impregnable fortress, safe from all threat of blockade. All
this opens up economic vistas which, one may think, will incline the
most liberal of the Western democrats towards the New Order.

(4) Hitler's plan to settle Germans in Ukraine, colonize the Ukranians,
expel Ukranian Jews

{pdf p.39} The essential thing, for the moment, is to conquer. ... The
Slavs are a mass of born slaves, who feel the need of a master. ... It
would be a mistake to claim to educate the native. All that we could
give him would be a half-knowledge - just what's needed to conduct a
revolution!

{pdf p.40} 34 THE SLAV NATIONS ...

The Slav peoples are not destined to live a cleanly life. They know it,
and we would be wrong to persuade them of the contrary. It was we who,
in 1918, created the Baltic countries and the Ukraine. But nowadays we
have no interest in maintaining Baltic States, any more than in creating
an independent Ukraine. We must likewise prevent them from returning to
Christianity. That would be a grave fault, for it would be giving them a
form of organisation.

I am not a partisan, either, of a university at Kiev. It's better not to
teach them to read. They won't love us for tormenting them with schools.
Even to give them a locomotive to drive would be a mistake. And what
stupidity it would be on our part to proceed to a distribution of land!
In spite of that, we'll see to it that the natives live better than
they've lived hitherto. We'll find amongst them the human material
that's indispensable for tilling the soil. We'll supply grain to all in
Europe who. need it. The Crimea will give us its citrus fruits, cotton
and rubber (100,000 acres of plantation would be enough to ensure our
independence). The Pripet marshes will keep us supplied with reeds.
We'll supply the Ukranians with scarves, glass beads and everything that
colonial peoples like. The Germans - this is essential - will have to
constitute amongst themselves a closed society, like a fortress. The
least of our stable-lads must be superior to any native.

{pdf p.43} 37

session23 23rd September 1941, evening

It's absurd to try to suppose that the frontier between the two separate
worlds of Europe and Asia is marked by a chain of not very high
mountains - and the long chain of the Urals is no more than that. One
might just as well decree that the frontier is marked by one of the
great Russian rivers. No, geographically Asia penetrates into Europe
without any sharp break. The real frontier is the one that separates the
Germanic world from the Slav world. It's our duty to place it where we
want it to be.

{pdf p.72} 42 17th October 1941, midday

{pdf p.74} 68

But the first thing, above all, is to get rid of the Jew. Without that,
it will be useless to clean the Augean stables. If Antonescu sets about
the job in this manner, he'll be the head of a thriving country,
inwardly healthy and strong. For this purpose he has a good peasantry
(Hungary has nothing like it) and natural riches. Moreover,''Rumania is
a country with a thinly scattered population.

session43 17th October 1941, evening

In comparison with the beauties accumulated in Central Germany, the new
territories in the East seem to us like a desert. Flanders, too, is only
a plain - but of what beauty! This Russian desert, we shall populate it.
The immense spaces of the Eastern Front will have been the field of the
greatest battles in history. We'll give this country a past.

We'll take away its character of an Asiatic steppe, we'll Europeanise
it. With this object, we have undertaken the construction of roads that
will lead to the southernmost point of the Crimea and to the Caucasus.
These roads will be studded along their whole length with German towns,
and around these towns our colonists will settle.

As for the two or three million men whom we need to accomplish this
task, we'll find them quicker than we think. They'll come from Germany,
Scandinavia, the Western countries and America. I shall no longer be
here to see all that, but in twenty years the Ukraine will already be a
home for twenty million inhabitants besides the natives. In three
hundred years, the country will be one of the loveliest gardens in the
world. As for the natives, we'll have to screen them carefully. The Jew,
that destroyer, we shall drive out. As far as the population is
concerned, I get a better impression in White Russia than in the
Ukraine. We shan't settle in the Russian towns, and we'll let them fall

{pdf p.75} 69

to pieces without intervening. And, above all, no remorse on this
subject! ... There's only one duty: to Germanise this country by the
immigration of Germans, and to look upon the natives as Redskins.

{pdf p.93} 87

session52 25th October 1941, evening

 From the rostrum of the Reichstag I prophesied to Jewry that, in the
event of war's proving inevitable, the Jew would disappear from Europe.
That race of criminals has on its conscience the two million dead of the
first World War, and now already hundreds of thousands more. Let nobody
tell me that all the same we can't park them in the marshy parts of
Russia! Who's worrying about our troops? It's not a bad idea, by the
way, that public rumour attributes to us a plan to exterminate the Jews.
Terror is a salutary thing.

The attempt to create a Jewish State will be a failure.

{pdf p.239} session119 23rd January 1942, midday

{pdf p.240} 234

Of all the Slavs, the Czech is the most dangerous, because he's a
worker. ... Now they'll work, for they know we're pitiless and brutal.
... the Czechs are a foreign body in the midst of the German community.
There's no room both for them and for us. One of us must give way. As
regards the Pole, it's lucky for us that he's idle, stupid and vain.

{pdf p.428} session190 nth {sic.} April 1942, at dinner

{pdf p.430} p.It will be the duty of our Commissars alone to supervise
and direct the economy of the captured territories, and what I have just
said applies equally to every form of organisation. Above all, we don't
want a horde of schoolmasters to descend suddenly on these territories
and force education down the throats

{pdf p.431} 425

of subject races. To teach the Russians, the Ukrainians and the Kirghiz
to read and write will eventually be to our own disadvantage; education
will give the more intelligent among them an opportunity to study
history, to acquire an historical sense and hence to develop political
ideas which cannot but be harmful to our interests. A loud-speaker
should be installed in each village, to provide them with odd items of
news and, above all, to afford distraction. What possible use to them
would a knowledge of politics or economics be? There is also no point in
broadcasting any stories of their past history - all the villagers
require is music, music and plenty of it. Cheerful music is a great
incentive to hard work; give them plenty of opportunities to dance, and
the villagers will be grateful to us. The soundness of these views is
proved by our ex erience at home during the time of the Weimar Republic.

One thing which it is essential to organise in the Russian territories
is an efficient system of communications, which is vital both to the
rational economic exploitation of the country and to the maintenance of
control and order. The local inhabitants must therefore be taught our
highway code, but beyond that I really do not see the need for any
further instruction.

In the field of public health there is no need whatsoever to extend to
the subject races the benefits of our own knowledge. This would result
only in an enormous increase in local populations, and I absolutely
forbid the organisation of any sort of hygiene or cleanliness crusades
in these territories. Compulsory vaccination will be confined to Germans
alone, and the doctors in the German colonies will be there solely for
the purpose of looking after the German colonists. It is stupid to
thrust happiness upon people against their wishes. Dentistry, too,
should remain a closed book to them; but in all these things prudence
and commonsense must be the deciding factors, and if some local
inhabitant has a violent tooth-ache and insists on seeing a dentist -
well, an exception must be made in his particular case!

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the
subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who
have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own
downfall by so doing. Indeed,

{pdf p.432} 426

I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is
a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have
any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the
sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the
occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points
must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.

All Germans living in the eastern territories must remain in personal
contact with these strong-points. The whole must be most carefully
organised to conform with the long-term policy of German colonisation,
and our colonising penetration must be constantly progressive, until it
reaches the stage where our own colonists far outnumber the local
inhabitants.

{pdf p.565} 559

session250 5th July 1942, midday

{pdf p.593} BORMANN'S TOUR OF THE UKRAINE 587

Bormann, who has just returned from a tour of inspection of the Kolkhoz
in the vicinity of General Headquarters, gave his impressions: "... I
was much struck by the fact that in these huge open spaces one saw so
many children and so few men. Such prolific breeding may one day give us
a knotty problem to solve, for as a race they are much hardier by nature
than we are. The men have admirable teeth, and rarely does one see a man
wearing glasses. They are well fed and bursting with good health at all
ages.

The difficult conditions under which these men have lived for centuries
have brought into being a merciless process of selection. If one of us
drinks a drop of their water, he all but dies. They on the other hand
live in the dirt, drink the muddy stagnant water of their ponds and
thrive on it. We fill ourselves with quinine as a safeguard against
malaria, while the Ukrainians are so immune, not only to malaria but to
scarlet fever as well, that they can live with impunity in surroundings
teeming with fleas and ticks.

"If these people are allowed, under German supervision - that is, under
greatly improved conditions - to multiply too quickly, it will be
against our interests, for the racial pressures which these damned
Ukrainians will exercise will constitute a real danger. Our interests
demand just the reverse - namely, that these territories, hitherto
Russian, should in time be

{pdf p.594} 588 populated by a larger number of German colonists than
local inhabitants" Hitler commented:

I recently read an article from the pen of some Herr Doktor advocating
the prohibition of the sale in the occupied territories of
contraceptives. If any criminal lunatic should really try to introduce
this measure I'd soon have his head off! In view of the extraordinary
fertility of the local inhabitants, we should be only too pleased to
encourage the women and the girls to practise the arts of contraception
at all times. Far from prohibiting the sale of contraceptives,
therefore, we should do our utmost to encourage it. We should call on
the Jews for help! With their unrivalled sense of commerce, they are the
very people for the job!

In all seriousness, however, there is a very real danger that these
local inhabitants will increase too rapidly under our care and
domination. Their conditions of life will inevitably improve under our
jurisdiction, and we must take all the measures necessary to ensure that
the non-German population does not increase at an excessive rate. In
these circumstances, it would be sheer folly to place at their disposal
a health service such as we know it in Germany; and so - no inoculations
and other preventative measures for the natives! We must even try to
stifle any desire for such things, by persuading them that vaccination
and the like are really most dangerous!

It is, furthermore, essential to avoid doing anything which might give
rise to a feeling of superiority or of racial pride among the natives.
This is of the utmost importance, for it is only by the creation of the
very reverse state of mind that we shall be able to prepare the ground
for the accomplishment of our plans.

For these reasons, the local population must be given no facilities for
higher education. A failure on our part in this respect would simply
plant the seeds of future opposition to our rule. Schools, of course,
they must have - and they must pay for their tuition. But there is no
need to teach them much more than, say, the meaning of the various
road-signs. Instruction in geography can be restricted to one single
sentence: The Capital of the Reich is Berlin, a city which everyone
should try to visit

{pdf p.595} KNOWLEDGE IS DANGEROUS 589

once in his lifetime. Finally, elementary instruction in reading and
writing in German will complete the course. Mathematics and such like
are quite unnecessary. In setting up the educational system, the same
principles apply to both Eastern territories and any other colonies. We
do not want any of this enlightenment nonsense propagated by an advance
guard of parsons! What is the use of talking about progress to people
like that? Jodl is quite right when he says that notices in the
Ukrainian language "Beware of the Trains" are superfluous; what on earth
does it matter if one or two more locals get run over by the trains? [...]

Germans will in no circumstances live in a Ukrainian town. If essential,
it will be better to put Germans in barracks outside a town than to
allow them to live inside it. Otherwise, sooner or later, the process of
cleaning up and improving the town will inevitably start; and Russian
and Ukrainian towns are not in any circumstances to be improved or made
more habitable. It is not our mission to lead the local inhabitants to a
higher standard of life; and our ultimate object must be to build towns
and villages exclusively for Germans and absolutely separate from
Russian or Ukrainian towns.

{pdf p.621} session281 6th August 1942, midday

{pdf p.623} p.617

As for the ridiculous hundred million Slavs, we will mould the best of
them to the shape that suits us, and we will isolate the rest of them in
their own pig-styes; and anyone who talks about cherishing the local
inhabitant and civilising him, goes straight off into a concentration camp!

At harvest time we will set up markets at all the centres of any
importance. There we will buy up all the cereals and fruit, and sell the
more trashy products of our own manufacture. In this way we shall
receive for these goods of ours a return considerably greater than their
intrinsic value. The profit will be pocketed by the Reich to defray the
price of the campaign. Our agricultural machinery factories, our
transport companies, our manufacturers of household goods and so forth
will find there an enormous market for their goods. It will also be a
splendid market for cheap cotton goods - the more brightly coloured the
better. Why should we thwart the longing of these people for bright colours?

(4) HITLER SPEAKS: Hitler's intended Genocide of Ukraine & Slavs

HITLER SPEAKS: Conversations of 1932-34 recorded by Hermann Rauschning

Rauschning was Head of State of Danzig
http://mailstar.net/Hitler-Speaks-Rauschning.doc

{p. 126} "We need space," he almost shrieked, "to make us independent of
every possible political grouping and alliance. In the east, we must
have the mastery as far as the Caucasus and Iran. In the west, we need
the French coast. We need Flanders and Holland. Above all we need
Sweden. We must become a colonial power. We must have a sea power equal
to that of Britain. The material basis for independence grows with the
increasing demands of technique and armaments. We cannot, like Bismarck,
limit ourselves to national aims. We must rule Europe or fall apart as a
nation, fall back into the chaos of small states. Now do you understand
why I cannot be limited, either in the east or in the west?"

{p. 136} "[...] It is still our task to shatter for all time the
menacing hordes of the pan-Slav empire. Under the shadow of this supreme
power, Germany would not be able to rise. Let us not forget that the
Slav East is more fertile than all the rest of Europe. We must meet this
danger, which threatens to engulf all Europe. We cannot in any way evade
the final battle between German race ideals and pan-Slav mass ideals.
Here yawns the eternal abyss which no mutual political interest can
bridge. We must win the victory of German race-consciousness over the
masses eternally fated to serve

{p. 137} and obey. We alone can conquer the great continental space, and
it will be done by us singly and alone, not through a pact with Moscow.
We shall take this struggle upon us. It will open to us the door to
permanent mastery of the world. That does not mean that I will refuse to
walk part of the road together with the Russians, if that will help us.
But it will be only in order to return the more swiftly to our true aims."

{p. 139} "We have far too much Slav blood in our veins already. [...]

{p. 140} "The least we can do," he continued, "is to prevent this alien
blood from rising higher in the national body. I admit that this danger
will not be diminished if in the near future we occupy regions with a
high proportion of Slav population, which we shall not be able to get
rid of very quickly. Consider Austria, consider Vienna! Is there
anything German left there?

" We are obliged to depopulate," he went on emphatically, "as part of
our mission of preserving the German population. We shall have to
develop a technique of depopulation. If you ask me what I mean by
depopulation, I mean the removal of entire racial units. And that is
what I intend to carry out — that, roughly, is my task. Nature is cruel,
therefore we, too, may be cruel. If I can send the flower of the German
nation into the hell of war without the smallest pity for the spilling
of precious German blood, then surely I have the right to remove
millions of an inferior race that breeds like vermin! And by 'remove' I
don't necessarily mean destroy; I shall simply take systematic measures
to dam their great natural fertility. For example, I shall keep their
men and women separated for years. Do you remember the falling
birth-rate of the world war? Why should we not do quite consciously and
through a number of years what was at that time merely the inevitable
conseguence of the long war? There are many ways, systematical and
comparatively painless, or at any rate bloodless, of causing undesirable
races to die out. [...]

{p. 141} It will be one of the chief tasks of German statesmanship for
all time to prevent, by every means in our power, the further increase
of the Slav races. Natural instincts bid all living beings not merely
conquer their enemies, but also destroy them. In former days, it was the
victor's prerogative to destroy entire tribes, entire peoples. By doing
this gradually and without bloodshed, we demonstrate our humanity. We
should remember, too, that we are merely doing unto others as they would
have done to us."

{p. 148} "It is a good idea," he said emphatically, "to have at least
two German societies in every country. One of them can then always call
attention to its loyalty to the country in question, and will have the
function of fostering social and economic connections. The other one may
be radical and revolutionary. It will have to be prepared to be
frequently repudiated by myself and other German authorities. I want to
make it quite clear, too, that I make no distinction between German
nationals and Germans by birth who are citizens of a foreign country.
Superficially we shall have to make allowances for such citizenship. But

{p. 149} it will be your special task to train all Germans, without
distinction, unconditionally to place their loyalty to Germandom before
their loyalty to the foreign state.

(5) Hitler a Zionist agent? Or British agent?

From: VRggeberg@aol.com
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 04:58:18 -0500
Subject: Re: HITLER SPEAKS: Conversations of 1932-34 recorded by Hermann
Rauschning

Dear Peter,
I appreciate many things your have written. But it is known since years
that A. Hitler was a Zionist Agent, so why you grab out old things wich
are mostly based on lies?
Greetings
Dieter

Adolf Hitler — Agent of Freemasonry and Zionism
*

Dieter,

 > Hitler was a Zionist Agent

Hitler admits, in Rauschning's book, that he accepted some Jewish funds
in the early days.

He USED everyone - Feder, Rohm, Gregor Strasser, and those Jewish
donors. Anything to get into power, then he dumped them.

It doesn't mean that he remained a tool of Zionism. Or that he was a
British agent.

Peter