Grand Orient Masonry link to Charlie Hebdo - Kerry Bolton
Newsletter published on 27 January 2015
(1) Charlie
Hebdo attack "not staged by any secret service" - JP Desmoulins
(2) Grand
Orient Masonry link to Charlie Hebdo - Kerry Bolton
(1) Charlie Hebdo
attack "not staged by any secret service" - JP Desmoulins
Date: Tue, 27
Jan 2015 12:01:49 +0100
From: JP Desmoulins <jean-pierre.desmoulins@orange.fr>
Subject:
Re: Thierry Meyssan & Jean-Marie Le Pen support Conspiracy theory
of
Charlie Hebdo massacre
Hi peter
I think that the attacks against
Charlie Hebdo and a jewish grocery
store couldn't be directly staged by any
secret service.
- French secret service : such a heavy operation, which
would clearly be
oriented towards a clash beetween the communities in the
country (gauls
against arabs) would be heavy to organize and, knowing that
there are
different sensibilities inside the french secret services,
including one
pro zionist and one pro arab, the plot would already have been
cracked
by whistleblowers. Think also that a lot of services (gendarmerie
and
GIGN, Paris police and BRI, ground police forces, rescue services of
pompiers de Paris, medical aid and rescue of SAMU) would have to be
involved. How can you imagine that a doctor at the SAMU, who had to
examine the wounds of the killed policeman, try to let him survive,
could lie or just be an actor in some video staging ?
- Foreign
secret service : OK, there is one which could have the
motivation to do such
a thing, Mossad. Really, I don't see how they
could perpetrate such an
attack with their agents, these guys escape and
some patsies (Kaouchi
brothers, Coulibaly) be designated as the
perpetrators and killed by police
to be silenced. We have seen the rush
of the police in the kosher grocery
store, the firing, the hostages
extracted from there, Coulibaly shot down
and lying on the ground. I
can't believe there could be a staging there. Of
course, in the case of
the Kaouchi brothers, it's unclear as a long time
occured beetween the
attack on Charlie and the shooting of the two brothers,
so nothing
proves that the two guys shooted, the Kaouchi brothers, were the
perpetrators of the attack. I would have been highly risky to do such a
thing : the policeman killed had shooted at the car of the attackers.
There could have been other cops coming on the spot (the attack was
rather long) and coming with powerful guns, so that the attackers could
easily have been killed or badly wounded on the spot. Imagine the
diplomatic consequences if one of them was recognized as an israeli
asset ! BTW, Mossad in all it's operations takes care of having his
assets escape the scene. In that the case, the escape was quite a
miracle for the attackers.
The technical analysis of the images which
has pushed some expert to say
that it was a staged event focuses on three
points.
- Analysis of the effects of a shot of an AK 47 into the head of
the
policeman. No explosion of the skull, no cerebral matter projected, no
instant move of the body under impact. I think we must be careful with
that, because the head was lying on the ground, so the bullet, on it's
exit side, was not on the conditions of an usual impact with the head
free in the air. The energy of the bullet when exiting can be absorbed
very locally by the skull, no global move of the head being seen because
the ground blocks the head to move in direction of the bullet. There is
therefore no large fragmentation of the skull by the bullet, and the
bullet hitting skull and ground nearly at the same time can bounce back
into the head, having lost most of it's energy and stay inside the head,
after having of course made a huge damage which causes instant
death.
- The rest of the body (arms, trunk) moves to the ground one
second
after the impact. This delay is normal, as it's not a cinetic effect
of
the shock of the bullet, but just the consequence of the instant death
which causes muscles to release and the body to take a rest position on
the ground.
- Odd things visible on one image (smoke from the gun,
something said to
be a paper from a blank cartridge). These images were shot
with a mobile
phone. There is no diaphragm on the optic, so that the
exposition is
adjusted by the exposure time on the sensor. In day light,
this exposure
time can be short regarding to the interframe delay, for
example 20%.
This means that on some very rapid moving objects, 80% of the
objects
can stay unseen on the images. When you see such a thing with your
eyes,
there is a persistence effect on your retina which makes you see even
very fast moving objects, like a bullet, some blood ejected by a bullet.
As these objects stay a very short time in the camera field, due to
their speed, you can miss them on such a video.
Now, all this being
said, I want to add two points.
- I think that DAESH and / or ISIS being
manipulated by Mossad / CIA is
believed by many people. The Kaouchi brothers
and Coulibaly being
inspired by somebody who is, consciously or not, acting
on a zionist /
US hawkish agenda, is for me a very serious
hypothese.
- There are many oddities on the lack of serious protection of
Charlie
offices and the very long time for the police to come on the spot,
those
coming having apparently no idea of what they were facing. This could
open the door to a LIHOP (let it happen on purpose) conspiracy
hypothesis.
These two points should be investigated. I'm afraid that
pushing
strongly the MIHOP hypothesis (event is staged...), like in the case
of
911, could kill the investigation on a LIHOP line. Once again Meyssan is
on the first line. Either he is stupid and has took no lesson of what he
provoked with his "no plane on the Pentagon" campaign, or he is acting
cleverly on purpose, creating a diversion. For Jean-Marie Le-Pen, no
comment : his daughter, now head of his party Front National, is
repeatedly embarassed by what her old dad publicly says.
You can
publish this commentary, Peter, and don't hesitate to correct my
english if
necessary.
regards
JPD
(2) Grand Orient Masonry link to Charlie
Hebdo - Kerry Bolton
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 20:26:51 +1300
From: Kerry
Bolton <vindex@clear.net.nz>
Subject: Re:
Thierry Meyssan & Jean-Marie Le Pen support Conspiracy
theory of Charlie
Hebdo massacre
My article on CH at:
http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/01/charlie-hebdo-all-idiots-now/
Charlie
Hebdo: All Idiots Now
Kerry Bolton
The staff of Charlie Hebdo was
and is perhaps the most representative
collection of culture-distorters and
culture-retards ever assembled at
one place. “They” are all there:
communists, Grand Orient Freemasons,
apostate Jews, each committed to a
neo-Jacobin ridicule of everything
traditional, every form of morality, any
vestige of faith. The program
was and is designed to be a provocation, and
when there was a reaction
humbug has reigned, and the amoral feign moral
outrage.
Charlie Hebdo (CH) came out of the New Left milieu of the 1960s,
and is
a product of the 1968 revolt against President Charles de Gaulle. It
happens that the most famous of the New Left revolts came at a time when
(1) the CIA was sponsoring anti-Soviet New Left student organizations
and other non-Soviet Left-wing endeavors throughout the world;[1] (2)
President de Gaulle was pursuing a course independent of U.S. foreign
policy.[2] The New Left was used in the USA dialectically to cause a
general shift of thinking leftward, which would seem “conservative” in
comparison to the Hippies and Yippies running rampant on campuses and in
the streets.[3] Charlie Hebdo, raising the banner of revolt, has always
regurgitated precisely what the “system” required.
Totalitarian
Jacobins
While pontificating about “free speech,” criticism of Israel was
not
tolerated, and any manifestation of the Nationalist Right was regarded
as requiring state repression. Charlie Hebdo advocates the “liberalism”
of the Jacobins, the argument of the guillotine, figuratively, if not
literally. They try to titillate the “educated” classes of France with
an illustration of Jesus sodomizing God,[4] and other such puerilities
on a weekly basis.
Never did they campaign in favor of genuine
“heretics” such as those who
questioned the “Holocaust.”
[...]
Charlie Hebdo actively campaigned to repress those with whom they
disagreed; i.e. those who represented any genuine revolt against the
status quo. Hence, in 2013, when the French Government banned a small
group of the Nationalist Right after the death of a young “antifa”
anarchist, Clément Méric, in a fight which he began,[6] CH also called
for the banning of the Front National (FN), a major political party. In
a petition to parliament CH insisted that the FN was in breach of the
Jacobin ideology of “The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the
Citizen,” which forms the basis of the French Constitution. Therefore,
CH does not support the existence of any doctrine or party that
advocates anything contrary to Jacobinism. Charlie Hebdo addressed their
petition to French president François Hollande. They stated:
The
Front National is in blatant contradiction with at least five
articles of
the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen,
which constitute
the preamble to the Constitution of the French people.
. . . We ask you to
dissolve the Front National, this league whose aim
is to bring about the end
of the French Republic.[7]
While the French political and intellectual
Establishment mobilized the
masses in an inane act of supposed defiance
against Islamism in the name
of Europe’s Jacobin values, at the same time
Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala,
France’s most popular comedian, was arrested for
“being an apologist for
terrorism.” He had posted on Facebook: “Tonight, as
far as I’m
concerned, I feel like Charlie Coulibaly”; a play on words “Je
suis
Charlie,” the banal phrase supplied to the masses to show solidarity
with Charlie Hebdo. M’Bala however used the name of one of the gunmen,
Amédy Coulibaly.[8] CH filth is lauded as “free speech” under the
highest ideal of the French Republic, while a one line quip is regarded
as “aiding terrorism.”
In 2002, Philippe Val, then editor in chief,
denounced Dr. Noam Chomsky
for his criticism of Israel, U. S. foreign policy
and the mainstream
media. In 2008 Charlie Hebdo cartoonist Siné commented on
a news item
that President Sarkozy’s son Jean was converting to Judaism to
marry the
heiress of an appliance chain that “He’ll go far, this lad.” Val
dismissed Siné for this quip on the grounds of
“anti-Semitism.”
Fellaheen versus Diseased
So who are those who
have been involved with Charlie Hebdo? In short, a
notably scabrous
collective of Marxists, apostate Jews, and Freemasons;
all neo-Jacobins
representing the West in its advance epoch of decay. It
is really a misnomer
to described this is part of a “clash of
civilizations” as explained by
Samuel Huntington, who, unlike neocons
such as Ralph Peters et al. did not
recommend the clash as desirable.[9]
What is happening is a clash between
fellaheen peoples[10] against
Western Civilization in an advanced state of
disease.
Neocon strategists such as Lt. Colonel Ralph Peters have taken
the
Huntington hypothesis further, and made it the basis of an epoch of
struggle to destroy all those who resist “The American Century,” as it
has been called. While Huntington rejects universalism, Peters and the
cabal of neocon policy-makers see America as the historical agent of an
irresistible universalism analogous to that of Marx’s historical
inevitability of communism. The USA has a world mission to spread a
culture-pathology, one might say, in the same sense that a disease
replicates its pathogens. Peters’ essay “Constant Conflict” is required
reading for anyone who wishes to understand the doctrine behind
globalization and U.S. foreign policy, why the USA is determined that
there cannot be peace, and the culture-pathogens that are an integral
part of U.S. globalism.[11]
While fellaheen are by definition
primitive, they are not diseased. They
are the remnants of prior
Civilizations. If some of their elements react
in a primitive manner what
they are reacting against is an instinctive
resistance to culture-pathogens:
a clash of primitive versus
pathological. The latter is called “progress”
and “Civilization” while
the former is called “barbarian,” a term used by
the Charlies in
condemning the fellaheen attack of January 7 on the CH
office.
The Culture-distorters and the Culture-retarders are right to
champion
Charlie Hebdo. The magazine epitomizes everything that is decadent
about
Western Civilization, and they are proud of their decadence. Indeed,
they subtitle their journal “irresponsible.” They are the rightful heirs
of J.-J. Rousseau and the Marquis de Sade, infantile mattoids[12] whose
culture-retardation laid the groundwork for the Jacobin Revolution of
1789. They ridicule all the beliefs and institutions that the Jacobins
put to the torch, the sabre, bullet, and guillotine and do so in the
name of “Liberalism” and “human rights.” One should recall that both
Liberalism and Marxism emerged from the French Revolution. It is a
logical dialectic that both Liberalism and Marxism should synthesize as
the dogma of the New World Order. One might say that Jacobin France was
a mixture of liberal-economics and what is today called
cultural-Marxism. It is this synthesis that re-emerged during the Cold
War among what is now called the “neocons,” although there is nothing
that is “new” nor “conservative” about them. As will be shown below, CH
and much of the French Left was re-set on the same course.
What are
the Charlies?
Apparently we are all Charlies now, the latest cliché of
globalism for
the masses, “Je suis Charlie.” As one would expect, the
depraved and the
stupid at the Golden Globe Awards, fulsomely embraced the
mania, as is
appropriate for the Hollywood purveyors of culture-syphilis.
“Charlie”
in Anglophone lingo is slang for idiot or fool. It is apt that the
masses of booboisie should march vacantly through the streets of Paris
and elsewhere holding the slogan aloft, fantasizing that what they are
doing by falling in line requires the slightest modicum of thought or
courage.
Charlie Hebdo was founded in February 1969 as the successor
to Hara-Kiri
magazine, founded in 1960. The first editor of CH was François
Cavanna.
He was succeeded in 1992 by Philippe Val who had relaunched CH in
1991
with Cavanna, Delfeil de Ton, and Georges Wolinski.
Wolinski,
one of those killed on January 7, was a Tunisian-born Jew, who
had
co-founded the satirical magazine L’Enragé during the 1968 New Left
revolt
of the banal. Among subsequent journals, including editorship of
Hari-kiri,
he wrote for the Leftist newspaper Libération. As will be
shown later, his
cartoons were in particular use by the Communist
newspaper L’Humanité.
Another Libération colleague on CH was Dutch
cartoonist Bernard Willem
Holtrop. Renaud Pierre Manuel Séchan who
became known as a singer and
songwriter with “Crève salope!” due to its
popularity among the ’68
revolters, was a founding shareholder of CH.
Of the present brouhaha
about “free speech” and the liberal values of
France and indeed the entire
“West,” Olivier Cyran, a former Charlie,
perceptively commented in 2006
about the CH editor’s conception of freedom:
The trouble is that this
right so abundantly spread by the director of
Charlie Hebdo is only for
himself and those who think like him. His
former employees of Charlie know
something: in case of divergence, the
Enlightenment suddenly turns to
despotism.[13]
“Enlightenment suddenly turns to despotism” is an apt
description of the
Jacobin regime, and subsequent attempts at “ liberty,
equality,
fraternity,” whether under The Communist Manifesto, Woodrow
Wilson’s
Fourteen Points, or the U.N. Charter.
Cyran gives the
example of Philippe Corcuff who was pushed out of CH for
not supporting
Islamophobia with sufficient zeal. In 2000 Mona Chollet
was fired for
objecting to Val’s reference to Palestinians as
“uncivilized.”[14] Val also
had his employees spied on to determine
their loyalty.[15] It is all so very
Liberal, Jacobin, Bolshevik,
Zionist; take your pick. Cyran speaks with
experience. He worked for CH
during 1992-2001, but quit because of the
dictatorial character and
corrupt promotion practices of Val. In 2013 he
wrote to the editor
Charbonnaire (“Charb”) and to Fabrice Nicolino[16] that
CH had made
France “a nastier place to live.”[17]
It was Val who
sacked Siné for supposed ‘anti-Semitism,” although a case
for wrongful
dismissal was won against CH in 2010. For services rendered
Val was
appointed in 2005 as director of France Inter, part of Radio France.
In
2006 Val co-signed a statement with Bernard-Henri Lévy,[18] and ten
others,
published in L’Express, stating:
After having overcome Fascism, Nazism
and Stalinism, the world now faces
a new global threat of a totalitarian
nature: Islamism. We – writers,
journalists, and intellectuals – call for
resistance against religious
totalitarianism to promote freedom, equal
opportunities and secular
values for all.[19]
The conflation of
Stalinism with Fascism and Nazism and those with
Islamism is classic
Trotskyism, promoted by neocons, such as
ex-Trotskyite, Jewish convert to
Sufism and “libertarian,” David Horowitz.
The manifesto was a call to
oppose the Islamic reaction to the cartoon
of Muhammad appearing in Denmark
in 2005, CH style; a calculated
provocation in Jyllands-Posten, whose
cultural editor was neocon Zionist
Fleming Rose, now the newspaper’s foreign
affairs editor. Shortly later,
Rose went to the USA to interview neocon
luminaries Francis Fukuyama,
Bill Kristol, Richard Perle, and Professor
Bernard Lewis, enthusiasts
for Israel who have had a major influences over
U.S. foreign policies.
In 2006 Olivier Cyran wrote that the
re-publication of the Danish
cartoons in a special issue of CH entitled
“freedom of expression” was a
“masterstroke” as a “publicity stunt.” On
February 8 sales records had
been broken with 400,000 copies of CH sold.[20]
Cyran quoted Pascal
Boniface, director of the Institute of International and
Strategic
Relations, stating of Val that he is a “seller” of the U.S.
neocon[21]
ideology.
Cyran stated also of Val: “Sharon and Bush are
his positive heroes,
those who dare to criticize him are complicit with
terrorists. In the
great battle of ideas which we are witnessing, Val is an
important
element. The ironic tone of newspaper cartoons allows him to sell
the
neo-conservative [sic] ideology contained in his editorials to an
electorate that would not naturally lean in that
direction.”[22]
Grand Orient
Among the dead on January 7 were two
brother Masons of the Grand Orient
de France. The Grand Orient has
posted:
Two of the journalists assassinated in the cowardly and barbarous
attack
on Charlie Hebdo were Freemasons. Bro Bernard Maris, economic
columnist
at CH, and Bro Michel Renaud, formerly of Europe 1 and Le Figaro,
were
both active Freemasons in the Grand Orient, Bernard in Roger Leray
Lodge
in Paris and Michel in Lux Perpetue Lodge in Clermont Ferrand. They
died
representing the values we stand for.[23]
The Grand Orient
connection is expected. The Jacobin Revolution
unleashed upon France in 1789
was the culmination of decades of Masonic
plotting, based on the “universal
values” promoted by Charlie Hebdo.
While the smug might dismiss this as
conspiracy theory, the Grand Orient
is openly proud of its Jacobin heritage.
Indeed, the Grand Orient has
officially identified the CH doctrine as in
accord with their creed, and
joined with the mass demonstration of
solidarity organised by Hollande,
President of France. The GODF
stated:
The Grand Orient of France was present yesterday evening in the
Republic
Square to share the emotion of thousands of anonymous who came to
express their support for the silent struggle of Charlie Hebdo. All were
not Charlie readers but all were aware that Charlie is one of the
standard bearers of democracy to which we are attached and for which
Charlie journalists fought every day without ever escaping the risks
that for that they had agreed to incur. Yes, they were all resistant to
a faceless war on terror claims to impose abject and cowardly. In these
circumstances, I would first like to emphasize the powerful outpouring
of compassion expressed by members of our Obedience of all backgrounds
who have expressed excitement but also their willingness to mobilize so
that we, the living, be worthy of those who were the victims of this
blind barbarism[24].
The Masonic martyrdom has been used by the GODF
to galvanize Masons. A
special meeting for January 12 at the Arthur
Groussier Temple, was
called by the GODF Grand Master, Daniel Keller, to
unify “the thinking
that must be ours on the values ??that we must promote
in the light of
the tragedy that has befallen our country.” Moreover the
GODF Foundation
is helping to fund CH to ensure that it continues beyond its
hitherto
fringe existence. The Masonic declaration reads:
1.The Grand
Orient will participate in a spirit of Masonic unity
alongside all liberal
and non-dogmatic Obediences, at the Republican
event taking place Sunday.
The place and time of the meeting will be
provided as it becomes
available.
2.The Council invites the brothers and sisters of the
Obedience to take
part in a special event Monday, January 12th at 19th at
Arthur Groussier
temple to federate the thinking that must be ours on the
values ??that
we must promote in the light of the tragedy that has befallen
our country.
3.The Foundation will appeal initially to donors who wish to
show their
solidarity with Charlie Hebdo to ensure the financial
sustainability of
the newspaper. The Foundation will of course listen to any
other
initiative that the newspaper could take in this
direction.
4.In addition to these actions of immediate support, it is
essential
that the commitment of GODF against all fanaticism, dogmatism,
fundamentalism, and communalism is more than ever at the heart of our
work and our actions externalizing. To say that the barbarism will not
pass is not enough, we must also unite a broad citizen movement to
assert and defend on the ground republican principles, democratic and
secular, unshakable foundations of our society. As such, the events
devoted to debunking Anti-Masonry will be throughout the year as a
messenger. Citizens, they are supposed to promote dialogue but they take
enhanced sharpness in the current circumstances.
5.Finally, it is
suggested in the extension of the national day of
mourning that day that
Lodges open their future work with a minute of
silence.[25]
A GODF
program has been built around the CH shootings including a call
to man the
figurative barricades in defence of republicanism as they did
at the literal
barricades of 1789, and the revolts of the 19th century.
Keller writes of
“barbarism” as though CH stood for anything but the
most pathological of the
decaying West’s sickness. To the GODF
illustrations of Jesus sodomizing god,
Cardinals in a chain of buggery,
and so forth, would be a titillating
delight at smearing the Church they
have always sought to
destroy.
The excessive sentiments of support among the befuddled French
booboisie, mobilised by President Hollande, and joined by his fellow
European Union leaders, in the name of a particularly crapulous form of
“free speech,” have enabled CH to be promoted as the flagship of the
“clash of civilizations” (or more accurately, the clash of the primitive
against the diseased). It has enabled CH to be seen as the defender of
what the “West” really now stands for.
U.S. Support
Hence, the
National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the globalist version
of the
Comintern, but far more subversive, issued “a statement of
solidarity with
the people of France.” The signatories to the brief
statement
include:
1.Vin Weber, Board member of the omnipresent globalist think
tank, the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), an adviser to the U.S.
Secretary of
Defence. Veteran socialist Carl Gershman remains NED
president.
2.Elliott Abrams might be recalled as one of the neocons in
the George
W. Bush administration, supervising U.S. Middle East policy, and
currently is senior fellow on the Middle East at the CFR. He is a
Zionist hawk whose commitment is to Israel.
3.Francis Fukuyama,
neocon ideological luminary.
4.Marne Levine, former Obama aide, and now
head of public policy at
“Facebook.”
5.Princeton N. Lyman, adjunct
senior fellow for Africa policy at the
CFR, ambassador, and former director
of USAID.
6.Will Marshall, founder of the Progressive Policy Institute, a
Left-wing think tank.
7.Robert B. Zoellick, like Abrams, he might be
recalled as a neocon hawk
in the Bush Administration, where he served as
U.S. Trade representative
and Deputy Secretary of State, having served as a
vice chairman of
Goldman Sachs.[26]
NED can be seen to combine
Republicans and Democrats, AFL-CIO labor and
plutocrats, with a significant
hangover from the CFR. One can expect NED
funds to go pouring into
CH.
Marie Harf, speaking for the U.S. State Department, declared that the
U.S. “absolutely supports” CH.[27] However, the USA has gone much
further and actively promoted CH. Harf condemned a Turkish court for
blocking internet sites from publishing the CH cartoon of Muhammad, and
she also condemned Turkish government officials for their criticism of
the CH cartoon as a provocation.[28]
With expressions of support from
Government leaders from all over the
European Union, the USA, and GODF, the
stage is set to launch CH from a
fringe magazine with a circulation of
60,000 into a significant
mouthpiece of the globalist establishment. CH will
now be subsided by
the French Government with a $1.2 million donation;
Google $296,000;
Guardian Media Group $150,000. The plan is to print
1,000,000 copies.[29]
Google is one of the primary founders and funders
of the Alliance of
Youth Movements, a project working in tandem with the
U.S. State
Department, CFR, Department of Homeland Security, foundations,
and
corporations, and major TV media. The purpose is to utilize social media
to mobilize youth in states targeted for destruction by the globalist
elite. Establishment revolutionary Jared Cohen, director of Google
Ideas, a CFR member and former State Department staffer, is a
co-founder.[30]
Among the leading ranks of the multitudes
demonstrating their support
for culture-retardation the USA was represented
by Ambassador Jane
Hartley, a member of the CFR[31] who is married to
investment banker
Ralph Schlosstein. They were major fundraiser for
Obama;[32] among the
many oligarchs who backed his presidential
candidacy.[33] The USA has a
special interest in the deconstruction of
French nationalism and under
prior Ambassador Charles Rivkin a far-reaching
program was undertaken to
manipulate alienated Muslim youth to destroy what
is regarded as French
“xenophobia.”[34]
Libération and
Rothschild
The million run CH is being printed courtesy of the Leftist
newspaper,
Libération, whose offices CH staff are using. The CH staff could
use
Libération facilities “as long as they needed, ” stated the newspaper’s
editor, Laurent Joffrin.[35] The principal shareholder and chairman of
Libération is Baron Édouard de Rothschild, who has lived in Israel since
2010.[36]
Libération was founded in 1968 by extreme Left philosopher
Jean-Paul
Sartre and Maoist journalist Serge July. Eduard de Rothschild
outlines
his close family connections with Israel, pointing out that the
“family
projects” have included the Knesset and the Supreme Court
building.[37]
Laurent Joffrin (born Lawrence Fink), was installed in 2006 as
part of a
recovery plan initiated by Eduard de Rothschild to save the
failing
newspaper.[38] Joffrin was a member of the Foundation Saint-Simon
(existing 1982-1999),[39] which, like other globalist think tanks such
as NED, united Leftist intellectuals with plutocrats, and was committed
to economic liberalism. The founder, François Furet, after breaking with
the Communist Party, did not conceal his connections with the CIA. The
Foundation was run in similar manner and purpose to the Cold War era
Congress for Cultural Freedom, set up by the CIA to utilise anti-Soviet
Trotskyites and other Leftists.[40] It was part of the Hague Club,
founded in 1971, which is composed of a network of Europe’s think tanks
and Foundations,[41] that meet annually in
secret.
Communist
While plans were underway to make CH a journal
of significance, the
funeral of the late editor, “Charb,” was conducted to
the tunes of
L’Internationale, as clenched fists were raised, while speakers
exhorted
the crowd to defend the Republic.[42] L’Humanité, newspaper of
France’s
Communist Party, editorialized of their CH “comrades”:
No
words can name the horrible attack perpetrated yesterday in the
middle of
Paris, eliminating our friends, our comrades at Charlie Hebdo,
one by one,
in cold blood during a conference. A newspaper, its
journalists, its
cartoonists were shot down by forces of terror. Others
were wounded. Faced
with these militants, they only had their pens to
defend
themselves.
Families will be in bereavement forever. We provide them
assurance of
our compassion, our solidarity. Beyond the death of our
comrades, it is
an attack against intelligence, the act of creating, and the
right to
think. Against freedom and democracy, as was the case in our
history’s
darkest and most tragic hours. Terror and death are the weapons
wielded
against fraternity, culture, debate, and any inclination to free
oneself
from a reactionary and obscurantist project. This we must
admit.
The targets are the Republic, its values, history, enlightenment,
and
secularism. This is a republic of tolerance, of respect for the other.
No matter what you think, Charlie Hebdo’s writing, drawings, and
caricatures reveal hidden faces of this world’s turpitude and its
agents. To be able to publish these things as well as to dispute their
contents is an integral part of the democratic debate. A united Republic
must immediately express its views with the strength and dignity
required under these circumstances. We will support any initiative which
will allow united, assembled citizens this form of expression. . .
.
Dear George Wolinski, Cabu, Charb, Tignous, Honoré, and all the others,
we cry for you and we will never forget you, faithful to the subversive
power of your art which cost you your life. This terrible drama and
these lives that were stolen away command us to defend the values of
freedom, tolerance, fraternity and equality every step of the way. In
these tragic hours, in a context where tension keeps mounting, the
Republic, indivisible, tolerant, secular, and social, must become more
tenacious than ever. It must resist and face up to these cowards and
these barbarians.[43]
Again, from the Communists, there are the clear
echoes of the GODF, with
a very perverted perception of “values.”
Self-described “British
communist journalist” Nick Wright commented on the
Le Hyarick editorial,
“There have always been strong links between
L’Humanité and Charlie
Hebdo with the cartoons, especially by Wolinski,
often appearing in the
paper and with a regular presence at the annual
fete.” The close
relationship between L’Humanité and CH was described by the
French
communists:
Most of the cartoons published by l’Humanité are
by Charlie’s
cartoonists. We followed the same path in work, and in
friendship. They
are one of us. A long companionship has grown, over the
years, between
the teams of Charlie Hebdo and of l’Humanité. Its conductor
was Charb,
communist, insolent, and a rigorous professional, who obtained
from his
crew of rebels the delivery, flawless and on time, of the cartoon
that
enlivens our daily’s last page. Jul, Luz, Babouze, and Charb himself
never missed the weekly appointments, nor did Coco and Besse, who draw
for l’Humanité Dimanche. On the eve of the Fête de l’Humanité, one year,
Charlie’s editorial team took over the entire iconography of the next
day’s issue, spreading over the pages an invigorating and harmless
insolence, and their priceless creations that clarified, in a few
strokes, the day’s events. Charb was even one day’s editor-in-chief for
l’Humanité. . . . They were one of us, and we have raised our glasses
together more than once. On the weekend of the Fête de l’Humanité at the
Courneuve, where their booth, each year, was shared with Cuba Si . .
.[44]
Femen
In a pathetic display of self-negation, the bells of
Notre Dame
Cathedral rang in honor of CH, while the booboisie marched en
masse
behind the gaggle of the European Union’s heads of state. In return,
the
Charlies editorialized in the first issue since the January 7 attack,
the issue subsidized by Rothschild, Google, GODF, and the French tax
payer:
What made us laugh the most is that the bells of Notre Dame rang
in our
honor. We would like to send a message to Pope Francis – who also was
Charlie this week: We will only accept the bells of Notre Dame ringing
in our honor when it is Femen who make them ring.” (Femen is the radical
feminist group whose members have staged topless demonstrations in
several European cathedrals.).[45]
Femen is an interesting but not
surprising choice by CH. Like the
Charlies, they are among the most puerile
of Culture-retards. Their
antics go beyond several topless demonstrations in
Europe. Founded in
the Ukraine in 2008, it is based on Paris. It is an
extreme feminist
group, calling itself “sextremist,” aimed at faith and
tradition, and
therefore the type of organization one would expect to be
getting
backing from the globalist power-elite. The original aim was
laudable,
opposing the trickery used to lure Ukrainian women abroad and then
held
as prostitutes. By far the largest component running this white slave
trade are Israelis,[46] but Femen notably excludes Israel and Judaism
from its protests. As with CH, Femen has been embraced by President
Hollande who chose Femen activist Inna Shevchenko as one of the models
for Marianne, the symbol of France of a woman wearing the Jacobin
phrygian cap.[47] However, the funding for the well-paid activists has
come from Jed Sunden, a Brooklyn-born Jewish media magnate with
newspaper interests in the Ukraine, who gave them their initial
publicity in his Kyiv Post. His newspaper, since sold, reports its
former owner’s involvement, quoting Femen founder Anna Hutsol:
In
2008, when topless protests were a novelty in Ukraine, Hutsol got a
call
from publisher Jed Sunden, the owner of KP Media. “Jed was the very
first
influential person who noticed us, helped us with all the
resources he had,
gave use some useful advice, generously donated and
said we were special.
Jed was the very first person who helped us in
organization’s promotion and
creation of our website. We used to call
him a ‘Femen Post’ [a play off of
the Kyiv Post newspaper, which Sunden
sold last year],” Hutsol said. Sunden
acknowledged he is more than a fan
of Femen. “I confirm that I do give money
to Femen,” Sunden said. “I
will not state the amount. After meeting with
Anna Hutsol, I was
impressed with her ideas and have been a supporter. I
believe Anna is a
young, independent voice in Ukraine. While I do not agree
with all of
her positions, I believe it is important to give her, and groups
like
hers, support.”[48]
While Femen has sought to affront Christians
and Muslims, its branch in
Israel has been significantly low key, given that
Israel is arguably the
most patriarchal and misogynistic state in the world
despite the
brouhaha about Islam. While the “Femen Israel” website depicts
topless
Femen from the USA and Europe, and a photo captioned “Fuck Sharia,
fuck
your morals,” “Femen Israel” activities within Israel are not
evident.[49] Indeed, in 2013 a Femen activist, Amina Sboui, who had been
jailed in Tunisia, and hence had been a cause célèbre, left Femen,
stating it is Islamophobic, and questioned whether there was funding
from Israeli sources.[50]
Indeed, although Femen does not seem to
have acted against an Orthodox
or Hasidic synagogue as a citadel of
patriarchy,[51] the offensiveness
against Christian churches and Mosques in
unrestrained. Kyiv Post,
continuing their publicity for Femen, reported in
2013 for example that
a Femen disrupted Christmas Mass at Kolner Dom, the
main Cathedral in
Cologne, climbing topless atop the altar, her body painted
with “I am
God.”[52] On November 25, 2014, a topless Femen entered
Strassbourg
Cathedral just prior to the scheduled visit of Pope Francis,
dancing
atop the altar.[53]
It is certainly understandable why the
Charlies are so admiring of
Femen, and why President Hollande would choose a
Femen to model as
Marianne. It is reminiscent of the Jacobin crowning of an
actress as
“The Goddess of Reason,” who was enthroned atop the altar of
Notre Dame
and worshipped by the enlightened revolutionists. This is what
the
Charlies, Hollande, the GODF, Google, NED, U.S. State Department, and so
on mean by the “West,” by “Western values,” and the “secular Europe”
that has brought out the booboisie across Europe and further afield.
When Femen anarchists ring the bells of Notre Dame, as per the Charlie
fantasy, then this pathogenic conglomerate of diseased cells on the body
of the Western culture-organism will rightly proclaim that their disease
has triumphed over the entire world.
Notes
[1] In particular
through the Congress of Cultural Freedom, a collection
of Trotskyites and
other anti-Soviet Marxists under the presidency of
Socialist intellectual
luminary Professor Sidney Hook, and through the
auspices of the CIA. See
Bolton, Revolution from above (London: Arktos,
2011), pp. 138-43. Frances
Stonor Saunders, The Cultural Cold War: The
CIA and the World of Arts and
Letters (New York: New Press, 2000).
[2] For example, de Gaulle took
France out of NATO and SEATO,
established an independent nuclear arsenal,
and put an arms embargo on
Israeli shortly before the 1967 Six Day
War.
[3] Bolton, Revolution, pp. 144-200.
[4] the cover
illustration can be found at:
http://www.australiamatters.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/hebdo_jesus_slander.jpg
[5]
Noam Chomsky, “His right to say it,” The Nation, February 28, 1981,
http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19810228.htm
[6]
Bolton, “Leftist humbuggery in France,” Counter-Currents,
http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/06/leftist-humbuggery-in-france-the-death-of-clement-meric/
[7]
“Charlie Hebdo: Dissolve the Front National,”
http://galliawatch.blogspot.co.nz/2013/06/charlie-hebdo-dissolve-front-national.html
[8]
Chelsea Regan, January 15, 2015, “French Comedian Dieudonné M’Bala
M’Bala
arrested over Facebook post about Paris gunman,”
http://uinterview.com/news/french-comedian-dieudonne-mbala-mbala-arrested-facebook-post-paris-gunman/
[9]
Samuel P. Huntington, “Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Affairs,
CFR,
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/48950/samuel-p-huntington/the-clash-of-civilizations
[10]
Oswald Spengler, The Decline of The West , Vol. II, Chapter IV,
“The Soul of
the City.” The Fellah type is the “residue” of a collapsed
civilization.
[11] Ralph Peters, “Constant conflict,” U.S. Army
Command and General
Staff College, Parameters, Summer 1997, pp. 4-14;
http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/Articles/97summer/peters.htm
[12]
Bolton, The Psychotic Left: From Jacobin France to the Occupy
movement
(London: Black House Publishing, 2013), pp. 49-63, 64-66.
[13] Olivier
Cyran, “Charlie Hebdo Pas Racciste Si Vou Le Dites,”
Aricle11, December
2013,
http://www.article11.info/?Charlie-Hebdo-pas-raciste-Si-vous
[14]
Olivier Cyran, ibid.
[15] Olivier Cyran, ibid.
[16] Injured during
the January 7 attack on CH offices.
[17] Cyran, op. cit.
[18] A
pre-eminent Jewish philosopher in France, with a Leftist
background
proceeding to the post-Left that converges with U.S.
globalism,
Bernard-Henri Lévy called for U.S. intervention in Serbia,
and in 2011
against Syria. In 2010, at a conference in Tel Aviv he said
of the Israeli
Defence Force, “I have never seen such a democratic army.
There is something
usually vital about Israeli democracy.” (Lévy, “I
have never seen an army as
democratic as the IDF,” Haaretz, May 30,
2010). Despite his post-Marxist
critique, he is a columnist and a Board
member for the Leftist newspaper
Libération, owned by Eduard de
Rothschild. As with his praise for “Israeli
democracy,” he has defended
other miscreant Jews such as the film director
Roman Polanski, and the
former IMF director Strauss-Kahn, both accused of
sexual offenses.
[19] “The Twelve’s Manifesto: Together Against the New
Totalitarianism,”
L’Express, March 2006.
[20] Olivier Cyran, “La
liberté d’expression selon Charlie Hebdo,” March
4 2006, http://lmsi.net/L-opinion-du-Patron
[21]
Boniface refers to “neoconservative” ideology, although like Val’s
perspective, comes from the Left.
[22] Olivier Cyran, op.
cit.
[23] “Masons killed in Charlie Hebdo attack,” Masoneria 357,
http://masoneria357.com/2015/01/10/masons-killed-in-charlie-hebdo-attack/
[24]
Daniel Keller, Grand Master, Circular of the Grand Master of the
GODF
January 8, 2015.
[25] Ibid.
[26] “Board of directors of the
National Endowment for Democracy issues
statement of solidarity with the
people of France,” NED, January 9,
2015, http://www.ned.org/ru/node/3333
[27]
“U.S. State Dept., supports Charlie Hebdo magazine’s right to
publish
freely,” Sputnik International, January 14 2015,
http://sputniknews.com/politics/20150114/1016863398.html
[28]
“U. S. slams Turkey over ban on publishing Charlie Hebdo cover,”
Today’s
Zaman, January 15 2015,
http://www.todayszaman.com/diplomacy_us-slams-turkey-over-ban-on-publishing-charlie-hebdo-cover_369893.html
[29]
“French Government donates $1.2 million to ensure that Charlie
Hebdo lives
on,” Mashable Australia, January 9 2015,
http://mashable.com/2015/01/08/france-charlie-hebdo-donations/
[30]
Tony Cartalucci, “Alliance eof Youth Movements, State Dept., CFR,
Google,
AT&T…,” mediachecker, June 13, 2013,
https://mediachecker.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/alliance-of-youth-movements-state-dept-cfr-google-att/
[31]
“Jane Hartley,” Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/profile/jane-hartley/
[32]
Joe Sobscyk, “Obama said close to picking Harley as ambassador,”
Bloomberg,
November 1, 2013,
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-01/obama-said-close-to-picking-harley-as-ambassador-in-paris.html
[33]
Bolton, “Obama catspaw of international finance,” Rense.com, August
28,
2008, http://rense.com/general83/cats.htm
[34]
Bolton, “The Rivkin project: how globalism uses multiculturalism to
subvert
sovereign nations,” Counter-Currents,
http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/03/the-rivkin-project-part-2/
[35]
“Liberation gives Charlie Hebdo facilities to bring out new
edition,” The
Irish Times, January 10, 2015,
http://defaultsearch.nchuser.com/search/web?fcoid=417&fcop=topnav&fpid=2&q=liberation+%2B+charlie+hebdo
[36]
Eduard de Rothschild Official Website,
http://www.edouard-rothschild.com/index.php?module=itevoCORE&func=viewPub&pt_name=itevoNEWS&p_id=14&newlang=eng
[37]
Ibid.,
http://www.edouard-rothschild.com/index.php?module=itevoCORE&func=viewPub&pt_name=itevoNEWS&p_id=15
[38]
Matthew Lewis, “Laurent Joffrin,” The Republic of Letters,
http://www.republique-des-lettres.fr/10483-laurent-joffrin.php
[39]
“Saint-Simon Foundation,” Think Tank Wiki,
http://thinktank.wikia.com/wiki/Saint-Simon_Foundation
[40]
Denis Boneau, “The hidden side of the Foundation Saint-Simon,”
Voltaire Net,
http://www.voltairenet.org/article30261.html
[41]
“The Hague Club,” Think Tank Wiki,
http://thinktank.wikia.com/wiki/The_Hague_Club
[42]
“Farewell for ‘Charb’ the last of the funerals for the Charlie
Hebdo
attack,” Euronews, January 16 2015,
http://www.euronews.com/2015/01/16/farewell-for-charb-the-last-of-the-funerals-of-charlie-hebdo-attack/
[43]
Patrick Le Hyarick, “Barbarians,” L’Humanite, January 10, 2015,
http://www.humaniteinenglish.com/spip.php?article2621
[44]
Henry Crapo, Isabelle Métral, “They are one of us,” L’Humanite,
January 8,
2015, http://www.humaniteinenglish.com/spip.php?article2618
[45]
“Charlie Hebdo rejects Catholic support,” Catholic World News,
January 15,
2015,
http://angelqueen.org/2015/01/15/charlie-hebdo-rejects-catholic-support/
[46]
Ted Pike, “Israel whorehouse of the Middle East,”
http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/political/jews/whorehouse.htm
Hovel,
“Three Israelis indicted for importing prostitutes from Ukraine,”
Haaretz,
august 2, 2013,
http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/three-israelis-indicted-for-importing-prostitutes-from-ukraine.premium-1.502212
[47]
Femen’s Inna Shevchenko inspired France’s Marianne stamp,” BBC
News, July
15, 2013, Inna Shevchenko
[48] “Femen wants to move from public exposure
to political power,” Kyiv
Post, April 29, 2010,
http://www.kyivpost.com/content/politics/femen-wants-to-move-from-public-exposure-to-politi-65379.html
[49]
FEMEN Israel,
https://www.facebook.com/pages/FEMEN-Israel/301176549986072
[50]
Umberto Bacchi, “Amina Sboui quits topless protest group Femen over
‘Islamophobia and Israeli fujding,’” International business News, August
20, 2013,
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/amina-tyler-sboui-leaves-femen-topless-islamophobia-500310
[51]
For Orthodox Jewish attitudes towards women see: Evelyn Kaye, The
hole in
the sheet: a modern woman looks at Orthodox and Hasidic Judaism
(New Jersey:
Lyle Stuart, 1987).
[52] “Topless FEMEN activist climbs altar in Cologne
cathedral during
Christmas mass,” Kyiv Post, December 25, 2013,
http://www.kyivpost.com/content/world/topless-femen-activist-climbs-altar-in-cologne-cathedral-during-christmas-mass-334252.html
[53]
“Femen desecrate Strasbourg Cathedral,” Gallia Watch,
http://galliawatch.blogspot.co.nz/2014/11/femen-desecrate-strasbourg-cathedral.html
14
Comments
Ulf Larsen
Posted January 25, 2015 at 3:52 pm |
Permalink
I agree that violent Muslims are the issue here. But isn’t the
issue,
also, that other hostile immigrants have, together with gullible
natives, played the part of the Trojan horse that has opened the
floodgates and broken down our defences, so that we are now vulnerable
to attacks from those Muslims? Can we hope to effectively deal with the
violent Muslim danger without first dealing with the, far less visible,
dangers posed by hostile elites and a maladaptive, liberal
culture?
Anyone can see the obvious dangers of a large Muslim population
in
Europe (or the US), but it is the foremost duty of intellectuals, like
the writers at C-C, to point out, and fight against, the mental poison
(and poisoners) that prevents us from asserting our own will to power.
Without self-assertion and a proper knowledge of our enemies, inner as
well as outer, we will never be able to fight and win. And, from that
perspective, Charlie Hebdo et al. have a more corrosive effect on our
civilization than do illiterate Muslim terrorists.
Reply
Kerry
Bolton
Posted January 25, 2015 at 6:24 pm | Permalink
Precisely.
And it is the US State Dept. that has played a large role in
particular in
France in promoting alienated Muslim youth and feeding
them Rap and other
such stuff from US ghettoes and boardrooms. As it
often the case, cause the
problem then offer supposed solutions that are
even worse.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.